All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:59:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220927185911.512737-1-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c

between commit:

  b723edf3a12a2 ("arm64: alternatives: make alt_region const")

from the arm64 tree and commit:

  5f20997c194e8 ("arm64: Drop unneeded __nocfi attributes")

from the kspp tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
index 64045e3ef03a9,d2c66507398d7..0000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
@@@ -139,9 -133,8 +139,9 @@@ static void clean_dcache_range_nopatch(
  	} while (cur += d_size, cur < end);
  }
  
- static void __nocfi __apply_alternatives(const struct alt_region *region,
- 					 bool is_module,
- 					 unsigned long *feature_mask)
 -static void __apply_alternatives(struct alt_region *region, bool is_module,
++static void __apply_alternatives(const struct alt_region *region,
++				 bool is_module,
+ 				 unsigned long *feature_mask)
  {
  	struct alt_instr *alt;
  	__le32 *origptr, *updptr;

             reply	other threads:[~2022-09-27 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-27 18:59 broonie [this message]
2022-09-27 19:28 ` linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the arm64 tree Kees Cook
2022-10-05  0:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-26  0:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-21  2:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18  2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18  4:49 ` Kees Cook
2016-07-18  5:06   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18  5:14     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220927185911.512737-1-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.