From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
cohuck@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com,
sgarzare@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 18:27:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524182751.1d4bf02f.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523105323.58c28d75.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 23 May 2022 10:53:23 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2022 11:59:42 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
>
> Sorry for being slow on this one. I'm pretty much under water. Will try
> to get some regression-testing done till tomorrow end of day.
>
Did some testing with the two stage indicators disabled. Didn't see any
significant difference in performance, and with that also no performance
regression. IMHO we are good to go ahead!
Sorry it took so long.
Regards,
Halil
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: lulu@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, maz@kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
eperezma@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 18:27:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524182751.1d4bf02f.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523105323.58c28d75.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 23 May 2022 10:53:23 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2022 11:59:42 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
>
> Sorry for being slow on this one. I'm pretty much under water. Will try
> to get some regression-testing done till tomorrow end of day.
>
Did some testing with the two stage indicators disabled. Didn't see any
significant difference in performance, and with that also no performance
regression. IMHO we are good to go ahead!
Sorry it took so long.
Regards,
Halil
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 3:59 [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 1/9] virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore() Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 2/9] virtio: use virtio_reset_device() when possible Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-19 8:32 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-19 8:32 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 3/9] virtio: introduce config op to synchronize vring callbacks Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-19 8:34 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-19 8:34 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 4/9] virtio-pci: implement synchronize_cbs() Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 5/9] virtio-mmio: " Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 6/9] virtio-ccw: " Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 9:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-05-18 9:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-05-19 8:02 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-19 8:02 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-24 16:29 ` Halil Pasic
2022-05-24 16:29 ` Halil Pasic
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 7/9] virtio: allow to unbreak virtqueue Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 10:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-05-18 10:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-05-19 8:08 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-19 8:08 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` [PATCH V5 9/9] virtio: use WARN_ON() to warn illegal status value Jason Wang
2022-05-18 3:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-19 8:34 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-19 8:34 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-23 8:53 ` [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio Halil Pasic
2022-05-23 8:53 ` Halil Pasic
2022-05-24 16:27 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2022-05-24 16:27 ` Halil Pasic
2022-05-25 2:33 ` Jason Wang
2022-05-25 2:33 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220524182751.1d4bf02f.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.