[PATCH] RISC-V: Don't truncate a hartid in the cbom-block-size mismatch warning

From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Don't truncate a hartid in the cbom-block-size mismatch warning
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 07:24:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220812142400.7186-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> (raw)

I forgot to update this when sorting out the 64-bit hartid code.

Fixes: 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
index cd2225304c82..61a4337cf7b1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
@@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
 	u32 val;
 
 	for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
-		unsigned long hartid;
-		int cbom_hartid;
+		unsigned long hartid, cbom_hartid;
 
 		ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
 		if (ret)
@@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
 			cbom_hartid = hartid;
 		} else {
 			if (riscv_cbom_block_size != val)
-				pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %d and %lu\n",
+				pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
 					cbom_hartid, hartid);
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
