* [PATCH 0/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
This series enables perf branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform
via a new arch feature called Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE). All
relevant register definitions could be accessed here.
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2021-12/AArch64-Registers
This series applies on v5.19-rc2 after the BRBE related perf ABI changes series
(V6) that was posted earlier.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220610035101.424112-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
Following issues remain inconclusive
- Jame's concerns regarding permission inadequacy related to perfmon_capable()
- Jame's concerns regarding using perf_event_paranoid along with perfmon_capable()
- Rob's concerns regarding the series structure, arm_pmu callbacks based framework
Changes in V1:
- Added CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS wrapper for all branch sample filter helpers
- Process new perf branch types via PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI
Changes in RFC V2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220412115455.293119-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
- Added branch_sample_priv() while consolidating other branch sample filter helpers
- Changed all SYS_BRBXXXN_EL1 register definition encodings per Marc
- Changed the BRBE driver as per proposed BRBE related perf ABI changes (V5)
- Added documentation for struct arm_pmu changes, updated commit message
- Updated commit message for BRBE detection infrastructure patch
- PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL gets checked during arm event init (outside the driver)
- Branch privilege state capture mechanism has now moved inside the driver
Changes in RFC V1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1642998653-21377-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Anshuman Khandual (8):
perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
arm64/perf: Add register definitions for BRBE
arm64/perf: Update struct arm_pmu for BRBE
arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events for BRBE
driver/perf/arm_pmu_platform: Add support for BRBE attributes detection
arm64/perf: Drive BRBE from perf event states
arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 222 ++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 48 ++++
drivers/perf/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/perf/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 72 +++++-
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c | 442 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h | 259 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 34 +++
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 63 +++++
include/linux/perf_event.h | 26 ++
kernel/events/core.c | 9 +-
11 files changed, 1177 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Besides the branch type filtering requests, 'event.attr.branch_sample_type'
also contains various flags indicating which additional information should
be captured, along with the base branch record. These flags help configure
the underlying hardware, and capture the branch records appropriately when
required e.g after PMU interrupt. But first, this moves an existing helper
perf_sample_save_hw_index() into the header before adding some more helpers
for other branch sample filter flags.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/events/core.c | 9 ++-------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index da759560eec5..afd288bc0b56 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1682,4 +1682,30 @@ static inline void perf_lopwr_cb(bool mode)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+static inline bool branch_sample_no_flags(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_no_cycles(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_type(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_hw_index(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_priv(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
#endif /* _LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 80782cddb1da..4ca35d634125 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6952,11 +6952,6 @@ static void perf_output_read(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
perf_output_read_one(handle, event, enabled, running);
}
-static inline bool perf_sample_save_hw_index(struct perf_event *event)
-{
- return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
-}
-
void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
struct perf_event_header *header,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
@@ -7045,7 +7040,7 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
* sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
perf_output_put(handle, data->br_stack->nr);
- if (perf_sample_save_hw_index(event))
+ if (branch_sample_hw_index(event))
perf_output_put(handle, data->br_stack->hw_idx);
perf_output_copy(handle, data->br_stack->entries, size);
} else {
@@ -7339,7 +7334,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header,
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
int size = sizeof(u64); /* nr */
if (data->br_stack) {
- if (perf_sample_save_hw_index(event))
+ if (branch_sample_hw_index(event))
size += sizeof(u64);
size += data->br_stack->nr
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Besides the branch type filtering requests, 'event.attr.branch_sample_type'
also contains various flags indicating which additional information should
be captured, along with the base branch record. These flags help configure
the underlying hardware, and capture the branch records appropriately when
required e.g after PMU interrupt. But first, this moves an existing helper
perf_sample_save_hw_index() into the header before adding some more helpers
for other branch sample filter flags.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/events/core.c | 9 ++-------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index da759560eec5..afd288bc0b56 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1682,4 +1682,30 @@ static inline void perf_lopwr_cb(bool mode)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+static inline bool branch_sample_no_flags(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_no_cycles(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_type(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_hw_index(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
+}
+
+static inline bool branch_sample_priv(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
#endif /* _LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 80782cddb1da..4ca35d634125 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6952,11 +6952,6 @@ static void perf_output_read(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
perf_output_read_one(handle, event, enabled, running);
}
-static inline bool perf_sample_save_hw_index(struct perf_event *event)
-{
- return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
-}
-
void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
struct perf_event_header *header,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
@@ -7045,7 +7040,7 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
* sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
perf_output_put(handle, data->br_stack->nr);
- if (perf_sample_save_hw_index(event))
+ if (branch_sample_hw_index(event))
perf_output_put(handle, data->br_stack->hw_idx);
perf_output_copy(handle, data->br_stack->entries, size);
} else {
@@ -7339,7 +7334,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header,
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
int size = sizeof(u64); /* nr */
if (data->br_stack) {
- if (perf_sample_save_hw_index(event))
+ if (branch_sample_hw_index(event))
size += sizeof(u64);
size += data->br_stack->nr
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 20:32 ` kernel test robot
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-13 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas,
James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar,
linux-perf-users
Hi Anshuman,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
[also build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git f0fe9f3c7abcc946a676dfb295478c50312523c2
config: x86_64-randconfig-a002-20220613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220614/202206140422.ttLxMHtq-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d378268ead93c85803c270277f0243737b536ae7)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
git checkout 1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:20:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
1 error generated.
--
In file included from drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:24:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1083:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
^
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1083:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
^
static
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1152:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
^
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1152:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
^
static
2 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +1708 include/linux/perf_event.h
1705
1706 static inline bool branch_sample_priv(const struct perf_event *event)
1707 {
> 1708 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
@ 2022-06-13 20:32 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-13 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas,
James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar,
linux-perf-users
Hi Anshuman,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
[also build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git f0fe9f3c7abcc946a676dfb295478c50312523c2
config: x86_64-randconfig-a002-20220613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220614/202206140422.ttLxMHtq-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d378268ead93c85803c270277f0243737b536ae7)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
git checkout 1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:20:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
1 error generated.
--
In file included from drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:24:
>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
^
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1083:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
^
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1083:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
^
static
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1152:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
^
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:1152:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
int __weak acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
^
static
2 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +1708 include/linux/perf_event.h
1705
1706 static inline bool branch_sample_priv(const struct perf_event *event)
1707 {
> 1708 return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
2022-06-13 20:32 ` kernel test robot
(?)
@ 2022-06-14 1:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-14 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/14/22 02:02, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
> [also build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git f0fe9f3c7abcc946a676dfb295478c50312523c2
> config: x86_64-randconfig-a002-20220613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220614/202206140422.ttLxMHtq-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d378268ead93c85803c270277f0243737b536ae7)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
> git checkout 1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
> # save the config file
> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:20:
>>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
> return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
> ^
> 1 error generated.
This series is dependent on another one which adds symbol PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
as mentioned in the cover letter. I understand the '--base' argument for git format-patch
output, but how to mention another prerequisite series before this can be built tested ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
@ 2022-06-14 1:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-14 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2797 bytes --]
On 6/14/22 02:02, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
> [also build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git f0fe9f3c7abcc946a676dfb295478c50312523c2
> config: x86_64-randconfig-a002-20220613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220614/202206140422.ttLxMHtq-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d378268ead93c85803c270277f0243737b536ae7)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
> git checkout 1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
> # save the config file
> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:20:
>>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
> return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
> ^
> 1 error generated.
This series is dependent on another one which adds symbol PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
as mentioned in the cover letter. I understand the '--base' argument for git format-patch
output, but how to mention another prerequisite series before this can be built tested ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
@ 2022-06-14 1:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-14 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/14/22 02:02, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
> [also build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git f0fe9f3c7abcc946a676dfb295478c50312523c2
> config: x86_64-randconfig-a002-20220613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220614/202206140422.ttLxMHtq-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d378268ead93c85803c270277f0243737b536ae7)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
> git checkout 1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
> # save the config file
> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:20:
>>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
> return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
> ^
> 1 error generated.
This series is dependent on another one which adds symbol PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
as mentioned in the cover letter. I understand the '--base' argument for git format-patch
output, but how to mention another prerequisite series before this can be built tested ?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
2022-06-14 1:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-14 11:13 ` Chen, Rong A
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Chen, Rong A @ 2022-06-14 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, kernel test robot, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/14/2022 9:36 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
> On 6/14/22 02:02, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Anshuman,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
>> [also build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
>> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git f0fe9f3c7abcc946a676dfb295478c50312523c2
>> config: x86_64-randconfig-a002-20220613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220614/202206140422.ttLxMHtq-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d378268ead93c85803c270277f0243737b536ae7)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
>> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
>> git checkout 1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
>> # save the config file
>> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:20:
>>>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
>> return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
>> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
>> ^
>> 1 error generated.
>
> This series is dependent on another one which adds symbol PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
> as mentioned in the cover letter. I understand the '--base' argument for git format-patch
> output, but how to mention another prerequisite series before this can be built tested ?
Hi Anshuman,
git format-patch supports to set prerequisite-patch-id, kernel test robot
can parse the information and apply patch to a proper branch to test.
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf: Consolidate branch sample filter helpers
@ 2022-06-14 11:13 ` Chen, Rong A
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Chen, Rong A @ 2022-06-14 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, kernel test robot, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/14/2022 9:36 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
> On 6/14/22 02:02, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Anshuman,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
>> [also build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
>> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git f0fe9f3c7abcc946a676dfb295478c50312523c2
>> config: x86_64-randconfig-a002-20220613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220614/202206140422.ttLxMHtq-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d378268ead93c85803c270277f0243737b536ae7)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
>> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220613-180501
>> git checkout 1bd23b8ca1fc92f2f5b28a94ebd95432febfe96c
>> # save the config file
>> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:20:
>>>> include/linux/perf_event.h:1708:42: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE'; did you mean 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE'?
>> return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE;
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
>> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:231:2: note: 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE' declared here
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
>> ^
>> 1 error generated.
>
> This series is dependent on another one which adds symbol PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE
> as mentioned in the cover letter. I understand the '--base' argument for git format-patch
> output, but how to mention another prerequisite series before this can be built tested ?
Hi Anshuman,
git format-patch supports to set prerequisite-patch-id, kernel test robot
can parse the information and apply patch to a proper branch to test.
