All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jack@suse.cz, kbusch@kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/5] sbitmap: remove redundant check in __sbitmap_queue_get_batch
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 22:33:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222143353.598042-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222143353.598042-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

Commit fbb564a557809 ("lib/sbitmap: Fix invalid loop in
__sbitmap_queue_get_batch()") mentioned that "Checking free bits when
setting the target bits. Otherwise, it may reuse the busying bits."
This commit add check to make sure all masked bits in word before
cmpxchg is zero. Then the existing check after cmpxchg to check any
zero bit is existing in masked bits in word is redundant.

Actually, old value of word before cmpxchg is stored in val and we
will filter out busy bits in val by "(get_mask & ~val)" after cmpxchg.
So we will not reuse busy bits methioned in commit fbb564a557809
("lib/sbitmap: Fix invalid loop in __sbitmap_queue_get_batch()"). Revert
new-added check to remove redundant check.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 lib/sbitmap.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
index cb5e03a2d65b..11e75f4040fb 100644
--- a/lib/sbitmap.c
+++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
@@ -518,11 +518,9 @@ unsigned long __sbitmap_queue_get_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, int nr_tags,
 
 			get_mask = ((1UL << nr_tags) - 1) << nr;
 			val = READ_ONCE(map->word);
-			do {
-				if ((val & ~get_mask) != val)
-					goto next;
-			} while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(ptr, &val,
-							  get_mask | val));
+			while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(ptr, &val,
+							  get_mask | val))
+				;
 			get_mask = (get_mask & ~val) >> nr;
 			if (get_mask) {
 				*offset = nr + (index << sb->shift);
-- 
2.30.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-22  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-22 14:33 [PATCH RESEND v2 0/5] A few bugfix and cleanup patches for sbitmap Kemeng Shi
2022-12-22 14:33 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/5] sbitmap: remove unnecessary calculation of alloc_hint in __sbitmap_get_shallow Kemeng Shi
2022-12-22 11:01   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 14:33 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2022-12-22 11:23   ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/5] sbitmap: remove redundant check in __sbitmap_queue_get_batch Jan Kara
2022-12-22 11:49     ` Kemeng Shi
2022-12-22 12:16       ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 14:33 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 3/5] sbitmap: rewrite sbitmap_find_bit_in_index to reduce repeat code Kemeng Shi
2022-12-22 12:23   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 14:33 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 4/5] sbitmap: add sbitmap_find_bit to remove repeat code in __sbitmap_get/__sbitmap_get_shallow Kemeng Shi
2022-12-22 12:42   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 14:33 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 5/5] sbitmap: correct wake_batch recalculation to avoid potential IO hung Kemeng Shi
2022-12-22 13:41   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-26  7:50     ` Yu Kuai
2022-12-26  8:57       ` Yu Kuai
2023-01-03  2:12         ` Kemeng Shi
2023-01-16  2:15           ` Kemeng Shi
2023-01-16  9:54             ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221222143353.598042-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.