All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Linux-Next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 21:49:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jL-=N8cxoLmfNhG-1Pa864MQBbue1SyBQo-HsuOH41_nQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160718125944.19ebe679@canb.auug.org.au>

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
>
> between commit:
>
>   bffe1baff5d5 ("arm64: kasan: instrument user memory access API")
>
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
>
>   b19e7f50f056 ("arm64/uaccess: Enable hardened usercopy")
>
> from the kspp tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 5e834d10b291,1779cbdb7838..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@@ -264,14 -276,14 +264,15 @@@ extern unsigned long __must_check __cle
>
>   static inline unsigned long __must_check __copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>   {
>  +      kasan_check_write(to, n);
> -       return  __arch_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> +       check_object_size(to, n, false);
> +       return __arch_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
>   }
>
>   static inline unsigned long __must_check __copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>   {
>  -      check_object_size(from, n, true);
>  +      kasan_check_read(from, n);
> -       return  __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> +       return __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n);

If I'm reading correctly, this second fixup is wrong. It should read;

    kasan_check_read(from, n);
    check_object_size(from, n, true);
    return __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n);

(i.e. fix double space between "return" and "__arch_copy..." in both
chunks and add check_object_size() calls after the kasan calls in both
chunks.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Brillo & Chrome OS Security

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18  2:59 linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18  4:49 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2016-07-18  5:06   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18  5:14     ` Kees Cook
2016-07-21  2:34 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-26  0:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-27 18:59 broonie
2022-09-27 19:28 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-05  0:22 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5jL-=N8cxoLmfNhG-1Pa864MQBbue1SyBQo-HsuOH41_nQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.