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/8] arm64/perf: Add register definitions for BRBE
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
This adds BRBE related register definitions and various other related field
macros there in. These will be used subsequently in a BRBE driver which is
being added later on.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 222 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 42ff95dba6da..f3547bc30b2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -161,6 +161,224 @@
#define SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0 sys_reg(2, 3, 0, 5, 0)
#define SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2 sys_reg(2, 4, 0, 7, 0)
+/*
+ * BRBINF<N>_EL1 Encoding: [2, 1, 8, CRm, op2]
+ *
+ * derived as <CRm> = c{N<3:0>} <op2> = (N<4>x4 + 0)
+ */
+#define __SYS_BRBINFO(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, ((n) & 0xf), (((n) & 0x10)) >> 2)
+
+#define SYS_BRBINF0_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(0)
+#define SYS_BRBINF1_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(1)
+#define SYS_BRBINF2_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(2)
+#define SYS_BRBINF3_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(3)
+#define SYS_BRBINF4_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(4)
+#define SYS_BRBINF5_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(5)
+#define SYS_BRBINF6_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(6)
+#define SYS_BRBINF7_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(7)
+#define SYS_BRBINF8_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(8)
+#define SYS_BRBINF9_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(9)
+#define SYS_BRBINF10_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(10)
+#define SYS_BRBINF11_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(11)
+#define SYS_BRBINF12_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(12)
+#define SYS_BRBINF13_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(13)
+#define SYS_BRBINF14_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(14)
+#define SYS_BRBINF15_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(15)
+#define SYS_BRBINF16_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(16)
+#define SYS_BRBINF17_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(17)
+#define SYS_BRBINF18_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(18)
+#define SYS_BRBINF19_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(19)
+#define SYS_BRBINF20_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(20)
+#define SYS_BRBINF21_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(21)
+#define SYS_BRBINF22_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(22)
+#define SYS_BRBINF23_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(23)
+#define SYS_BRBINF24_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(24)
+#define SYS_BRBINF25_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(25)
+#define SYS_BRBINF26_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(26)
+#define SYS_BRBINF27_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(27)
+#define SYS_BRBINF28_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(28)
+#define SYS_BRBINF29_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(29)
+#define SYS_BRBINF30_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(30)
+#define SYS_BRBINF31_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(31)
+
+/*
+ * BRBSRC<N>_EL1 Encoding: [2, 1, 8, CRm, op2]
+ *
+ * derived as <CRm> = c{N<3:0>} <op2> = (N<4>x4 + 1)
+ */
+#define __SYS_BRBSRC(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, ((n) & 0xf), ((((n) & 0x10)) >> 2 + 1))
+
+#define SYS_BRBSRC0_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(0)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC1_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(1)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC2_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(2)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC3_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(3)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC4_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(4)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC5_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(5)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC6_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(6)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC7_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(7)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC8_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(8)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC9_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(9)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC10_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(10)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC11_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(11)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC12_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(12)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC13_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(13)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC14_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(14)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC15_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(15)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC16_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(16)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC17_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(17)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC18_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(18)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC19_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(19)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC20_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(20)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC21_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(21)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC22_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(22)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC23_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(23)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC24_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(24)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC25_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(25)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC26_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(26)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC27_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(27)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC28_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(28)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC29_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(29)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC30_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(30)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC31_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(31)
+
+/*
+ * BRBTGT<N>_EL1 Encoding: [2, 1, 8, CRm, op2]
+ *
+ * derived as <CRm> = c{N<3:0>} <op2> = (N<4>x4 + 2)
+ */
+#define __SYS_BRBTGT(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, ((n) & 0xf), ((((n) & 0x10)) >> 2 + 2))
+
+#define SYS_BRBTGT0_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(0)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT1_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(1)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT2_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(2)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT3_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(3)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT4_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(4)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT5_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(5)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT6_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(6)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT7_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(7)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT8_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(8)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT9_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(9)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT10_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(10)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT11_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(11)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT12_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(12)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT13_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(13)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT14_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(14)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT15_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(15)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT16_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(16)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT17_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(17)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT18_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(18)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT19_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(19)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT20_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(20)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT21_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(21)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT22_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(22)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT23_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(23)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT24_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(24)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT25_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(25)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT26_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(26)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT27_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(27)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT28_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(28)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT29_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(29)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT30_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(30)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT31_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(31)
+
+#define SYS_BRBIDR0_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 2, 0)
+#define SYS_BRBCR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 0)
+#define SYS_BRBFCR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 1)
+#define SYS_BRBTS_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 2)
+#define SYS_BRBINFINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 0)
+#define SYS_BRBSRCINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 1)
+#define SYS_BRBTGTINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 2)
+
+#define BRBIDR0_CC_SHIFT 12
+#define BRBIDR0_CC_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define BRBIDR0_FORMAT_SHIFT 8
+#define BRBIDR0_FORMAT_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_SHIFT 0
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+#define BRBIDR0_CC_20_BIT 0x5
+#define BRBIDR0_FORMAT_0 0x0
+
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_8 0x08
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_16 0x10
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_32 0x20
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_64 0x40
+
+#define BRBINF_VALID_SHIFT 0
+#define BRBINF_VALID_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBINF_MPRED (1UL << 5)
+#define BRBINF_EL_SHIFT 6
+#define BRBINF_EL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_SHIFT 8
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
+#define BRBINF_TX (1UL << 16)
+#define BRBINF_LASTFAILED (1UL << 17)
+#define BRBINF_CC_SHIFT 32
+#define BRBINF_CC_MASK GENMASK(13, 0)
+#define BRBINF_CCU (1UL << 46)
+
+#define BRBINF_EL_EL0 0x0
+#define BRBINF_EL_EL1 0x1
+#define BRBINF_EL_EL2 0x2
+
+#define BRBINF_VALID_INVALID 0x0
+#define BRBINF_VALID_TARGET 0x1
+#define BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE 0x2
+#define BRBINF_VALID_ALL 0x3
+
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_UNCOND_DIR 0x0
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR 0x1
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DIR_LINK 0x2
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR_LINK 0x3
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_RET_SUB 0x5
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_RET_EXCPT 0x7
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_COND_DIR 0x8
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_HALT 0x21
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_CALL 0x22
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_TRAP 0x23
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_SERROR 0x24
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INST_DEBUG 0x26
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_DEBUG 0x27
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_ALGN_FAULT 0x2A
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INST_FAULT 0x2B
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_FAULT 0x2C
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_IRQ 0x2E
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_FIQ 0x2F
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_EXIT 0x39
+
+#define BRBCR_E0BRE (1UL << 0)
+#define BRBCR_E1BRE (1UL << 1)
+#define BRBCR_CC (1UL << 3)
+#define BRBCR_MPRED (1UL << 4)
+#define BRBCR_FZP (1UL << 8)
+#define BRBCR_ERTN (1UL << 22)
+#define BRBCR_EXCEPTION (1UL << 23)
+#define BRBCR_TS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBCR_TS_SHIFT 5
+
+#define BRBCR_TS_VIRTUAL 0x1
+#define BRBCR_TS_GST_PHYSICAL 0x2
+#define BRBCR_TS_PHYSICAL 0x3
+
+#define BRBFCR_LASTFAILED (1UL << 6)
+#define BRBFCR_PAUSED (1UL << 7)
+#define BRBFCR_ENL (1UL << 16)
+#define BRBFCR_DIRECT (1UL << 17)
+#define BRBFCR_INDIRECT (1UL << 18)
+#define BRBFCR_RTN (1UL << 19)
+#define BRBFCR_INDCALL (1UL << 20)
+#define BRBFCR_DIRCALL (1UL << 21)
+#define BRBFCR_CONDDIR (1UL << 22)
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT 28
+
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_FIRST 0x0
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_SECOND 0x1
+
+#define BRBFCR_BRANCH_ALL (BRBFCR_DIRECT | BRBFCR_INDIRECT | \
+ BRBFCR_RTN | BRBFCR_INDCALL | \
+ BRBFCR_DIRCALL | BRBFCR_CONDDIR)
+
#define SYS_MIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 0)
#define SYS_MPIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 5)
#define SYS_REVIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 6)
@@ -936,6 +1154,7 @@
#define ID_AA64MMFR2_CNP_SHIFT 0
/* id_aa64dfr0 */
+#define ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_SHIFT 52
#define ID_AA64DFR0_MTPMU_SHIFT 48
#define ID_AA64DFR0_TRBE_SHIFT 44
#define ID_AA64DFR0_TRACE_FILT_SHIFT 40
@@ -958,6 +1177,9 @@
#define ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2 0x1
#define ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3 0x2
+#define ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE 0x1
+#define ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_V1P1 0x2
+
#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24
#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_8_0 0x3
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/8] arm64/perf: Add register definitions for BRBE
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
This adds BRBE related register definitions and various other related field
macros there in. These will be used subsequently in a BRBE driver which is
being added later on.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 222 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 42ff95dba6da..f3547bc30b2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -161,6 +161,224 @@
#define SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0 sys_reg(2, 3, 0, 5, 0)
#define SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2 sys_reg(2, 4, 0, 7, 0)
+/*
+ * BRBINF<N>_EL1 Encoding: [2, 1, 8, CRm, op2]
+ *
+ * derived as <CRm> = c{N<3:0>} <op2> = (N<4>x4 + 0)
+ */
+#define __SYS_BRBINFO(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, ((n) & 0xf), (((n) & 0x10)) >> 2)
+
+#define SYS_BRBINF0_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(0)
+#define SYS_BRBINF1_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(1)
+#define SYS_BRBINF2_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(2)
+#define SYS_BRBINF3_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(3)
+#define SYS_BRBINF4_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(4)
+#define SYS_BRBINF5_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(5)
+#define SYS_BRBINF6_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(6)
+#define SYS_BRBINF7_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(7)
+#define SYS_BRBINF8_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(8)
+#define SYS_BRBINF9_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(9)
+#define SYS_BRBINF10_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(10)
+#define SYS_BRBINF11_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(11)
+#define SYS_BRBINF12_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(12)
+#define SYS_BRBINF13_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(13)
+#define SYS_BRBINF14_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(14)
+#define SYS_BRBINF15_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(15)
+#define SYS_BRBINF16_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(16)
+#define SYS_BRBINF17_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(17)
+#define SYS_BRBINF18_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(18)
+#define SYS_BRBINF19_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(19)
+#define SYS_BRBINF20_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(20)
+#define SYS_BRBINF21_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(21)
+#define SYS_BRBINF22_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(22)
+#define SYS_BRBINF23_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(23)
+#define SYS_BRBINF24_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(24)
+#define SYS_BRBINF25_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(25)
+#define SYS_BRBINF26_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(26)
+#define SYS_BRBINF27_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(27)
+#define SYS_BRBINF28_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(28)
+#define SYS_BRBINF29_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(29)
+#define SYS_BRBINF30_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(30)
+#define SYS_BRBINF31_EL1 __SYS_BRBINFO(31)
+
+/*
+ * BRBSRC<N>_EL1 Encoding: [2, 1, 8, CRm, op2]
+ *
+ * derived as <CRm> = c{N<3:0>} <op2> = (N<4>x4 + 1)
+ */
+#define __SYS_BRBSRC(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, ((n) & 0xf), ((((n) & 0x10)) >> 2 + 1))
+
