From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> To: <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: <liaochang1@huawei.com>, <chris.zjh@huawei.com>, <zouyipeng@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: hold caller_addr to hardirq_{enable,disable}_ip Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:45:14 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220901104515.135162-2-zouyipeng@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220901104515.135162-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com> Currently, The arguments passing to lockdep_hardirqs_{on,off} was fixed in CALLER_ADDR0. The function trace_hardirqs_on_caller should have been intended to use caller_addr to represent the address that caller wants to be traced. For example, lockdep log in riscv showing the last {enabled,disabled} at __trace_hardirqs_{on,off} all the time(if called by): [ 57.853175] hardirqs last enabled at (2519): __trace_hardirqs_on+0xc/0x14 [ 57.853848] hardirqs last disabled at (2520): __trace_hardirqs_off+0xc/0x14 After use trace_hardirqs_xx_caller, we can get more effective information: [ 53.781428] hardirqs last enabled at (2595): restore_all+0xe/0x66 [ 53.782185] hardirqs last disabled at (2596): ret_from_exception+0xa/0x10 Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> --- kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c index 95b58bd757ce..1e130da1b742 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c @@ -95,14 +95,14 @@ __visible void trace_hardirqs_on_caller(unsigned long caller_addr) } lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(); - lockdep_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0); + lockdep_hardirqs_on(caller_addr); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_caller); NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_caller); __visible void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long caller_addr) { - lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0); + lockdep_hardirqs_off(caller_addr); if (!this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) { this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 1); -- 2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> To: <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: <liaochang1@huawei.com>, <chris.zjh@huawei.com>, <zouyipeng@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: hold caller_addr to hardirq_{enable,disable}_ip Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:45:14 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220901104515.135162-2-zouyipeng@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220901104515.135162-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com> Currently, The arguments passing to lockdep_hardirqs_{on,off} was fixed in CALLER_ADDR0. The function trace_hardirqs_on_caller should have been intended to use caller_addr to represent the address that caller wants to be traced. For example, lockdep log in riscv showing the last {enabled,disabled} at __trace_hardirqs_{on,off} all the time(if called by): [ 57.853175] hardirqs last enabled at (2519): __trace_hardirqs_on+0xc/0x14 [ 57.853848] hardirqs last disabled at (2520): __trace_hardirqs_off+0xc/0x14 After use trace_hardirqs_xx_caller, we can get more effective information: [ 53.781428] hardirqs last enabled at (2595): restore_all+0xe/0x66 [ 53.782185] hardirqs last disabled at (2596): ret_from_exception+0xa/0x10 Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> --- kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c index 95b58bd757ce..1e130da1b742 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c @@ -95,14 +95,14 @@ __visible void trace_hardirqs_on_caller(unsigned long caller_addr) } lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(); - lockdep_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0); + lockdep_hardirqs_on(caller_addr); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_caller); NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_caller); __visible void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long caller_addr) { - lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0); + lockdep_hardirqs_off(caller_addr); if (!this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) { this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 1); -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 10:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-09-01 10:45 [PATCH 0/2] riscv: tracing: Improve hardirq tracing message Yipeng Zou 2022-09-01 10:45 ` Yipeng Zou 2022-09-01 10:45 ` Yipeng Zou [this message] 2022-09-01 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: hold caller_addr to hardirq_{enable,disable}_ip Yipeng Zou 2022-09-07 1:12 ` Steven Rostedt 2022-09-07 1:12 ` Steven Rostedt 2022-09-01 10:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv: tracing: Improve hardirq tracing message Yipeng Zou 2022-09-01 10:45 ` Yipeng Zou 2022-09-09 9:40 ` Yipeng Zou 2022-09-09 9:40 ` Yipeng Zou 2022-09-14 7:29 ` Yipeng Zou 2022-09-15 1:34 ` Guo Ren 2022-09-15 2:42 ` Yipeng Zou
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220901104515.135162-2-zouyipeng@huawei.com \ --to=zouyipeng@huawei.com \ --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \ --cc=chris.zjh@huawei.com \ --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.