[PATCH bpf-next,v3] bpf/scripts: assert helper enum value is aligned with comment order

* [PATCH bpf-next,v3] bpf/scripts: assert helper enum value is aligned with comment order
@ 2022-08-24 12:26 Eyal Birger
  2022-08-24 17:25 ` Quentin Monnet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Birger @ 2022-08-24 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs, john.fastabend,
	kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, quentin
  Cc: bpf, Eyal Birger

The helper value is ABI as defined by enum bpf_func_id.
As bpf_helper_defs.h is used for the userpace part, it must be consistent
with this enum.

Before this change the comments order was used by the bpf_doc script in
order to set the helper values defined in the helpers file.

When adding new helpers it is very puzzling when the userspace application
breaks in weird places if the comment is inserted instead of appended -
because the generated helper ABI is incorrect and shifted.

This commit sets the helper value to the enum value.

In addition it is currently the practice to have the comments appended
and kept in the same order as the enum. As such, add an assertion
validating the comment order is consistent with enum value.

In case a different comments ordering is desired, this assertion can
be lifted.

Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>

---
v3: based on feedback from Quentin Monnet:
- move assertion to parser
- avoid using define_unique_helpers as elem_number_check() relies on
  it being an array
- set enum_val in helper object instead of passing as a dict to the
  printer

v2: based on feedback from Quentin Monnet:
- assert the current comment ordering
- match only one FN in each line
---
 scripts/bpf_doc.py | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/bpf_doc.py b/scripts/bpf_doc.py
index f4f3e7ec6d44..114b2a60afc8 100755
--- a/scripts/bpf_doc.py
+++ b/scripts/bpf_doc.py
@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ class Helper(APIElement):
     @desc: textual description of the helper function
     @ret: description of the return value of the helper function
     """
+    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+        super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
+        self.enum_value = None
+
     def proto_break_down(self):
         """
         Break down helper function protocol into smaller chunks: return type,
@@ -92,6 +96,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
         self.commands = []
         self.desc_unique_helpers = set()
         self.define_unique_helpers = []
+        self.helper_enum_vals = {}
         self.desc_syscalls = []
         self.enum_syscalls = []
 
@@ -248,30 +253,54 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
                 break
 
     def parse_define_helpers(self):
-        # Parse the number of FN(...) in #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER to compare
-        # later with the number of unique function names present in description.
+        # Parse FN(...) in #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER to compare later with the
+        # number of unique function names present in description and use the
+        # correct enumeration value.
         # Note: seek_to(..) discards the first line below the target search text,
         # resulting in FN(unspec) being skipped and not added to self.define_unique_helpers.
         self.seek_to('#define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)',
                      'Could not find start of eBPF helper definition list')
-        # Searches for either one or more FN(\w+) defines or a backslash for newline
-        p = re.compile('\s*(FN\(\w+\))+|\\\\')
+        # Searches for one FN(\w+) define or a backslash for newline
+        p = re.compile('\s*FN\((\w+)\)|\\\\')
         fn_defines_str = ''
+        i = 1  # 'unspec' is skipped as mentioned above
         while True:
             capture = p.match(self.line)
             if capture:
                 fn_defines_str += self.line
+                self.helper_enum_vals[capture.expand(r'bpf_\1')] = i
+                i += 1
             else:
                 break
             self.line = self.reader.readline()
         # Find the number of occurences of FN(\w+)
         self.define_unique_helpers = re.findall('FN\(\w+\)', fn_defines_str)
 
+    def assign_helper_values(self):
+        seen_helpers = set()
+        for helper in self.helpers:
+            proto = helper.proto_break_down()
+            name = proto['name']
+            try:
+                enum_val = self.helper_enum_vals[name]
+            except KeyError:
+                raise Exception("Helper %s is missing from enum bpf_func_id" % name)
+
+            # Enforce current practice of having the descriptions ordered
+            # by enum value.
+            seen_helpers.add(name)
+            desc_val = len(seen_helpers)
+            if desc_val != enum_val:
+                raise Exception("Helper %s comment order (#%d) must be aligned with its position (#%d) in enum bpf_func_id" % (name, desc_val, enum_val))
+
+            helper.enum_val = enum_val
+
     def run(self):
         self.parse_desc_syscall()
         self.parse_enum_syscall()
         self.parse_desc_helpers()
         self.parse_define_helpers()
+        self.assign_helper_values()
         self.reader.close()
 
 ###############################################################################
@@ -796,7 +825,7 @@ class PrinterHelpers(Printer):
             comma = ', '
             print(one_arg, end='')
 
-        print(') = (void *) %d;' % len(self.seen_helpers))
+        print(') = (void *) %d;' % helper.enum_val)
         print('')
 
 ###############################################################################
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread