[PATCH V6 0/2] remoteproc: support self recovery

[PATCH V6 0/2] remoteproc: support self recovery

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

V6:
 Rename rproc_firmware_recovery to rproc_boot_recovery
 Drop the unlock/lock when do reproc_attach_recovery

V5:
 Rename RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_RECOVERY to RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY
 Add kerneldoc for rproc features
 Change rproc_set_feature to return int type and add a max feature check
 Use __rproc_detach and __rproc_attach when do attach recovery
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20220615032048.465486-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/

V4:
  Based on Bjorn's comments on V2-2
  Move the rproc_has_feature/rproc_set_feature to remoteproc_internal.h and
 Keep rproc_features still in remoteproc.h, because we use
 RPROC_MAX_FEATURES to declare bitmap.
  Update commit log for patch 2/2, and add comments

  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20220323034405.976643-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
 
V3:
 Resend the wrong labeled patchset
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=621311

 Write a cover-letter
 To i.MX8QM/QXP, they have a M4 core self-recovery capability without
 Linux loading firmware. The self recovery is done by
 SCU(System Control Unit). Current remoteproc framework only support Linux
 help recovery remote processor(stop, loading firmware, start). This
 patchset is support remote processor self recovery(attach recovery).

 In order to avoid introducing a new variable(bool support_self_recovery),
 patch 1 introduce a new function, rproc_has_feature to make code easy to
 extend, cleaner, such as we could move "bool has_iommu" to
 rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_IOMMU).

 Patch 2 is introduce a new function rproc_attach_recovery for
 self recovery, the original logic move to rproc_firmware_recovery meaning
 needs linux to help recovery.

 V2-version 2:
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=621311
 Introduce rproc_has_feature

 V2-version 1:
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20220126085120.3397450-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
 Nothing change in V2.
 Only move this patch out from
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=604364


Peng Fan (2):
  remoteproc: introduce rproc features
  remoteproc: support attach recovery after rproc crash

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 62 ++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 15 ++++++
 include/linux/remoteproc.h               | 15 ++++++
 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V6 1/2] remoteproc: introduce rproc features

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

remote processor may support:
 - firmware recovery with help from main processor
 - self recovery without help from main processor
 - iommu
 - etc

Introduce rproc features could simplify code to avoid adding more bool
flags

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
 include/linux/remoteproc.h               | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
index 72d4d3d7d94d..82247cb5d0c2 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
@@ -24,6 +24,21 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry trace_mem;
 };
 
+static inline bool rproc_has_feature(struct rproc *rproc, unsigned int feature)
+{
+	return test_bit(feature, rproc->features);
+}
+
+static inline int rproc_set_feature(struct rproc *rproc, unsigned int feature)
+{
+	if (feature >= RPROC_MAX_FEATURES)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	set_bit(feature, rproc->features);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* from remoteproc_core.c */
 void rproc_release(struct kref *kref);
 irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index aea79c77db0f..bbfb3affff32 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -489,6 +489,19 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
 	loff_t offset;
 };
 
+/**
+ * enum rproc_features - features supported
+ *
+ * @RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY: remote processor no need help from Linux
+ *                                 to recover, such as firmware loading.
+ *                                 Linux just need to attach after recovery.
+ */
+
+enum rproc_features {
+	RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY,
+	RPROC_MAX_FEATURES,
+};
+
 /**
  * struct rproc - represents a physical remote processor device
  * @node: list node of this rproc object
@@ -530,6 +543,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @elf_machine: firmware ELF machine
  * @cdev: character device of the rproc
  * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release
+ * @features: indicate remoteproc features
  */
 struct rproc {
 	struct list_head node;
@@ -570,6 +584,7 @@ struct rproc {
 	u16 elf_machine;
 	struct cdev cdev;
 	bool cdev_put_on_release;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(features, RPROC_MAX_FEATURES);
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V6 2/2] remoteproc: support attach recovery after rproc crash

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Current logic only support main processor to stop/start the remote
processor after rproc crash. However to SoC, such as i.MX8QM/QXP, the
remote processor could do attach recovery after crash and trigger watchdog
reboot. It does not need main processor to load image, or stop/start M4
core.

Introduce two functions: rproc_attach_recovery, rproc_firmware_recovery
for the two cases. Firmware recovery is as before, let main processor to
help recovery, while attach recovery is recover itself withou help.
To attach recovery, we only do detach and attach.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index ed374c8bf14a..ef5b9310bc83 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1884,6 +1884,45 @@ static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rproc_attach_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return __rproc_attach(rproc);
+}
+
+static int rproc_boot_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	const struct firmware *firmware_p;
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, true);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* generate coredump */
+	rproc->ops->coredump(rproc);
+
+	/* load firmware */
+	ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* boot the remote processor up again */
+	ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p);
+
+	release_firmware(firmware_p);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc
  * @rproc: the remote processor
@@ -1898,7 +1937,6 @@ static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
  */
 int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
-	const struct firmware *firmware_p;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1912,24 +1950,10 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	dev_err(dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name);
 
-	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, true);
-	if (ret)
-		goto unlock_mutex;
-
-	/* generate coredump */
-	rproc->ops->coredump(rproc);
-
-	/* load firmware */
-	ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret);
-		goto unlock_mutex;
-	}
-
-	/* boot the remote processor up again */
-	ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p);
-
-	release_firmware(firmware_p);
+	if (rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY))
+		ret = rproc_attach_recovery(rproc);
+	else
+		ret = rproc_boot_recovery(rproc);
 
 unlock_mutex:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] remoteproc: introduce rproc features