+#define SYS_BRBSRC0_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(0)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC1_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(1)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC2_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(2)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC3_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(3)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC4_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(4)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC5_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(5)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC6_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(6)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC7_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(7)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC8_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(8)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC9_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(9)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC10_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(10)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC11_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(11)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC12_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(12)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC13_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(13)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC14_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(14)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC15_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(15)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC16_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(16)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC17_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(17)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC18_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(18)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC19_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(19)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC20_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(20)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC21_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(21)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC22_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(22)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC23_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(23)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC24_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(24)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC25_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(25)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC26_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(26)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC27_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(27)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC28_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(28)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC29_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(29)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC30_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(30)
+#define SYS_BRBSRC31_EL1 __SYS_BRBSRC(31)
+
+/*
+ * BRBTGT<N>_EL1 Encoding: [2, 1, 8, CRm, op2]
+ *
+ * derived as <CRm> = c{N<3:0>} <op2> = (N<4>x4 + 2)
+ */
+#define __SYS_BRBTGT(n) sys_reg(2, 1, 8, ((n) & 0xf), ((((n) & 0x10)) >> 2 + 2))
+
+#define SYS_BRBTGT0_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(0)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT1_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(1)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT2_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(2)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT3_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(3)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT4_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(4)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT5_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(5)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT6_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(6)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT7_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(7)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT8_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(8)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT9_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(9)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT10_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(10)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT11_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(11)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT12_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(12)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT13_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(13)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT14_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(14)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT15_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(15)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT16_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(16)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT17_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(17)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT18_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(18)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT19_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(19)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT20_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(20)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT21_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(21)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT22_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(22)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT23_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(23)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT24_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(24)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT25_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(25)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT26_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(26)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT27_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(27)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT28_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(28)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT29_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(29)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT30_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(30)
+#define SYS_BRBTGT31_EL1 __SYS_BRBTGT(31)
+
+#define SYS_BRBIDR0_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 2, 0)
+#define SYS_BRBCR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 0)
+#define SYS_BRBFCR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 1)
+#define SYS_BRBTS_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 0, 2)
+#define SYS_BRBINFINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 0)
+#define SYS_BRBSRCINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 1)
+#define SYS_BRBTGTINJ_EL1 sys_reg(2, 1, 9, 1, 2)
+
+#define BRBIDR0_CC_SHIFT 12
+#define BRBIDR0_CC_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define BRBIDR0_FORMAT_SHIFT 8
+#define BRBIDR0_FORMAT_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_SHIFT 0
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+#define BRBIDR0_CC_20_BIT 0x5
+#define BRBIDR0_FORMAT_0 0x0
+
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_8 0x08
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_16 0x10
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_32 0x20
+#define BRBIDR0_NUMREC_64 0x40
+
+#define BRBINF_VALID_SHIFT 0
+#define BRBINF_VALID_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBINF_MPRED (1UL << 5)
+#define BRBINF_EL_SHIFT 6
+#define BRBINF_EL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_SHIFT 8
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
+#define BRBINF_TX (1UL << 16)
+#define BRBINF_LASTFAILED (1UL << 17)
+#define BRBINF_CC_SHIFT 32
+#define BRBINF_CC_MASK GENMASK(13, 0)
+#define BRBINF_CCU (1UL << 46)
+
+#define BRBINF_EL_EL0 0x0
+#define BRBINF_EL_EL1 0x1
+#define BRBINF_EL_EL2 0x2
+
+#define BRBINF_VALID_INVALID 0x0
+#define BRBINF_VALID_TARGET 0x1
+#define BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE 0x2
+#define BRBINF_VALID_ALL 0x3
+
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_UNCOND_DIR 0x0
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR 0x1
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DIR_LINK 0x2
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR_LINK 0x3
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_RET_SUB 0x5
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_RET_EXCPT 0x7
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_COND_DIR 0x8
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_HALT 0x21
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_CALL 0x22
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_TRAP 0x23
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_SERROR 0x24
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INST_DEBUG 0x26
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_DEBUG 0x27
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_ALGN_FAULT 0x2A
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_INST_FAULT 0x2B
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_FAULT 0x2C
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_IRQ 0x2E
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_FIQ 0x2F
+#define BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_EXIT 0x39
+
+#define BRBCR_E0BRE (1UL << 0)
+#define BRBCR_E1BRE (1UL << 1)
+#define BRBCR_CC (1UL << 3)
+#define BRBCR_MPRED (1UL << 4)
+#define BRBCR_FZP (1UL << 8)
+#define BRBCR_ERTN (1UL << 22)
+#define BRBCR_EXCEPTION (1UL << 23)
+#define BRBCR_TS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBCR_TS_SHIFT 5
+
+#define BRBCR_TS_VIRTUAL 0x1
+#define BRBCR_TS_GST_PHYSICAL 0x2
+#define BRBCR_TS_PHYSICAL 0x3
+
+#define BRBFCR_LASTFAILED (1UL << 6)
+#define BRBFCR_PAUSED (1UL << 7)
+#define BRBFCR_ENL (1UL << 16)
+#define BRBFCR_DIRECT (1UL << 17)
+#define BRBFCR_INDIRECT (1UL << 18)
+#define BRBFCR_RTN (1UL << 19)
+#define BRBFCR_INDCALL (1UL << 20)
+#define BRBFCR_DIRCALL (1UL << 21)
+#define BRBFCR_CONDDIR (1UL << 22)
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT 28
+
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_FIRST 0x0
+#define BRBFCR_BANK_SECOND 0x1
+
+#define BRBFCR_BRANCH_ALL (BRBFCR_DIRECT | BRBFCR_INDIRECT | \
+ BRBFCR_RTN | BRBFCR_INDCALL | \
+ BRBFCR_DIRCALL | BRBFCR_CONDDIR)
+
#define SYS_MIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 0)
#define SYS_MPIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 5)
#define SYS_REVIDR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 0, 6)
@@ -936,6 +1154,7 @@
#define ID_AA64MMFR2_CNP_SHIFT 0
/* id_aa64dfr0 */
+#define ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_SHIFT 52
#define ID_AA64DFR0_MTPMU_SHIFT 48
#define ID_AA64DFR0_TRBE_SHIFT 44
#define ID_AA64DFR0_TRACE_FILT_SHIFT 40
@@ -958,6 +1177,9 @@
#define ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2 0x1
#define ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3 0x2
+#define ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE 0x1
+#define ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_V1P1 0x2
+
#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24
#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_8_0 0x3
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/8] arm64/perf: Update struct arm_pmu for BRBE
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Although BRBE is an armv8 speciifc HW feature, abstracting out its various
function callbacks at the struct arm_pmu level is preferred, as it cleaner
, easier to follow and maintain.
Besides some helpers i.e brbe_supported(), brbe_probe() and brbe_reset()
might not fit seamlessly, when tried to be embedded via existing arm_pmu
helpers in the armv8 implementation.
Updates the struct arm_pmu to include all required helpers that will drive
BRBE functionality for a given PMU implementation. These are the following.
- brbe_filter : Convert perf event filters into BRBE HW filters
- brbe_probe : Probe BRBE HW and capture its attributes
- brbe_enable : Enable BRBE HW with a given config
- brbe_disable : Disable BRBE HW
- brbe_read : Read BRBE buffer for captured branch records
- brbe_reset : Reset BRBE buffer
- brbe_supported: Whether BRBE is supported or not
A BRBE driver implementation needs to provide these functionalities.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index cb69ff1e6138..e7013699171f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1025,6 +1025,35 @@ static int armv8pmu_filter_match(struct perf_event *event)
return evtype != ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CHAIN;
}
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static bool armv8pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info)
{
struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = (struct arm_pmu *)info;
@@ -1257,6 +1286,13 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, char *name,
cpu_pmu->pmu.event_idx = armv8pmu_user_event_idx;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_filter = armv8pmu_brbe_filter;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_enable = armv8pmu_brbe_enable;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_disable = armv8pmu_brbe_disable;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_read = armv8pmu_brbe_read;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_probe = armv8pmu_brbe_probe;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_reset = armv8pmu_brbe_reset;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_supported = armv8pmu_brbe_supported;
cpu_pmu->name = name;
cpu_pmu->map_event = map_event;
cpu_pmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_EVENTS] = events ?
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 0407a38b470a..3d427ac0ca45 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -100,6 +100,27 @@ struct arm_pmu {
void (*reset)(void *);
int (*map_event)(struct perf_event *event);
int (*filter_match)(struct perf_event *event);
+
+ /* Convert perf event filters into BRBE HW filters */
+ void (*brbe_filter)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event);
+
+ /* Probe BRBE HW and capture its attributes */
+ void (*brbe_probe)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Enable BRBE HW with a given config */
+ void (*brbe_enable)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Disable BRBE HW */
+ void (*brbe_disable)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Process BRBE buffer for captured branch records */
+ void (*brbe_read)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event);
+
+ /* Reset BRBE buffer */
+ void (*brbe_reset)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Check whether BRBE is supported */
+ bool (*brbe_supported)(struct perf_event *event);
int num_events;
bool secure_access; /* 32-bit ARM only */
#define ARMV8_PMUV3_MAX_COMMON_EVENTS 0x40
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/8] arm64/perf: Update struct arm_pmu for BRBE
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Although BRBE is an armv8 speciifc HW feature, abstracting out its various
function callbacks at the struct arm_pmu level is preferred, as it cleaner
, easier to follow and maintain.
Besides some helpers i.e brbe_supported(), brbe_probe() and brbe_reset()
might not fit seamlessly, when tried to be embedded via existing arm_pmu
helpers in the armv8 implementation.
Updates the struct arm_pmu to include all required helpers that will drive
BRBE functionality for a given PMU implementation. These are the following.
- brbe_filter : Convert perf event filters into BRBE HW filters
- brbe_probe : Probe BRBE HW and capture its attributes
- brbe_enable : Enable BRBE HW with a given config
- brbe_disable : Disable BRBE HW
- brbe_read : Read BRBE buffer for captured branch records
- brbe_reset : Reset BRBE buffer
- brbe_supported: Whether BRBE is supported or not
A BRBE driver implementation needs to provide these functionalities.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index cb69ff1e6138..e7013699171f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1025,6 +1025,35 @@ static int armv8pmu_filter_match(struct perf_event *event)
return evtype != ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CHAIN;
}
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static void armv8pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
+{
+}
+
+static bool armv8pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info)
{
struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = (struct arm_pmu *)info;
@@ -1257,6 +1286,13 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, char *name,
cpu_pmu->pmu.event_idx = armv8pmu_user_event_idx;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_filter = armv8pmu_brbe_filter;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_enable = armv8pmu_brbe_enable;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_disable = armv8pmu_brbe_disable;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_read = armv8pmu_brbe_read;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_probe = armv8pmu_brbe_probe;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_reset = armv8pmu_brbe_reset;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_supported = armv8pmu_brbe_supported;
cpu_pmu->name = name;
cpu_pmu->map_event = map_event;
cpu_pmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_EVENTS] = events ?
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 0407a38b470a..3d427ac0ca45 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -100,6 +100,27 @@ struct arm_pmu {
void (*reset)(void *);
int (*map_event)(struct perf_event *event);
int (*filter_match)(struct perf_event *event);
+
+ /* Convert perf event filters into BRBE HW filters */
+ void (*brbe_filter)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event);
+
+ /* Probe BRBE HW and capture its attributes */
+ void (*brbe_probe)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Enable BRBE HW with a given config */
+ void (*brbe_enable)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Disable BRBE HW */
+ void (*brbe_disable)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Process BRBE buffer for captured branch records */
+ void (*brbe_read)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event);
+
+ /* Reset BRBE buffer */
+ void (*brbe_reset)(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events);
+
+ /* Check whether BRBE is supported */
+ bool (*brbe_supported)(struct perf_event *event);
int num_events;
bool secure_access; /* 32-bit ARM only */
#define ARMV8_PMUV3_MAX_COMMON_EVENTS 0x40
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/8] arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events for BRBE
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
A single perf event instance BRBE related contexts and data will be tracked
in struct pmu_hw_events. Hence update the structure to accommodate required
details related to BRBE.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 3d427ac0ca45..18e519e4e658 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@
}, \
}
+/*
+ * Maximum branch records in BRBE
+ */
+#define BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES 64
+
/* The events for a given PMU register set. */
struct pmu_hw_events {
/*
@@ -69,6 +74,23 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
struct arm_pmu *percpu_pmu;
int irq;
+
+ /* Detected BRBE attributes */
+ bool v1p1;
+ int brbe_cc;
+ int brbe_nr;
+
+ /* Evaluated BRBE configuration */
+ u64 brbfcr;
+ u64 brbcr;
+
+ /* Tracked BRBE context */
+ unsigned int brbe_users;
+ void *brbe_context;
+
+ /* Captured BRBE buffer - copied as is into perf_sample_data */
+ struct perf_branch_stack brbe_stack;
+ struct perf_branch_entry brbe_entries[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
};
enum armpmu_attr_groups {
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/8] arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events for BRBE
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
A single perf event instance BRBE related contexts and data will be tracked
in struct pmu_hw_events. Hence update the structure to accommodate required
details related to BRBE.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 3d427ac0ca45..18e519e4e658 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@
}, \
}
+/*
+ * Maximum branch records in BRBE
+ */
+#define BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES 64
+
/* The events for a given PMU register set. */
struct pmu_hw_events {
/*
@@ -69,6 +74,23 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
struct arm_pmu *percpu_pmu;
int irq;
+
+ /* Detected BRBE attributes */
+ bool v1p1;
+ int brbe_cc;
+ int brbe_nr;
+
+ /* Evaluated BRBE configuration */
+ u64 brbfcr;
+ u64 brbcr;
+
+ /* Tracked BRBE context */
+ unsigned int brbe_users;
+ void *brbe_context;
+
+ /* Captured BRBE buffer - copied as is into perf_sample_data */
+ struct perf_branch_stack brbe_stack;
+ struct perf_branch_entry brbe_entries[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
};
enum armpmu_attr_groups {
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/8] driver/perf/arm_pmu_platform: Add support for BRBE attributes detection
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
This adds arm pmu infrastrure to probe BRBE implementation's attributes via
driver exported callbacks later. The actual BRBE feature detection will be
added by the driver itself.
