All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor
@ 2022-06-06 11:10 Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi @ 2022-06-06 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Saravana Kannan,
	Sibi Sankar, linux-pm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

While developing a krait cache scaling devfreq driver I encounter tons
of panics and errors with using the new cpufreq passive governor
functions. While the krait cache scaling is still WIP and required some
testing I would like to push all the fixes to make the new
implementation wroking since currently with a the governor
PROBE_DEFERRing all sort of things happen from kernel panic from invalid
address access to freq_table getting corrupted.

With the following fixes my WIP driver works correctly without any
warning/problems. 

Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi (5):
  PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER
  PM / devfreq: Fix kernel warning with cpufreq passive register fail
  PM / devfreq: Fix kernel panic with cpu based scaling to passive gov
  PM / devfreq: Rework freq_table to be local to devfreq struct
  PM / devfreq: Mute warning on governor PROBE_DEFER

 drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c          | 75 ++++++++++++++----------------
 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 39 ++++++----------
 include/linux/devfreq.h            |  4 ++
 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER
  2022-06-06 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
@ 2022-06-06 11:11 ` Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel warning with cpufreq passive register fail Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi @ 2022-06-06 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Saravana Kannan,
	Sibi Sankar, linux-pm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

With the passive governor, the cpu based scaling can PROBE_DEFER due to
the fact that CPU policy are not ready.
The cpufreq passive unregister notifier is called both from the
GOV_START errors and for the GOV_STOP and assume the notifier is
successfully registred every time. With GOV_START failing it's wrong to
loop over each possible CPU since the register path has failed for
some CPU policy not ready. Change the logic and unregister the notifer
based on the current allocated parent_cpu_data list to correctly handle
errors and the governor unregister path.

Fixes: a03dacb0316f ("PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor")
Signed-off-by: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 21 +++++----------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
index 72c67979ebe1..09b6c852fccc 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 	struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data
 			= (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
 	struct devfreq_cpu_data *parent_cpu_data;
-	int cpu, ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (p_data->nb.notifier_call) {
 		ret = cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&p_data->nb,
@@ -232,27 +232,16 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
-		if (!policy) {
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		parent_cpu_data = get_parent_cpu_data(p_data, policy);
-		if (!parent_cpu_data) {
-			cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-			continue;
-		}
-
+	list_for_each_entry(parent_cpu_data, &p_data->cpu_data_list, node) {
 		list_del(&parent_cpu_data->node);
+
 		if (parent_cpu_data->opp_table)
 			dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(parent_cpu_data->opp_table);
+
 		kfree(parent_cpu_data);
-		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int cpufreq_passive_register_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel warning with cpufreq passive register fail
  2022-06-06 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
@ 2022-06-06 11:11 ` Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel panic with cpu based scaling to passive gov Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi @ 2022-06-06 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Saravana Kannan,
	Sibi Sankar, linux-pm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

When the cpufreq passive register path from the passive governor fails,
the cpufreq_passive_unregister is called and a kernel WARNING is always
reported.
This is caused by the fact that the devfreq driver already call the
governor unregister with the GOV_STOP, for this reason the second
cpufreq_passive_unregister always return error and a WARN is printed
from the WARN_ON function.
Remove the unregister call from the error handling of the cpufreq register
notifier as it's fundamentally wrong and already handled by the devfreq
core code.

Fixes: a03dacb0316f ("PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor")
Signed-off-by: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
index 09b6c852fccc..ab393c8174f4 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ static int cpufreq_passive_register_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 err_put_policy:
 	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 err:
-	WARN_ON(cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(devfreq));
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel panic with cpu based scaling to passive gov
  2022-06-06 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel warning with cpufreq passive register fail Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
@ 2022-06-06 11:11 ` Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] PM / devfreq: Rework freq_table to be local to devfreq struct Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] PM / devfreq: Mute warning on governor PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi @ 2022-06-06 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Saravana Kannan,
	Sibi Sankar, linux-pm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

The cpufreq passive register notifier can PROBE_DEFER and the devfreq
struct is freed and then reallocaed on probe retry.
The current logic assume that the code can't PROBE_DEFER so the devfreq
struct in the this variable in devfreq_passive_data is assumed to be
(if already set) always correct.
This cause kernel panic as the code try to access the wrong address.
To correctly handle this, update the this variable in
devfreq_passive_data to the devfreq reallocated struct.

Fixes: a03dacb0316f ("PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor")
Signed-off-by: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
index ab393c8174f4..528c8f3b25f0 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -395,8 +395,7 @@ static int devfreq_passive_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
 	if (!p_data)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!p_data->this)
-		p_data->this = devfreq;
+	p_data->this = devfreq;
 
 	switch (event) {
 	case DEVFREQ_GOV_START:
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] PM / devfreq: Rework freq_table to be local to devfreq struct
  2022-06-06 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel panic with cpu based scaling to passive gov Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
@ 2022-06-06 11:11 ` Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] PM / devfreq: Mute warning on governor PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi @ 2022-06-06 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Saravana Kannan,
	Sibi Sankar, linux-pm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

Currently we reference the freq_table to the profile defined one and we
make changes on it. Devfreq never supported PROBE_DEFER before the cpu
based scaling support to the passive governor and assumed that a devfreq
device could only had error and be done with it.
Now that a device can PROBE_DEFER a rework to the freq_table logic is
required.

If a device PROBE_DEFER on the GOV_START, the freq_table is already set
in the device profile struct and its init is skipped. This is due to the
fact that it's common for devs to declare this kind of struct static.
This cause the devfreq logic to find a freq table declared (freq_table
not NULL) with random data and poiting to the old addrs freed by devm.

This problem CAN be solved by devs by clearing the freq_table in their
profile struct on driver exit path but it should not be trusted and it
looks to use a flawed logic.

A better solution is to move the freq_table and max_state to the
devfreq struct and never change the profile struct.
This permit to correctly handle PROBE_DEFER since the devfreq struct is
reallocated and contains new values.
Also the profile struct should only be used to init the driver and should
not be used by the devfreq to write the freq_table if it's not provided
by the driver.

Fixes: a03dacb0316f ("PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor")
Signed-off-by: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c          | 71 ++++++++++++++----------------
 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 14 +++---
 include/linux/devfreq.h            |  4 ++
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index 01474daf4548..2e2b3b414d67 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
 			    unsigned long *min_freq,
 			    unsigned long *max_freq)
 {
-	unsigned long *freq_table = devfreq->profile->freq_table;
+	unsigned long *freq_table = devfreq->freq_table;
 	s32 qos_min_freq, qos_max_freq;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock);
@@ -133,11 +133,11 @@ void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
 	 * The devfreq drivers can initialize this in either ascending or
 	 * descending order and devfreq core supports both.
 	 */
-	if (freq_table[0] < freq_table[devfreq->profile->max_state - 1]) {
+	if (freq_table[0] < freq_table[devfreq->max_state - 1]) {
 		*min_freq = freq_table[0];
-		*max_freq = freq_table[devfreq->profile->max_state - 1];
+		*max_freq = freq_table[devfreq->max_state - 1];
 	} else {
-		*min_freq = freq_table[devfreq->profile->max_state - 1];
+		*min_freq = freq_table[devfreq->max_state - 1];
 		*max_freq = freq_table[0];
 	}
 
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ static int devfreq_get_freq_level(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long freq)
 {
 	int lev;
 
