From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git pile 3 - dcache
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 06:52:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220804065223.209ac060@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiMFU1+pyG9AgbGSZfxNpoOzOEmjVyy87J6Q8aPKAJ7jQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 19:16:12 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > I wonder if raw_preempt_disable() would be another name to use?
>
> NO!
>
> The point is that normal non-RT code does *not* disable preemption at
> all, because it is already disabled thanks to the earlier spinlock.
>
> So we definitely do *not* want to call this "raw_preempt_disable()",
> because it's actually not supposed to normally disable anything at
> all. Only for RT, where the spinlock code doesn't do it.
Yeah, I'm just brainstorming ideas on what we could use to make that name a
little shorter, and I'm not coming up with much.
OK, I'm becoming colorblind with this shed.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-04 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 18:39 [git pull] vfs.git pile 3 - dcache Al Viro
2022-08-03 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-03 19:49 ` Al Viro
2022-08-03 21:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-03 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-03 22:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-03 23:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-03 23:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-04 0:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-04 1:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-04 2:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-04 10:52 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2022-08-08 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-08 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-09 16:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-09 16:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-09 17:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-03 19:00 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220804065223.209ac060@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.