* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys
@ 2022-05-31 8:37 Nico Boehr
2022-05-31 8:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] " Nico Boehr
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-05-31 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, linux-s390; +Cc: frankja, imbrenda, thuth, scgl
v2->v3:
----
* remove some useless variables, style suggestions, improve commit description
(thanks Janis)
* reverse christmas tree (thanks Claudio)
v1->v2:
----
* As per discussion with Janis and Claudio, remove the actual access check from
the test. This also allows us to remove the check_pgm_int_code_xfail() patch.
* Typos/Style suggestions (thanks Janis)
Upon migration, we expect storage keys set by the guest to be preserved,
so add a test for it.
We keep 128 pages and set predictable storage keys. Then, we migrate and check
they can be read back.
Nico Boehr (1):
s390x: add migration test for storage keys
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/migration-skey.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 4 +++
3 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 s390x/migration-skey.c
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys
2022-05-31 8:37 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys Nico Boehr
@ 2022-05-31 8:37 ` Nico Boehr
2022-05-31 8:55 ` Thomas Huth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-05-31 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, linux-s390; +Cc: frankja, imbrenda, thuth, scgl
Upon migration, we expect storage keys set by the guest to be preserved, so add
a test for it.
We keep 128 pages and set predictable storage keys. Then, we migrate and check
that they can be read back and match the value originally set.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/migration-skey.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 4 +++
3 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 s390x/migration-skey.c
diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 25802428fa13..94fc5c1a3527 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-attest.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-cmm.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-skey.elf
pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
diff --git a/s390x/migration-skey.c b/s390x/migration-skey.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f846ac435836
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/migration-skey.c
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Storage Key migration tests
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/mem.h>
+#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <hardware.h>
+
+#define NUM_PAGES 128
+static uint8_t pagebuf[NUM_PAGES][PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE)));
+
+static void test_migration(void)
+{
+ union skey expected_key, actual_key;
+ int i, key_to_set;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
+ /*
+ * Storage keys are 7 bit, lowest bit is always returned as zero
+ * by iske
+ */
+ key_to_set = i * 2;
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf[i], key_to_set, 1);
+ }
+
+ puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
+ (void)getchar();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
+ report_prefix_pushf("page %d", i);
+
+ actual_key.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf[i]);
+ expected_key.val = i * 2;
+
+ /* ignore reference bit */
+ actual_key.str.rf = 0;
+ expected_key.str.rf = 0;
+
+ report(actual_key.val == expected_key.val, "expected_key=0x%x actual_key=0x%x", expected_key.val, actual_key.val);
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ }
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("migration-skey");
+ if (test_facility(169)) {
+ report_skip("storage key removal facility is active");
+
+ /*
+ * If we just exit and don't ask migrate_cmd to migrate us, it
+ * will just hang forever. Hence, also ask for migration when we
+ * skip this test altogether.
+ */
+ puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
+ (void)getchar();
+
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ test_migration();
+
+done:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index 9b97d0471bcf..8e52f560bb1e 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -180,3 +180,7 @@ smp = 2
[migration-cmm]
file = migration-cmm.elf
groups = migration
+
+[migration-skey]
+file = migration-skey.elf
+groups = migration
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys
2022-05-31 8:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] " Nico Boehr
@ 2022-05-31 8:55 ` Thomas Huth
2022-06-01 7:29 ` Nico Boehr
2022-06-01 13:48 ` Nico Boehr
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2022-05-31 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Boehr, kvm, linux-s390; +Cc: frankja, imbrenda, scgl
On 31/05/2022 10.37, Nico Boehr wrote:
> Upon migration, we expect storage keys set by the guest to be preserved, so add
> a test for it.
>
> We keep 128 pages and set predictable storage keys. Then, we migrate and check
> that they can be read back and match the value originally set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> s390x/migration-skey.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/unittests.cfg | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 s390x/migration-skey.c
>
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 25802428fa13..94fc5c1a3527 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-attest.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-cmm.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-skey.elf
>
> pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
>
> diff --git a/s390x/migration-skey.c b/s390x/migration-skey.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f846ac435836
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/migration-skey.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Storage Key migration tests
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/mem.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <hardware.h>
> +
> +#define NUM_PAGES 128
> +static uint8_t pagebuf[NUM_PAGES][PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE)));
> +
> +static void test_migration(void)
> +{
> + union skey expected_key, actual_key;
> + int i, key_to_set;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> + /*
> + * Storage keys are 7 bit, lowest bit is always returned as zero
> + * by iske
> + */
> + key_to_set = i * 2;
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf[i], key_to_set, 1);
> + }
> +
> + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> + (void)getchar();
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> + report_prefix_pushf("page %d", i);
> +
> + actual_key.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf[i]);
> + expected_key.val = i * 2;
> +
> + /* ignore reference bit */
> + actual_key.str.rf = 0;
> + expected_key.str.rf = 0;
If the reference bit gets always ignored, testing 64 pages should be enough?
OTOH this will complicate the for-loop / creation of the key value, so I
don't mind too much if we keep it this way.
> + report(actual_key.val == expected_key.val, "expected_key=0x%x actual_key=0x%x", expected_key.val, actual_key.val);
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + report_prefix_push("migration-skey");
> + if (test_facility(169)) {
> + report_skip("storage key removal facility is active");
> +
> + /*
> + * If we just exit and don't ask migrate_cmd to migrate us, it
> + * will just hang forever. Hence, also ask for migration when we
> + * skip this test altogether.
