All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <linmq006@gmail.com>
Cc: <bhelgaas@google.com>, <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
	<kw@linux.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<maz@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Fix refcount leak in mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 02:13:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220531181316.24452-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530064807.34534-1-linmq006@gmail.com>

Hi Miaoqian,

>of_get_child_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount
>incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when not need anymore.
>Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
>
>Fixes: 814cceebba9b ("PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add INTx support")
>Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
>---
>changes in v2:
>- move of_node_put(intc_node) right after irq_domain_add_linear to cover
>normal path and error paths.
>
>v1 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220526110246.53502-1-linmq006@gmail.com/
>---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>index 3e8d70bfabc6..19a01daad304 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>@@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> 
> 	pcie->intx_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
> 						  &intx_domain_ops, pcie);
>+	of_node_put(intc_node);
> 	if (!pcie->intx_domain) {
> 		dev_err(dev, "failed to create INTx IRQ domain\n");
> 		return -ENODEV;
>
> 		

Thanks for this v2 patch. I think we can do similar things like
rtl8365mb_irq_setup() in drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c.

When I read the error path, I will go back and see if everything is
released, so I think it is clearer to put of_node_put() in the error
path and before return 0.

How do you think?

i.g.,

static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
{
	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
	struct device_node *intc_node, *node = dev->of_node;
	int ret;

	raw_spin_lock_init(&pcie->irq_lock);

	/* Setup INTx */
	intc_node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "interrupt-controller");
	if (!intc_node) {
		dev_err(dev, "missing interrupt-controller node\n");
		return -ENODEV;
	}

	pcie->intx_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
						  &intx_domain_ops, pcie);
	if (!pcie->intx_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create INTx IRQ domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto out_put_node;
	}

	/* Setup MSI */
	mutex_init(&pcie->lock);

	pcie->msi_bottom_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, PCIE_MSI_IRQS_NUM,
				  &mtk_msi_bottom_domain_ops, pcie);
	if (!pcie->msi_bottom_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI bottom domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto err_msi_bottom_domain;
	}

	pcie->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(dev->fwnode,
						     &mtk_msi_domain_info,
						     pcie->msi_bottom_domain);
	if (!pcie->msi_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto err_msi_domain;
	}

	of_node_put(intc);
	return 0;

err_msi_domain:
	irq_domain_remove(pcie->msi_bottom_domain);
err_msi_bottom_domain:
	irq_domain_remove(pcie->intx_domain);
out_put_node:
	of_node_put(intc);

	return ret;
}

thanks,
Miles

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <linmq006@gmail.com>
Cc: <bhelgaas@google.com>, <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
	<kw@linux.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<maz@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Fix refcount leak in mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 02:13:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220531181316.24452-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530064807.34534-1-linmq006@gmail.com>

Hi Miaoqian,

>of_get_child_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount
>incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when not need anymore.
>Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
>
>Fixes: 814cceebba9b ("PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add INTx support")
>Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
>---
>changes in v2:
>- move of_node_put(intc_node) right after irq_domain_add_linear to cover
>normal path and error paths.
>
>v1 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220526110246.53502-1-linmq006@gmail.com/
>---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>index 3e8d70bfabc6..19a01daad304 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>@@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> 
> 	pcie->intx_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
> 						  &intx_domain_ops, pcie);
>+	of_node_put(intc_node);
> 	if (!pcie->intx_domain) {
> 		dev_err(dev, "failed to create INTx IRQ domain\n");
> 		return -ENODEV;
>
> 		

Thanks for this v2 patch. I think we can do similar things like
rtl8365mb_irq_setup() in drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c.

When I read the error path, I will go back and see if everything is
released, so I think it is clearer to put of_node_put() in the error
path and before return 0.

