* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Reorder symbols to get rid of a few forward declarations
@ 2022-09-25 14:26 Guenter Roeck
2022-09-25 19:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-09-25 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König; +Cc: Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, kernel
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Declarations for static symbols are useless code repetition (unless
> there are cyclic dependencies).
>
> Reorder some functions and variables which allows to get rid of 42
> forward declarations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Applied to hwmon-next.
Thanks,
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Reorder symbols to get rid of a few forward declarations
2022-09-25 14:26 [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Reorder symbols to get rid of a few forward declarations Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-09-25 19:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-25 19:50 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-09-25 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: linux-hwmon, Jean Delvare, kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1164 bytes --]
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 07:26:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Declarations for static symbols are useless code repetition (unless
> > there are cyclic dependencies).
> >
> > Reorder some functions and variables which allows to get rid of 42
> > forward declarations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>
> Applied to hwmon-next.
Thanks for your prompt action on my patches, very appreciated!
Let me just note two things:
a) vger refused to accept this mail with "Message too long (>100000
chars)", so I guess it won't appear in the archives
b) Your reply didn't have a "In-Reply-To:" header, so the threading is
broken. Because of a) you cannot see this in the archives, but it
happend already before, but not on all the mail I got from you. An
earlier instance is
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20220923002301.GA1159397@roeck-us.net
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Reorder symbols to get rid of a few forward declarations
2022-09-25 19:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-09-25 19:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-26 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-09-25 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König; +Cc: linux-hwmon, Jean Delvare, kernel
On 9/25/22 12:18, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 07:26:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> Declarations for static symbols are useless code repetition (unless
>>> there are cyclic dependencies).
>>>
>>> Reorder some functions and variables which allows to get rid of 42
>>> forward declarations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>
>> Applied to hwmon-next.
>
> Thanks for your prompt action on my patches, very appreciated!
>
> Let me just note two things:
>
> a) vger refused to accept this mail with "Message too long (>100000
> chars)", so I guess it won't appear in the archives
>
I guess that explains why I don't see all patches in patchwork.
> b) Your reply didn't have a "In-Reply-To:" header, so the threading is
> broken. Because of a) you cannot see this in the archives, but it
> happend already before, but not on all the mail I got from you. An
> earlier instance is
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20220923002301.GA1159397@roeck-us.net
>
Some of the e-mails I reply from mutt, others from Thunderbird. I suspect
that one of them doesn't add the "In-Reply-To:" header. This one is from
Thunderbird. I'll send another one without Cc: from mutt. Please let me know
which one is missing the header.
Thanks,
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Reorder symbols to get rid of a few forward declarations
2022-09-25 19:50 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-09-26 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-26 13:33 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-09-26 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: linux-hwmon, Jean Delvare, kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1959 bytes --]
Hello Guenter,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 12:50:55PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/25/22 12:18, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 07:26:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > Declarations for static symbols are useless code repetition (unless
> > > > there are cyclic dependencies).
> > > >
> > > > Reorder some functions and variables which allows to get rid of 42
> > > > forward declarations.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > >
> > > Applied to hwmon-next.
> >
> > Thanks for your prompt action on my patches, very appreciated!
> >
> > Let me just note two things:
> >
> > a) vger refused to accept this mail with "Message too long (>100000
> > chars)", so I guess it won't appear in the archives
>
> I guess that explains why I don't see all patches in patchwork.
The f71882fg was the first one of my patches that vger refused. I didn't
check, but vger at least didn't tell me about my other patches that it
refused any of them.
> > b) Your reply didn't have a "In-Reply-To:" header, so the threading is
> > broken. Because of a) you cannot see this in the archives, but it
> > happend already before, but not on all the mail I got from you. An
> > earlier instance is
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20220923002301.GA1159397@roeck-us.net
> >
>
> Some of the e-mails I reply from mutt, others from Thunderbird. I suspect
> that one of them doesn't add the "In-Reply-To:" header. This one is from
> Thunderbird. I'll send another one without Cc: from mutt. Please let me know
> which one is missing the header.
Both of these mails have the In-Reply-To header.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Reorder symbols to get rid of a few forward declarations
2022-09-26 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-09-26 13:33 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-09-26 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König; +Cc: linux-hwmon, Jean Delvare, kernel
On 9/26/22 00:03, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Guenter,
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 12:50:55PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 9/25/22 12:18, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 07:26:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>>> Declarations for static symbols are useless code repetition (unless
>>>>> there are cyclic dependencies).
>>>>>
>>>>> Reorder some functions and variables which allows to get rid of 42
>>>>> forward declarations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>>>
>>>> Applied to hwmon-next.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your prompt action on my patches, very appreciated!
>>>
>>> Let me just note two things:
>>>
>>> a) vger refused to accept this mail with "Message too long (>100000
>>> chars)", so I guess it won't appear in the archives
>>
>> I guess that explains why I don't see all patches in patchwork.
>
> The f71882fg was the first one of my patches that vger refused. I didn't
> check, but vger at least didn't tell me about my other patches that it
> refused any of them.
>
Not of yours, but it happens once in a while that I don't see a patch there.
Though thinking about it they are not typically that large.
>
> Both of these mails have the In-Reply-To header.
>
Odd. No idea what causes it to get lost.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-26 15:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-25 14:26 [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Reorder symbols to get rid of a few forward declarations Guenter Roeck
2022-09-25 19:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-25 19:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-26 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-26 13:33 ` Guenter Roeck
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.