CPU specific BRBE entries, cycle count, format support gets detected during
PMU init. This information gets saved in per-cpu struct pmu_hw_events which
later helps in operating BRBE during a perf event context.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
index 513de1f54e2d..800e4a6e8bc3 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
@@ -172,6 +172,36 @@ static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
return err;
}
+static void arm_brbe_probe_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events;
+ struct arm_pmu *armpmu = info;
+
+ /*
+ * Return from here, if BRBE driver has not been
+ * implemented for this PMU. This helps prevent
+ * kernel crash later when brbe_probe() will be
+ * called on the PMU.
+ */
+ if (!armpmu->brbe_probe)
+ return;
+
+ hw_events = per_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events, smp_processor_id());
+ armpmu->brbe_probe(hw_events);
+}
+
+static int armpmu_request_brbe(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+ int cpu, err = 0;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, arm_brbe_probe_cpu, armpmu, 1);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+
static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
int cpu;
@@ -229,6 +259,10 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
if (ret)
goto out_free_irqs;
+ ret = armpmu_request_brbe(pmu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_free_irqs;
+
ret = armpmu_register(pmu);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register PMU devices!\n");
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/8] driver/perf/arm_pmu_platform: Add support for BRBE attributes detection
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
This adds arm pmu infrastrure to probe BRBE implementation's attributes via
driver exported callbacks later. The actual BRBE feature detection will be
added by the driver itself.
CPU specific BRBE entries, cycle count, format support gets detected during
PMU init. This information gets saved in per-cpu struct pmu_hw_events which
later helps in operating BRBE during a perf event context.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
index 513de1f54e2d..800e4a6e8bc3 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
@@ -172,6 +172,36 @@ static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
return err;
}
+static void arm_brbe_probe_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events;
+ struct arm_pmu *armpmu = info;
+
+ /*
+ * Return from here, if BRBE driver has not been
+ * implemented for this PMU. This helps prevent
+ * kernel crash later when brbe_probe() will be
+ * called on the PMU.
+ */
+ if (!armpmu->brbe_probe)
+ return;
+
+ hw_events = per_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events, smp_processor_id());
+ armpmu->brbe_probe(hw_events);
+}
+
+static int armpmu_request_brbe(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+ int cpu, err = 0;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, arm_brbe_probe_cpu, armpmu, 1);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+
static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
int cpu;
@@ -229,6 +259,10 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
if (ret)
goto out_free_irqs;
+ ret = armpmu_request_brbe(pmu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_free_irqs;
+
ret = armpmu_register(pmu);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register PMU devices!\n");
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6/8] arm64/perf: Drive BRBE from perf event states
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Branch stack sampling rides along the normal perf event and all the branch
records get captured during the PMU interrupt. This just changes perf event
handling on the arm64 platform to accommodate required BRBE operations that
will enable branch stack sampling support.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 6 +++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index e7013699171f..5bfaba8edad1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -874,6 +874,12 @@ static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
if (!armpmu_event_set_period(event))
continue;
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_read(cpuc, event);
+ data.br_stack = &cpuc->brbe_stack;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_reset(cpuc);
+ }
+
/*
* Perf event overflow will queue the processing of the event as
* an irq_work which will be taken care of in the handling of
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 59d3980b8ca2..52a903d26702 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -271,12 +271,22 @@ armpmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
/*
* ARM pmu always has to update the counter, so ignore
* PERF_EF_UPDATE, see comments in armpmu_start().
*/
if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!hw_events->brbe_users);
+ hw_events->brbe_users--;
+ if (!hw_events->brbe_users) {
+ hw_events->brbe_context = NULL;
+ armpmu->brbe_disable(hw_events);
+ }
+ }
+
armpmu->disable(event);
armpmu_event_update(event);
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED | PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
@@ -287,6 +297,7 @@ static void armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
/*
* ARM pmu always has to reprogram the period, so ignore
@@ -304,6 +315,14 @@ static void armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
* happened since disabling.
*/
armpmu_event_set_period(event);
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ if (event->ctx->task && hw_events->brbe_context != event->ctx) {
+ armpmu->brbe_reset(hw_events);
+ hw_events->brbe_context = event->ctx;
+ }
+ armpmu->brbe_enable(hw_events);
+ hw_events->brbe_users++;
+ }
armpmu->enable(event);
}
@@ -349,6 +368,10 @@ armpmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
hw_events->events[idx] = event;
hwc->state = PERF_HES_STOPPED | PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
+
+ if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ armpmu->brbe_filter(hw_events, event);
+
if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
armpmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
@@ -443,6 +466,7 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
int mapping;
hwc->flags = 0;
@@ -492,6 +516,9 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
}
+ if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ armpmu->brbe_filter(hw_events, event);
+
return validate_group(event);
}
@@ -520,6 +547,18 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
return __hw_perf_event_init(event);
}
+static void armpmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
+{
+ struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(ctx->pmu);
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
+
+ if (!hw_events->brbe_users)
+ return;
+
+ if (sched_in)
+ armpmu->brbe_reset(hw_events);
+}
+
static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu);
@@ -877,6 +916,7 @@ static struct arm_pmu *__armpmu_alloc(gfp_t flags)
}
pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
+ .sched_task = armpmu_sched_task,
.pmu_enable = armpmu_enable,
.pmu_disable = armpmu_disable,
.event_init = armpmu_event_init,
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6/8] arm64/perf: Drive BRBE from perf event states
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Branch stack sampling rides along the normal perf event and all the branch
records get captured during the PMU interrupt. This just changes perf event
handling on the arm64 platform to accommodate required BRBE operations that
will enable branch stack sampling support.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 6 +++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index e7013699171f..5bfaba8edad1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -874,6 +874,12 @@ static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
if (!armpmu_event_set_period(event))
continue;
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_read(cpuc, event);
+ data.br_stack = &cpuc->brbe_stack;
+ cpu_pmu->brbe_reset(cpuc);
+ }
+
/*
* Perf event overflow will queue the processing of the event as
* an irq_work which will be taken care of in the handling of
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 59d3980b8ca2..52a903d26702 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -271,12 +271,22 @@ armpmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
/*
* ARM pmu always has to update the counter, so ignore
* PERF_EF_UPDATE, see comments in armpmu_start().
*/
if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!hw_events->brbe_users);
+ hw_events->brbe_users--;
+ if (!hw_events->brbe_users) {
+ hw_events->brbe_context = NULL;
+ armpmu->brbe_disable(hw_events);
+ }
+ }
+
armpmu->disable(event);
armpmu_event_update(event);
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED | PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
@@ -287,6 +297,7 @@ static void armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
/*
* ARM pmu always has to reprogram the period, so ignore
@@ -304,6 +315,14 @@ static void armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
* happened since disabling.
*/
armpmu_event_set_period(event);
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ if (event->ctx->task && hw_events->brbe_context != event->ctx) {
+ armpmu->brbe_reset(hw_events);
+ hw_events->brbe_context = event->ctx;
+ }
+ armpmu->brbe_enable(hw_events);
+ hw_events->brbe_users++;
+ }
armpmu->enable(event);
}
@@ -349,6 +368,10 @@ armpmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
hw_events->events[idx] = event;
hwc->state = PERF_HES_STOPPED | PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
+
+ if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ armpmu->brbe_filter(hw_events, event);
+
if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
armpmu_start(event, PERF_EF_RELOAD);
@@ -443,6 +466,7 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
int mapping;
hwc->flags = 0;
@@ -492,6 +516,9 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
}
+ if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ armpmu->brbe_filter(hw_events, event);
+
return validate_group(event);
}
@@ -520,6 +547,18 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
return __hw_perf_event_init(event);
}
+static void armpmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
+{
+ struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(ctx->pmu);
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
+
+ if (!hw_events->brbe_users)
+ return;
+
+ if (sched_in)
+ armpmu->brbe_reset(hw_events);
+}
+
static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu);
@@ -877,6 +916,7 @@ static struct arm_pmu *__armpmu_alloc(gfp_t flags)
}
pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
+ .sched_task = armpmu_sched_task,
.pmu_enable = armpmu_enable,
.pmu_disable = armpmu_disable,
.event_init = armpmu_event_init,
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7/8] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
This adds a BRBE driver which implements all the required helper functions
for struct arm_pmu. Following functions are defined by this driver which
will configure, enable, capture, reset and disable BRBE buffer HW as and
when requested via perf branch stack sampling framework.
- arm64_pmu_brbe_filter()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_enable()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_disable()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_read()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_probe()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_reset()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_supported()
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 8 +-
drivers/perf/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/perf/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c | 442 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h | 259 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 20 ++
6 files changed, 740 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 5bfaba8edad1..76d409d9b5f3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1033,31 +1033,37 @@ static int armv8pmu_filter_match(struct perf_event *event)
static void armv8pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(hw_event, event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(hw_event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(hw_event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_read(hw_event, event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(hw_event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(hw_event);
}
static bool armv8pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event)
{
- return false;
+ return arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(event);
}
static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
index 1e2d69453771..9fa34a1d3a23 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
@@ -183,6 +183,17 @@ config APPLE_M1_CPU_PMU
Provides support for the non-architectural CPU PMUs present on
the Apple M1 SoCs and derivatives.
+config ARM_BRBE_PMU
+ tristate "Enable support for Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE)"
+ depends on ARM64 && ARM_PMU
+ default y
+ help
+ Enable perf support for Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE) which
+ records all branches taken in an execution path. This supports some
+ branch types and privilege based filtering. It captured additional
+ relevant information such as cycle count, misprediction and branch
+ type, branch privilege level etc.