How do you think?

i.g.,

static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
{
	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
	struct device_node *intc_node, *node = dev->of_node;
	int ret;

	raw_spin_lock_init(&pcie->irq_lock);

	/* Setup INTx */
	intc_node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "interrupt-controller");
	if (!intc_node) {
		dev_err(dev, "missing interrupt-controller node\n");
		return -ENODEV;
	}

	pcie->intx_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
						  &intx_domain_ops, pcie);
	if (!pcie->intx_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create INTx IRQ domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto out_put_node;
	}

	/* Setup MSI */
	mutex_init(&pcie->lock);

	pcie->msi_bottom_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, PCIE_MSI_IRQS_NUM,
				  &mtk_msi_bottom_domain_ops, pcie);
	if (!pcie->msi_bottom_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI bottom domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto err_msi_bottom_domain;
	}

	pcie->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(dev->fwnode,
						     &mtk_msi_domain_info,
						     pcie->msi_bottom_domain);
	if (!pcie->msi_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto err_msi_domain;
	}

	of_node_put(intc);
	return 0;

err_msi_domain:
	irq_domain_remove(pcie->msi_bottom_domain);
err_msi_bottom_domain:
	irq_domain_remove(pcie->intx_domain);
out_put_node:
	of_node_put(intc);

	return ret;
}

thanks,
Miles

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <linmq006@gmail.com>
Cc: <bhelgaas@google.com>, <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
	<kw@linux.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<maz@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Fix refcount leak in mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 02:13:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220531181316.24452-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530064807.34534-1-linmq006@gmail.com>

Hi Miaoqian,

>of_get_child_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount
>incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when not need anymore.
>Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
>
>Fixes: 814cceebba9b ("PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add INTx support")
>Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
>---
>changes in v2:
>- move of_node_put(intc_node) right after irq_domain_add_linear to cover
>normal path and error paths.
>
>v1 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220526110246.53502-1-linmq006@gmail.com/
>---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>index 3e8d70bfabc6..19a01daad304 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
>@@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> 
> 	pcie->intx_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
> 						  &intx_domain_ops, pcie);
>+	of_node_put(intc_node);
> 	if (!pcie->intx_domain) {
> 		dev_err(dev, "failed to create INTx IRQ domain\n");
> 		return -ENODEV;
>
> 		

Thanks for this v2 patch. I think we can do similar things like
rtl8365mb_irq_setup() in drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c.

When I read the error path, I will go back and see if everything is
released, so I think it is clearer to put of_node_put() in the error
path and before return 0.

How do you think?

i.g.,

static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
{
	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
	struct device_node *intc_node, *node = dev->of_node;
	int ret;

	raw_spin_lock_init(&pcie->irq_lock);

	/* Setup INTx */
	intc_node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "interrupt-controller");
	if (!intc_node) {
		dev_err(dev, "missing interrupt-controller node\n");
		return -ENODEV;
	}

	pcie->intx_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
						  &intx_domain_ops, pcie);
	if (!pcie->intx_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create INTx IRQ domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto out_put_node;
	}

	/* Setup MSI */
	mutex_init(&pcie->lock);

	pcie->msi_bottom_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, PCIE_MSI_IRQS_NUM,
				  &mtk_msi_bottom_domain_ops, pcie);
	if (!pcie->msi_bottom_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI bottom domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto err_msi_bottom_domain;
	}

	pcie->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(dev->fwnode,
						     &mtk_msi_domain_info,
						     pcie->msi_bottom_domain);
	if (!pcie->msi_domain) {
		dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
		ret = -ENODEV;
		goto err_msi_domain;
	}

	of_node_put(intc);
	return 0;

err_msi_domain:
	irq_domain_remove(pcie->msi_bottom_domain);
err_msi_bottom_domain:
	irq_domain_remove(pcie->intx_domain);
out_put_node:
	of_node_put(intc);

	return ret;
}

thanks,
Miles

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-31 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-30  6:48 [PATCH v2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Fix refcount leak in mtk_pcie_init_irq_domains Miaoqian Lin
2022-05-30  6:48 ` Miaoqian Lin
2022-05-30  6:48 ` Miaoqian Lin
2022-05-31 18:13 ` Miles Chen [this message]
2022-05-31 18:13   ` Miles Chen
2022-05-31 18:13   ` Miles Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220531181316.24452-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com \
    --to=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linmq006@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.