All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, sbhat@linux.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/3] Hugetlb:Migrating the libhugetlbfs tests
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:18:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019184846.89318-1-tsahu@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,
Libhugetlbfs is not being maintained actively, and some distro is dropping
support for it. There are some tests that are good for testing hugetlb
functionality in kernel.

As per previous dicussion in RFC[1], Here, this patch series consists
of hugetlb tests taken from libhugetlbfs modified to work in ltp
environment.

Based on suggestion[2], I am reposting the patches again. Also, I added
suggested changes by Cyril Hrubis and Li Wang[3].

ref:
1:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220908173947.17956-1-tsahu@linux.ibm.com/
2:https://lore.kernel.org/all/87wn8xi61v.fsf@suse.de/
3:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221016125731.249078-1-tsahu@linux.ibm.com/

v1 -> v2
	1. In (brk near huge) test [PATCH 1/3] removed unused library
		function test_addr_huge() and read_maps().

Tarun Sahu (3):
  Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs brk_near_huge
  Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs chunk-overcommit
  Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs corrupt-by-cow-opt

 runtest/hugetlb                               |   3 +
 testcases/kernel/mem/.gitignore               |   3 +
 .../kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap07.c  | 156 ++++++++++++++++
 .../kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap08.c  | 166 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap09.c  |  90 ++++++++++
 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/lib/hugetlb.h    |   3 +
 6 files changed, 421 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap07.c
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap08.c
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/hugemmap/hugemmap09.c

-- 
2.31.1


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19 18:48 Tarun Sahu [this message]
2022-10-19 18:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/3] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs brk_near_huge Tarun Sahu
2022-10-25  9:57   ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-10-26 16:22     ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-27  9:21       ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-10-27 18:22         ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-19 18:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/3] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs chunk-overcommit Tarun Sahu
2022-10-19 18:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs corrupt-by-cow-opt Tarun Sahu
2022-10-25 11:04   ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-10-26 17:09     ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-27  9:18       ` Richard Palethorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221019184846.89318-1-tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.