[PATCH 1/2] modules: Ensure natural alignment for .altinstructions and __bug_table sections

[PATCH 1/2] modules: Ensure natural alignment for .altinstructions and __bug_table sections

[Helge Deller]

In the kernel image vmlinux.lds.S linker scripts the .altinstructions
and __bug_table sections are 32- or 64-bit aligned because they hold 32-
and/or 64-bit values.

But for modules the module.lds.S linker script doesn't define a default
alignment yet, so the linker chooses the default byte-alignment, which
then leads to unnecessary unaligned memory accesses at runtime.

This patch adds the missing alignments.

Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
---
 scripts/module.lds.S | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/module.lds.S b/scripts/module.lds.S
index 1d0e1e4dc3d2..3a3aa2354ed8 100644
--- a/scripts/module.lds.S
+++ b/scripts/module.lds.S
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ SECTIONS {
 	.ctors			0 : ALIGN(8) { *(SORT(.ctors.*)) *(.ctors) }
 	.init_array		0 : ALIGN(8) { *(SORT(.init_array.*)) *(.init_array) }

+	.altinstructions	0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(.altinstructions)) }
+	__bug_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__bug_table)) }
 	__jump_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__jump_table)) }

 	__patchable_function_entries : { *(__patchable_function_entries) }
--
2.35.3

[PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Update file list for module maintainers

[Helge Deller]

The scripts/module.lds.S and scripts/modules-check.sh files
should be maintained by the "MODULE SUPPORT" maintainers.

Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index fe5daf141501..6073fc7c0fa4 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -13471,6 +13471,7 @@ S:	Maintained
 T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git modules-next
 F:	include/linux/module.h
 F:	kernel/module/
+F:	scripts/module*

 MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEM PMIC DRIVER
 M:	Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@gmail.com>
--
2.35.3

Re: [PATCH 1/2] modules: Ensure natural alignment for .altinstructions and __bug_table sections

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:05:50PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> In the kernel image vmlinux.lds.S linker scripts the .altinstructions
> and __bug_table sections are 32- or 64-bit aligned because they hold 32-
> and/or 64-bit values.
> 
> But for modules the module.lds.S linker script doesn't define a default
> alignment yet, so the linker chooses the default byte-alignment, which
> then leads to unnecessary unaligned memory accesses at runtime.
> 
> This patch adds the missing alignments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>

Good catch but does this fix a real world issue? When are
altinstructions used for modules? When are alternatives used
for modules?

How did you notice this issue?

This information should go into the commit log.

  Luis
> ---
>  scripts/module.lds.S | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/module.lds.S b/scripts/module.lds.S
> index 1d0e1e4dc3d2..3a3aa2354ed8 100644
> --- a/scripts/module.lds.S
> +++ b/scripts/module.lds.S
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ SECTIONS {
>  	.ctors			0 : ALIGN(8) { *(SORT(.ctors.*)) *(.ctors) }
>  	.init_array		0 : ALIGN(8) { *(SORT(.init_array.*)) *(.init_array) }
> 
> +	.altinstructions	0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(.altinstructions)) }
> +	__bug_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__bug_table)) }
>  	__jump_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__jump_table)) }
> 
>  	__patchable_function_entries : { *(__patchable_function_entries) }
> --
> 2.35.3
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] modules: Ensure natural alignment for .altinstructions and __bug_table sections

[Helge Deller]

On 7/1/22 20:02, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:05:50PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>> In the kernel image vmlinux.lds.S linker scripts the .altinstructions
>> and __bug_table sections are 32- or 64-bit aligned because they hold 32-
>> and/or 64-bit values.
>>
>> But for modules the module.lds.S linker script doesn't define a default
>> alignment yet, so the linker chooses the default byte-alignment, which
>> then leads to unnecessary unaligned memory accesses at runtime.
>>
>> This patch adds the missing alignments.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>
> Good catch but does this fix a real world issue? When are
> altinstructions used for modules? When are alternatives used
> for modules?
>
> How did you notice this issue?

You are right - usually this is unnoticed, because either the
hardware (on x86 cpus) or by exception handlers (e.g. on hppa
or sparc) fix up such unaligned accesses at runtime.

I noticed that, because on hppa the 32-bit unalignment handler
was broken due a bad commit, and as such wrong values were
returned on unaligned accesses, which then led to other bugs.
For hppa I fixed it with this commit:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-parisc/patch/20220626233911.1023515-1-deller@gmx.de/

This happened when loading the mptbase kernel module:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/07d91863-dacc-a503-aa2b-05c3b92a1e39@bell.net/T/#mab602dfa32be5e229d5e192ab012af196d04d75d
The summary why it went wrong is at the end of that thread.

On hppa we replace "sync" and some other instructions in kernel
and modules - depending on the CPU type (detected at runtime), or
on the environment (e.g. when running in qemu).

IMHO this really should be fixed, esp. since the fix is trivial.

> This information should go into the commit log.

Sure, I'll resend with updated info.

Thanks!
Helge


>>  scripts/module.lds.S | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/module.lds.S b/scripts/module.lds.S
>> index 1d0e1e4dc3d2..3a3aa2354ed8 100644
>> --- a/scripts/module.lds.S
>> +++ b/scripts/module.lds.S
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ SECTIONS {
>>  	.ctors			0 : ALIGN(8) { *(SORT(.ctors.*)) *(.ctors) }
>>  	.init_array		0 : ALIGN(8) { *(SORT(.init_array.*)) *(.init_array) }
>>
>> +	.altinstructions	0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(.altinstructions)) }
>> +	__bug_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__bug_table)) }
>>  	__jump_table		0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__jump_table)) }
>>
>>  	__patchable_function_entries : { *(__patchable_function_entries) }
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>>

Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Update file list for module maintainers

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:05:51PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> The scripts/module.lds.S and scripts/modules-check.sh files
> should be maintained by the "MODULE SUPPORT" maintainers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>

Thanks! Queued onto modules-next.

  Luis