All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<marcan@marcan.st>, <sven@svenpeter.dev>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<robdclark@gmail.com>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<agross@kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
	<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
	<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, <wens@csie.org>,
	<jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, <samuel@sholland.org>,
	<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
	<alim.akhtar@samsung.com>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	<yong.wu@mediatek.com>, <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	<gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	<vdumpa@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Prefer to reuse domains vs match enforced cache coherency
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 23:19:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220606061927.26049-4-nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606061927.26049-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

The KVM mechanism for controlling wbinvd is only triggered during
kvm_vfio_group_add(), meaning it is a one-shot test done once the devices
are setup.

So, there is no value in trying to push a device that could do enforced
cache coherency to a dedicated domain vs re-using an existing domain since
KVM won't be able to take advantage of it. This just wastes domain memory.

Simplify this code and eliminate the test. This removes the only logic
that needed to have a dummy domain attached prior to searching for a
matching domain and simplifies the next patches.

If someday we want to try and optimize this further the better approach is
to update the Intel driver so that enforce_cache_coherency() can work on a
domain that already has IOPTEs and then call the enforce_cache_coherency()
after detaching a device from a domain to upgrade the whole domain to
enforced cache coherency mode.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index c13b9290e357..f4e3b423a453 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -2285,9 +2285,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	 * testing if they're on the same bus_type.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
-		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops &&
-		    d->enforce_cache_coherency ==
-			    domain->enforce_cache_coherency) {
+		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops) {
 			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 			if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain,
 						group->iommu_group)) {
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<marcan@marcan.st>, <sven@svenpeter.dev>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<robdclark@gmail.com>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<agross@kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
	<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
	<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, <wens@csie.org>,
	<jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, <samuel@sholland.org>,
	<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
	alyssa@rosenzweig.io, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Prefer to reuse domains vs match enforced cache coherency
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 23:19:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220606061927.26049-4-nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606061927.26049-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

The KVM mechanism for controlling wbinvd is only triggered during
kvm_vfio_group_add(), meaning it is a one-shot test done once the devices
are setup.

So, there is no value in trying to push a device that could do enforced
cache coherency to a dedicated domain vs re-using an existing domain since
KVM won't be able to take advantage of it. This just wastes domain memory.

Simplify this code and eliminate the test. This removes the only logic
that needed to have a dummy domain attached prior to searching for a
matching domain and simplifies the next patches.

If someday we want to try and optimize this further the better approach is
to update the Intel driver so that enforce_cache_coherency() can work on a
domain that already has IOPTEs and then call the enforce_cache_coherency()
after detaching a device from a domain to upgrade the whole domain to
enforced cache coherency mode.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index c13b9290e357..f4e3b423a453 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -2285,9 +2285,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	 * testing if they're on the same bus_type.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
-		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops &&
-		    d->enforce_cache_coherency ==
-			    domain->enforce_cache_coherency) {
+		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops) {
 			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 			if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain,
 						group->iommu_group)) {
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<marcan@marcan.st>, <sven@svenpeter.dev>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<robdclark@gmail.com>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<agross@kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
	<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
	<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, <wens@csie.org>,
	<jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, <samuel@sholland.org>,
	<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
	<alim.akhtar@samsung.com>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	<yong.wu@mediatek.com>, <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	<gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	<vdumpa@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Prefer to reuse domains vs match enforced cache coherency
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 23:19:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220606061927.26049-4-nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606061927.26049-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

The KVM mechanism for controlling wbinvd is only triggered during
kvm_vfio_group_add(), meaning it is a one-shot test done once the devices
are setup.

So, there is no value in trying to push a device that could do enforced
cache coherency to a dedicated domain vs re-using an existing domain since
KVM won't be able to take advantage of it. This just wastes domain memory.

Simplify this code and eliminate the test. This removes the only logic
that needed to have a dummy domain attached prior to searching for a
matching domain and simplifies the next patches.

If someday we want to try and optimize this further the better approach is
to update the Intel driver so that enforce_cache_coherency() can work on a
domain that already has IOPTEs and then call the enforce_cache_coherency()
after detaching a device from a domain to upgrade the whole domain to
enforced cache coherency mode.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index c13b9290e357..f4e3b423a453 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -2285,9 +2285,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	 * testing if they're on the same bus_type.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
-		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops &&
-		    d->enforce_cache_coherency ==
-			    domain->enforce_cache_coherency) {
+		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops) {
 			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 			if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain,
 						group->iommu_group)) {
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<marcan@marcan.st>, <sven@svenpeter.dev>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<robdclark@gmail.com>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<agross@kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
	<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
	<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, <wens@csie.org>,
	<jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, <samuel@sholland.org>,
	<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
	<alim.akhtar@samsung.com>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	<yong.wu@mediatek.com>, <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	<gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	<vdumpa@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Prefer to reuse domains vs match enforced cache coherency
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 23:19:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220606061927.26049-4-nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606061927.26049-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

The KVM mechanism for controlling wbinvd is only triggered during
kvm_vfio_group_add(), meaning it is a one-shot test done once the devices
are setup.

