All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, ltp@lists.linux.it,
	sbhat@linux.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs corrupt-by-cow-opt
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:04:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735bcxicr.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019184846.89318-4-tsahu@linux.ibm.com>

Hello,

Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/corrupt-by-cow-opt.c test
>
> Test Description: Test sanity of cow optimization on page cache. If a page
> in page cache has only 1 ref count, it is mapped for a private mapping
> directly and is overwritten freely, so next time we access the page, we
> can see corrupt data.

Seems like this and 2/3 follow the same pattern. The setups are
reasonably similar and could be encapsulated in tst_hugepage.

> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.needs_root = 1,
> +	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +	.options = (struct tst_option[]) {
> +		{"H:", &Hopt,   "Location of hugetlbfs, i.e.  -H /var/hugetlbfs"},
> +		{"s:", &nr_opt, "Set the number of the been allocated
> hugepages"},

nr_opt also seems suspicious. The test only ever allocates one page at a
time regardless of what this is set to. Changing it will just change how
much free memory we check for unless I am mistaken.

> +		{}
> +	},
> +	.setup = setup,
> +	.cleanup = cleanup,
> +	.test_all = run_test,
> +	.hugepages = {2, TST_NEEDS},
> +};
> -- 
> 2.31.1


-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19 18:48 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/3] Hugetlb:Migrating the libhugetlbfs tests Tarun Sahu
2022-10-19 18:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/3] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs brk_near_huge Tarun Sahu
2022-10-25  9:57   ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-10-26 16:22     ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-27  9:21       ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-10-27 18:22         ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-19 18:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/3] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs chunk-overcommit Tarun Sahu
2022-10-19 18:48 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs corrupt-by-cow-opt Tarun Sahu
2022-10-25 11:04   ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2022-10-26 17:09     ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-27  9:18       ` Richard Palethorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8735bcxicr.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.