+
source "drivers/perf/hisilicon/Kconfig"
config MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU
diff --git a/drivers/perf/Makefile b/drivers/perf/Makefile
index 57a279c61df5..b81fc134d95f 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/perf/Makefile
@@ -20,3 +20,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DMC620_PMU) += arm_dmc620_pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_TAD_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_M1_CPU_PMU) += apple_m1_cpu_pmu.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU) += arm_pmu_brbe.o
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dea478abb431
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Branch Record Buffer Extension Driver.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+ *
+ * Author: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
+ */
+#include "arm_pmu_brbe.h"
+
+#define BRBE_FCR_MASK (BRBFCR_BRANCH_ALL)
+#define BRBE_CR_MASK (BRBCR_EXCEPTION | BRBCR_ERTN | BRBCR_CC | \
+ BRBCR_MPRED | BRBCR_E1BRE | BRBCR_E0BRE)
+
+static void set_brbe_disabled(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ cpuc->brbe_nr = 0;
+}
+
+static bool brbe_disabled(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ return !cpuc->brbe_nr;
+}
+
+bool arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = per_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events, event->cpu);
+
+ /*
+ * If the event does not have at least one of the privilege
+ * branch filters as in PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL, the core
+ * perf will adjust its value based on perf event's existing
+ * privilege level via attr.exclude_[user|kernel|hv].
+ *
+ * As event->attr.branch_sample_type might have been changed
+ * when the event reaches here, it is not possible to figure
+ * out whether the event originally had HV privilege request
+ * or got added via the core perf. Just report this situation
+ * once and continue ignoring if there are other instances.
+ */
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HV)
+ pr_warn_once("does not support hypervisor privilege branch filter\n");
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ABORT_TX) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not support aborted transaction branch filter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_TX) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not support non transaction branch filter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IN_TX) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not support in transaction branch filter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ return !brbe_disabled(hw_events);
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 aa64dfr0, brbidr;
+ unsigned int brbe, format, cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ aa64dfr0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
+ brbe = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_SHIFT);
+ if (!brbe) {
+ pr_info("no implementation found on cpu %d\n", cpu);
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ } else if (brbe == ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE) {
+ pr_info("implementation found on cpu %d\n", cpu);
+ cpuc->v1p1 = false;
+ } else if (brbe == ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_V1P1) {
+ pr_info("implementation (v1p1) found on cpu %d\n", cpu);
+ cpuc->v1p1 = true;
+ }
+
+ brbidr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBIDR0_EL1);
+ format = brbe_fetch_format(brbidr);
+ if (format != BRBIDR0_FORMAT_0) {
+ pr_warn("format 0 not implemented\n");
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cpuc->brbe_cc = brbe_fetch_cc_bits(brbidr);
+ if (cpuc->brbe_cc != BRBIDR0_CC_20_BIT) {
+ pr_warn("20-bit counter not implemented\n");
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cpuc->brbe_nr = brbe_fetch_numrec(brbidr);
+ if (!valid_brbe_nr(cpuc->brbe_nr)) {
+ pr_warn("invalid number of records\n");
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ }
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr, brbcr;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ brbfcr &= ~(BRBFCR_BANK_MASK << BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT);
+ brbfcr &= ~(BRBFCR_ENL | BRBFCR_PAUSED | BRBE_FCR_MASK);
+ brbfcr |= (cpuc->brbfcr & BRBE_FCR_MASK);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+
+ brbcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ brbcr &= ~BRBE_CR_MASK;
+ brbcr |= BRBCR_FZP;
+ brbcr |= (BRBCR_TS_PHYSICAL << BRBCR_TS_SHIFT);
+ brbcr |= (cpuc->brbcr & BRBE_CR_MASK);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbcr, SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 brbcr;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ brbcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ brbcr &= ~(BRBCR_E0BRE | BRBCR_E1BRE);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbcr, SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+}
+
+static void perf_branch_to_brbfcr(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, int branch_type)
+{
+ cpuc->brbfcr = 0;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY) {
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_BRANCH_ALL;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= (BRBFCR_INDCALL | BRBFCR_DIRCALL);
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_RTN;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_INDCALL;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_CONDDIR;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_JUMP)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_INDIRECT;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_DIRCALL;
+}
+
+static void perf_branch_to_brbcr(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, int branch_type)
+{
+ cpuc->brbcr = (BRBCR_CC | BRBCR_MPRED);
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER)
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_E0BRE;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) {
+ /*
+ * This should have been verified earlier.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(!perfmon_capable());
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_E1BRE;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES)
+ cpuc->brbcr &= ~BRBCR_CC;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS)
+ cpuc->brbcr &= ~BRBCR_MPRED;
+
+ if (!perfmon_capable())
+ return;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY) {
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_EXCEPTION;
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_ERTN;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_EXCEPTION;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_ERTN;
+}
+
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ u64 branch_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ perf_branch_to_brbfcr(cpuc, branch_type);
+ perf_branch_to_brbcr(cpuc, branch_type);
+}
+
+static int brbe_fetch_perf_type(u64 brbinf, bool *new_branch_type)
+{
+ int brbe_type = brbe_fetch_type(brbinf);
+ *new_branch_type = false;
+
+ switch (brbe_type) {
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_UNCOND_DIR:
+ return PERF_BR_UNCOND;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR:
+ return PERF_BR_IND;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DIR_LINK:
+ return PERF_BR_CALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR_LINK:
+ return PERF_BR_IND_CALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_RET_SUB:
+ return PERF_BR_RET;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_COND_DIR:
+ return PERF_BR_COND;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_CALL:
+ return PERF_BR_CALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_TRAP:
+ return PERF_BR_SYSCALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_RET_EXCPT:
+ return PERF_BR_ERET;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_IRQ:
+ return PERF_BR_IRQ;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_HALT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_HALT;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_SERROR:
+ return PERF_BR_SERROR;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INST_DEBUG:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_INST;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_DEBUG:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_DATA;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_ALGN_FAULT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INST_FAULT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_INST;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_FAULT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_DATA;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_FIQ:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_FIQ;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_EXIT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_EXIT;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unknown branch type captured\n");
+ return PERF_BR_UNKNOWN;
+ }
+}
+
+static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf);
+
+ switch (brbe_el) {
+ case BRBINF_EL_EL0:
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
+ case BRBINF_EL_EL1:
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
+ case BRBINF_EL_EL2:
+ if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+}
+
+static void capture_brbe_flags(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ u64 brbinf, int idx)
+{
+ int branch_type, type = brbe_record_valid(brbinf);
+ bool new_branch_type;
+
+ if (!branch_sample_no_cycles(event))
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].cycles = brbe_fetch_cycles(brbinf);
+
+ if (branch_sample_type(event)) {
+ branch_type = brbe_fetch_perf_type(brbinf, &new_branch_type);
+ if (new_branch_type) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].type = PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].new_type = branch_type;
+ } else {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].type = branch_type;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!branch_sample_no_flags(event)) {
+ /*
+ * BRBINF_LASTFAILED does not indicate that the last transaction
+ * got failed or aborted during the current branch record itself.
+ * Rather, this indicates that all the branch records which were
+ * in transaction until the curret branch record have failed. So
+ * the entire BRBE buffer needs to be processed later on to find
+ * all branch records which might have failed.
+ */
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort = brbinf & BRBINF_LASTFAILED;
+
+ /*
+ * All these information (i.e transaction state and mispredicts)
+ * are not available for target only branch records.
+ */
+ if (type != BRBINF_VALID_TARGET) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].mispred = brbinf & BRBINF_MPRED;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].predicted = !(brbinf & BRBINF_MPRED);
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].in_tx = brbinf & BRBINF_TX;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (branch_sample_priv(event)) {
+ /*
+ * All these information (i.e branch privilege level) are not
+ * available for source only branch records.
+ */
+ if (type != BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE)
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * A branch record with BRBINF_EL1.LASTFAILED set, implies that all
+ * preceding consecutive branch records, that were in a transaction
+ * (i.e their BRBINF_EL1.TX set) have been aborted.
+ *
+ * Similarly BRBFCR_EL1.LASTFAILED set, indicate that all preceding
+ * consecutive branch records upto the last record, which were in a
+ * transaction (i.e their BRBINF_EL1.TX set) have been aborted.
+ *
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 00 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX success]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 01 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX success]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 02 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 0 | LF = 0 |
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 03 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 04 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 05 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 0 | LF = 1 |
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | .. | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 0 | LF = 0 |
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 61 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 62 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 63 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ *
+ * BRBFCR_EL1.LASTFAILED == 1
+ *
+ * Here BRBFCR_EL1.LASTFAILED failes all those consecutive and also
+ * in transaction branches near the end of the BRBE buffer.
+ */
+static void process_branch_aborts(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ bool lastfailed = !!(brbfcr & BRBFCR_LASTFAILED);
+ int idx = cpuc->brbe_nr - 1;
+
+ do {
+ if (cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].in_tx) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort = lastfailed;
+ } else {
+ lastfailed = cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort = false;
+ }
+ } while (idx--, idx >= 0);
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ u64 brbinf;
+ int idx;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ set_brbe_paused();
+ for (idx = 0; idx < cpuc->brbe_nr; idx++) {
+ select_brbe_bank_index(idx);
+ brbinf = get_brbinf_reg(idx);
+ /*
+ * There are no valid entries anymore on the buffer.
+ * Abort the branch record processing to save some
+ * cycles and also reduce the capture/process load
+ * for the user space as well.
+ */
+ if (brbe_invalid(brbinf))
+ break;
+
+ if (brbe_valid(brbinf)) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ } else if (brbe_source(brbinf)) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].to = 0;
+ } else if (brbe_target(brbinf)) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].from = 0;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ }
+ capture_brbe_flags(cpuc, event, brbinf, idx);
+ }
+ cpuc->brbe_stack.nr = idx;
+ cpuc->brbe_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL;
+ process_branch_aborts(cpuc);
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ asm volatile(BRB_IALL);
+ isb();
+}
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f04975cdc242
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Branch Record Buffer Extension Helpers.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+ *
+ * Author: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
+ */
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "brbe: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
+
+/*
+ * BRBE Instructions
+ *
+ * BRB_IALL : Invalidate the entire buffer
+ * BRB_INJ : Inject latest branch record derived from [BRBSRCINJ, BRBTGTINJ, BRBINFINJ]
+ */
+#define BRB_IALL __emit_inst(0xD5000000 | sys_insn(1, 1, 7, 2, 4) | (0x1f))
+#define BRB_INJ __emit_inst(0xD5000000 | sys_insn(1, 1, 7, 2, 5) | (0x1f))
+
+/*
+ * BRBE Buffer Organization
+ *
+ * BRBE buffer is arranged as multiple banks of 32 branch record
+ * entries each. An indivdial branch record in a given bank could
+ * be accessedi, after selecting the bank in BRBFCR_EL1.BANK and
+ * accessing the registers i.e [BRBSRC, BRBTGT, BRBINF] set with
+ * indices [0..31].
