All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups
@ 2022-11-02  9:00 Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data during probe Manivannan Sadhasivam
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam @ 2022-11-02  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andersson, viresh.kumar, rafael
  Cc: johan, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, linux-pm, Manivannan Sadhasivam

Hello,

This series contains cleanup patches targeting the Qcom CPUFreq HW driver.
This is a spun off of the clock provier series [1].

Thanks,
Mani

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221025073254.1564622-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org/T/

Changes in v2:

* Rebased on top of cpufreq/arm/linux-next branch

Manivannan Sadhasivam (3):
  cpufreq: qcom-hw: Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data during probe
  cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use cached dev pointer in probe()
  cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move soc_data to struct qcom_cpufreq

 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 118 ++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data during probe
  2022-11-02  9:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Manivannan Sadhasivam
@ 2022-11-02  9:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use cached dev pointer in probe() Manivannan Sadhasivam
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam @ 2022-11-02  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andersson, viresh.kumar, rafael
  Cc: johan, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, linux-pm, Manivannan Sadhasivam

qcom_cpufreq_data is allocated based on the number of frequency domains
defined in DT which is static and won't change during runtime. There is
no real reason to allocate it during the CPU init() callback and deallocate
it during exit(). Hence, move the allocation to probe() and use the
allocated memory during init().

This also allows us to use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() helper
for acquiring the freq-domain resources from DT.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 86 +++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 61850d75e82f..25951a32b9d5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ struct qcom_cpufreq_data {
 	struct freq_qos_request throttle_freq_req;
 };
 
+static struct {
+	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
+} qcom_cpufreq;
+
 static unsigned long cpu_hw_rate, xo_rate;
 static bool icc_scaling_enabled;
 
@@ -503,8 +507,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	struct of_phandle_args args;
 	struct device_node *cpu_np;
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
-	struct resource *res;
-	void __iomem *base;
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
 	int ret, index;
 
@@ -526,43 +528,16 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		return ret;
 
 	index = args.args[0];
-
-	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, index);
-	if (!res) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to get mem resource %d\n", index);
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	if (!request_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res), res->name)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to request resource %pR\n", res);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
-	if (!base) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to map resource %pR\n", res);
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto release_region;
-	}
-
-	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!data) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto unmap_base;
-	}
-
 	data->soc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
-	data->base = base;
-	data->res = res;
+	data = &qcom_cpufreq.data[index];
 
 	/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
-	if (!(readl_relaxed(base + data->soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
+	if (!(readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", index);
-		ret = -ENODEV;
-		goto error;
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (readl_relaxed(base + data->soc_data->reg_dcvs_ctrl) & 0x1)
+	if (readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_dcvs_ctrl) & 0x1)
 		data->per_core_dcvs = true;
 
 	qcom_get_related_cpus(index, policy->cpus);
@@ -573,14 +548,13 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	ret = qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(cpu_dev, policy);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to read LUT\n", index);
-		goto error;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
 	if (ret <= 0) {
 		dev_err(cpu_dev, "Failed to add OPPs\n");
-		ret = -ENODEV;
-		goto error;
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
 	if (policy_has_boost_freq(policy)) {
@@ -589,18 +563,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 			dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to enable boost: %d\n", ret);
 	}
 
-	ret = qcom_cpufreq_hw_lmh_init(policy, index);
-	if (ret)
-		goto error;
-
-	return 0;
-error:
-	kfree(data);
-unmap_base:
-	iounmap(base);
-release_region:
-	release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res));
-	return ret;
+	return qcom_cpufreq_hw_lmh_init(policy, index);
 }
 
 static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -657,7 +620,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
 	struct clk *clk;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, i, num_domains;
 
 	clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "xo");
 	if (IS_ERR(clk))
@@ -684,6 +647,31 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data based on the available frequency domains in DT */
+	num_domains = of_property_count_elems_of_size(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg", sizeof(u32) * 4);
+	if (num_domains <= 0)
+		return num_domains;
+
+	qcom_cpufreq.data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct qcom_cpufreq_data) * num_domains,
+					 GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!qcom_cpufreq.data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_domains; i++) {
+		struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = &qcom_cpufreq.data[i];
+		struct resource *res;
+		void __iomem *base;
+
+		base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, i, &res);
+		if (IS_ERR(base)) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map resource %pR\n", res);
+			return PTR_ERR(base);
+		}
+
+		data->base = base;
+		data->res = res;
+	}
+
 	ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver);
 	if (ret)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use cached dev pointer in probe()
  2022-11-02  9:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data during probe Manivannan Sadhasivam
@ 2022-11-02  9:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move soc_data to struct qcom_cpufreq Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Viresh Kumar
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam @ 2022-11-02  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andersson, viresh.kumar, rafael
  Cc: johan, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, linux-pm, Manivannan Sadhasivam

There are multiple instances of dev pointer used in the probe() function.
Instead of referencing pdev->dev all the time, let's use a cached dev
pointer to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 25951a32b9d5..6d807956aaf6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -618,18 +618,19 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver = {
 
 static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	int ret, i, num_domains;
 
