All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, seanjc@google.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] x86/tdx: Handle load_unaligned_zeropad() page-cross to a shared page
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 20:10:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615171042.oeumb3vs3ttu4rvd@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <051fd468-11e6-308b-66c8-4de16ff80deb@intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 08:27:52AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/14/22 05:01, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page boundaries.
> > The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they might be made to
> > totally unrelated or even unmapped memory. load_unaligned_zeropad()
> > relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now #VE) to recover from these
> > unwanted loads.
> > 
> > In TDX guests, the second page can be shared page and VMM may configure
> > it to trigger #VE.
> > 
> > Kernel assumes that #VE on a shared page is MMIO access and tries to
> > decode instruction to handle it. In case of load_unaligned_zeropad() it
> > may result in confusion as it is not MMIO access.
> > 
> > Fix it by detecting split page MMIO accesses and fail them.
> > load_unaligned_zeropad() will recover using exception fixups.
> > 
> > The issue was discovered by analysis. It was not triggered during the
> > testing.
> 
> I thought this whole exercise was kicked off by hitting this in testing.
>  Am I remembering this wrong?
> 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220517153444.11195-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com/
> 
> Says:
> 
> > This is an actual, real-world problem which was discovered during TDX
> > testing.
> 
> Or were you considering this a different problem somehow?

They are different.

The patch by the link addresses issue of load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping
onto unaccepted memory. This was triggered in practice.

This patch address stepping onto MMIO shared memory. I had to force the
situation manually as MMIO memory mapped with ioremap() and it is not next
to normally allocated memory used by load_unaligned_zeropad() (such as
dentry cache).

Although any shared memory (SWIOTLB buffer for instance) can generate EPT
violation #VE if the VMM is malicious enough.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14 12:01 [PATCHv4 0/3] An updated version of the load_unaligned_zeropad() fix Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:01 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] x86/tdx: Fix early #VE handling Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-17 21:53   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:01 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] x86/tdx: Clarify RIP adjustments in #VE handler Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-17 21:53   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:01 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] x86/tdx: Handle load_unaligned_zeropad() page-cross to a shared page Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 15:27   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 17:10     ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2022-06-15 21:55       ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 22:43         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 22:49           ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 23:16             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 18:12   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 22:32     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 22:36       ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-15 23:16         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 22:52   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 23:34     ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-16  1:19       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-16  6:35       ` David Laight
2022-06-17 21:53   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-17 22:41   ` tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220615171042.oeumb3vs3ttu4rvd@black.fi.intel.com \
    --to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.