+ *
+ * Bank 0
+ *
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 00 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 00 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 01 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 01 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | .. | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | .. |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 31 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 31 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ *
+ * Bank 1
+ *
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 32 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 00 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 33 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 01 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | .. | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | .. |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 63 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 31 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ */
+#define BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MIN 0
+#define BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MAX 31
+#define BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MIN 32
+#define BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MAX 63
+
+#define RETURN_READ_BRBSRCN(n) \
+ read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBSRC##n##_EL1)
+
+#define RETURN_READ_BRBTGTN(n) \
+ read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBTGT##n##_EL1)
+
+#define RETURN_READ_BRBINFN(n) \
+ read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBINF##n##_EL1)
+
+#define BRBE_REGN_CASE(n, case_macro) \
+ case n: return case_macro(n); break
+
+#define BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(x, case_macro) \
+ do { \
+ switch (x) { \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(0, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(1, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(2, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(3, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(4, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(5, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(6, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(7, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(8, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(9, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(10, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(11, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(12, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(13, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(14, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(15, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(16, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(17, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(18, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(19, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(20, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(21, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(22, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(23, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(24, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(25, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(26, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(27, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(28, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(29, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(30, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(31, case_macro); \
+ default: \
+ pr_warn("unknown register index\n"); \
+ return -1; \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
+
+static inline int buffer_to_brbe_idx(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ return buffer_idx % 32;
+}
+
+static inline u64 get_brbsrc_reg(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ int brbe_idx = buffer_to_brbe_idx(buffer_idx);
+
+ BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(brbe_idx, RETURN_READ_BRBSRCN);
+}
+
+static inline u64 get_brbtgt_reg(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ int brbe_idx = buffer_to_brbe_idx(buffer_idx);
+
+ BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(brbe_idx, RETURN_READ_BRBTGTN);
+}
+
+static inline u64 get_brbinf_reg(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ int brbe_idx = buffer_to_brbe_idx(buffer_idx);
+
+ BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(brbe_idx, RETURN_READ_BRBINFN);
+}
+
+static inline u64 brbe_record_valid(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbinf & (BRBINF_VALID_MASK << BRBINF_VALID_SHIFT);
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_invalid(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_INVALID;
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_valid(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_ALL;
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_source(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE;
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_target(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_TARGET;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_cycles(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ /*
+ * Captured cycle count is unknown and hence
+ * should not be passed on the user space.
+ */
+ if (brbinf & BRBINF_CCU)
+ return 0;
+
+ return (brbinf >> BRBINF_CC_SHIFT) & BRBINF_CC_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_type(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return (brbinf >> BRBINF_TYPE_SHIFT) & BRBINF_TYPE_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_el(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return (brbinf >> BRBINF_EL_SHIFT) & BRBINF_EL_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_numrec(u64 brbidr)
+{
+ return (brbidr >> BRBIDR0_NUMREC_SHIFT) & BRBIDR0_NUMREC_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_format(u64 brbidr)
+{
+ return (brbidr >> BRBIDR0_FORMAT_SHIFT) & BRBIDR0_FORMAT_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_cc_bits(u64 brbidr)
+{
+ return (brbidr >> BRBIDR0_CC_SHIFT) & BRBIDR0_CC_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline void select_brbe_bank(int bank)
+{
+ static int brbe_current_bank = -1;
+ u64 brbfcr;
+
+ if (brbe_current_bank == bank)
+ return;
+
+ WARN_ON(bank > 1);
+ brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ brbfcr &= ~(BRBFCR_BANK_MASK << BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT);
+ brbfcr |= ((bank & BRBFCR_BANK_MASK) << BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+ brbe_current_bank = bank;
+}
+
+static inline void select_brbe_bank_index(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ switch (buffer_idx) {
+ case BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MIN ... BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MAX:
+ select_brbe_bank(0);
+ break;
+ case BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MIN ... BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MAX:
+ select_brbe_bank(1);
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unsupported BRBE index\n");
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool valid_brbe_nr(int brbe_nr)
+{
+ switch (brbe_nr) {
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_8:
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_16:
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_32:
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_64:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unsupported BRBE entries\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_paused(void)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+
+ return brbfcr & BRBFCR_PAUSED;
+}
+
+static inline void set_brbe_paused(void)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr | BRBFCR_PAUSED, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 18e519e4e658..65bbe6e2a913 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -162,6 +162,26 @@ struct arm_pmu {
unsigned long acpi_cpuid;
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+bool arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event);
+#else
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+}
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline bool arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event) {return false; }
+#endif
+
#define to_arm_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_pmu, pmu))
u64 armpmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 7/8] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
This adds a BRBE driver which implements all the required helper functions
for struct arm_pmu. Following functions are defined by this driver which
will configure, enable, capture, reset and disable BRBE buffer HW as and
when requested via perf branch stack sampling framework.
- arm64_pmu_brbe_filter()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_enable()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_disable()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_read()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_probe()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_reset()
- arm64_pmu_brbe_supported()
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 8 +-
drivers/perf/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/perf/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c | 442 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h | 259 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 20 ++
6 files changed, 740 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 5bfaba8edad1..76d409d9b5f3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1033,31 +1033,37 @@ static int armv8pmu_filter_match(struct perf_event *event)
static void armv8pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(hw_event, event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(hw_event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(hw_event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event, struct perf_event *event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_read(hw_event, event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(hw_event);
}
static void armv8pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_event)
{
+ arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(hw_event);
}
static bool armv8pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event)
{
- return false;
+ return arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(event);
}
static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
index 1e2d69453771..9fa34a1d3a23 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
@@ -183,6 +183,17 @@ config APPLE_M1_CPU_PMU
Provides support for the non-architectural CPU PMUs present on
the Apple M1 SoCs and derivatives.
+config ARM_BRBE_PMU
+ tristate "Enable support for Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE)"
+ depends on ARM64 && ARM_PMU
+ default y
+ help
+ Enable perf support for Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE) which
+ records all branches taken in an execution path. This supports some
+ branch types and privilege based filtering. It captured additional
+ relevant information such as cycle count, misprediction and branch
+ type, branch privilege level etc.
+
source "drivers/perf/hisilicon/Kconfig"
config MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU
diff --git a/drivers/perf/Makefile b/drivers/perf/Makefile
index 57a279c61df5..b81fc134d95f 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/perf/Makefile
@@ -20,3 +20,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DMC620_PMU) += arm_dmc620_pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_TAD_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_M1_CPU_PMU) += apple_m1_cpu_pmu.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU) += arm_pmu_brbe.o
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dea478abb431
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Branch Record Buffer Extension Driver.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+ *
+ * Author: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
+ */
+#include "arm_pmu_brbe.h"
+
+#define BRBE_FCR_MASK (BRBFCR_BRANCH_ALL)
+#define BRBE_CR_MASK (BRBCR_EXCEPTION | BRBCR_ERTN | BRBCR_CC | \
+ BRBCR_MPRED | BRBCR_E1BRE | BRBCR_E0BRE)
+
+static void set_brbe_disabled(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ cpuc->brbe_nr = 0;
+}
+
+static bool brbe_disabled(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ return !cpuc->brbe_nr;
+}
+
+bool arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
+ struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = per_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events, event->cpu);
+
+ /*
+ * If the event does not have at least one of the privilege
+ * branch filters as in PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL, the core
+ * perf will adjust its value based on perf event's existing
+ * privilege level via attr.exclude_[user|kernel|hv].
+ *
+ * As event->attr.branch_sample_type might have been changed
+ * when the event reaches here, it is not possible to figure
+ * out whether the event originally had HV privilege request
+ * or got added via the core perf. Just report this situation
+ * once and continue ignoring if there are other instances.
+ */
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HV)
+ pr_warn_once("does not support hypervisor privilege branch filter\n");
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ABORT_TX) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not support aborted transaction branch filter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_TX) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not support non transaction branch filter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IN_TX) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not support in transaction branch filter\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ return !brbe_disabled(hw_events);
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 aa64dfr0, brbidr;
+ unsigned int brbe, format, cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ aa64dfr0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
+ brbe = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_SHIFT);
+ if (!brbe) {
+ pr_info("no implementation found on cpu %d\n", cpu);
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ } else if (brbe == ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE) {
+ pr_info("implementation found on cpu %d\n", cpu);
+ cpuc->v1p1 = false;
+ } else if (brbe == ID_AA64DFR0_BRBE_V1P1) {
+ pr_info("implementation (v1p1) found on cpu %d\n", cpu);
+ cpuc->v1p1 = true;
+ }
+
+ brbidr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBIDR0_EL1);
+ format = brbe_fetch_format(brbidr);
+ if (format != BRBIDR0_FORMAT_0) {
+ pr_warn("format 0 not implemented\n");
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cpuc->brbe_cc = brbe_fetch_cc_bits(brbidr);
+ if (cpuc->brbe_cc != BRBIDR0_CC_20_BIT) {
+ pr_warn("20-bit counter not implemented\n");
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cpuc->brbe_nr = brbe_fetch_numrec(brbidr);
+ if (!valid_brbe_nr(cpuc->brbe_nr)) {
+ pr_warn("invalid number of records\n");
+ set_brbe_disabled(cpuc);
+ return;
+ }
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr, brbcr;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ brbfcr &= ~(BRBFCR_BANK_MASK << BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT);
+ brbfcr &= ~(BRBFCR_ENL | BRBFCR_PAUSED | BRBE_FCR_MASK);
+ brbfcr |= (cpuc->brbfcr & BRBE_FCR_MASK);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+
+ brbcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ brbcr &= ~BRBE_CR_MASK;
+ brbcr |= BRBCR_FZP;
+ brbcr |= (BRBCR_TS_PHYSICAL << BRBCR_TS_SHIFT);
+ brbcr |= (cpuc->brbcr & BRBE_CR_MASK);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbcr, SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 brbcr;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ brbcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ brbcr &= ~(BRBCR_E0BRE | BRBCR_E1BRE);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbcr, SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+}
+
+static void perf_branch_to_brbfcr(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, int branch_type)
+{
+ cpuc->brbfcr = 0;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY) {
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_BRANCH_ALL;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= (BRBFCR_INDCALL | BRBFCR_DIRCALL);
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_RTN;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_INDCALL;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_CONDDIR;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_JUMP)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_INDIRECT;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbfcr |= BRBFCR_DIRCALL;
+}
+
+static void perf_branch_to_brbcr(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, int branch_type)
+{
+ cpuc->brbcr = (BRBCR_CC | BRBCR_MPRED);
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER)
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_E0BRE;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) {
+ /*
+ * This should have been verified earlier.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(!perfmon_capable());
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_E1BRE;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES)
+ cpuc->brbcr &= ~BRBCR_CC;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS)
+ cpuc->brbcr &= ~BRBCR_MPRED;
+
+ if (!perfmon_capable())
+ return;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY) {
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_EXCEPTION;
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_ERTN;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL)
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_EXCEPTION;
+
+ if (branch_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
+ cpuc->brbcr |= BRBCR_ERTN;
+}
+
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ u64 branch_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ perf_branch_to_brbfcr(cpuc, branch_type);
+ perf_branch_to_brbcr(cpuc, branch_type);
+}
+
+static int brbe_fetch_perf_type(u64 brbinf, bool *new_branch_type)
+{
+ int brbe_type = brbe_fetch_type(brbinf);
+ *new_branch_type = false;
+
+ switch (brbe_type) {
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_UNCOND_DIR:
+ return PERF_BR_UNCOND;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR:
+ return PERF_BR_IND;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DIR_LINK:
+ return PERF_BR_CALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR_LINK:
+ return PERF_BR_IND_CALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_RET_SUB:
+ return PERF_BR_RET;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_COND_DIR:
+ return PERF_BR_COND;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_CALL:
+ return PERF_BR_CALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_TRAP:
+ return PERF_BR_SYSCALL;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_RET_EXCPT:
+ return PERF_BR_ERET;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_IRQ:
+ return PERF_BR_IRQ;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_HALT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_HALT;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_SERROR:
+ return PERF_BR_SERROR;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INST_DEBUG:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_INST;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_DEBUG:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_DATA;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_ALGN_FAULT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_INST_FAULT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_INST;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_FAULT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_DATA;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_FIQ:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_FIQ;
+ case BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_EXIT:
+ *new_branch_type = true;
+ return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_EXIT;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unknown branch type captured\n");
+ return PERF_BR_UNKNOWN;
+ }
+}
+
+static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf);
+
+ switch (brbe_el) {
+ case BRBINF_EL_EL0:
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
+ case BRBINF_EL_EL1:
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
+ case BRBINF_EL_EL2:
+ if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
+ return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+}
+
+static void capture_brbe_flags(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ u64 brbinf, int idx)
+{
+ int branch_type, type = brbe_record_valid(brbinf);
+ bool new_branch_type;
+
+ if (!branch_sample_no_cycles(event))
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].cycles = brbe_fetch_cycles(brbinf);
+
+ if (branch_sample_type(event)) {
+ branch_type = brbe_fetch_perf_type(brbinf, &new_branch_type);
+ if (new_branch_type) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].type = PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].new_type = branch_type;
+ } else {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].type = branch_type;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!branch_sample_no_flags(event)) {
+ /*
+ * BRBINF_LASTFAILED does not indicate that the last transaction
+ * got failed or aborted during the current branch record itself.
+ * Rather, this indicates that all the branch records which were
+ * in transaction until the curret branch record have failed. So
+ * the entire BRBE buffer needs to be processed later on to find
+ * all branch records which might have failed.
+ */
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort = brbinf & BRBINF_LASTFAILED;
+
+ /*
+ * All these information (i.e transaction state and mispredicts)
+ * are not available for target only branch records.
+ */
+ if (type != BRBINF_VALID_TARGET) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].mispred = brbinf & BRBINF_MPRED;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].predicted = !(brbinf & BRBINF_MPRED);
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].in_tx = brbinf & BRBINF_TX;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (branch_sample_priv(event)) {
+ /*
+ * All these information (i.e branch privilege level) are not
+ * available for source only branch records.
+ */
+ if (type != BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE)
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * A branch record with BRBINF_EL1.LASTFAILED set, implies that all
+ * preceding consecutive branch records, that were in a transaction
+ * (i.e their BRBINF_EL1.TX set) have been aborted.
+ *
+ * Similarly BRBFCR_EL1.LASTFAILED set, indicate that all preceding
+ * consecutive branch records upto the last record, which were in a
+ * transaction (i.e their BRBINF_EL1.TX set) have been aborted.
+ *
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 00 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX success]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 01 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX success]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 02 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 0 | LF = 0 |
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 03 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 04 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 05 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 0 | LF = 1 |
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | .. | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 0 | LF = 0 |
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 61 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 62 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ * | 63 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | TX = 1 | LF = 0 | [TX failed]
+ * --------------------------------- -------------------
+ *
+ * BRBFCR_EL1.LASTFAILED == 1
+ *
+ * Here BRBFCR_EL1.LASTFAILED failes all those consecutive and also
+ * in transaction branches near the end of the BRBE buffer.
+ */
+static void process_branch_aborts(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ bool lastfailed = !!(brbfcr & BRBFCR_LASTFAILED);
+ int idx = cpuc->brbe_nr - 1;
+
+ do {
+ if (cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].in_tx) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort = lastfailed;
+ } else {
+ lastfailed = cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort = false;
+ }
+ } while (idx--, idx >= 0);
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ u64 brbinf;
+ int idx;
+
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ set_brbe_paused();
+ for (idx = 0; idx < cpuc->brbe_nr; idx++) {
+ select_brbe_bank_index(idx);
+ brbinf = get_brbinf_reg(idx);
+ /*
+ * There are no valid entries anymore on the buffer.
+ * Abort the branch record processing to save some
+ * cycles and also reduce the capture/process load
+ * for the user space as well.
+ */
+ if (brbe_invalid(brbinf))
+ break;
+
+ if (brbe_valid(brbinf)) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ } else if (brbe_source(brbinf)) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].from = get_brbsrc_reg(idx);
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].to = 0;
+ } else if (brbe_target(brbinf)) {
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].from = 0;
+ cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].to = get_brbtgt_reg(idx);
+ }
+ capture_brbe_flags(cpuc, event, brbinf, idx);
+ }
+ cpuc->brbe_stack.nr = idx;
+ cpuc->brbe_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL;
+ process_branch_aborts(cpuc);
+}
+
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc)
+{
+ if (brbe_disabled(cpuc))
+ return;
+
+ asm volatile(BRB_IALL);
+ isb();
+}
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f04975cdc242
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Branch Record Buffer Extension Helpers.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+ *
+ * Author: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
+ */
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "brbe: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
+
+/*
+ * BRBE Instructions
+ *
+ * BRB_IALL : Invalidate the entire buffer
+ * BRB_INJ : Inject latest branch record derived from [BRBSRCINJ, BRBTGTINJ, BRBINFINJ]
+ */
+#define BRB_IALL __emit_inst(0xD5000000 | sys_insn(1, 1, 7, 2, 4) | (0x1f))
+#define BRB_INJ __emit_inst(0xD5000000 | sys_insn(1, 1, 7, 2, 5) | (0x1f))
+
+/*
+ * BRBE Buffer Organization
+ *
+ * BRBE buffer is arranged as multiple banks of 32 branch record
+ * entries each. An indivdial branch record in a given bank could
+ * be accessedi, after selecting the bank in BRBFCR_EL1.BANK and
+ * accessing the registers i.e [BRBSRC, BRBTGT, BRBINF] set with
+ * indices [0..31].
+ *
+ * Bank 0
+ *
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 00 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 00 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 01 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 01 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | .. | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | .. |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 31 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 31 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ *
+ * Bank 1
+ *
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 32 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 00 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 33 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 01 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | .. | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | .. |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ * | 63 | BRBSRC | BRBTGT | BRBINF | | 31 |
+ * --------------------------------- ------
+ */
+#define BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MIN 0
+#define BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MAX 31
+#define BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MIN 32
+#define BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MAX 63
+
+#define RETURN_READ_BRBSRCN(n) \
+ read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBSRC##n##_EL1)
+
+#define RETURN_READ_BRBTGTN(n) \
+ read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBTGT##n##_EL1)
+
+#define RETURN_READ_BRBINFN(n) \
+ read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBINF##n##_EL1)
+
+#define BRBE_REGN_CASE(n, case_macro) \
+ case n: return case_macro(n); break
+
+#define BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(x, case_macro) \
+ do { \
+ switch (x) { \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(0, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(1, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(2, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(3, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(4, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(5, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(6, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(7, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(8, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(9, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(10, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(11, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(12, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(13, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(14, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(15, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(16, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(17, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(18, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(19, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(20, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(21, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(22, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(23, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(24, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(25, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(26, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(27, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(28, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(29, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(30, case_macro); \
+ BRBE_REGN_CASE(31, case_macro); \
+ default: \
+ pr_warn("unknown register index\n"); \
+ return -1; \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
+
+static inline int buffer_to_brbe_idx(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ return buffer_idx % 32;
+}
+
+static inline u64 get_brbsrc_reg(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ int brbe_idx = buffer_to_brbe_idx(buffer_idx);
+
+ BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(brbe_idx, RETURN_READ_BRBSRCN);
+}
+
+static inline u64 get_brbtgt_reg(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ int brbe_idx = buffer_to_brbe_idx(buffer_idx);
+
+ BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(brbe_idx, RETURN_READ_BRBTGTN);
+}
+
+static inline u64 get_brbinf_reg(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ int brbe_idx = buffer_to_brbe_idx(buffer_idx);
+
+ BRBE_REGN_SWITCH(brbe_idx, RETURN_READ_BRBINFN);
+}
+
+static inline u64 brbe_record_valid(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbinf & (BRBINF_VALID_MASK << BRBINF_VALID_SHIFT);
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_invalid(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_INVALID;
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_valid(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_ALL;
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_source(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE;
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_target(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return brbe_record_valid(brbinf) == BRBINF_VALID_TARGET;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_cycles(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ /*
+ * Captured cycle count is unknown and hence
+ * should not be passed on the user space.
+ */
+ if (brbinf & BRBINF_CCU)
+ return 0;
+
+ return (brbinf >> BRBINF_CC_SHIFT) & BRBINF_CC_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_type(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return (brbinf >> BRBINF_TYPE_SHIFT) & BRBINF_TYPE_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_el(u64 brbinf)
+{
+ return (brbinf >> BRBINF_EL_SHIFT) & BRBINF_EL_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_numrec(u64 brbidr)
+{
+ return (brbidr >> BRBIDR0_NUMREC_SHIFT) & BRBIDR0_NUMREC_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_format(u64 brbidr)
+{
+ return (brbidr >> BRBIDR0_FORMAT_SHIFT) & BRBIDR0_FORMAT_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline int brbe_fetch_cc_bits(u64 brbidr)
+{
+ return (brbidr >> BRBIDR0_CC_SHIFT) & BRBIDR0_CC_MASK;
+}
+
+static inline void select_brbe_bank(int bank)
+{
+ static int brbe_current_bank = -1;
+ u64 brbfcr;
+
+ if (brbe_current_bank == bank)
+ return;
+
+ WARN_ON(bank > 1);
+ brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ brbfcr &= ~(BRBFCR_BANK_MASK << BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT);
+ brbfcr |= ((bank & BRBFCR_BANK_MASK) << BRBFCR_BANK_SHIFT);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+ brbe_current_bank = bank;
+}
+
+static inline void select_brbe_bank_index(int buffer_idx)
+{
+ switch (buffer_idx) {
+ case BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MIN ... BRBE_BANK0_IDX_MAX:
+ select_brbe_bank(0);
+ break;
+ case BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MIN ... BRBE_BANK1_IDX_MAX:
+ select_brbe_bank(1);
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unsupported BRBE index\n");
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool valid_brbe_nr(int brbe_nr)
+{
+ switch (brbe_nr) {
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_8:
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_16:
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_32:
+ case BRBIDR0_NUMREC_64:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ pr_warn("unsupported BRBE entries\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool brbe_paused(void)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+
+ return brbfcr & BRBFCR_PAUSED;
+}
+
+static inline void set_brbe_paused(void)
+{
+ u64 brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr | BRBFCR_PAUSED, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 18e519e4e658..65bbe6e2a913 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -162,6 +162,26 @@ struct arm_pmu {
unsigned long acpi_cpuid;
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+void arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc);
+bool arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event);
+#else
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_filter(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+}
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_disable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_enable(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_probe(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline void arm64_pmu_brbe_reset(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc) { }
+static inline bool arm64_pmu_brbe_supported(struct perf_event *event) {return false; }
+#endif
+
#define to_arm_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_pmu, pmu))
u64 armpmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event);
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 12:16 ` German Gomez
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: German Gomez @ 2022-06-13 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Hi Anshuman, thanks for the update,
As I mentioned offline, I have a perf test that I've been using for the
branch records and filters. I'll let you know the result using this set.
On 13/06/2022 11:01, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> [...]
>
> +
> +static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf)
> +{
> + int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf);
> +
> + switch (brbe_el) {
> + case BRBINF_EL_EL0:
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
> + case BRBINF_EL_EL1:
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
> + case BRBINF_EL_EL2:
> + if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
> + default:
> + pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n");
> + return -1;
This looks like it should return PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN.
Thanks,
German
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void capture_brbe_flags(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
> + u64 brbinf, int idx)
> +{
>
> [...]
