All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Save and restore MSI control of RC in suspend and resume
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 12:49:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313174929.GA1509198@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR04MB86763F096229D90DCBF6C0D08CB99@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 02:50:31AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 2023年3月11日 0:14
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > Cc: l.stach@pengutronix.de; bhelgaas@google.com;
> > linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Save and restore MSI control of RC in
> > suspend and resume
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:08:06AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> > > > Sent: 2022年12月30日 23:06
> > > > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; l.stach@pengutronix.de;
> > > > bhelgaas@google.com
> > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > > > <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Save and restore MSI control of
> > > > RC in suspend and resume
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:05:34PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > > > The MSI Enable bit controls delivery of MSI interrupts from
> > > > > components below the Root Port. This bit might lost during the
> > > > > suspend, should be re-stored during resume.
> > > > >
> > > > > Save the MSI control during suspend, and restore it in resume.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that what Lucas and Bjorn asked on v1 is still not answered.
> > > >
> > > > The root port is a PCI device, why do we need to save and restore
> > > > the MSI cap on top of what PCI core already does ? The RP should be
> > > > enumerated as a PCI device and therefore I expect the MSI cap to be
> > > > saved/restored in the suspend/resume execution.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think there is anything iMX6 specific in this.
> > > Hi Lorenzo:
> > > Thanks for your comments.
> > > Sorry to reply late, since I got a high fever in the past days.
> > >
> > > Based on i.MX6QP SABRESD board and XHCI PCIe2USB3.0 device, the MSI
> > > cap  save/restore of PCI core is not executed(dev->msi_enabled is
> > > zero)  during my suspend/resume tests.
> > 
> > I still do not understand. The register you are saving/restoring in the RC is not
> > the root port Message control field in the root port MSI capability, it is a
> > separate register that controls the root complex MSI forwarding, is that
> > correct ?
> > 
> > The root port MSI capability does not control the root complex forwarding of
> > MSIs TLPs.
> > 
> > So the bits you are saving and restoring IIUC should be MMIO space in the
> > root complex, dressed as an MSI capability, that has nothing to do with the
> > root port MSI capability.
> > 
> > Is that correct ?
>
> It's not a separate register.
>
> The bit I manipulated is the MSI Enable bit of the Message Control
> Register for MSI (Offset 02h) contained in the MSI-capability of
> Root Complex.
>
> In addition, on i.MX6, the MSI Enable bit controls delivery of MSI
> interrupts from components below the Root Port.
>
> So, set MSI Enable in imx6q-pcie to let the MSI from downstream
> components works.

My confusion is about this "MSI Capability" found by
"dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI)" in your patch.

The i.MX6 manual might refer to that as an "MSI Capability" but as far
as I know, the PCIe base spec doesn't document a Root Complex MSI
Capability.

I don't think it's the same as the one documented in PCIe r6.0, sec
7.7.2.  I think it's different because:

  (1) I *think* "pci" here refers to the RC, not to a Root Port.

  (2) The semantics are different.  The MSI-X Enable bit in 7.7.2 only
  determines whether the Function itself is permitted to use MSI-X.
  It has nothing to do with devices *below* a Root Port can use MSI-X.
  It also has nothing to do with whether a Root Port can forward MSI
  transactions from those downstream devices.

This part of my confusion could be easily resolved via a comment.

I do have a follow-on question, though: the patch seems to enable
MSI-related functionality using a register in the DesignWare IP, not
something in the i.MX6-specific IP.  If that's true, why don't other
DesignWare-based drivers need something similar?

