All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmu_notifiers: Restore documentation for .invalidate_range()
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:48:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524114859.000016e3.zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cece716fc09724793aa832e755abfc9d70a8bb3.1684892404.git-series.apopple@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 24 May 2023 11:47:28 +1000
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:

It is actually commit 4e15a073a168 ("Revert "mm, mmu_notifier:
annotate mmu notifiers with blockable invalidate callbacks"")'s problem.
It tries to revert commit 5ff7091f5a2c but forgets to get back this
piece of comment.

It would be better to have a Fixes tag in the commit message.

> The .invalidate_range() callback is called by
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() which is often called while holding
> the ptl spin-lock. Therefore any implementations of this callback must
> not sleep. This was originally documented when the call back was added
> in commit 0f0a327fa12c ("mmu_notifier: add the callback for
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()") but appears to have been
> inadvertently removed by commit 5ff7091f5a2c ("mm, mmu_notifier:
> annotate mmu notifiers with blockable invalidate callbacks").
> 
> Restore the comment to make it clear that .invalidate_range()
> callbacks may not sleep.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> index 64a3e05..447d757 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ struct mmu_notifier_ops {
>  	 * external TLB range needs to be flushed. For more in depth
>  	 * discussion on this see Documentation/mm/mmu_notifier.rst
>  	 *
> +	 * The invalidate_range() function is called under the ptl
> +	 * spin-lock and not allowed to sleep.
> +	 *
>  	 * Note that this function might be called with just a sub-range
>  	 * of what was passed to invalidate_range_start()/end(), if
>  	 * called between those functions.
> 
> base-commit: 44c026a73be8038f03dbdeef028b642880cf1511


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmu_notifiers: Restore documentation for .invalidate_range()
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:48:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524114859.000016e3.zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cece716fc09724793aa832e755abfc9d70a8bb3.1684892404.git-series.apopple@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 24 May 2023 11:47:28 +1000
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:

It is actually commit 4e15a073a168 ("Revert "mm, mmu_notifier:
annotate mmu notifiers with blockable invalidate callbacks"")'s problem.
It tries to revert commit 5ff7091f5a2c but forgets to get back this
piece of comment.

It would be better to have a Fixes tag in the commit message.

> The .invalidate_range() callback is called by
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() which is often called while holding
> the ptl spin-lock. Therefore any implementations of this callback must
> not sleep. This was originally documented when the call back was added
> in commit 0f0a327fa12c ("mmu_notifier: add the callback for
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()") but appears to have been
> inadvertently removed by commit 5ff7091f5a2c ("mm, mmu_notifier:
> annotate mmu notifiers with blockable invalidate callbacks").
> 
> Restore the comment to make it clear that .invalidate_range()
> callbacks may not sleep.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> index 64a3e05..447d757 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ struct mmu_notifier_ops {
>  	 * external TLB range needs to be flushed. For more in depth
>  	 * discussion on this see Documentation/mm/mmu_notifier.rst
>  	 *
> +	 * The invalidate_range() function is called under the ptl
> +	 * spin-lock and not allowed to sleep.
> +	 *
>  	 * Note that this function might be called with just a sub-range
>  	 * of what was passed to invalidate_range_start()/end(), if
>  	 * called between those functions.
> 
> base-commit: 44c026a73be8038f03dbdeef028b642880cf1511


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-24  1:47 [PATCH 1/2] mmu_notifiers: Restore documentation for .invalidate_range() Alistair Popple
2023-05-24  1:47 ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-24  1:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Notify on pte permission upgrades Alistair Popple
2023-05-24  1:47   ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-28  0:02   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-28  0:02     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30  8:05     ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-30  8:05       ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-30 11:54       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30 11:54         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30 12:14         ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-30 12:14           ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-30 12:52           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30 12:52             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30 13:44             ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-30 13:44               ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-30 14:06               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30 14:06                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30 21:44                 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-30 21:44                   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-30 23:08                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-30 23:08                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-31  0:30                     ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-31  0:30                       ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-31  0:32                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-31  0:32                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-31  2:46                         ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-31  2:46                           ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-31 15:30                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-31 15:30                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-31 23:56                             ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-31 23:56                               ` Alistair Popple
     [not found]                       ` <31cdd164783fefad4c9ef4a6d33c1e0094405d0f03added523a82dd9febdf15f@mu.id>
2023-06-09  2:06                         ` Alistair Popple
2023-06-09  2:06                           ` Alistair Popple
2023-06-09  6:05                           ` Alistair Popple
2023-06-09  6:05                             ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmu_notifiers: Restore documentation for .invalidate_range() John Hubbard
2023-05-24  2:20   ` John Hubbard
2023-05-24  4:45   ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-24  4:45     ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-27 23:56   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-27 23:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-24  3:48 ` Zhi Wang [this message]
2023-05-24  3:48   ` Zhi Wang
2023-05-24  4:57   ` Alistair Popple
2023-05-24  4:57     ` Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230524114859.000016e3.zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    --to=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.