All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: duplicate patches in the backlight tree
@ 2023-01-06  0:35 Stephen Rothwell
  2023-01-06  9:25 ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-01-06  0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 437 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commits are also in the backlight-fixes tree as different
commits (but the same patches):

  44bbdb7e3a67 ("backlight: ktd253: Switch to use dev_err_probe() helper")
  c0e09423bbb4 ("dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8950 compatible")
  73516cbcf8d9 ("backlight: pwm_bl: Drop support for legacy PWM probing")

Forgot to push out an updated backlight-fixes tree?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the backlight tree
  2023-01-06  0:35 linux-next: duplicate patches in the backlight tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2023-01-06  9:25 ` Lee Jones
  2023-01-06  9:31   ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2023-01-06  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

On Fri, 06 Jan 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the backlight-fixes tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
> 
>   44bbdb7e3a67 ("backlight: ktd253: Switch to use dev_err_probe() helper")
>   c0e09423bbb4 ("dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8950 compatible")
>   73516cbcf8d9 ("backlight: pwm_bl: Drop support for legacy PWM probing")
> 
> Forgot to push out an updated backlight-fixes tree?

Don't think so?

88603b6dc4194 (HEAD -> refs/heads/backlight-fixes, tag: \
  refs/tags/v6.2-rc2, 					\
  refs/remotes/mfd/mfd-fixes, 				\
  refs/remotes/leds/for-leds-next, 			\
  refs/remotes/backlight/backlight-fixes, 		\
  refs/heads/mfd-fixes, 				\
  refs/heads/for-leds-next) 				\
    Linux 6.2-rc2

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the backlight tree
  2023-01-06  9:25 ` Lee Jones
@ 2023-01-06  9:31   ` Lee Jones
  2023-01-06 11:59     ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2023-01-06  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

On Fri, 06 Jan 2023, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Jan 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commits are also in the backlight-fixes tree as different
> > commits (but the same patches):
> > 
> >   44bbdb7e3a67 ("backlight: ktd253: Switch to use dev_err_probe() helper")
> >   c0e09423bbb4 ("dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8950 compatible")
> >   73516cbcf8d9 ("backlight: pwm_bl: Drop support for legacy PWM probing")
> > 
> > Forgot to push out an updated backlight-fixes tree?

What's the branch name that you're tracking?

> Don't think so?
> 
> 88603b6dc4194 (HEAD -> refs/heads/backlight-fixes, tag: \
>   refs/tags/v6.2-rc2, 					\
>   refs/remotes/mfd/mfd-fixes, 				\
>   refs/remotes/leds/for-leds-next, 			\
>   refs/remotes/backlight/backlight-fixes, 		\

Ah, wait!  This is the old naming scheme.

I assume, despite the message above, you're tracking
'for-backlight-fixes', right?

>   refs/heads/mfd-fixes, 				\
>   refs/heads/for-leds-next) 				\
>     Linux 6.2-rc2

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the backlight tree
  2023-01-06  9:31   ` Lee Jones
@ 2023-01-06 11:59     ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-01-06 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 631 bytes --]

Hi Lee,

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 09:31:33 +0000 Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> What's the branch name that you're tracking?
> 
> > Don't think so?
> > 
> > 88603b6dc4194 (HEAD -> refs/heads/backlight-fixes, tag: \
> >   refs/tags/v6.2-rc2, 					\
> >   refs/remotes/mfd/mfd-fixes, 				\
> >   refs/remotes/leds/for-leds-next, 			\
> >   refs/remotes/backlight/backlight-fixes, 		\  
> 
> Ah, wait!  This is the old naming scheme.
> 
> I assume, despite the message above, you're tracking
> 'for-backlight-fixes', right?

Correct.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-06 12:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-06  0:35 linux-next: duplicate patches in the backlight tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-06  9:25 ` Lee Jones
2023-01-06  9:31   ` Lee Jones
2023-01-06 11:59     ` Stephen Rothwell

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.