So, there is no value in trying to push a device that could do enforced
cache coherency to a dedicated domain vs re-using an existing domain since
KVM won't be able to take advantage of it. This just wastes domain memory.

Simplify this code and eliminate the test. This removes the only logic
that needed to have a dummy domain attached prior to searching for a
matching domain and simplifies the next patches.

If someday we want to try and optimize this further the better approach is
to update the Intel driver so that enforce_cache_coherency() can work on a
domain that already has IOPTEs and then call the enforce_cache_coherency()
after detaching a device from a domain to upgrade the whole domain to
enforced cache coherency mode.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index c13b9290e357..f4e3b423a453 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -2285,9 +2285,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	 * testing if they're on the same bus_type.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
-		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops &&
-		    d->enforce_cache_coherency ==
-			    domain->enforce_cache_coherency) {
+		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops) {
 			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 			if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain,
 						group->iommu_group)) {
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<marcan@marcan.st>, <sven@svenpeter.dev>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<robdclark@gmail.com>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<agross@kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
	<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
	<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, <wens@csie.org>,
	<jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, <samuel@sholland.org>,
	<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
	alyssa@rosenzweig.io, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	yong.wu@mediatek.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Prefer to reuse domains vs match enforced cache coherency
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 23:19:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220606061927.26049-4-nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606061927.26049-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

The KVM mechanism for controlling wbinvd is only triggered during
kvm_vfio_group_add(), meaning it is a one-shot test done once the devices
are setup.

So, there is no value in trying to push a device that could do enforced
cache coherency to a dedicated domain vs re-using an existing domain since
KVM won't be able to take advantage of it. This just wastes domain memory.

Simplify this code and eliminate the test. This removes the only logic
that needed to have a dummy domain attached prior to searching for a
matching domain and simplifies the next patches.

If someday we want to try and optimize this further the better approach is
to update the Intel driver so that enforce_cache_coherency() can work on a
domain that already has IOPTEs and then call the enforce_cache_coherency()
after detaching a device from a domain to upgrade the whole domain to
enforced cache coherency mode.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index c13b9290e357..f4e3b423a453 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -2285,9 +2285,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	 * testing if they're on the same bus_type.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
-		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops &&
-		    d->enforce_cache_coherency ==
-			    domain->enforce_cache_coherency) {
+		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops) {
 			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 			if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain,
 						group->iommu_group)) {
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-06  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-06  6:19 [PATCH 0/5] Simplify vfio_iommu_type1 attach/detach routine Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19 ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-06  6:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-07  3:23   ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  3:23     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  3:23     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  3:23     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  3:23     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  4:03     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-07  4:03       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-07  4:03       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-07  4:03       ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-07  4:03       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08  7:49   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  7:49     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  7:49     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  7:49     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  7:49     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  7:49     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 17:38     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:38       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:38       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:38       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:38       ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-06  6:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu: Ensure device has the same iommu_ops as the domain Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-06 14:33   ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 14:33     ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 14:33     ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 14:33     ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 14:33     ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 14:33     ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 16:51     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 16:51       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 16:51       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 16:51       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 16:51       ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-06 17:50       ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 17:50         ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 17:50         ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 17:50         ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 17:50         ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 17:50         ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-06 18:28         ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 18:28           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 18:28           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 18:28           ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-06 18:28           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06 18:52           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-06 18:52             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-06 18:52             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-06 18:52             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-06 18:52             ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-06  6:19 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2022-06-06  6:19   ` [PATCH 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Prefer to reuse domains vs match enforced cache coherency Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-08  8:28   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:28     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:28     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:28     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:28     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:28     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 11:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-08 11:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-08 11:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-08 11:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-08 11:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-08 23:48       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 23:48         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 23:48         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 23:48         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 23:48         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 23:48         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 20:45         ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-14 20:45           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-14 20:45           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-14 20:45           ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-14 20:45           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-15  7:35           ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15  7:35             ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15  7:35             ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15  7:35             ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15  7:35             ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15  7:35             ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15 23:12             ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-15 23:12               ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-15 23:12               ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-15 23:12               ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Clean up update_dirty_scope in detach_group() Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-08  8:35   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:35     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:35     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:35     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:35     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08  8:35     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-08 17:46     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:46       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:46       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:46       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-08 17:46       ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-06  6:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Simplify group attachment Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-06  6:19   ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
2022-06-07  7:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] Simplify vfio_iommu_type1 attach/detach routine Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  7:44   ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  7:44   ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  7:44   ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07  7:44   ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07 11:58   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-07 11:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-07 11:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-07 11:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-07 11:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-07 12:42     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07 12:42       ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07 12:42       ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07 12:42       ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-07 12:42       ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-10 16:39 [PATCH 5/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Simplify group attachment kernel test robot
2022-06-13 13:42 ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220606061927.26049-4-nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=marcan@marcan.st \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.