* [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
@ 2023-03-10 14:47 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2023-03-10 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Simek; +Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
} else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
return ret;
- } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
+ } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
}
- } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
+ } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (irq <= 0)
return -ENXIO;
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
2023-03-10 14:47 ` Rob Herring
@ 2023-03-11 16:15 ` kernel test robot
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-03-11 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring, Michal Simek
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi Rob,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on xilinx-xlnx/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Rob-Herring/soc-xilinx-Use-of_property_present-for-testing-DT-property-presence/20230310-225437
base: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310144725.1545315-1-robh%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230312/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/7d21b118deba11d338baf0365e962a8889f3ac68
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Rob-Herring/soc-xilinx-Use-of_property_present-for-testing-DT-property-presence/20230310-225437
git checkout 7d21b118deba11d338baf0365e962a8889f3ac68
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/soc/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c: In function 'zynqmp_pm_probe':
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c:221:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_property_present'; did you mean 'fwnode_property_present'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
221 | } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| fwnode_property_present
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +221 drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
183
184 static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
185 {
186 int ret, irq;
187 u32 pm_api_version;
188 struct mbox_client *client;
189
190 zynqmp_pm_get_api_version(&pm_api_version);
191
192 /* Check PM API version number */
193 if (pm_api_version < ZYNQMP_PM_VERSION)
194 return -ENODEV;
195
196 /*
197 * First try to use Xilinx Event Manager by registering suspend_event_callback
198 * for suspend/shutdown event.
199 * If xlnx_register_event() returns -EACCES (Xilinx Event Manager
200 * is not available to use) or -ENODEV(Xilinx Event Manager not compiled),
201 * then use ipi-mailbox or interrupt method.
202 */
203 ret = xlnx_register_event(PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB, 0, 0, false,
204 suspend_event_callback, NULL);
205 if (!ret) {
206 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
207 sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
208 GFP_KERNEL);
209 if (!zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work) {
210 xlnx_unregister_event(PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB, 0, 0,
211 suspend_event_callback, NULL);
212 return -ENOMEM;
213 }
214 event_registered = true;
215
216 INIT_WORK(&zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->callback_work,
217 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work_fn);
218 } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
219 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
220 return ret;
> 221 } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
222 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
223 devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
224 sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
225 GFP_KERNEL);
226 if (!zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work)
227 return -ENOMEM;
228
229 INIT_WORK(&zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->callback_work,
230 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work_fn);
231 client = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*client), GFP_KERNEL);
232 if (!client)
233 return -ENOMEM;
234
235 client->dev = &pdev->dev;
236 client->rx_callback = ipi_receive_callback;
237
238 rx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(client, "rx");
239 if (IS_ERR(rx_chan)) {
240 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
241 return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
242 }
243 } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
244 irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
245 if (irq <= 0)
246 return -ENXIO;
247
248 ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
249 zynqmp_pm_isr,
250 IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
251 dev_name(&pdev->dev),
252 &pdev->dev);
253 if (ret) {
254 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "devm_request_threaded_irq '%d' failed with %d\n",
255 irq, ret);
256 return ret;
257 }
258 } else {
259 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Required property not found in DT node\n");
260 return -ENOENT;
261 }
262
263 ret = sysfs_create_file(&pdev->dev.kobj, &dev_attr_suspend_mode.attr);
264 if (ret) {
265 if (event_registered) {
266 xlnx_unregister_event(PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB, 0, 0, suspend_event_callback,
267 NULL);
268 event_registered = false;
269 }
270 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create sysfs interface\n");
271 return ret;
272 }
273
274 return 0;
275 }
276
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
@ 2023-03-11 16:15 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-03-11 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring, Michal Simek
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi Rob,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on xilinx-xlnx/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Rob-Herring/soc-xilinx-Use-of_property_present-for-testing-DT-property-presence/20230310-225437
base: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310144725.1545315-1-robh%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230312/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/7d21b118deba11d338baf0365e962a8889f3ac68
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Rob-Herring/soc-xilinx-Use-of_property_present-for-testing-DT-property-presence/20230310-225437
git checkout 7d21b118deba11d338baf0365e962a8889f3ac68
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/soc/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c: In function 'zynqmp_pm_probe':
>> drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c:221:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_property_present'; did you mean 'fwnode_property_present'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
221 | } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| fwnode_property_present
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +221 drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
183
184 static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
185 {
186 int ret, irq;
187 u32 pm_api_version;
188 struct mbox_client *client;
189
190 zynqmp_pm_get_api_version(&pm_api_version);
191
192 /* Check PM API version number */
193 if (pm_api_version < ZYNQMP_PM_VERSION)
194 return -ENODEV;
195
196 /*
197 * First try to use Xilinx Event Manager by registering suspend_event_callback
198 * for suspend/shutdown event.
199 * If xlnx_register_event() returns -EACCES (Xilinx Event Manager
200 * is not available to use) or -ENODEV(Xilinx Event Manager not compiled),
201 * then use ipi-mailbox or interrupt method.
202 */
203 ret = xlnx_register_event(PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB, 0, 0, false,
204 suspend_event_callback, NULL);
205 if (!ret) {
206 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
207 sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
208 GFP_KERNEL);
209 if (!zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work) {
210 xlnx_unregister_event(PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB, 0, 0,
211 suspend_event_callback, NULL);
212 return -ENOMEM;
213 }
214 event_registered = true;
215
216 INIT_WORK(&zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->callback_work,
217 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work_fn);
218 } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
219 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
220 return ret;
> 221 } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
222 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
223 devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
224 sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
225 GFP_KERNEL);
226 if (!zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work)
227 return -ENOMEM;
228
229 INIT_WORK(&zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work->callback_work,
230 zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work_fn);
231 client = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*client), GFP_KERNEL);
232 if (!client)
233 return -ENOMEM;
234
235 client->dev = &pdev->dev;
236 client->rx_callback = ipi_receive_callback;
237
238 rx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(client, "rx");
239 if (IS_ERR(rx_chan)) {
240 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
241 return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
242 }
243 } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
244 irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
245 if (irq <= 0)
246 return -ENXIO;
247
248 ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
249 zynqmp_pm_isr,
250 IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
251 dev_name(&pdev->dev),
252 &pdev->dev);
253 if (ret) {
254 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "devm_request_threaded_irq '%d' failed with %d\n",
255 irq, ret);
256 return ret;
257 }
258 } else {
259 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Required property not found in DT node\n");
260 return -ENOENT;
261 }
262
263 ret = sysfs_create_file(&pdev->dev.kobj, &dev_attr_suspend_mode.attr);
264 if (ret) {
265 if (event_registered) {
266 xlnx_unregister_event(PM_INIT_SUSPEND_CB, 0, 0, suspend_event_callback,
267 NULL);
268 event_registered = false;
269 }
270 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create sysfs interface\n");
271 return ret;
272 }
273
274 return 0;
275 }
276
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
2023-03-10 14:47 ` Rob Herring
@ 2023-03-13 10:18 ` Michal Simek
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2023-03-13 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring, Michal Simek; +Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 3/10/23 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
> zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
> devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
> return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
> }
> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (irq <= 0)
> return -ENXIO;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Waiting for v2 because of missing of.h header reported by lkp.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
M
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
@ 2023-03-13 10:18 ` Michal Simek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2023-03-13 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring, Michal Simek; +Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 3/10/23 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
> zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
> devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
> return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
> }
> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (irq <= 0)
> return -ENXIO;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Waiting for v2 because of missing of.h header reported by lkp.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
M
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
2023-03-13 10:18 ` Michal Simek
@ 2023-03-14 13:23 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2023-03-14 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Simek; +Cc: Michal Simek, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 5:19 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/10/23 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> > for presence of a property and nothing more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> > index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
> > return ret;
> > - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
> > + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
> > zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
> > devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
> > @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
> > return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
> > }
> > - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
> > + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
> > irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > if (irq <= 0)
> > return -ENXIO;
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>
> Waiting for v2 because of missing of.h header reported by lkp.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
It's a false positive. The header change is in v6.3-rc1, but 0-day is
applying these to branches not yet updated to rc1.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
@ 2023-03-14 13:23 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2023-03-14 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Simek; +Cc: Michal Simek, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 5:19 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/10/23 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> > for presence of a property and nothing more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> > index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
> > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
> > return ret;
> > - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
> > + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
> > zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
> > devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
> > @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
> > return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
> > }
> > - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
> > + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
> > irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > if (irq <= 0)
> > return -ENXIO;
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>
> Waiting for v2 because of missing of.h header reported by lkp.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
It's a false positive. The header change is in v6.3-rc1, but 0-day is
applying these to branches not yet updated to rc1.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
2023-03-14 13:23 ` Rob Herring
@ 2023-03-28 7:37 ` Michal Simek
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2023-03-28 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring; +Cc: Michal Simek, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 3/14/23 14:23, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 5:19 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/10/23 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
>>> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
>>> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
>>> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
>>> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
>>> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
>>> return ret;
>>> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
>>> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
>>> zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
>>> devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>> sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
>>> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
>>> return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
>>> }
>>> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
>>> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
>>> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>> if (irq <= 0)
>>> return -ENXIO;
>>> --
>>> 2.39.2
>>>
>>
>> Waiting for v2 because of missing of.h header reported by lkp.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
>
> It's a false positive. The header change is in v6.3-rc1, but 0-day is
> applying these to branches not yet updated to rc1.
ok. applied.
Thanks,
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
@ 2023-03-28 7:37 ` Michal Simek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2023-03-28 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring; +Cc: Michal Simek, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 3/14/23 14:23, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 5:19 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/10/23 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
>>> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
>>> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
>>> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
>>> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
>>> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
>>> return ret;
>>> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
>>> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
>>> zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
>>> devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>> sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
>>> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
>>> return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
>>> }
>>> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
>>> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
>>> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>> if (irq <= 0)
>>> return -ENXIO;
>>> --
>>> 2.39.2
>>>
>>
>> Waiting for v2 because of missing of.h header reported by lkp.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
>
> It's a false positive. The header change is in v6.3-rc1, but 0-day is
> applying these to branches not yet updated to rc1.
ok. applied.
Thanks,
Michal
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread