All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1] kernel/trace/trace: check the return value of tracing_update_buffers()
@ 2022-09-17  2:03 Li Zhong
  2022-09-26 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Li Zhong @ 2022-09-17  2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: mingo, rostedt, Li Zhong

Check the return value of tracing_update_buffers() in case it fails.

Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index d3005279165d..0e367e326147 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3305,7 +3305,8 @@ void trace_printk_init_buffers(void)
 	pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
 
 	/* Expand the buffers to set size */
-	tracing_update_buffers();
+	if (tracing_update_buffers() < 0)
+		return;
 
 	buffers_allocated = 1;
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1] kernel/trace/trace: check the return value of tracing_update_buffers()
  2022-09-17  2:03 [PATCH v1] kernel/trace/trace: check the return value of tracing_update_buffers() Li Zhong
@ 2022-09-26 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2022-09-26 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Zhong; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo

On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:03:53 -0700
Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com> wrote:

> Check the return value of tracing_update_buffers() in case it fails.

FYI, the subject should be:

  tracing: Check the return value of tracing_update_buffers()

> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index d3005279165d..0e367e326147 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -3305,7 +3305,8 @@ void trace_printk_init_buffers(void)
>  	pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
>  
>  	/* Expand the buffers to set size */
> -	tracing_update_buffers();
> +	if (tracing_update_buffers() < 0)
> +		return;

Even if the buffers are not expanded, tracing can still work. This should
not return here. But instead we should have something like:

	/* Allocation really should not fail here at boot up or module load */
	if (tracing_update_buffers() < 0)
		pr_err("Failed to expand tracing buffers for trace_printk() calls\n");
	else
		buffers_allocate = 1;

As we still want the cmdline action done late in the code.

-- Steve


>  
>  	buffers_allocated = 1;
>  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-26 18:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-17  2:03 [PATCH v1] kernel/trace/trace: check the return value of tracing_update_buffers() Li Zhong
2022-09-26 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.