* [PATCH] arm64: make is_ttbrX_addr() noinstr-safe
@ 2022-11-14 14:40 Mark Rutland
2022-11-15 18:32 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2022-11-14 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: catalin.marinas, mark.rutland, will
We use is_ttbr0_addr() in noinstr code, but as it's only marked as
inline, it's theoretically possible for the compiler to place it
out-of-line and instrument it, which would be problematic.
Mark is_ttbr0_addr() as __always_inline such that that can safely be
used from noinstr code. For consistency, do the same to is_ttbr1_addr().
Note that while is_ttbr1_addr() calls arch_kasan_reset_tag(), this is a
macro (and its callees are either macros or __always_inline), so there
is not a risk of transient instrumentation.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
index 445aa3af3b76..400f8956328b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -308,13 +308,13 @@ static inline void compat_start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
}
#endif
-static inline bool is_ttbr0_addr(unsigned long addr)
+static __always_inline bool is_ttbr0_addr(unsigned long addr)
{
/* entry assembly clears tags for TTBR0 addrs */
return addr < TASK_SIZE;
}
-static inline bool is_ttbr1_addr(unsigned long addr)
+static __always_inline bool is_ttbr1_addr(unsigned long addr)
{
/* TTBR1 addresses may have a tag if KASAN_SW_TAGS is in use */
return arch_kasan_reset_tag(addr) >= PAGE_OFFSET;
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: make is_ttbrX_addr() noinstr-safe
2022-11-14 14:40 [PATCH] arm64: make is_ttbrX_addr() noinstr-safe Mark Rutland
@ 2022-11-15 18:32 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-11-15 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, Mark Rutland; +Cc: catalin.marinas, kernel-team, Will Deacon
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:40:42 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> We use is_ttbr0_addr() in noinstr code, but as it's only marked as
> inline, it's theoretically possible for the compiler to place it
> out-of-line and instrument it, which would be problematic.
>
> Mark is_ttbr0_addr() as __always_inline such that that can safely be
> used from noinstr code. For consistency, do the same to is_ttbr1_addr().
> Note that while is_ttbr1_addr() calls arch_kasan_reset_tag(), this is a
> macro (and its callees are either macros or __always_inline), so there
> is not a risk of transient instrumentation.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/trivial), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: make is_ttbrX_addr() noinstr-safe
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d8c1d798a2e5
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-15 18:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-14 14:40 [PATCH] arm64: make is_ttbrX_addr() noinstr-safe Mark Rutland
2022-11-15 18:32 ` Will Deacon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.