All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Add fixes for ocelot driver
@ 2022-07-12 19:50 Horatiu Vultur
  2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x Horatiu Vultur
  2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg Horatiu Vultur
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Horatiu Vultur @ 2022-07-12 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: linus.walleij, alexandre.belloni, kavyasree.kotagiri,
	colin.foster, UNGLinuxDriver, maxime.chevallier, michael,
	andy.shevchenko, Horatiu Vultur

The patch series fixes 2 issues with pincfg.
- first issue is that on lan966x uses different offsets than sparx5
  so it can't use directly the ocelot_confops
- second issue is pincfg stop working when regmap support was added.

v3->v4:
- add missing check for NULL pointer when doing devm_kmemdup
- remove devm_kmemdup for pincfg_data as it can be const
- remove has_schmitt field, because we can use schmitt_bit for checking
  if it has support for PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE
- change the declaration of ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg

v2->v3:
- reorder ocelot_pincfg_data fields, mandatory fields go first
- move the field pincfg_data inside ocelot_pinctrl
- add back max_register for regmap_config for pincfg.
- make struct ocelot_match_data const and drop the cast.

v1->v2:
- use regmap_get_reg_stride instead of making regmap_config global
- update how ocelot_match_data structs are initialized

Horatiu Vultur (2):
  pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x
  pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg

 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x
  2022-07-12 19:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Add fixes for ocelot driver Horatiu Vultur
@ 2022-07-12 19:50 ` Horatiu Vultur
  2022-07-13  9:53   ` Andy Shevchenko
  2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg Horatiu Vultur
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Horatiu Vultur @ 2022-07-12 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: linus.walleij, alexandre.belloni, kavyasree.kotagiri,
	colin.foster, UNGLinuxDriver, maxime.chevallier, michael,
	andy.shevchenko, Horatiu Vultur

The blamed commit introduce support for lan966x which use the same
pinconf_ops as sparx5. The problem is that pinconf_ops is specific to
sparx5. More precisely the offset of the bits in the pincfg register are
different and also lan966x doesn't have support for
PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE.

Fix this by making pinconf_ops more generic such that it can be also
used by lan966x. This is done by introducing 'ocelot_pincfg_data' which
contains the offset and what is supported for each SOC.

Fixes: 531d6ab36571 ("pinctrl: ocelot: Extend support for lan966x")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
index 5f4a8c5c6650..873bba245522 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
@@ -29,19 +29,12 @@
 #define ocelot_clrsetbits(addr, clear, set) \
 	writel((readl(addr) & ~(clear)) | (set), (addr))
 
-/* PINCONFIG bits (sparx5 only) */
 enum {
 	PINCONF_BIAS,
 	PINCONF_SCHMITT,
 	PINCONF_DRIVE_STRENGTH,
 };
 
-#define BIAS_PD_BIT BIT(4)
-#define BIAS_PU_BIT BIT(3)
-#define BIAS_BITS   (BIAS_PD_BIT|BIAS_PU_BIT)
-#define SCHMITT_BIT BIT(2)
-#define DRIVE_BITS  GENMASK(1, 0)
-
 /* GPIO standard registers */
 #define OCELOT_GPIO_OUT_SET	0x0
 #define OCELOT_GPIO_OUT_CLR	0x4
@@ -321,6 +314,13 @@ struct ocelot_pin_caps {
 	unsigned char a_functions[OCELOT_FUNC_PER_PIN];	/* Additional functions */
 };
 
+struct ocelot_pincfg_data {
+	u8 pd_bit;
+	u8 pu_bit;
+	u8 drive_bits;
+	u8 schmitt_bit;
+};
+
 struct ocelot_pinctrl {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl;
@@ -328,10 +328,16 @@ struct ocelot_pinctrl {
 	struct regmap *map;
 	struct regmap *pincfg;
 	struct pinctrl_desc *desc;
+	const struct ocelot_pincfg_data *pincfg_data;
 	struct ocelot_pmx_func func[FUNC_MAX];
 	u8 stride;
 };
 
+struct ocelot_match_data {
+	struct pinctrl_desc desc;
+	struct ocelot_pincfg_data pincfg_data;
+};
+
 #define LUTON_P(p, f0, f1)						\
 static struct ocelot_pin_caps luton_pin_##p = {				\
 	.pin = p,							\
@@ -1325,6 +1331,7 @@ static int ocelot_hw_get_value(struct ocelot_pinctrl *info,
 	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	if (info->pincfg) {
+		const struct ocelot_pincfg_data *opd = info->pincfg_data;
 		u32 regcfg;
 
 		ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg, pin, &regcfg);
@@ -1334,15 +1341,15 @@ static int ocelot_hw_get_value(struct ocelot_pinctrl *info,
 		ret = 0;
 		switch (reg) {
 		case PINCONF_BIAS:
-			*val = regcfg & BIAS_BITS;
+			*val = regcfg & (opd->pd_bit | opd->pu_bit);
 			break;
 
 		case PINCONF_SCHMITT:
-			*val = regcfg & SCHMITT_BIT;
+			*val = regcfg & opd->schmitt_bit;
 			break;
 
 		case PINCONF_DRIVE_STRENGTH:
-			*val = regcfg & DRIVE_BITS;
+			*val = regcfg & opd->drive_bits;
 			break;
 
 		default:
@@ -1379,23 +1386,27 @@ static int ocelot_hw_set_value(struct ocelot_pinctrl *info,
 	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	if (info->pincfg) {
+		const struct ocelot_pincfg_data *opd = info->pincfg_data;
 
 		ret = 0;
 		switch (reg) {
 		case PINCONF_BIAS:
-			ret = ocelot_pincfg_clrsetbits(info, pin, BIAS_BITS,
+			ret = ocelot_pincfg_clrsetbits(info, pin,
+						       opd->pd_bit | opd->pu_bit,
 						       val);
 			break;
 
 		case PINCONF_SCHMITT:
-			ret = ocelot_pincfg_clrsetbits(info, pin, SCHMITT_BIT,
+			ret = ocelot_pincfg_clrsetbits(info, pin,
+						       opd->schmitt_bit,
 						       val);
 			break;
 
 		case PINCONF_DRIVE_STRENGTH:
 			if (val <= 3)
 				ret = ocelot_pincfg_clrsetbits(info, pin,
-							       DRIVE_BITS, val);
+							       opd->drive_bits,
+							       val);
 			else
 				ret = -EINVAL;
 			break;
@@ -1425,17 +1436,20 @@ static int ocelot_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 		if (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE)
 			val = (val == 0);
 		else if (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN)
-			val = (val & BIAS_PD_BIT ? true : false);
+			val = !!(val & info->pincfg_data->pd_bit);
 		else    /* PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP */
-			val = (val & BIAS_PU_BIT ? true : false);
+			val = !!(val & info->pincfg_data->pu_bit);
 		break;
 
 	case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE:
+		if (!info->pincfg_data->schmitt_bit)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 		err = ocelot_hw_get_value(info, pin, PINCONF_SCHMITT, &val);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
-		val = (val & SCHMITT_BIT ? true : false);
+		val = !!(val & info->pincfg_data->schmitt_bit);
 		break;
 
 	case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH:
@@ -1491,8 +1505,8 @@ static int ocelot_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
 		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
 		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
 			arg = (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE) ? 0 :
-			(param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP) ? BIAS_PU_BIT :
-			BIAS_PD_BIT;
+			(param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP) ? info->pincfg_data->pu_bit :
+			info->pincfg_data->pd_bit;
 
 			err = ocelot_hw_set_value(info, pin, PINCONF_BIAS, arg);
 			if (err)
@@ -1501,7 +1515,10 @@ static int ocelot_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
 			break;
 
 		case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE:
-			arg = arg ? SCHMITT_BIT : 0;
+			if (!info->pincfg_data->schmitt_bit)
+				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+			arg = arg ? info->pincfg_data->schmitt_bit : 0;
 			err = ocelot_hw_set_value(info, pin, PINCONF_SCHMITT,
 						  arg);
 			if (err)
@@ -1562,69 +1579,94 @@ static const struct pinctrl_ops ocelot_pctl_ops = {
 	.dt_free_map = pinconf_generic_dt_free_map,
 };
 
-static struct pinctrl_desc luton_desc = {
-	.name = "luton-pinctrl",
-	.pins = luton_pins,
-	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(luton_pins),
-	.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
-	.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
-	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct ocelot_match_data luton_desc = {
+	.desc = {
+		.name = "luton-pinctrl",
+		.pins = luton_pins,
+		.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(luton_pins),
+		.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
+		.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
 };
 
-static struct pinctrl_desc serval_desc = {
-	.name = "serval-pinctrl",
-	.pins = serval_pins,
-	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(serval_pins),
-	.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
-	.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
-	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct ocelot_match_data serval_desc = {
+	.desc = {
+		.name = "serval-pinctrl",
+		.pins = serval_pins,
+		.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(serval_pins),
+		.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
+		.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
 };
 
-static struct pinctrl_desc ocelot_desc = {
-	.name = "ocelot-pinctrl",
-	.pins = ocelot_pins,
-	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(ocelot_pins),
-	.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
-	.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
-	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct ocelot_match_data ocelot_desc = {
+	.desc = {
+		.name = "ocelot-pinctrl",
+		.pins = ocelot_pins,
+		.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(ocelot_pins),
+		.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
+		.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
 };
 
-static struct pinctrl_desc jaguar2_desc = {
-	.name = "jaguar2-pinctrl",
-	.pins = jaguar2_pins,
-	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(jaguar2_pins),
-	.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
-	.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
-	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct ocelot_match_data jaguar2_desc = {
+	.desc = {
+		.name = "jaguar2-pinctrl",
+		.pins = jaguar2_pins,
+		.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(jaguar2_pins),
+		.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
+		.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
 };
 
-static struct pinctrl_desc servalt_desc = {
-	.name = "servalt-pinctrl",
-	.pins = servalt_pins,
-	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(servalt_pins),
-	.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
-	.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
-	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct ocelot_match_data servalt_desc = {
+	.desc = {
+		.name = "servalt-pinctrl",
+		.pins = servalt_pins,
+		.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(servalt_pins),
+		.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
+		.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
 };
 
-static struct pinctrl_desc sparx5_desc = {
-	.name = "sparx5-pinctrl",
-	.pins = sparx5_pins,
-	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(sparx5_pins),
-	.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
-	.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
-	.confops = &ocelot_confops,
-	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct ocelot_match_data sparx5_desc = {
+	.desc = {
+		.name = "sparx5-pinctrl",
+		.pins = sparx5_pins,
+		.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(sparx5_pins),
+		.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
+		.pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
+		.confops = &ocelot_confops,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
+	.pincfg_data = {
+		.pd_bit = BIT(4),
+		.pu_bit = BIT(3),
+		.drive_bits = GENMASK(1, 0),
+		.schmitt_bit = BIT(2),
+	},
 };
 
-static struct pinctrl_desc lan966x_desc = {
-	.name = "lan966x-pinctrl",
-	.pins = lan966x_pins,
-	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(lan966x_pins),
-	.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
-	.pmxops = &lan966x_pmx_ops,
-	.confops = &ocelot_confops,
-	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct ocelot_match_data lan966x_desc = {
+	.desc = {
+		.name = "lan966x-pinctrl",
+		.pins = lan966x_pins,
+		.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(lan966x_pins),
+		.pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
+		.pmxops = &lan966x_pmx_ops,
+		.confops = &ocelot_confops,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	},
+	.pincfg_data = {
+		.pd_bit = BIT(3),
+		.pu_bit = BIT(2),
+		.drive_bits = GENMASK(1, 0),
+	},
 };
 
 static int ocelot_create_group_func_map(struct device *dev,
@@ -1913,6 +1955,7 @@ static struct regmap *ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static int ocelot_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	const struct ocelot_match_data *data;
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct ocelot_pinctrl *info;
 	struct reset_control *reset;
@@ -1929,7 +1972,16 @@ static int ocelot_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	info->desc = (struct pinctrl_desc *)device_get_match_data(dev);
+	data = device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!data)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	info->desc = devm_kmemdup(dev, &data->desc, sizeof(*info->desc),
+				  GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!info->desc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	info->pincfg_data = &data->pincfg_data;
 
 	reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(dev, "switch");
 	if (IS_ERR(reset))
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg
  2022-07-12 19:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Add fixes for ocelot driver Horatiu Vultur
  2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x Horatiu Vultur
@ 2022-07-12 19:50 ` Horatiu Vultur
  2022-07-13  8:35   ` Colin Foster
  2022-07-13  9:54   ` Andy Shevchenko
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Horatiu Vultur @ 2022-07-12 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: linus.walleij, alexandre.belloni, kavyasree.kotagiri,
	colin.foster, UNGLinuxDriver, maxime.chevallier, michael,
	andy.shevchenko, Horatiu Vultur

The blamed commit changed to use regmaps instead of __iomem. But it
didn't update the register offsets to be at word offset, so it uses byte
offset.
Another issue with the same commit is that it has a limit of 32 registers
which is incorrect. The sparx5 has 64 while lan966x has 77.

Fixes: 076d9e71bcf8 ("pinctrl: ocelot: convert pinctrl to regmap")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
index 873bba245522..c5a9f87f0c49 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
@@ -1334,7 +1334,9 @@ static int ocelot_hw_get_value(struct ocelot_pinctrl *info,
 		const struct ocelot_pincfg_data *opd = info->pincfg_data;
 		u32 regcfg;
 
-		ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg, pin, &regcfg);
+		ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg,
+				  pin * regmap_get_reg_stride(info->pincfg),
+				  &regcfg);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -1366,14 +1368,18 @@ static int ocelot_pincfg_clrsetbits(struct ocelot_pinctrl *info, u32 regaddr,
 	u32 val;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg, regaddr, &val);
+	ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg,
+			  regaddr * regmap_get_reg_stride(info->pincfg),
+			  &val);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	val &= ~clrbits;
 	val |= setbits;
 
-	ret = regmap_write(info->pincfg, regaddr, val);
+	ret = regmap_write(info->pincfg,
+			   regaddr * regmap_get_reg_stride(info->pincfg),
+			   val);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1932,7 +1938,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id ocelot_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
 	{},
 };
 
-static struct regmap *ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static struct regmap *ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(struct platform_device *pdev,
+						   const struct ocelot_pinctrl *info)
 {
 	void __iomem *base;
 
@@ -1940,7 +1947,7 @@ static struct regmap *ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		.reg_bits = 32,
 		.val_bits = 32,
 		.reg_stride = 4,
-		.max_register = 32,
+		.max_register = info->desc->npins * 4,
 		.name = "pincfg",
 	};
 
@@ -2008,7 +2015,7 @@ static int ocelot_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* Pinconf registers */
 	if (info->desc->confops) {
-		pincfg = ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(pdev);
+		pincfg = ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(pdev, info);
 		if (IS_ERR(pincfg))
 			dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to create pincfg regmap\n");
 		else
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg
  2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg Horatiu Vultur
@ 2022-07-13  8:35   ` Colin Foster
  2022-07-13  9:54   ` Andy Shevchenko
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Colin Foster @ 2022-07-13  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Horatiu Vultur
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linus.walleij, alexandre.belloni,
	kavyasree.kotagiri, UNGLinuxDriver, maxime.chevallier, michael,
	andy.shevchenko

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The blamed commit changed to use regmaps instead of __iomem. But it
> didn't update the register offsets to be at word offset, so it uses byte
> offset.
> Another issue with the same commit is that it has a limit of 32 registers
> which is incorrect. The sparx5 has 64 while lan966x has 77.
> 
> Fixes: 076d9e71bcf8 ("pinctrl: ocelot: convert pinctrl to regmap")
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>

Acked-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x
  2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x Horatiu Vultur
@ 2022-07-13  9:53   ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2022-07-13  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Horatiu Vultur
  Cc: open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linus Walleij, Alexandre Belloni, kavyasree.kotagiri,
	Colin Foster, Microchip Linux Driver Support, Maxime Chevallier,
	Michael Walle

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:46 PM Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> The blamed commit introduce support for lan966x which use the same
> pinconf_ops as sparx5. The problem is that pinconf_ops is specific to
> sparx5. More precisely the offset of the bits in the pincfg register are
> different and also lan966x doesn't have support for
> PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE.
>
> Fix this by making pinconf_ops more generic such that it can be also
> used by lan966x. This is done by introducing 'ocelot_pincfg_data' which
> contains the offset and what is supported for each SOC.

Looks better, my comments below.

...

> +               const struct ocelot_pincfg_data *opd = info->pincfg_data;

This one...

...

> @@ -1425,17 +1436,20 @@ static int ocelot_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,

...can also be applied here...

...

>                 case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
>                         arg = (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE) ? 0 :
> -                       (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP) ? BIAS_PU_BIT :
> -                       BIAS_PD_BIT;
> +                       (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP) ? info->pincfg_data->pu_bit :
> +                       info->pincfg_data->pd_bit;

...which in particular may help to sort out this indentation mess.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg
  2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg Horatiu Vultur
  2022-07-13  8:35   ` Colin Foster
@ 2022-07-13  9:54   ` Andy Shevchenko
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2022-07-13  9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Horatiu Vultur
  Cc: open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linus Walleij, Alexandre Belloni, kavyasree.kotagiri,
	Colin Foster, Microchip Linux Driver Support, Maxime Chevallier,
	Michael Walle

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:46 PM Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> The blamed commit changed to use regmaps instead of __iomem. But it
> didn't update the register offsets to be at word offset, so it uses byte
> offset.
> Another issue with the same commit is that it has a limit of 32 registers
> which is incorrect. The sparx5 has 64 while lan966x has 77.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

> Fixes: 076d9e71bcf8 ("pinctrl: ocelot: convert pinctrl to regmap")
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
> index 873bba245522..c5a9f87f0c49 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ocelot.c
> @@ -1334,7 +1334,9 @@ static int ocelot_hw_get_value(struct ocelot_pinctrl *info,
>                 const struct ocelot_pincfg_data *opd = info->pincfg_data;
>                 u32 regcfg;
>
> -               ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg, pin, &regcfg);
> +               ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg,
> +                                 pin * regmap_get_reg_stride(info->pincfg),
> +                                 &regcfg);
>                 if (ret)
>                         return ret;
>
> @@ -1366,14 +1368,18 @@ static int ocelot_pincfg_clrsetbits(struct ocelot_pinctrl *info, u32 regaddr,
>         u32 val;
>         int ret;
>
> -       ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg, regaddr, &val);
> +       ret = regmap_read(info->pincfg,
> +                         regaddr * regmap_get_reg_stride(info->pincfg),
> +                         &val);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
>         val &= ~clrbits;
>         val |= setbits;
>
> -       ret = regmap_write(info->pincfg, regaddr, val);
> +       ret = regmap_write(info->pincfg,
> +                          regaddr * regmap_get_reg_stride(info->pincfg),
> +                          val);
>
>         return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1932,7 +1938,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id ocelot_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
>         {},
>  };
>
> -static struct regmap *ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static struct regmap *ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +                                                  const struct ocelot_pinctrl *info)
>  {
>         void __iomem *base;
>
> @@ -1940,7 +1947,7 @@ static struct regmap *ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 .reg_bits = 32,
>                 .val_bits = 32,
>                 .reg_stride = 4,
> -               .max_register = 32,
> +               .max_register = info->desc->npins * 4,
>                 .name = "pincfg",
>         };
>
> @@ -2008,7 +2015,7 @@ static int ocelot_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         /* Pinconf registers */
>         if (info->desc->confops) {
> -               pincfg = ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(pdev);
> +               pincfg = ocelot_pinctrl_create_pincfg(pdev, info);
>                 if (IS_ERR(pincfg))
>                         dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to create pincfg regmap\n");
>                 else
> --
> 2.33.0
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-13  9:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-12 19:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Add fixes for ocelot driver Horatiu Vultur
2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x Horatiu Vultur
2022-07-13  9:53   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-12 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg Horatiu Vultur
2022-07-13  8:35   ` Colin Foster
2022-07-13  9:54   ` Andy Shevchenko

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.