All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 1/3] band: add band_estimate_he_rx_rate
@ 2022-07-20 19:33 James Prestwood
  2022-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] wiphy: use HE element for data rate estimation James Prestwood
  2022-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] unit: add HE tests to test-band James Prestwood
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Prestwood @ 2022-07-20 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: iwd; +Cc: James Prestwood

Similar to the HT/VHT APIs, this estimates the data rate based on the
HE Capabilities element, in addition to our own capabilities. The
logic is much the same as HT/VHT. The major difference being that HE
uses several MCS tables depending on the channel width. Each width
MCS set is checked (if supported) and the highest estimated rate out
of all the MCS sets is used.
---
 src/band.c | 248 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 src/band.h |   3 +-
 2 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

v3:
 * Bail if previous width support bits aren't set
 * Loop over all <= 80mhz widths (rate may be faster)
 * Remove find_he_width_offset and check inline

diff --git a/src/band.c b/src/band.c
index 0728b0cc..542e99d2 100644
--- a/src/band.c
+++ b/src/band.c
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
 
 #include "ell/useful.h"
 
-#include "band.h"
+#include "src/band.h"
+#include "src/netdev.h"
 
 void band_free(struct band *band)
 {
@@ -125,14 +126,21 @@ int band_estimate_nonht_rate(const struct band *band,
 }
 
 /*
- * Base RSSI values for 20MHz (both HT and VHT) channel. These values can be
+ * Base RSSI values for 20MHz (HT, VHT and HE) channel. These values can be
  * used to calculate the minimum RSSI values for all other channel widths. HT
- * MCS indexes are grouped into ranges of 8 (per spatial stream) where VHT are
- * grouped in chunks of 10. This just means HT will not use the last two
- * index's of this array.
+ * MCS indexes are grouped into ranges of 8 (per spatial stream), VHT in groups
+ * of 10 and HE in groups of 12. This just means HT will not use the last four
+ * index's of this array, and VHT won't use the last two.
+ *
+ * Note: The values here are not based on anything from 802.11 but data
+ *       found elsewhere online (presumably from testing, we hope). The two
+ *       indexes for HE (MCS 11/12) are not based on any data, but just
+ *       increased by 3dB compared to the previous value. We consider this good
+ *       enough for its purpose to estimate the date rate for network/BSS
+ *       preference.
  */
-static const int32_t ht_vht_base_rssi[] = {
-	-82, -79, -77, -74, -70, -66, -65, -64, -59, -57
+static const int32_t ht_vht_he_base_rssi[] = {
+	-82, -79, -77, -74, -70, -66, -65, -64, -59, -57, -54, -51
 };
 
 /*
@@ -194,7 +202,7 @@ bool band_ofdm_rate(uint8_t index, enum ofdm_channel_width width,
 	uint64_t rate;
 	int32_t width_adjust = width * 3;
 
-	if (rssi < ht_vht_base_rssi[index] + width_adjust)
+	if (rssi < ht_vht_he_base_rssi[index] + width_adjust)
 		return false;
 
 	rate = ht_vht_rates[width][index];
@@ -495,6 +503,230 @@ try_vht80:
 	return -ENETUNREACH;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Data Rate for HE is much the same as HT/VHT but some additional MCS indexes
+ * were added. This mean rfactors, and nbpscs will contain two additional
+ * values:
+ *
+ * rfactors.extend([3/4, 5/6])
+ * nbpscs.extend([10, 10])
+ *
+ * The guard interval also differs:
+ *
+ * Tdft = 12.8us
+ * Tgi = 0.8, 1.6 or 2.3us
+ *
+ * The Nsd values for HE are:
+ *
+ * Nsd = [234, 468, 980, 1960]
+ *
+ * The formula is identical to HT/VHT:
+ *
+ * Nsd * Nbpscs * R * Nss / (Tdft + Tgi)
+ *
+ * Note: The table below assumes a 0.8us GI. There isn't any way to know what
+ *       GI will be used for an actual connection, so assume the best.
+ */
+static uint64_t he_rates[4][12] = {
+	[OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20MHZ] = {
+		8600000ULL, 17200000ULL, 25800000ULL, 34400000ULL,
+		51600000ULL, 68800000ULL, 77400000ULL, 86000000ULL,
+		103200000ULL, 114700000ULL, 129000000ULL, 143300000ULL,
+	},
+	[OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40MHZ] = {
+		17200000ULL, 34400000ULL, 51600000ULL, 68800000ULL,
+		103200000ULL, 137600000ULL, 154900000ULL, 172000000ULL,
+		206500000ULL, 229400000ULL, 258000000ULL, 286800000ULL,
+	},
+	[OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80MHZ] = {
+		36000000ULL, 72000000ULL, 108000000ULL, 144100000ULL,
+		216200000ULL, 288200000ULL, 324300000ULL, 360300000ULL,
+		432400000ULL, 480400000ULL, 540400000ULL, 600500000ULL,
+	},
+	[OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ] = {
+		72000000ULL, 144100000ULL, 216200000ULL, 288200000ULL,
+		432400000ULL, 576500000ULL, 648500000ULL, 720600000ULL,
+		864700000ULL, 960800000ULL, 1080900000ULL, 1201000000ULL,
+	},
+};
+
+static bool band_he_rate(uint8_t index, enum ofdm_channel_width width,
+			int32_t rssi, uint8_t nss, uint64_t *data_rate)
+{
+	uint64_t rate;
+	int32_t width_adjust;
+
+	width_adjust = width * 3;
+
+	if (rssi < ht_vht_he_base_rssi[index] + width_adjust)
+		return false;
+
+	rate = he_rates[width][index];
+
+	rate *= nss;
+
+	*data_rate = rate;
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool find_rate_he(const uint8_t *rx_map, const uint8_t *tx_map,
+				enum ofdm_channel_width width, int32_t rssi,
+				uint64_t *out_data_rate)
+{
+	uint32_t nss;
+	uint32_t max_mcs;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!find_best_mcs_nss(rx_map, tx_map, 7, 9, 11,
+				&max_mcs, &nss))
+		return false;
+
+	for (i = max_mcs; i >= 0; i--)
+		if (band_he_rate(i, width, rssi, nss, out_data_rate))
+			return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * HE data rate is calculated based on 802.11ax - Section 27.5
+ */
+int band_estimate_he_rx_rate(const struct band *band, const uint8_t *hec,
+				int32_t rssi, uint64_t *out_data_rate)
+{
+	enum ofdm_channel_width width = OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20MHZ;
+	enum ofdm_channel_width i;
+	const struct band_he_capabilities *he_cap = NULL;
+	const struct l_queue_entry *entry;
+	const uint8_t *rx_map;
+	const uint8_t *tx_map;
+	bool mcs80p80 = false;
+	uint64_t rate = 0;
+	uint64_t new_rate = 0;
+	uint8_t width_set;
+
+	if (!hec || !band->he_capabilities)
+		return -EBADMSG;
+
+	for (entry = l_queue_get_entries(band->he_capabilities);
+						entry; entry = entry->next) {
+		const struct band_he_capabilities *cap = entry->data;
+
+		/*
+		 * TODO: Station type is assumed here since it is the only
+		 *       consumer of these data rate estimation APIs. If this
+		 *       changes the iftype would need to be passed in.
+		 */
+		if (cap->iftypes & (1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION)) {
+			he_cap = cap;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	l_info("he_cap=%p", he_cap);
+	if (!he_cap)
+		return -ENOTSUP;
+
+	/* AND the width sets, giving the widths supported by both */
+	width_set = bit_field(he_cap->he_phy_capa[0], 1, 7) &
+				bit_field((hec + 8)[0], 1, 7);
+
+	l_info("width set %02x", width_set);
+	/*
+	 * 802.11ax Table 9-322b
+	 */
+	switch (band->freq) {
+	case BAND_FREQ_2_4_GHZ:
+		/* B0 indicates support for 40MHz */
+		if (test_bit(&width_set, 0))
+			width = OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40MHZ;
+
+		break;
+	case BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ:
+	case BAND_FREQ_6_GHZ:
+		/* B1 indicates support for 40MHz and 80MHz, choose 80 */
+		if (test_bit(&width_set, 1))
+			width = OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80MHZ;
+
+		/* B2 indicates support for 160MHz */
+		if (test_bit(&width_set, 2)) {
+			if (width != OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80MHZ) {
+				l_warn("Support for 160MHz but not 80MHz!");
+				return -EBADMSG;
+			}
+
+			width = OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ;
+		}
+
+		/* B3 indicates support for 80+80MHz */
+		if (test_bit(&width_set, 3)) {
+			if (width != OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ) {
+				l_warn("Support for 80+80MHz but not 160MHz!");
+				return -EBADMSG;
+			}
+
+			mcs80p80 = true;
+		}
+
+		break;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The HE-MCS maps are 19 bytes into the HE Capabilities IE, and
+	 * alternate RX/TX every 2 bytes. Start the TX map 19 + 2 bytes
+	 * into the MCS set. For each MCS set find the best data rate.
+	 *
+	 * Note: Since 'hec' is an extended IE index 0 is actually the length
+	 *       since wiphy offsets data - 2.
+	 */
+	rx_map = he_cap->he_mcs_set;
+	tx_map = hec + 21;
+
+	/* 80+80MHz MCS set */
+	if (mcs80p80) {
+		/* 21 + 8 - 1 (len) bytes into the IE, plus 2 for the MCS set */
+		if (hec[0] < 30)
+			return -EBADMSG;
+
+		if (find_rate_he(rx_map + 8, tx_map + 8,
+				OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ, rssi, &new_rate))
+			rate = new_rate;
+	}
+
+	/* 160MHz MCS set */
+	if (width == OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ) {
+		/* 21 + 4 - 1 (len) bytes into the IE, plus 2 for the MCS set */
+		if (hec[0] < 26) {
+			l_info("bad len");
+			return -EBADMSG;
+		}
+
+		if (find_rate_he(rx_map + 4, tx_map + 4,
+				OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ, rssi, &new_rate) &&
+				new_rate > rate)
+			rate = new_rate;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * <= 80MHz MCS set. Adjust width to this range (if needed) and check
+	 * every smaller width in case the rate is higher
+	 */
+	if (width > OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80MHZ)
+		width = OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80MHZ;
+
+	for (i = OFDM_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20MHZ; i <= width; i++) {
+		if (find_rate_he(rx_map, tx_map, i, rssi, &new_rate) &&
+					new_rate > rate)
+			rate = new_rate;
+	}
+
+	if (!rate)
+		return -EBADMSG;
+
+	*out_data_rate = rate;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int band_channel_info_get_bandwidth(const struct band_chandef *info)
 {
 	switch (info->channel_width) {
diff --git a/src/band.h b/src/band.h
index 1f1269c7..9b307a77 100644
--- a/src/band.h
+++ b/src/band.h
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ void band_free(struct band *band);
 bool band_ofdm_rate(uint8_t index, enum ofdm_channel_width width,
 			int32_t rssi, uint8_t nss, bool sgi,
 			uint64_t *data_rate);
-
+int band_estimate_he_rx_rate(const struct band *band, const uint8_t *hec,
+				int32_t rssi, uint64_t *out_dat_rate);
 int band_estimate_vht_rx_rate(const struct band *band,
 				const uint8_t *vhtc, const uint8_t *vhto,
 				const uint8_t *htc, const uint8_t *hto,
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/3] wiphy: use HE element for data rate estimation
  2022-07-20 19:33 [PATCH v3 1/3] band: add band_estimate_he_rx_rate James Prestwood
@ 2022-07-20 19:33 ` James Prestwood
  2022-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] unit: add HE tests to test-band James Prestwood
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Prestwood @ 2022-07-20 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: iwd; +Cc: James Prestwood

If an HE element is found, prefer using this for the rate estimation
since it will likely yield the fastest rate.
---
 src/wiphy.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/wiphy.c b/src/wiphy.c
index 696064c0..9bcbea77 100644
--- a/src/wiphy.c
+++ b/src/wiphy.c
@@ -788,6 +788,7 @@ int wiphy_estimate_data_rate(struct wiphy *wiphy,
 	const void *vht_operation = NULL;
 	const void *ht_capabilities = NULL;
 	const void *ht_operation = NULL;
+	const void *he_capabilities = NULL;
 	const struct band *bandp;
 	enum band_freq band;
 
@@ -847,11 +848,22 @@ int wiphy_estimate_data_rate(struct wiphy *wiphy,
 
 			vht_operation = iter.data - 2;
 			break;
+		case IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES:
+			if (iter.len < 23)
+				return -EBADMSG;
+
+			he_capabilities = iter.data - 2;
+			break;
 		default:
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!band_estimate_he_rx_rate(bandp, he_capabilities,
+					bss->signal_strength / 100,
+					out_data_rate))
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!band_estimate_vht_rx_rate(bandp, vht_capabilities, vht_operation,
 					ht_capabilities, ht_operation,
 					bss->signal_strength / 100,
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 3/3] unit: add HE tests to test-band
  2022-07-20 19:33 [PATCH v3 1/3] band: add band_estimate_he_rx_rate James Prestwood
  2022-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] wiphy: use HE element for data rate estimation James Prestwood
@ 2022-07-20 19:33 ` James Prestwood
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Prestwood @ 2022-07-20 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: iwd; +Cc: James Prestwood

This tests for all the possible widths selected in 2.4 and 5/6GHz,
as well as some failure tests.
---
 unit/test-band.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 240 insertions(+)

diff --git a/unit/test-band.c b/unit/test-band.c
index 0dd9b67b..8a927339 100644
--- a/unit/test-band.c
+++ b/unit/test-band.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
 #include <ell/ell.h>
 
 #include "src/band.h"
+#include "src/netdev.h"
+#include "src/ie.h"
 
 static struct band *new_band()
 {
@@ -284,6 +286,225 @@ static void band_test_vht_1(const void *data)
 	band_free(band);
 }
 
+struct he_test_data {
+	enum band_freq freq;
+	int32_t rssi;
+	uint64_t expected_rate;
+	int expected_return;
+	/* Own capabilities */
+	struct band_he_capabilities capabilities;
+	/* Peer HE Capabilities IE */
+	uint8_t he_capabilities[31];
+
+};
+
+/* IWD doesn't look at this */
+#define HE_MAC_CAPA 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
+/* IWD only cares about the width set byte */
+#define HE_PHY_CAPA(wset) wset, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
+
+#define MCS7		0
+#define MCS9		1
+#define MCS11		2
+#define MCS_UNSUP	0xff, 0xff
+/* A readable macro for defining MCS sets */
+#define HE_MCS_SET(mcs, nss) \
+	(nss >= 1 ? mcs << 0 : 3 << 0) | \
+	(nss >= 2 ? mcs << 2 : 3 << 2) | \
+	(nss >= 3 ? mcs << 4 : 3 << 4) | \
+	(nss >= 4 ? mcs << 6 : 3 << 6),  \
+	(nss >= 5 ? mcs << 0 : 3 << 0) | \
+	(nss >= 6 ? mcs << 2 : 3 << 2) | \
+	(nss >= 7 ? mcs << 4 : 3 << 4) | \
+	(nss >= 8 ? mcs << 6 : 3 << 6)
+
+/* 2.4GHz, 20MHz, MCS 7, NSS 1 */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_2_4_20mhz_mcs_7_nss_1 = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_2_4_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 86000000ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x00) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		22, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x00), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1),
+	},
+};
+
+/* 2.4GHz, 40MHz, MCS 7, NSS 1 */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_2_4_40mhz_mcs_7_nss_1 = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_2_4_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 172000000ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x02) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		22, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x02), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1),
+	},
+};
+
+/* 5GHz, 20MHz, MCS 7, NSS 1 */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_5_20mhz_mcs_7_nss_1 = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 86000000ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x00) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		22, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x00), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1)
+	},
+};
+
+/* 5GHz, 80MHz, MCS 7, NSS 1 */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_5_80mhz_mcs_7_nss_1 = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 360300000ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x04) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		22, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x04), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1)
+	},
+};
+
+/* 5GHz, 160MHz, MCS 7, NSS 1 */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_5_160mhz_mcs_7_nss_1 = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 720600000ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP,
+				HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x0c) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		26, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x0c), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1),
+				MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1)
+	},
+};
+
+/* 5GHz, 160/80+80MHz, MCS 7, NSS 1 */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_5_160_80_P_80_mhz_mcs_7_nss_1 = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 720600000ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP,
+				HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP,
+				HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		30, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1),
+				MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1),
+				MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS7, 1)
+	},
+};
+
+/* 5GHz, max data rate */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_5_max_data_rate = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 1201000000ULL * 8ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8), MCS_UNSUP,
+				HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8), MCS_UNSUP,
+				HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		30, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8),
+				MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8),
+				MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8)
+	},
+};
+
+const struct he_test_data he_all_mcs_unsupported = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -20,
+	.expected_rate = 1201000000ULL * 8ULL,
+	.expected_return = -EBADMSG,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { MCS_UNSUP, MCS_UNSUP,
+				MCS_UNSUP, MCS_UNSUP,
+				MCS_UNSUP, MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		30, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c), MCS_UNSUP, MCS_UNSUP,
+				MCS_UNSUP, MCS_UNSUP,
+				MCS_UNSUP, MCS_UNSUP
+	},
+};
+
+/* 5GHz, max data rate, low-rssi */
+const struct he_test_data he_test_5_low_rssi = {
+	.freq = BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ,
+	.rssi = -80, /* Should force 20MHz/MCS0 width to be used */
+	.expected_rate = 8600000ULL * 8ULL,
+	.capabilities = {
+		.he_mcs_set = { HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8), MCS_UNSUP,
+				HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8), MCS_UNSUP,
+				HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8), MCS_UNSUP },
+		.he_phy_capa = { HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c) },
+		.iftypes = 1 << NETDEV_IFTYPE_STATION,
+	},
+	.he_capabilities = {
+		30, IE_TYPE_HE_CAPABILITIES - 256, HE_MAC_CAPA,
+		HE_PHY_CAPA(0x1c), MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8),
+				MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8),
+				MCS_UNSUP, HE_MCS_SET(MCS11, 8)
+	},
+};
+
+static void band_test_he(const void *data)
+{
+	const struct he_test_data *he_data = data;
+	struct band *band;
+	uint64_t rate = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	band = new_band();
+	band->freq = he_data->freq;
+	band->he_capabilities = l_queue_new();
+
+	l_queue_push_tail(band->he_capabilities,
+				(void*)&(he_data->capabilities));
+
+	ret = band_estimate_he_rx_rate(band, he_data->he_capabilities,
+					he_data->rssi, &rate);
+	assert(ret == he_data->expected_return);
+
+	if (ret == 0)
+		assert(rate == he_data->expected_rate);
+
+	l_queue_destroy(band->he_capabilities, NULL);
+	l_free(band);
+}
+
 struct oci2freq_data {
 	unsigned int op;
 	unsigned int chan;
@@ -436,6 +657,25 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	l_test_add("/band/VHT/test1", band_test_vht_1, NULL);
 
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/2.4GHz/20MHz/MCS7/NSS1", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_2_4_20mhz_mcs_7_nss_1);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/2.4GHz/40MHz/MCS7/NSS1", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_2_4_40mhz_mcs_7_nss_1);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/5GHz/20MHz/MCS7/NSS1", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_5_20mhz_mcs_7_nss_1);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/5GHz/80MHz/MCS7/NSS1", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_5_80mhz_mcs_7_nss_1);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/5GHz/160MHz/MCS7/NSS1", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_5_160mhz_mcs_7_nss_1);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/5GHz/160/80+80MHz/MCS7/NSS1", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_5_160_80_P_80_mhz_mcs_7_nss_1);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/5GHz/max data rate", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_5_max_data_rate);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/all MCS unsupported", band_test_he,
+					&he_all_mcs_unsupported);
+	l_test_add("/band/HE/test/low RSSI", band_test_he,
+					&he_test_5_low_rssi);
+
 	l_test_add("/band/oci2freq 1", test_oci2freq, &oci2freq_data_1);
 	l_test_add("/band/oci2freq 2", test_oci2freq, &oci2freq_data_2);
 	l_test_add("/band/oci2freq 3", test_oci2freq, &oci2freq_data_3);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-20 19:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-20 19:33 [PATCH v3 1/3] band: add band_estimate_he_rx_rate James Prestwood
2022-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] wiphy: use HE element for data rate estimation James Prestwood
2022-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] unit: add HE tests to test-band James Prestwood

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.