> > > It seems that some device might shutdown msi when do the suspend
> > operations.
> > > >
> > > > Would you mind investigating it please ?
> > > Sure, I did further investigation on i.MX6QP platform.
> > > The MSI_EN bit of RC MSI capability would be cleared to zero, when
> > >  PCIE_RESET(BIT29 of IOMUXC_GPR1) is toggled (assertion 1b'1,  then
> > > de-assertion 1b'0).
> > >
> > > Verification steps:
> > > MSI_EN of RC is set to 1b'1 when system is boot up.
> > >  ./memtool 1ffc050 1
> > > 0x01FFC050:  01017005
> > >
> > > Toggle PCIe reset of i.MX6QP.
> > > root@imx6qpdlsolox:~# ./memtool 20e0004=68691005 Writing 32-bit value
> > > 0x68691005 to address 0x020E0004 root@imx6qpdlsolox:~# ./memtool
> > > 20e0004=48691005 Writing 32-bit value 0x48691005 to address
> > 0x020E0004
> > >
> > > The MSI_EN bit of RC had been cleared to 1b'0.
> > > ./memtool 1ffc050 1
> > > 0x01FFC050:  01807005
> > >
> > > This is why I used to reply to Bjorn the MSI_EN of RC is cleared when
> > > RESETs are toggled during the imx6_pcie_host_init() in
> > >  imx6_pcie_resume_noirq() callback.
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > Richard Zhu
> > > >
> > > > Lorenzo
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes v1-->v2:
> > > > > New create one save/restore function, used save the setting in
> > > > > suspend and restore the configuration in resume.
> > > > > v1
> > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> > > > >
> > patc%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%7C24971d8de9b54b
> > 0b10
> > > > >
> > ad08db2182774d%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6
> > 38140
> > > > >
> > 616456052078%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJ
> > QIjoiV
> > > > >
> > 2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vE
> > tRxL
> > > > > BVi5lYmpwTNZfafMms3263LZXodneLChjEaOM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-pci%2Fpatch%2F1667289595-12440-1-
> > > > g
> > > > i
> > > > >
> > > >
> > t-send-email-hongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu
> > > > %40n
> > > > >
> > > >
> > xp.com%7C3aeb1d128f854dad1a5608daea77706d%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa9
> > 2
> > > > cd99c5c
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 301635%7C0%7C0%7C638080095954881374%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
> > > > d8eyJWIjoiMC
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000
> > %
> > > > 7C%7C%
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 7C&sdata=V8yVvvpTKGoR1UyQP5HD2IdlSjJdznBeD12bdI67dEI%3D&reserved
> > =
> > > > 0
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 23
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > index 1dde5c579edc..aa3096890c3b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> > > > >  	struct clk		*pcie;
> > > > >  	struct clk		*pcie_aux;
> > > > >  	struct regmap		*iomuxc_gpr;
> > > > > +	u16			msi_ctrl;
> > > > >  	u32			controller_id;
> > > > >  	struct reset_control	*pciephy_reset;
> > > > >  	struct reset_control	*apps_reset;
> > > > > @@ -1042,6 +1043,26 @@ static void imx6_pcie_pm_turnoff(struct
> > > > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > > > >  	usleep_range(1000, 10000);
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static void imx6_pcie_msi_save_restore(struct imx6_pcie
> > > > > +*imx6_pcie, bool save) {
> > > > > +	u8 offset;
> > > > > +	u16 val;
> > > > > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (pci_msi_enabled()) {
> > > > > +		offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> > > > > +		if (save) {
> > > > > +			val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS);
> > > > > +			imx6_pcie->msi_ctrl = val;
> > > > > +		} else {
> > > > > +			dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> > > > > +			val = imx6_pcie->msi_ctrl;
> > > > > +			dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, val);
> > > > > +			dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
> > > > > +		}
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)  {
> > > > >  	struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev); @@ -1050,6
> > > > > +1071,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > > > >  	if (!(imx6_pcie->drvdata->flags &
> > > > IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SUSPEND))
> > > > >  		return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > +	imx6_pcie_msi_save_restore(imx6_pcie, true);
> > > > >  	imx6_pcie_pm_turnoff(imx6_pcie);
> > > > >  	imx6_pcie_stop_link(imx6_pcie->pci);
> > > > >  	imx6_pcie_host_exit(pp);
> > > > > @@ -1069,6 +1091,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_resume_noirq(struct
> > > > > device
> > > > *dev)
> > > > >  	ret = imx6_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > >  		return ret;
> > > > > +	imx6_pcie_msi_save_restore(imx6_pcie, false);
> > > > >  	dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp);
> > > > >
> > > > >  	if (imx6_pcie->link_is_up)
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Save and restore MSI control of RC in suspend and resume
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 12:49:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313174929.GA1509198@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR04MB86763F096229D90DCBF6C0D08CB99@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 02:50:31AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 2023年3月11日 0:14
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > Cc: l.stach@pengutronix.de; bhelgaas@google.com;
> > linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Save and restore MSI control of RC in
> > suspend and resume
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:08:06AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> > > > Sent: 2022年12月30日 23:06
> > > > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>; l.stach@pengutronix.de;
> > > > bhelgaas@google.com
> > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > > > <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Save and restore MSI control of
> > > > RC in suspend and resume
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:05:34PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > > > The MSI Enable bit controls delivery of MSI interrupts from
> > > > > components below the Root Port. This bit might lost during the
> > > > > suspend, should be re-stored during resume.
> > > > >
> > > > > Save the MSI control during suspend, and restore it in resume.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that what Lucas and Bjorn asked on v1 is still not answered.
> > > >
> > > > The root port is a PCI device, why do we need to save and restore
> > > > the MSI cap on top of what PCI core already does ? The RP should be
> > > > enumerated as a PCI device and therefore I expect the MSI cap to be
> > > > saved/restored in the suspend/resume execution.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think there is anything iMX6 specific in this.
> > > Hi Lorenzo:
> > > Thanks for your comments.
> > > Sorry to reply late, since I got a high fever in the past days.
> > >
> > > Based on i.MX6QP SABRESD board and XHCI PCIe2USB3.0 device, the MSI
> > > cap  save/restore of PCI core is not executed(dev->msi_enabled is
> > > zero)  during my suspend/resume tests.
> > 
> > I still do not understand. The register you are saving/restoring in the RC is not
> > the root port Message control field in the root port MSI capability, it is a
> > separate register that controls the root complex MSI forwarding, is that
> > correct ?
> > 
> > The root port MSI capability does not control the root complex forwarding of
> > MSIs TLPs.
> > 
> > So the bits you are saving and restoring IIUC should be MMIO space in the
> > root complex, dressed as an MSI capability, that has nothing to do with the
> > root port MSI capability.
> > 
> > Is that correct ?
>
> It's not a separate register.
>
> The bit I manipulated is the MSI Enable bit of the Message Control
> Register for MSI (Offset 02h) contained in the MSI-capability of
> Root Complex.
>
> In addition, on i.MX6, the MSI Enable bit controls delivery of MSI
> interrupts from components below the Root Port.
>
> So, set MSI Enable in imx6q-pcie to let the MSI from downstream
> components works.

My confusion is about this "MSI Capability" found by
"dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI)" in your patch.

The i.MX6 manual might refer to that as an "MSI Capability" but as far
as I know, the PCIe base spec doesn't document a Root Complex MSI
Capability.

I don't think it's the same as the one documented in PCIe r6.0, sec
7.7.2.  I think it's different because:

  (1) I *think* "pci" here refers to the RC, not to a Root Port.

  (2) The semantics are different.  The MSI-X Enable bit in 7.7.2 only
  determines whether the Function itself is permitted to use MSI-X.
  It has nothing to do with devices *below* a Root Port can use MSI-X.
  It also has nothing to do with whether a Root Port can forward MSI
  transactions from those downstream devices.

This part of my confusion could be easily resolved via a comment.

I do have a follow-on question, though: the patch seems to enable
MSI-related functionality using a register in the DesignWare IP, not
something in the i.MX6-specific IP.  If that's true, why don't other
DesignWare-based drivers need something similar?

> > > It seems that some device might shutdown msi when do the suspend
> > operations.
> > > >
> > > > Would you mind investigating it please ?
> > > Sure, I did further investigation on i.MX6QP platform.
> > > The MSI_EN bit of RC MSI capability would be cleared to zero, when
> > >  PCIE_RESET(BIT29 of IOMUXC_GPR1) is toggled (assertion 1b'1,  then
> > > de-assertion 1b'0).
> > >
> > > Verification steps:
> > > MSI_EN of RC is set to 1b'1 when system is boot up.
> > >  ./memtool 1ffc050 1
> > > 0x01FFC050:  01017005
> > >
> > > Toggle PCIe reset of i.MX6QP.
> > > root@imx6qpdlsolox:~# ./memtool 20e0004=68691005 Writing 32-bit value
> > > 0x68691005 to address 0x020E0004 root@imx6qpdlsolox:~# ./memtool
> > > 20e0004=48691005 Writing 32-bit value 0x48691005 to address
> > 0x020E0004
> > >
> > > The MSI_EN bit of RC had been cleared to 1b'0.
> > > ./memtool 1ffc050 1
> > > 0x01FFC050:  01807005
> > >
> > > This is why I used to reply to Bjorn the MSI_EN of RC is cleared when
> > > RESETs are toggled during the imx6_pcie_host_init() in
> > >  imx6_pcie_resume_noirq() callback.
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > Richard Zhu
> > > >
> > > > Lorenzo
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes v1-->v2:
> > > > > New create one save/restore function, used save the setting in
> > > > > suspend and restore the configuration in resume.
> > > > > v1
> > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> > > > >
> > patc%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%7C24971d8de9b54b
> > 0b10
> > > > >
> > ad08db2182774d%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6
> > 38140
> > > > >
> > 616456052078%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJ
> > QIjoiV
> > > > >
> > 2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vE
> > tRxL
> > > > > BVi5lYmpwTNZfafMms3263LZXodneLChjEaOM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-pci%2Fpatch%2F1667289595-12440-1-
> > > > g
> > > > i
> > > > >
> > > >
> > t-send-email-hongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu
> > > > %40n
> > > > >
> > > >
> > xp.com%7C3aeb1d128f854dad1a5608daea77706d%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa9
> > 2
> > > > cd99c5c
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 301635%7C0%7C0%7C638080095954881374%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
> > > > d8eyJWIjoiMC
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000
> > %
> > > > 7C%7C%
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 7C&sdata=V8yVvvpTKGoR1UyQP5HD2IdlSjJdznBeD12bdI67dEI%3D&reserved
> > =
> > > > 0
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 23
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > index 1dde5c579edc..aa3096890c3b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> > > > >  	struct clk		*pcie;
> > > > >  	struct clk		*pcie_aux;
> > > > >  	struct regmap		*iomuxc_gpr;
> > > > > +	u16			msi_ctrl;
> > > > >  	u32			controller_id;
> > > > >  	struct reset_control	*pciephy_reset;
> > > > >  	struct reset_control	*apps_reset;
> > > > > @@ -1042,6 +1043,26 @@ static void imx6_pcie_pm_turnoff(struct
> > > > imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > > > >  	usleep_range(1000, 10000);
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static void imx6_pcie_msi_save_restore(struct imx6_pcie
> > > > > +*imx6_pcie, bool save) {
> > > > > +	u8 offset;
> > > > > +	u16 val;
> > > > > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (pci_msi_enabled()) {
> > > > > +		offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> > > > > +		if (save) {
> > > > > +			val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS);
> > > > > +			imx6_pcie->msi_ctrl = val;
> > > > > +		} else {
> > > > > +			dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> > > > > +			val = imx6_pcie->msi_ctrl;
> > > > > +			dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, val);
> > > > > +			dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
> > > > > +		}
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)  {
> > > > >  	struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev); @@ -1050,6
> > > > > +1071,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > > > >  	if (!(imx6_pcie->drvdata->flags &
> > > > IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SUSPEND))
> > > > >  		return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > +	imx6_pcie_msi_save_restore(imx6_pcie, true);
> > > > >  	imx6_pcie_pm_turnoff(imx6_pcie);
> > > > >  	imx6_pcie_stop_link(imx6_pcie->pci);
> > > > >  	imx6_pcie_host_exit(pp);
> > > > > @@ -1069,6 +1091,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_resume_noirq(struct
> > > > > device
> > > > *dev)
> > > > >  	ret = imx6_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > > > >  	if (ret)
> > > > >  		return ret;
> > > > > +	imx6_pcie_msi_save_restore(imx6_pcie, false);
> > > > >  	dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp);
> > > > >
> > > > >  	if (imx6_pcie->link_is_up)
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-13 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-08  6:05 [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Save and restore MSI control of RC in suspend and resume Richard Zhu
2022-12-08  6:05 ` Richard Zhu
2022-12-30 15:06 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-12-30 15:06   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-01-09  2:08   ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-01-09  2:08     ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-10 16:13     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-10 16:13       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-13  2:50       ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-13  2:50         ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-13 17:49         ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-03-13 17:49           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-14  3:24           ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-14  3:24             ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-14 10:27             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-14 10:27               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-16  7:37               ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-16  7:37                 ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-16  8:10                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-16  8:10                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-17  7:38                   ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-17  7:38                     ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-17 22:24                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-17 22:24                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-20  7:02                       ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-20  7:02                         ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-24 15:59                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-24 15:59                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-03-27  0:22                           ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-03-27  0:22                             ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-04-05 15:55                             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-04-05 15:55                               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-04-10  6:48                               ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-04-10  6:48                                 ` Hongxing Zhu
2023-06-19  9:07                                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-06-19  9:07                                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-04-11  2:36                               ` Serge Semin
2023-04-11  2:36                                 ` Serge Semin
2023-06-19  9:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-06-19  9:38   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230313174929.GA1509198@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.