[V3] tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: Fix get_clk_div_rate() which otherwise could return a sub-optimal clock rate.

* [V3] tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: Fix get_clk_div_rate() which otherwise could return a sub-optimal clock rate.
@ 2022-07-07 19:17 Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi
  2022-07-08  4:48 ` kernel test robot
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi @ 2022-07-07 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: agross, bjorn.andersson, konrad.dybcio, gregkh, jirislaby,
	linux-arm-msm, linux-serial, linux-kernel
  Cc: quic_msavaliy, dianders, mka, swboyd, Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi

In the logic around call to clk_round_rate(), for some corner conditions,
get_clk_div_rate() could return an sub-optimal clock rate. Also, if an
exact clock rate was not found lowest clock was being returned.

Search for suitable clock rate in 2 steps
a) exact match or within 2% tolerance
b) within 5% tolerance
This also takes care of corner conditions.

Fixes: c2194bc999d4 ("tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: Remove uart frequency table. Instead, find suitable frequency with call to clk_round_rate")
Signed-off-by: Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi <quic_vnivarth@quicinc.com>
---
v3: simplified algorithm further, fixed robot compile warnings
v2: removed minor optimisations to make more readable
v1: intial patch contained slightly complicated logic
---
 drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
index 2e23b65..ac2df1c 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
@@ -943,52 +943,71 @@ static int qcom_geni_serial_startup(struct uart_port *uport)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static unsigned long get_clk_div_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned int baud,
-			unsigned int sampling_rate, unsigned int *clk_div)
+static unsigned long find_clk_rate_in_tol(struct clk *clk, unsigned int desired_clk,
+			unsigned int *clk_div, unsigned int percent_tol)
 {
-	unsigned long ser_clk;
-	unsigned long desired_clk;
-	unsigned long freq, prev;
+	unsigned long freq;
 	unsigned long div, maxdiv;
-	int64_t mult;
-
-	desired_clk = baud * sampling_rate;
-	if (!desired_clk) {
-		pr_err("%s: Invalid frequency\n", __func__);
-		return 0;
-	}
+	u64 mult;
+	unsigned long offset, abs_tol, achieved;
 
+	abs_tol = div_u64((u64)desired_clk * percent_tol, 100);
 	maxdiv = CLK_DIV_MSK >> CLK_DIV_SHFT;
-	prev = 0;
-
-	for (div = 1; div <= maxdiv; div++) {
-		mult = div * desired_clk;
-		if (mult > ULONG_MAX)
+	div = 1;
+	while (div <= maxdiv) {
+		mult = (u64)div * desired_clk;
+		if (mult != (unsigned long)mult)
 			break;
 
-		freq = clk_round_rate(clk, (unsigned long)mult);
-		if (!(freq % desired_clk)) {
-			ser_clk = freq;
-			break;
-		}
+		offset = div * abs_tol;
+		freq = clk_round_rate(clk, mult - offset);
 
-		if (!prev)
-			ser_clk = freq;
-		else if (prev == freq)
+		/* Can only get lower if we're done */
+		if (freq < mult - offset)
 			break;
 
-		prev = freq;
+		/*
+		 * Re-calculate div in case rounding skipped rates but we
+		 * ended up at a good one, then check for a match.
+		 */
+		div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(freq, desired_clk);
+		achieved = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(freq, div);
+		if (achieved <= desired_clk + abs_tol &&
+			achieved >= desired_clk - abs_tol) {
+			*clk_div = div;
+			return freq;
+		}
+
+		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(freq, desired_clk);
 	}
 
-	if (!ser_clk) {
-		pr_err("%s: Can't find matching DFS entry for baud %d\n",
-								__func__, baud);
-		return ser_clk;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned long get_clk_div_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned int baud,
+			unsigned int sampling_rate, unsigned int *clk_div)
+{
+	unsigned long ser_clk;
+	unsigned long desired_clk;
+
+	desired_clk = baud * sampling_rate;
+	if (!desired_clk) {
+		pr_err("%s: Invalid frequency\n", __func__);
+		return 0;
 	}
 
-	*clk_div = ser_clk / desired_clk;
-	if (!(*clk_div))
-		*clk_div = 1;
+	/*
+	 * try to find a clock rate within 2% tolerance, then within
+	 */
+	ser_clk = find_clk_rate_in_tol(clk, desired_clk, clk_div, 2);
+	if (!ser_clk)
+		ser_clk = find_clk_rate_in_tol(clk, desired_clk, clk_div, 5);
+
+	if (!ser_clk)
+		pr_err("Couldn't find suitable clock rate for %lu\n", desired_clk);
+	else
+		pr_debug("desired_clk-%lu, ser_clk-%lu, clk_div-%lu\n",
+			desired_clk, ser_clk, *clk_div);
 
 	return ser_clk;
 }
@@ -1021,8 +1040,7 @@ static void qcom_geni_serial_set_termios(struct uart_port *uport,
 	if (ver >= QUP_SE_VERSION_2_5)
 		sampling_rate /= 2;
 
-	clk_rate = get_clk_div_rate(port->se.clk, baud,
-		sampling_rate, &clk_div);
+	clk_rate = get_clk_div_rate(port->se.clk, baud, sampling_rate, &clk_div);
 	if (!clk_rate)
 		goto out_restart_rx;
 
-- 
Qualcomm INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation.


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread