From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>, kernel@collabora.com Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Initial rk3588 DT Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 18:14:55 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221108171500.99599-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> (raw) Hi, This adds initial rk3588(s) DT including two different board devicetrees. This patchset has a couple of dependencies: * clock support https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221018151407.63395-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ * dt binding fixes https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221107173310.60503-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221107180231.73663-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221021172012.87954-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ Even with that there is still one warning from the DT check: $ make CHECK_DTBS=y rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5a.dtb DTC_CHK arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb /home/sre/src/collabora/rode/linux-rockchip-upstream/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb: ethernet@fe1c0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('interrupt-names', 'interrupts', 'mdio', 'power-domains', 'reg', 'reset-names', 'resets', 'rx-queues-config', 'snps,axi-config', 'snps,mixed-burst', 'snps,mtl-rx-config', 'snps,mtl-tx-config', 'snps,tso', 'stmmac-axi-config', 'tx-queues-config' were unexpected) From schema: /home/sre/src/collabora/rode/linux-rockchip-upstream/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml This is for gmac1. gmac0 has the same properties and there is no warning. Also rk3588s (and thus the Rock 5A) has only gmac1 and there is no warning for the Rock 5A. It looks like the for some reason the referenced "snps,dwmac.yaml#" is only checked for the first node. I think it's a bug in dt-validate. -- Sebastian Jianqun Xu (1): arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588 pinctrl data Kever Yang (2): arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588-evb1 board Sebastian Reichel (2): dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: add initial rk3588 syscon compatibles arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock-5a board .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 10 + .../devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml | 5 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 2 + .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts | 156 + .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi | 516 +++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi | 62 + .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-pinctrl.dtsi | 3403 +++++++++++++++++ .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5a.dts | 63 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 1678 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 5895 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-pinctrl.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5a.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi -- 2.35.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>, kernel@collabora.com Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Initial rk3588 DT Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 18:14:55 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221108171500.99599-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> (raw) Hi, This adds initial rk3588(s) DT including two different board devicetrees. This patchset has a couple of dependencies: * clock support https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221018151407.63395-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ * dt binding fixes https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221107173310.60503-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221107180231.73663-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221021172012.87954-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ Even with that there is still one warning from the DT check: $ make CHECK_DTBS=y rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5a.dtb DTC_CHK arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb /home/sre/src/collabora/rode/linux-rockchip-upstream/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb: ethernet@fe1c0000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('interrupt-names', 'interrupts', 'mdio', 'power-domains', 'reg', 'reset-names', 'resets', 'rx-queues-config', 'snps,axi-config', 'snps,mixed-burst', 'snps,mtl-rx-config', 'snps,mtl-tx-config', 'snps,tso', 'stmmac-axi-config', 'tx-queues-config' were unexpected) From schema: /home/sre/src/collabora/rode/linux-rockchip-upstream/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml This is for gmac1. gmac0 has the same properties and there is no warning. Also rk3588s (and thus the Rock 5A) has only gmac1 and there is no warning for the Rock 5A. It looks like the for some reason the referenced "snps,dwmac.yaml#" is only checked for the first node. I think it's a bug in dt-validate. -- Sebastian Jianqun Xu (1): arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588 pinctrl data Kever Yang (2): arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588-evb1 board Sebastian Reichel (2): dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: add initial rk3588 syscon compatibles arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock-5a board .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 10 + .../devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml | 5 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 2 + .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts | 156 + .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi | 516 +++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi | 62 + .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-pinctrl.dtsi | 3403 +++++++++++++++++ .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5a.dts | 63 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 1678 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 5895 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-pinctrl.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-rock-5a.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi -- 2.35.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 17:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-11-08 17:14 Sebastian Reichel [this message] 2022-11-08 17:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] Initial rk3588 DT Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: add initial rk3588 syscon compatibles Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588 pinctrl data Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588-evb1 board Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:14 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 18:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-11-08 18:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-11-09 5:35 ` kernel test robot 2022-11-13 2:04 ` kernel test robot 2022-11-08 17:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock-5a board Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-08 17:15 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-11-09 9:16 ` Michael Riesch 2022-11-09 9:16 ` Michael Riesch 2022-11-09 12:01 ` ZHANG Yuntian 2022-11-09 12:01 ` ZHANG Yuntian
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20221108171500.99599-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \ --to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=kernel@collabora.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \ --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.