[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible

[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible

[Alex Elder]

Add support for SDX65, which uses IPA v5.0.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
---
v2: Add review tag; base on linux-next/master; drop "net-next" in subject

It is my intention to have this patch be taken via the Qualcomm
repository (not net-next).

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml
index 4aeda379726fa..2d5e4ffb2f9ef 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ properties:
       - qcom,sc7280-ipa
       - qcom,sdm845-ipa
       - qcom,sdx55-ipa
+      - qcom,sdx65-ipa
       - qcom,sm6350-ipa
       - qcom,sm8350-ipa
 
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:43:05 -0500 Alex Elder wrote:
> Add support for SDX65, which uses IPA v5.0.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: Add review tag; base on linux-next/master; drop "net-next" in subject
> 
> It is my intention to have this patch be taken via the Qualcomm
> repository (not net-next).

That's a bit unusual, no strong feelings but why is that?
Bindings usually go with the code, ipa is a networking thing, right?

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible

[Alex Elder]

On 3/16/23 7:10 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:43:05 -0500 Alex Elder wrote:
>> Add support for SDX65, which uses IPA v5.0.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> v2: Add review tag; base on linux-next/master; drop "net-next" in subject
>>
>> It is my intention to have this patch be taken via the Qualcomm
>> repository (not net-next).
> 
> That's a bit unusual, no strong feelings but why is that?
> Bindings usually go with the code, ipa is a networking thing, right?

I'm sorry, yes, there is no reason the bindings update
should be taken through the Qualcomm tree.

This is a trivial patch.  This version (2) is based on
linux-next/master but it can be cleanly cherry-picked
onto net-next/master.

Please accept this patch via net-next, and if you want
me to send an updated version, please say so.

I'm very sorry for the confusion here.  For some reason
this has been a rough week with little patches for me.

					-Alex

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:43:05 -0500 you wrote:
> Add support for SDX65, which uses IPA v5.0.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: Add review tag; base on linux-next/master; drop "net-next" in subject
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0de10fd6eb94

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html