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

Hello,

On 7/1/22 11:37, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> remote processor may support:
>  - firmware recovery with help from main processor
>  - self recovery without help from main processor
>  - iommu
>  - etc
> 
> Introduce rproc features could simplify code to avoid adding more bool
> flags
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 72d4d3d7d94d..82247cb5d0c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,21 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace {
>  	struct rproc_mem_entry trace_mem;
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool rproc_has_feature(struct rproc *rproc, unsigned int feature)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(feature, rproc->features);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rproc_set_feature(struct rproc *rproc, unsigned int feature)
> +{
> +	if (feature >= RPROC_MAX_FEATURES)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	set_bit(feature, rproc->features);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /* from remoteproc_core.c */
>  void rproc_release(struct kref *kref);
>  irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index aea79c77db0f..bbfb3affff32 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -489,6 +489,19 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
>  	loff_t offset;
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * enum rproc_features - features supported
> + *
> + * @RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY: remote processor no need help from Linux
> + *                                 to recover, such as firmware loading.
typo: 
s/remote processor no need/ The remote processor does not need/

> + *                                 Linux just need to attach after recovery.
typo 
s/need/needs/

Regards,
Arnaud

> + */
> +
> +enum rproc_features {
> +	RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY,
> +	RPROC_MAX_FEATURES,
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * struct rproc - represents a physical remote processor device
>   * @node: list node of this rproc object
> @@ -530,6 +543,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
>   * @elf_machine: firmware ELF machine
>   * @cdev: character device of the rproc
>   * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release
> + * @features: indicate remoteproc features
>   */
>  struct rproc {
>  	struct list_head node;
> @@ -570,6 +584,7 @@ struct rproc {
>  	u16 elf_machine;
>  	struct cdev cdev;
>  	bool cdev_put_on_release;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(features, RPROC_MAX_FEATURES);
>  };
>  
>  /**

Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] remoteproc: support attach recovery after rproc crash

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

On 7/1/22 11:37, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Current logic only support main processor to stop/start the remote
> processor after rproc crash. However to SoC, such as i.MX8QM/QXP, the
> remote processor could do attach recovery after crash and trigger watchdog
> reboot. It does not need main processor to load image, or stop/start M4
> core.

I would suppress "M4 core" to be generic.

> 
> Introduce two functions: rproc_attach_recovery, rproc_firmware_recovery

rproc_boot_recovery

> for the two cases. Firmware recovery is as before, let main processor to

s/Firmware/Boot/ 

> help recovery, while attach recovery is recover itself withou help.

without

> To attach recovery, we only do detach and attach.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index ed374c8bf14a..ef5b9310bc83 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1884,6 +1884,45 @@ static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int rproc_attach_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return __rproc_attach(rproc);
> +}
> +
> +static int rproc_boot_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	const struct firmware *firmware_p;
> +	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, true);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* generate coredump */
> +	rproc->ops->coredump(rproc);
> +
> +	/* load firmware */
> +	ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* boot the remote processor up again */
> +	ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p);
> +
> +	release_firmware(firmware_p);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc
>   * @rproc: the remote processor
> @@ -1898,7 +1937,6 @@ static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>   */
>  int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
> -	const struct firmware *firmware_p;
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -1912,24 +1950,10 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	dev_err(dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name);
>  
> -	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, true);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto unlock_mutex;
> -
> -	/* generate coredump */
> -	rproc->ops->coredump(rproc);
> -
> -	/* load firmware */
> -	ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto unlock_mutex;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* boot the remote processor up again */
> -	ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p);
> -
> -	release_firmware(firmware_p);
> +	if (rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY))
> +		ret = rproc_attach_recovery(rproc);
> +	else
> +		ret = rproc_boot_recovery(rproc);

I tested the series on stm32mp1 with success.

With typo fixes:
Acked-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>

Thanks,
Arnaud

>  
>  unlock_mutex:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);

Re: [PATCH V6 0/2] remoteproc: support self recovery

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 03:35, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> V6:
>  Rename rproc_firmware_recovery to rproc_boot_recovery
>  Drop the unlock/lock when do reproc_attach_recovery

Dropped.

>
> V5:
>  Rename RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_RECOVERY to RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY
>  Add kerneldoc for rproc features
>  Change rproc_set_feature to return int type and add a max feature check
>  Use __rproc_detach and __rproc_attach when do attach recovery
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20220615032048.465486-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
>
> V4:
>   Based on Bjorn's comments on V2-2
>   Move the rproc_has_feature/rproc_set_feature to remoteproc_internal.h and
>  Keep rproc_features still in remoteproc.h, because we use
>  RPROC_MAX_FEATURES to declare bitmap.
>   Update commit log for patch 2/2, and add comments
>
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20220323034405.976643-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
>
> V3:
>  Resend the wrong labeled patchset
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=621311
>
>  Write a cover-letter
>  To i.MX8QM/QXP, they have a M4 core self-recovery capability without
>  Linux loading firmware. The self recovery is done by
>  SCU(System Control Unit). Current remoteproc framework only support Linux
>  help recovery remote processor(stop, loading firmware, start). This
>  patchset is support remote processor self recovery(attach recovery).
>
>  In order to avoid introducing a new variable(bool support_self_recovery),
>  patch 1 introduce a new function, rproc_has_feature to make code easy to
>  extend, cleaner, such as we could move "bool has_iommu" to
>  rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_IOMMU).
>
>  Patch 2 is introduce a new function rproc_attach_recovery for
>  self recovery, the original logic move to rproc_firmware_recovery meaning
>  needs linux to help recovery.
>
>  V2-version 2:
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=621311
>  Introduce rproc_has_feature
>
>  V2-version 1:
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20220126085120.3397450-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
>  Nothing change in V2.
>  Only move this patch out from
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=604364
>
>
> Peng Fan (2):
>   remoteproc: introduce rproc features
>   remoteproc: support attach recovery after rproc crash
>
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 62 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 15 ++++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               | 15 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>