> + */
> + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> + (void)getchar();
> +
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + test_migration();
> +
> +done:
} else {
test_migration();
}
to get rid of the goto?
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + return report_summary();
> +}
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys
2022-05-31 8:55 ` Thomas Huth
@ 2022-06-01 7:29 ` Nico Boehr
2022-06-01 13:48 ` Nico Boehr
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-06-01 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, frankja, imbrenda, scgl
On Tue, 31 May 2022 10:55:27 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 31/05/2022 10.37, Nico Boehr wrote:
> > Upon migration, we expect storage keys set by the guest to be
> > preserved, so add a test for it.
> >
> > We keep 128 pages and set predictable storage keys. Then, we
> > migrate and check that they can be read back and match the value
> > originally set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> > s390x/migration-skey.c | 76
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ s390x/unittests.cfg |
> > 4 +++ 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 s390x/migration-skey.c
> >
> > diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> > index 25802428fa13..94fc5c1a3527 100644
> > --- a/s390x/Makefile
> > +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf
> > tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration.elf
> > tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-attest.elf
> > tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-cmm.elf
> > +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-skey.elf
> >
> > pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
> >
> > diff --git a/s390x/migration-skey.c b/s390x/migration-skey.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f846ac435836
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/s390x/migration-skey.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +/*
> > + * Storage Key migration tests
> > + *
> > + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <libcflat.h>
> > +#include <asm/facility.h>
> > +#include <asm/page.h>
> > +#include <asm/mem.h>
> > +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <hardware.h>
> > +
> > +#define NUM_PAGES 128
> > +static uint8_t pagebuf[NUM_PAGES][PAGE_SIZE]
> > __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE))); +
> > +static void test_migration(void)
> > +{
> > + union skey expected_key, actual_key;
> > + int i, key_to_set;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> > + /*
> > + * Storage keys are 7 bit, lowest bit is always
> > returned as zero
> > + * by iske
> > + */
> > + key_to_set = i * 2;
> > + set_storage_key(pagebuf[i], key_to_set, 1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> > + (void)getchar();
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> > + report_prefix_pushf("page %d", i);
> > +
> > + actual_key.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf[i]);
> > + expected_key.val = i * 2;
> > +
> > + /* ignore reference bit */
> > + actual_key.str.rf = 0;
> > + expected_key.str.rf = 0;
>
> If the reference bit gets always ignored, testing 64 pages should be
> enough? OTOH this will complicate the for-loop / creation of the key
> value, so I don't mind too much if we keep it this way.
>
> > + report(actual_key.val == expected_key.val,
> > "expected_key=0x%x actual_key=0x%x", expected_key.val,
> > actual_key.val); +
> > + report_prefix_pop();
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +int main(void)
> > +{
> > + report_prefix_push("migration-skey");
> > + if (test_facility(169)) {
> > + report_skip("storage key removal facility is
> > active"); +
> > + /*
> > + * If we just exit and don't ask migrate_cmd to
> > migrate us, it
> > + * will just hang forever. Hence, also ask for
> > migration when we
> > + * skip this test altogether.
> > + */
> > + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> > + (void)getchar();
> > +
> > + goto done;
> > + }
> > +
> > + test_migration();
> > +
> > +done:
>
> } else {
> test_migration();
> }
>
> to get rid of the goto?
>
> > + report_prefix_pop();
> > + return report_summary();
> > +}
>
> Either way:
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys
2022-05-31 8:55 ` Thomas Huth
2022-06-01 7:29 ` Nico Boehr
@ 2022-06-01 13:48 ` Nico Boehr
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-06-01 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, frankja, imbrenda, scgl
Ooops, I just realized I accidentally sent an empty message this
morning. Sorry!
On Tue, 31 May 2022 10:55:27 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/s390x/migration-skey.c b/s390x/migration-skey.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f846ac435836
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/s390x/migration-skey.c
[...]
> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> > + report_prefix_pushf("page %d", i);
> > +
> > + actual_key.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf[i]);
> > + expected_key.val = i * 2;
> > +
> > + /* ignore reference bit */
> > + actual_key.str.rf = 0;
> > + expected_key.str.rf = 0;
>
> If the reference bit gets always ignored, testing 64 pages should be
> enough? OTOH this will complicate the for-loop / creation of the key
> value, so I don't mind too much if we keep it this way.
Since it would make this thing more complex, I think I would just leave it as-is, 64 additional pages don't cost much.
[...]
> > + if (test_facility(169)) {
> > + report_skip("storage key removal facility is
> > active"); +
> > + /*
> > + * If we just exit and don't ask migrate_cmd to
> > migrate us, it
> > + * will just hang forever. Hence, also ask for
> > migration when we
> > + * skip this test altogether.
> > + */
> > + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> > + (void)getchar();
> > +
> > + goto done;
> > + }
> > +
> > + test_migration();
> > +
> > +done:
>
> } else {
> test_migration();
> }
>
> to get rid of the goto?
Yes, makes sense, thank you.
[...]
> Either way:
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-01 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-31 8:37 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys Nico Boehr
2022-05-31 8:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/1] " Nico Boehr
2022-05-31 8:55 ` Thomas Huth
2022-06-01 7:29 ` Nico Boehr
2022-06-01 13:48 ` Nico Boehr
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.