-	for (lev = 0; lev < devfreq->profile->max_state; lev++)
-		if (freq == devfreq->profile->freq_table[lev])
+	for (lev = 0; lev < devfreq->max_state; lev++)
+		if (freq == devfreq->freq_table[lev])
 			return lev;
 
 	return -EINVAL;
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ static int devfreq_get_freq_level(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long freq)
 
 static int set_freq_table(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 {
-	struct devfreq_dev_profile *profile = devfreq->profile;
 	struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
 	unsigned long freq;
 	int i, count;
@@ -188,25 +187,22 @@ static int set_freq_table(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 	if (count <= 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	profile->max_state = count;
-	profile->freq_table = devm_kcalloc(devfreq->dev.parent,
-					profile->max_state,
-					sizeof(*profile->freq_table),
-					GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!profile->freq_table) {
-		profile->max_state = 0;
+	devfreq->max_state = count;
+	devfreq->freq_table = devm_kcalloc(devfreq->dev.parent,
+					   devfreq->max_state,
+					   sizeof(*devfreq->freq_table),
+					   GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!devfreq->freq_table)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
 
-	for (i = 0, freq = 0; i < profile->max_state; i++, freq++) {
+	for (i = 0, freq = 0; i < devfreq->max_state; i++, freq++) {
 		opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(devfreq->dev.parent, &freq);
 		if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
-			devm_kfree(devfreq->dev.parent, profile->freq_table);
-			profile->max_state = 0;
+			devm_kfree(devfreq->dev.parent, devfreq->freq_table);
 			return PTR_ERR(opp);
 		}
 		dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
-		profile->freq_table[i] = freq;
+		devfreq->freq_table[i] = freq;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -246,7 +242,7 @@ int devfreq_update_status(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long freq)
 
 	if (lev != prev_lev) {
 		devfreq->stats.trans_table[
-			(prev_lev * devfreq->profile->max_state) + lev]++;
+			(prev_lev * devfreq->max_state) + lev]++;
 		devfreq->stats.total_trans++;
 	}
 
@@ -835,6 +831,9 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto err_dev;
 		mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
+	} else {
+		devfreq->freq_table = devfreq->profile->freq_table;
+		devfreq->max_state = devfreq->profile->max_state;
 	}
 
 	devfreq->scaling_min_freq = find_available_min_freq(devfreq);
@@ -870,8 +869,8 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 
 	devfreq->stats.trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
 			array3_size(sizeof(unsigned int),
-				    devfreq->profile->max_state,
-				    devfreq->profile->max_state),
+				    devfreq->max_state,
+				    devfreq->max_state),
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!devfreq->stats.trans_table) {
 		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
@@ -880,7 +879,7 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 	}
 
 	devfreq->stats.time_in_state = devm_kcalloc(&devfreq->dev,
-			devfreq->profile->max_state,
+			devfreq->max_state,
 			sizeof(*devfreq->stats.time_in_state),
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!devfreq->stats.time_in_state) {
@@ -1665,9 +1664,9 @@ static ssize_t available_frequencies_show(struct device *d,
 
 	mutex_lock(&df->lock);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < df->profile->max_state; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < df->max_state; i++)
 		count += scnprintf(&buf[count], (PAGE_SIZE - count - 2),
-				"%lu ", df->profile->freq_table[i]);
+				"%lu ", df->freq_table[i]);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
 	/* Truncate the trailing space */
@@ -1690,7 +1689,7 @@ static ssize_t trans_stat_show(struct device *dev,
 
 	if (!df->profile)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	max_state = df->profile->max_state;
+	max_state = df->max_state;
 
 	if (max_state == 0)
 		return sprintf(buf, "Not Supported.\n");
@@ -1707,19 +1706,17 @@ static ssize_t trans_stat_show(struct device *dev,
 	len += sprintf(buf + len, "           :");
 	for (i = 0; i < max_state; i++)
 		len += sprintf(buf + len, "%10lu",
-				df->profile->freq_table[i]);
+				df->freq_table[i]);
 
 	len += sprintf(buf + len, "   time(ms)\n");
 