>
> +
> + if (branch_sample_priv(event)) {
> + /*
> + * All these information (i.e branch privilege level) are not
> + * available for source only branch records.
> + */
> + if (type != BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE)
> + cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf);
> + }
> +}
> +
>
> [...]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
@ 2022-06-13 12:16 ` German Gomez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: German Gomez @ 2022-06-13 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Hi Anshuman, thanks for the update,
As I mentioned offline, I have a perf test that I've been using for the
branch records and filters. I'll let you know the result using this set.
On 13/06/2022 11:01, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> [...]
>
> +
> +static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf)
> +{
> + int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf);
> +
> + switch (brbe_el) {
> + case BRBINF_EL_EL0:
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
> + case BRBINF_EL_EL1:
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
> + case BRBINF_EL_EL2:
> + if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
> + default:
> + pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n");
> + return -1;
This looks like it should return PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN.
Thanks,
German
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void capture_brbe_flags(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
> + u64 brbinf, int idx)
> +{
>
> [...]
>
> +
> + if (branch_sample_priv(event)) {
> + /*
> + * All these information (i.e branch privilege level) are not
> + * available for source only branch records.
> + */
> + if (type != BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE)
> + cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf);
> + }
> +}
> +
>
> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
2022-06-13 12:16 ` German Gomez
@ 2022-06-14 1:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-14 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: German Gomez, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/13/22 17:46, German Gomez wrote:
> Hi Anshuman, thanks for the update,
>
> As I mentioned offline, I have a perf test that I've been using for the
> branch records and filters. I'll let you know the result using this set.
Sure, thanks !
>
> On 13/06/2022 11:01, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> +
>> +static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf)
>> +{
>> + int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf);
>> +
>> + switch (brbe_el) {
>> + case BRBINF_EL_EL0:
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
>> + case BRBINF_EL_EL1:
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
>> + case BRBINF_EL_EL2:
>> + if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
>> + default:
>> + pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n");
>> + return -1;
>
> This looks like it should return PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN.
Right, return from this function gets into perf branch record's priv
element and '-1' is not something that can be parsed correctly in the
user space tools as the corresponding enum itself starts with 0 i.e
PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN.
cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf)
Will change the return as PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
@ 2022-06-14 1:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-14 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: German Gomez, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme,
mark.rutland, will
Cc: Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/13/22 17:46, German Gomez wrote:
> Hi Anshuman, thanks for the update,
>
> As I mentioned offline, I have a perf test that I've been using for the
> branch records and filters. I'll let you know the result using this set.
Sure, thanks !
>
> On 13/06/2022 11:01, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> +
>> +static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf)
>> +{
>> + int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf);
>> +
>> + switch (brbe_el) {
>> + case BRBINF_EL_EL0:
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
>> + case BRBINF_EL_EL1:
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
>> + case BRBINF_EL_EL2:
>> + if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
>> + return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
>> + default:
>> + pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n");
>> + return -1;
>
> This looks like it should return PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN.
Right, return from this function gets into perf branch record's priv
element and '-1' is not something that can be parsed correctly in the
user space tools as the corresponding enum itself starts with 0 i.e
PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN.
cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf)
Will change the return as PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN instead.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 8/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Now that all the required pieces are already in place, just enable the perf
branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform, by removing the gate which
blocks it in armpmu_event_init().
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 52a903d26702..efbc6db42b35 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -537,9 +537,35 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
!cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus))
return -ENOENT;
- /* does not support taken branch sampling */
- if (has_branch_stack(event))
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ /*
+ * BRBE support is absent. Select CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU
+ * in the config, before branch stack sampling events
+ * can be requested.
+ */
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU)) {
+ pr_warn_once("BRBE is disabled, select CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) {
+ if (!perfmon_capable()) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not have permission for kernel branch filter\n");
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Branch stack sampling event can not be supported in
+ * case either the required driver itself is absent or
+ * BRBE buffer, is not supported. Besides checking for
+ * the callback prevents a crash in case it's absent.
+ */
+ if (!armpmu->brbe_supported || !armpmu->brbe_supported(event)) {
+ pr_warn_once("BRBE is not supported\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+ }
if (armpmu->map_event(event) == -ENOENT)
return -ENOENT;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread* [PATCH 8/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
@ 2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland, will
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring,
Marc Zyngier, Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
Now that all the required pieces are already in place, just enable the perf
branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform, by removing the gate which
blocks it in armpmu_event_init().
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 52a903d26702..efbc6db42b35 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -537,9 +537,35 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
!cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus))
return -ENOENT;
- /* does not support taken branch sampling */
- if (has_branch_stack(event))
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+ /*
+ * BRBE support is absent. Select CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU
+ * in the config, before branch stack sampling events
+ * can be requested.
+ */
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU)) {
+ pr_warn_once("BRBE is disabled, select CONFIG_ARM_BRBE_PMU\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL) {
+ if (!perfmon_capable()) {
+ pr_warn_once("does not have permission for kernel branch filter\n");
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Branch stack sampling event can not be supported in
+ * case either the required driver itself is absent or
+ * BRBE buffer, is not supported. Besides checking for
+ * the callback prevents a crash in case it's absent.
+ */
+ if (!armpmu->brbe_supported || !armpmu->brbe_supported(event)) {
+ pr_warn_once("BRBE is not supported\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+ }
if (armpmu->map_event(event) == -ENOENT)
return -ENOENT;
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
2022-06-13 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-06-27 11:01 ` Will Deacon
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-06-27 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland,
Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:31:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This series enables perf branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform
> via a new arch feature called Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE). All
> relevant register definitions could be accessed here.
>
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2021-12/AArch64-Registers
>
> This series applies on v5.19-rc2 after the BRBE related perf ABI changes series
> (V6) that was posted earlier.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220610035101.424112-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>
> Following issues remain inconclusive
>
> - Jame's concerns regarding permission inadequacy related to perfmon_capable()
> - Jame's concerns regarding using perf_event_paranoid along with perfmon_capable()
afaict, the capability stuff remains unresolved with the SPE driver, so I'd
really like to see it fixed there first before we add more broken drivers.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118100702.GB16547@willie-the-truck
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
@ 2022-06-27 11:01 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-06-27 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland,
Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:31:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This series enables perf branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform
> via a new arch feature called Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE). All
> relevant register definitions could be accessed here.
>
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2021-12/AArch64-Registers
>
> This series applies on v5.19-rc2 after the BRBE related perf ABI changes series
> (V6) that was posted earlier.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220610035101.424112-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>
> Following issues remain inconclusive
>
> - Jame's concerns regarding permission inadequacy related to perfmon_capable()
> - Jame's concerns regarding using perf_event_paranoid along with perfmon_capable()
afaict, the capability stuff remains unresolved with the SPE driver, so I'd
really like to see it fixed there first before we add more broken drivers.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118100702.GB16547@willie-the-truck
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
2022-06-27 11:01 ` Will Deacon
@ 2022-06-28 7:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-28 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland,
Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/27/22 16:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:31:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This series enables perf branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform
>> via a new arch feature called Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE). All
>> relevant register definitions could be accessed here.
>>
>> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2021-12/AArch64-Registers
>>
>> This series applies on v5.19-rc2 after the BRBE related perf ABI changes series
>> (V6) that was posted earlier.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220610035101.424112-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>>
>> Following issues remain inconclusive
>>
>> - Jame's concerns regarding permission inadequacy related to perfmon_capable()
>> - Jame's concerns regarding using perf_event_paranoid along with perfmon_capable()
>
> afaict, the capability stuff remains unresolved with the SPE driver, so I'd
> really like to see it fixed there first before we add more broken drivers.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118100702.GB16547@willie-the-truck
Hello Will,
I did go through the above mentioned thread, but could not understand (clear
enough) - what needs to be done. Could you please help summerize the problem
and possible solutions which I can start looking into. Thank you.
- Anshuman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
@ 2022-06-28 7:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-06-28 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland,
Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On 6/27/22 16:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:31:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This series enables perf branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform
>> via a new arch feature called Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE). All
>> relevant register definitions could be accessed here.
>>
>> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2021-12/AArch64-Registers
>>
>> This series applies on v5.19-rc2 after the BRBE related perf ABI changes series
>> (V6) that was posted earlier.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220610035101.424112-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>>
>> Following issues remain inconclusive
>>
>> - Jame's concerns regarding permission inadequacy related to perfmon_capable()
>> - Jame's concerns regarding using perf_event_paranoid along with perfmon_capable()
>
> afaict, the capability stuff remains unresolved with the SPE driver, so I'd
> really like to see it fixed there first before we add more broken drivers.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118100702.GB16547@willie-the-truck
Hello Will,
I did go through the above mentioned thread, but could not understand (clear
enough) - what needs to be done. Could you please help summerize the problem
and possible solutions which I can start looking into. Thank you.
- Anshuman
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
2022-06-28 7:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-07-05 12:09 ` Will Deacon
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-07-05 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland,
Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 01:10:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 6/27/22 16:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:31:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> This series enables perf branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform
> >> via a new arch feature called Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE). All
> >> relevant register definitions could be accessed here.
> >>
> >> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2021-12/AArch64-Registers
> >>
> >> This series applies on v5.19-rc2 after the BRBE related perf ABI changes series
> >> (V6) that was posted earlier.
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220610035101.424112-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> >>
> >> Following issues remain inconclusive
> >>
> >> - Jame's concerns regarding permission inadequacy related to perfmon_capable()
> >> - Jame's concerns regarding using perf_event_paranoid along with perfmon_capable()
> >
> > afaict, the capability stuff remains unresolved with the SPE driver, so I'd
> > really like to see it fixed there first before we add more broken drivers.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118100702.GB16547@willie-the-truck
>
> Hello Will,
>
> I did go through the above mentioned thread, but could not understand (clear
> enough) - what needs to be done. Could you please help summerize the problem
> and possible solutions which I can start looking into. Thank you.
I don't recall any details beyond what was discussed in the thread. Your
best bet is probably to talk to James (Clark) and German, as they reported
the issue initially and you all work for the same company...
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling
@ 2022-07-05 12:09 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 35+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-07-05 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, peterz, acme, mark.rutland,
Catalin Marinas, James Clark, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier,
Ingo Molnar, linux-perf-users
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 01:10:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 6/27/22 16:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:31:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> This series enables perf branch stack sampling support on arm64 platform
> >> via a new arch feature called Branch Record Buffer Extension (BRBE). All
> >> relevant register definitions could be accessed here.
> >>
> >> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2021-12/AArch64-Registers
> >>
> >> This series applies on v5.19-rc2 after the BRBE related perf ABI changes series
> >> (V6) that was posted earlier.
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220610035101.424112-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> >>
> >> Following issues remain inconclusive
> >>
> >> - Jame's concerns regarding permission inadequacy related to perfmon_capable()
> >> - Jame's concerns regarding using perf_event_paranoid along with perfmon_capable()
> >
> > afaict, the capability stuff remains unresolved with the SPE driver, so I'd
> > really like to see it fixed there first before we add more broken drivers.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118100702.GB16547@willie-the-truck
>
> Hello Will,
>
> I did go through the above mentioned thread, but could not understand (clear
> enough) - what needs to be done. Could you please help summerize the problem
> and possible solutions which I can start looking into. Thank you.
I don't recall any details beyond what was discussed in the thread. Your
best bet is probably to talk to James (Clark) and German, as they reported
the issue initially and you all work for the same company...
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 35+ messages in thread