[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 1/4] udf: Define EFSCORRUPTED error code

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 1/4] udf: Define EFSCORRUPTED error code

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

[ Upstream commit 3d2d7e61553dbcc8ba45201d8ae4f383742c8202 ]

Similarly to other filesystems define EFSCORRUPTED error code for
reporting internal filesystem corruption.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/udf/udf_sb.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/udf/udf_sb.h b/fs/udf/udf_sb.h
index 8eace7a633d38..d91cbfb08983e 100644
--- a/fs/udf/udf_sb.h
+++ b/fs/udf/udf_sb.h
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@
 #define MF_DUPLICATE_MD		0x01
 #define MF_MIRROR_FE_LOADED	0x02
 
+#define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN
+
 struct udf_meta_data {
 	__u32	s_meta_file_loc;
 	__u32	s_mirror_file_loc;
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 2/4] ARM: dts: exynos: Use Exynos5420 compatible for the MIPI video phy

[Sasha Levin]

From: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 5d5aa219a790d61cad2c38e1aa32058f16ad2f0b ]

For some reason, the driver adding support for Exynos5420 MIPI phy
back in 2016 wasn't used on Exynos5420, which caused a kernel panic.
Add the proper compatible for it.

Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230121201844.46872-2-markuss.broks@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 7d51e0f4ab79a..5da434ccf12ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ dp_phy: dp-video-phy {
 		};
 
 		mipi_phy: mipi-video-phy {
-			compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-mipi-video-phy";
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-mipi-video-phy";
 			syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
 			#phy-cells = <1>;
 		};
-- 
2.39.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 2/4] ARM: dts: exynos: Use Exynos5420 compatible for the MIPI video phy

[Sasha Levin]

From: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 5d5aa219a790d61cad2c38e1aa32058f16ad2f0b ]

For some reason, the driver adding support for Exynos5420 MIPI phy
back in 2016 wasn't used on Exynos5420, which caused a kernel panic.
Add the proper compatible for it.

Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230121201844.46872-2-markuss.broks@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 7d51e0f4ab79a..5da434ccf12ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ dp_phy: dp-video-phy {
 		};
 
 		mipi_phy: mipi-video-phy {
-			compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-mipi-video-phy";
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-mipi-video-phy";
 			syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
 			#phy-cells = <1>;
 		};
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 3/4] blk-iocost: fix divide by 0 error in calc_lcoefs()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 984af1e66b4126cf145153661cc24c213e2ec231 ]

echo max of u64 to cost.model can cause divide by 0 error.

  # echo 8:0 rbps=18446744073709551615 > /sys/fs/cgroup/io.cost.model

  divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
  RIP: 0010:calc_lcoefs+0x4c/0xc0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ioc_refresh_params+0x2b3/0x4f0
   ioc_cost_model_write+0x3cb/0x4c0
   ? _copy_from_iter+0x6d/0x6c0
   ? kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xfc/0x270
   cgroup_file_write+0xa0/0x200
   kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x270
   vfs_write+0x414/0x620
   ksys_write+0x73/0x160
   __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
   do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

calc_lcoefs() uses the input value of cost.model in DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL,
overflow would happen if bps plus IOC_PAGE_SIZE is greater than
ULLONG_MAX, it can cause divide by 0 error.

Fix the problem by setting basecost

Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230117070806.3857142-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-iocost.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index ef287c33d6d97..4fdc8858a69a9 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -785,9 +785,14 @@ static void calc_lcoefs(u64 bps, u64 seqiops, u64 randiops,
 
 	*page = *seqio = *randio = 0;
 
-	if (bps)
-		*page = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(VTIME_PER_SEC,
-					   DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(bps, IOC_PAGE_SIZE));
+	if (bps) {
+		u64 bps_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(bps, IOC_PAGE_SIZE);
+
+		if (bps_pages)
+			*page = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(VTIME_PER_SEC, bps_pages);
+		else
+			*page = 1;
+	}
 
 	if (seqiops) {
 		v = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(VTIME_PER_SEC, seqiops);
-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 4/4] sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed

[Sasha Levin]

From: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 829c1651e9c4a6f78398d3e67651cef9bb6b42cc ]

When a scheduling entity is placed onto cfs_rq, its vruntime is pulled
to the base level (around cfs_rq->min_vruntime), so that the entity
doesn't gain extra boost when placed backwards.

However, if the entity being placed wasn't executed for a long time, its
vruntime may get too far behind (e.g. while cfs_rq was executing a
low-weight hog), which can inverse the vruntime comparison due to s64
overflow.  This results in the entity being placed with its original
vruntime way forwards, so that it will effectively never get to the cpu.

To prevent that, ignore the vruntime of the entity being placed if it
didn't execute for much longer than the characteristic sheduler time
scale.

[rkagan: formatted, adjusted commit log, comments, cutoff value]
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230130122216.3555094-1-rkagan@amazon.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d2a68ae7596ec..97ede6b914422 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3881,6 +3881,7 @@ static void
 place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
 {
 	u64 vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+	u64 sleep_time;
 
 	/*
 	 * The 'current' period is already promised to the current tasks,
@@ -3905,8 +3906,18 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
 		vruntime -= thresh;
 	}
 
-	/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
-	se->vruntime = max_vruntime(se->vruntime, vruntime);
+	/*
+	 * Pull vruntime of the entity being placed to the base level of
+	 * cfs_rq, to prevent boosting it if placed backwards.  If the entity
+	 * slept for a long time, don't even try to compare its vruntime with
+	 * the base as it may be too far off and the comparison may get
+	 * inversed due to s64 overflow.
+	 */
+	sleep_time = rq_clock_task(rq_of(cfs_rq)) - se->exec_start;
+	if ((s64)sleep_time > 60LL * NSEC_PER_SEC)
+		se->vruntime = vruntime;
+	else
+		se->vruntime = max_vruntime(se->vruntime, vruntime);
 }
 
 static void check_enqueue_throttle(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
-- 
2.39.0