 	for (i = 0; i < max_state; i++) {
-		if (df->profile->freq_table[i]
-					== df->previous_freq) {
+		if (df->freq_table[i] == df->previous_freq)
 			len += sprintf(buf + len, "*");
-		} else {
+		else
 			len += sprintf(buf + len, " ");
-		}
-		len += sprintf(buf + len, "%10lu:",
-				df->profile->freq_table[i]);
+
+		len += sprintf(buf + len, "%10lu:", df->freq_table[i]);
 		for (j = 0; j < max_state; j++)
 			len += sprintf(buf + len, "%10u",
 				df->stats.trans_table[(i * max_state) + j]);
@@ -1743,7 +1740,7 @@ static ssize_t trans_stat_store(struct device *dev,
 	if (!df->profile)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (df->profile->max_state == 0)
+	if (df->max_state == 0)
 		return count;
 
 	err = kstrtoint(buf, 10, &value);
@@ -1751,11 +1748,11 @@ static ssize_t trans_stat_store(struct device *dev,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&df->lock);
-	memset(df->stats.time_in_state, 0, (df->profile->max_state *
+	memset(df->stats.time_in_state, 0, (df->max_state *
 					sizeof(*df->stats.time_in_state)));
 	memset(df->stats.trans_table, 0, array3_size(sizeof(unsigned int),
-					df->profile->max_state,
-					df->profile->max_state));
+					df->max_state,
+					df->max_state));
 	df->stats.total_trans = 0;
 	df->stats.last_update = get_jiffies_64();
 	mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
index 528c8f3b25f0..fe1937f32cc8 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -131,18 +131,18 @@ static int get_target_freq_with_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq,
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Use interpolation if required opps is not available */
-	for (i = 0; i < parent_devfreq->profile->max_state; i++)
-		if (parent_devfreq->profile->freq_table[i] == *freq)
+	for (i = 0; i < parent_devfreq->max_state; i++)
+		if (parent_devfreq->freq_table[i] == *freq)
 			break;
 
-	if (i == parent_devfreq->profile->max_state)
+	if (i == parent_devfreq->max_state)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (i < devfreq->profile->max_state) {
-		child_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[i];
+	if (i < devfreq->max_state) {
+		child_freq = devfreq->freq_table[i];
 	} else {
-		count = devfreq->profile->max_state;
-		child_freq = devfreq->profile->freq_table[count - 1];
+		count = devfreq->max_state;
+		child_freq = devfreq->freq_table[count - 1];
 	}
 
 out:
diff --git a/include/linux/devfreq.h b/include/linux/devfreq.h
index dc10bee75a72..770a7532655c 100644
--- a/include/linux/devfreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/devfreq.h
@@ -185,6 +185,10 @@ struct devfreq {
 	struct notifier_block nb;
 	struct delayed_work work;
 
+	/* devfreq local freq_table */
+	unsigned long *freq_table;
+	unsigned int max_state;
+
 	unsigned long previous_freq;
 	struct devfreq_dev_status last_status;
 
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/5] PM / devfreq: Mute warning on governor PROBE_DEFER
  2022-06-06 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] PM / devfreq: Rework freq_table to be local to devfreq struct Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
@ 2022-06-06 11:11 ` Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi @ 2022-06-06 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Saravana Kannan,
	Sibi Sankar, linux-pm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

Don't print warning when a governor PROBE_DEFER as it's not a real
GOV_START fail.

Fixes: a03dacb0316f ("PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive governor")
Signed-off-by: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index 2e2b3b414d67..df6972bb0ce8 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -931,8 +931,8 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 	err = devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq, DEVFREQ_GOV_START,
 						NULL);
 	if (err) {
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: Unable to start governor for the device\n",
-			__func__);
+		dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "%s: Unable to start governor for the device\n",
+			      __func__);
 		goto err_init;
 	}
 	create_sysfs_files(devfreq, devfreq->governor);
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER
  2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
  (?)
@ 2022-06-10  6:41 ` Dan Carpenter
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-10  3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4116 bytes --]

CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
BCC: lkp(a)intel.com
In-Reply-To: <20220606111104.14534-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
References: <20220606111104.14534-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
TO: "Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
TO: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
TO: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
TO: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
TO: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
TO: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
TO: linux-pm(a)vger.kernel.org
TO: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: "Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>

Hi Christian,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on chanwoo/devfreq-testing]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.19-rc1 next-20220609]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Ansuel-Marangi/PM-devfreq-Various-Fixes-to-cpufreq-based-passive-governor/20220606-191335
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git devfreq-testing
:::::: branch date: 4 days ago
:::::: commit date: 4 days ago
config: i386-randconfig-m021 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220610/202206101102.4JCYtCjM-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-1) 11.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:235 cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier() error: dereferencing freed memory 'parent_cpu_data'

vim +/parent_cpu_data +235 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c

a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  220  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  221  static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  222  {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  223  	struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  224  			= (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  225  	struct devfreq_cpu_data *parent_cpu_data;
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  226  	int ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  227  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  228  	if (p_data->nb.notifier_call) {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  229  		ret = cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&p_data->nb,
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  230  					CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  231  		if (ret < 0)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  232  			return ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  233  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  234  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06 @235  	list_for_each_entry(parent_cpu_data, &p_data->cpu_data_list, node) {
26984d9d581e50 Chanwoo Choi               2022-04-27  236  		list_del(&parent_cpu_data->node);
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  237  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  238  		if (parent_cpu_data->opp_table)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  239  			dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(parent_cpu_data->opp_table);
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  240  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  241  		kfree(parent_cpu_data);
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  242  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  243  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  244  	return 0;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  245  }
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  246  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER
@ 2022-06-10  6:41 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2022-06-10  6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild, Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi, MyungJoo Ham,
	Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Saravana Kannan, Sibi Sankar,
	linux-pm, linux-kernel
  Cc: lkp, kbuild-all, Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

Hi Christian,

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Ansuel-Marangi/PM-devfreq-Various-Fixes-to-cpufreq-based-passive-governor/20220606-191335
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git devfreq-testing
config: i386-randconfig-m021 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220610/202206101102.4JCYtCjM-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-1) 11.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:235 cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier() error: dereferencing freed memory 'parent_cpu_data'

vim +/parent_cpu_data +235 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c

a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  221  static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  222  {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  223  	struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  224  			= (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  225  	struct devfreq_cpu_data *parent_cpu_data;
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  226  	int ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  227  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  228  	if (p_data->nb.notifier_call) {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  229  		ret = cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&p_data->nb,
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  230  					CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  231  		if (ret < 0)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  232  			return ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  233  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  234  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06 @235  	list_for_each_entry(parent_cpu_data, &p_data->cpu_data_list, node) {

This needs to be list_for_each_entry_safe()

26984d9d581e50 Chanwoo Choi               2022-04-27  236  		list_del(&parent_cpu_data->node);

Otherwise it will only iterate one time

2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  237  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  238  		if (parent_cpu_data->opp_table)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  239  			dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(parent_cpu_data->opp_table);
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  240  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  241  		kfree(parent_cpu_data);

And it will dereference a freed pointer

a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  242  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  243  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  244  	return 0;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  245  }

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER
@ 2022-06-10  6:41 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2022-06-10  6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3125 bytes --]

Hi Christian,

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Ansuel-Marangi/PM-devfreq-Various-Fixes-to-cpufreq-based-passive-governor/20220606-191335
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git devfreq-testing
config: i386-randconfig-m021 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220610/202206101102.4JCYtCjM-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-1) 11.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:235 cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier() error: dereferencing freed memory 'parent_cpu_data'

vim +/parent_cpu_data +235 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c

a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  221  static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  222  {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  223  	struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  224  			= (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  225  	struct devfreq_cpu_data *parent_cpu_data;
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  226  	int ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  227  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  228  	if (p_data->nb.notifier_call) {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  229  		ret = cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&p_data->nb,
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  230  					CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  231  		if (ret < 0)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  232  			return ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  233  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  234  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06 @235  	list_for_each_entry(parent_cpu_data, &p_data->cpu_data_list, node) {

This needs to be list_for_each_entry_safe()

26984d9d581e50 Chanwoo Choi               2022-04-27  236  		list_del(&parent_cpu_data->node);

Otherwise it will only iterate one time

2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  237  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  238  		if (parent_cpu_data->opp_table)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  239  			dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(parent_cpu_data->opp_table);
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  240  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  241  		kfree(parent_cpu_data);

And it will dereference a freed pointer

a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  242  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  243  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  244  	return 0;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  245  }

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER
@ 2022-06-07  2:48 kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-07  2:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4458 bytes --]

:::::: 
:::::: Manual check reason: "low confidence static check warning: drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:238:24: warning: Uninitialized variable: parent_cpu_data->opp_table [uninitvar]"
:::::: 

CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
BCC: lkp(a)intel.com
In-Reply-To: <20220606111104.14534-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
References: <20220606111104.14534-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
TO: "Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
TO: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
TO: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
TO: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
TO: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
TO: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
TO: linux-pm(a)vger.kernel.org
TO: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: "Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>

Hi Christian,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on chanwoo/devfreq-testing]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.19-rc1 next-20220606]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Ansuel-Marangi/PM-devfreq-Various-Fixes-to-cpufreq-based-passive-governor/20220606-191335
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git devfreq-testing
:::::: branch date: 16 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 16 hours ago
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
reproduce (cppcheck warning):
        # apt-get install cppcheck
        git checkout 2d59e1f0c418bf7a6fb2396c60a643994b4c4aba
        cppcheck --quiet --enable=style,performance,portability --template=gcc FILE

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>


cppcheck possible warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>, may not real problems)

>> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:238:24: warning: Uninitialized variable: parent_cpu_data->opp_table [uninitvar]
     if (parent_cpu_data->opp_table)
                          ^

vim +238 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c

a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  220  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  221  static int cpufreq_passive_unregister_notifier(struct devfreq *devfreq)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  222  {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  223  	struct devfreq_passive_data *p_data
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  224  			= (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  225  	struct devfreq_cpu_data *parent_cpu_data;
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  226  	int ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  227  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  228  	if (p_data->nb.notifier_call) {
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  229  		ret = cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&p_data->nb,
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  230  					CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  231  		if (ret < 0)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  232  			return ret;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  233  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  234  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  235  	list_for_each_entry(parent_cpu_data, &p_data->cpu_data_list, node) {
26984d9d581e50 Chanwoo Choi               2022-04-27  236  		list_del(&parent_cpu_data->node);
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  237  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02 @238  		if (parent_cpu_data->opp_table)
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  239  			dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(parent_cpu_data->opp_table);
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  240  
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  241  		kfree(parent_cpu_data);
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  242  	}
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  243  
2d59e1f0c418bf Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi 2022-06-06  244  	return 0;
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  245  }
a03dacb0316f74 Saravana Kannan            2021-03-02  246  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-10  6:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-10  3:25 [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER kernel test robot
2022-06-10  6:41 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-06-10  6:41 ` Dan Carpenter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-07  2:48 kernel test robot
2022-06-06 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] PM / devfreq: Various Fixes to cpufreq based passive governor Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / devfreq: Fix cpufreq passive unregister erroring on PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel warning with cpufreq passive register fail Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] PM / devfreq: Fix kernel panic with cpu based scaling to passive gov Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] PM / devfreq: Rework freq_table to be local to devfreq struct Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi
2022-06-06 11:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] PM / devfreq: Mute warning on governor PROBE_DEFER Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.