All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
To: <jack@suse.cz>, <axboe@kernel.dk>, <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 0/6] multiple cleanup patches for bfq
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 15:35:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220521073523.3118246-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> (raw)

Changes in v2:
 - add missing blank line in patch 1.
 - remove patch 7,8, since they are wrong.
 - add reviewed-by tag

There are no functional changes in this patchset, just some places
that I think can be improved during code review.

This patchset is rebased based on this patchset:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220428120837.3737765-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/

Previous version:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220514090522.1669270-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/

Yu Kuai (6):
  block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis
  block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove()
  block, bfq: factor out code to update 'active_entities'
  block, bfq: don't declare 'bfqd' as type 'void *' in bfq_group
  block, bfq: cleanup bfq_activate_requeue_entity()
  block, bfq: remove dead code for updating 'rq_in_driver'

 block/bfq-cgroup.c  |  2 +-
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 38 +++----------------
 block/bfq-iosched.h | 11 ++----
 block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
To: jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk, paolo.valente@linaro.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 0/6] multiple cleanup patches for bfq
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 15:35:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220521073523.3118246-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> (raw)

Changes in v2:
 - add missing blank line in patch 1.
 - remove patch 7,8, since they are wrong.
 - add reviewed-by tag

There are no functional changes in this patchset, just some places
that I think can be improved during code review.

This patchset is rebased based on this patchset:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220428120837.3737765-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/

Previous version:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220514090522.1669270-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/

Yu Kuai (6):
  block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis
  block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove()
  block, bfq: factor out code to update 'active_entities'
  block, bfq: don't declare 'bfqd' as type 'void *' in bfq_group
  block, bfq: cleanup bfq_activate_requeue_entity()
  block, bfq: remove dead code for updating 'rq_in_driver'

 block/bfq-cgroup.c  |  2 +-
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 38 +++----------------
 block/bfq-iosched.h | 11 ++----
 block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-21  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-21  7:35 Yu Kuai [this message]
2022-05-21  7:35 ` [PATCH -next v2 0/6] multiple cleanup patches for bfq Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/6] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35   ` Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/6] block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove() Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35   ` Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35 ` [PATCH -next v2 3/6] block, bfq: factor out code to update 'active_entities' Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35   ` Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35 ` [PATCH -next v2 4/6] block, bfq: don't declare 'bfqd' as type 'void *' in bfq_group Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35   ` Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35 ` [PATCH -next v2 5/6] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_activate_requeue_entity() Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35   ` Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35 ` [PATCH -next v2 6/6] block, bfq: remove dead code for updating 'rq_in_driver' Yu Kuai
2022-05-21  7:35   ` Yu Kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220521073523.3118246-1-yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --to=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.