-	clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "xo");
+	clk = clk_get(dev, "xo");
 	if (IS_ERR(clk))
 		return PTR_ERR(clk);
 
 	xo_rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
 	clk_put(clk);
 
-	clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "alternate");
+	clk = clk_get(dev, "alternate");
 	if (IS_ERR(clk))
 		return PTR_ERR(clk);
 
@@ -648,11 +649,11 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 
 	/* Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data based on the available frequency domains in DT */
-	num_domains = of_property_count_elems_of_size(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg", sizeof(u32) * 4);
+	num_domains = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dev->of_node, "reg", sizeof(u32) * 4);
 	if (num_domains <= 0)
 		return num_domains;
 
-	qcom_cpufreq.data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct qcom_cpufreq_data) * num_domains,
+	qcom_cpufreq.data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct qcom_cpufreq_data) * num_domains,
 					 GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!qcom_cpufreq.data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -664,7 +665,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 		base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, i, &res);
 		if (IS_ERR(base)) {
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map resource %pR\n", res);
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to map resource %pR\n", res);
 			return PTR_ERR(base);
 		}
 
@@ -674,9 +675,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver);
 	if (ret)
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
+		dev_err(dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
 	else
-		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "QCOM CPUFreq HW driver initialized\n");
+		dev_dbg(dev, "QCOM CPUFreq HW driver initialized\n");
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move soc_data to struct qcom_cpufreq
  2022-11-02  9:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data during probe Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use cached dev pointer in probe() Manivannan Sadhasivam
@ 2022-11-02  9:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
  2022-11-02  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Viresh Kumar
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam @ 2022-11-02  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andersson, viresh.kumar, rafael
  Cc: johan, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, linux-pm, Manivannan Sadhasivam

soc_data is a static info of the driver and thus no need to cache it inside
the qcom_cpufreq_data struct which is allocated per frequency domain. So,
move it inside qcom_cpufreq struct.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 6d807956aaf6..5e0598730a04 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data {
 struct qcom_cpufreq_data {
 	void __iomem *base;
 	struct resource *res;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
 
 	/*
 	 * Mutex to synchronize between de-init sequence and re-starting LMh
@@ -63,6 +62,7 @@ struct qcom_cpufreq_data {
 
 static struct {
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
 } qcom_cpufreq;
 
 static unsigned long cpu_hw_rate, xo_rate;
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					unsigned int index)
 {
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 	unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
 		return 0;
 
 	data = policy->driver_data;
-	soc_data = data->soc_data;
+	soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 
 	index = readl_relaxed(data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
 	index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 						unsigned int target_freq)
 {
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 	unsigned int index;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
 	unsigned long rate;
 	int ret;
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *drv_data = policy->driver_data;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = drv_data->soc_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 
 	table = kcalloc(LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!table)
@@ -294,10 +294,10 @@ static unsigned long qcom_lmh_get_throttle_freq(struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data)
 {
 	unsigned int lval;
 
-	if (data->soc_data->reg_current_vote)
-		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_current_vote) & 0x3ff;
+	if (qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_current_vote)
+		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_current_vote) & 0x3ff;
 	else
-		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_domain_state) & 0xff;
+		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_domain_state) & 0xff;
 
 	return lval * xo_rate;
 }
@@ -371,9 +371,9 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_lmh_dcvs_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
 	disable_irq_nosync(c_data->throttle_irq);
 	schedule_delayed_work(&c_data->throttle_work, 0);
 
-	if (c_data->soc_data->reg_intr_clr)
+	if (qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_intr_clr)
 		writel_relaxed(GT_IRQ_STATUS,
-			       c_data->base + c_data->soc_data->reg_intr_clr);
+			       c_data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_intr_clr);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -528,16 +528,15 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		return ret;
 
 	index = args.args[0];
-	data->soc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
 	data = &qcom_cpufreq.data[index];
 
 	/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
-	if (!(readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
+	if (!(readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", index);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_dcvs_ctrl) & 0x1)
+	if (readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_dcvs_ctrl) & 0x1)
 		data->per_core_dcvs = true;
 
 	qcom_get_related_cpus(index, policy->cpus);
@@ -658,6 +657,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!qcom_cpufreq.data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	qcom_cpufreq.soc_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < num_domains; i++) {
 		struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = &qcom_cpufreq.data[i];
 		struct resource *res;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups
  2022-11-02  9:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Manivannan Sadhasivam
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move soc_data to struct qcom_cpufreq Manivannan Sadhasivam
@ 2022-11-02  9:05 ` Viresh Kumar
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2022-11-02  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manivannan Sadhasivam
  Cc: andersson, rafael, johan, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, linux-pm

On 02-11-22, 14:30, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This series contains cleanup patches targeting the Qcom CPUFreq HW driver.
> This is a spun off of the clock provier series [1].
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221025073254.1564622-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org/T/
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 
> * Rebased on top of cpufreq/arm/linux-next branch

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-02  9:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-02  9:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Allocate qcom_cpufreq_data during probe Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use cached dev pointer in probe() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-02  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move soc_data to struct qcom_cpufreq Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-11-02  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Qcom CPUFreq HW driver cleanups Viresh Kumar

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.