All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
To: thomas@t-8ch.de
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	w@1wt.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/nolibc: add sizeof test for the new 64bit data types
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 19:17:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230530111753.403722-1-falcon@tinylab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c68a6f60-0906-408a-9454-419085df695e@t-8ch.de>

> On 2023-05-30 14:42:56+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > These test cases are required to make sure the new added data types are
> > really 64bit based.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > index 20d184da9a2b..43ce4d34b596 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > @@ -721,6 +721,14 @@ int run_stdlib(int min, int max)
> >  #else
> >  # warning "__SIZEOF_LONG__ is undefined"
> >  #endif /* __SIZEOF_LONG__ */
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_time_t);           EXPECT_EQ(1, 8,                sizeof(time_t)); break;
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_timespec);         EXPECT_EQ(1, 16,               sizeof(struct timespec)); break;
> > +#ifdef NOLIBC
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_itimerspec);       EXPECT_EQ(1, 32,               sizeof(struct itimerspec)); break;
> > +#endif
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_timeval);          EXPECT_EQ(1, 16,               sizeof(struct timeval)); break;
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_itimerval);        EXPECT_EQ(1, 32,               sizeof(struct itimerval)); break;
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_off_t);            EXPECT_EQ(1, 8,                sizeof(off_t)); break;
> 
> These will break on 32bit glibc configurations.
> (At least on x86)

Yes, I added a big #ifdef at first, but narrowed it down after a default
x86_64 gcc+glibc test, 32bit has been ignored from my mind ;-(

Will add the big #ifdef back.

Thanks,
Zhangjin

> 
> >  		case __LINE__:
> >  			return ret; /* must be last */
> >  		/* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
> > -- 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
To: thomas@t-8ch.de
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	w@1wt.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/nolibc: add sizeof test for the new 64bit data types
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 19:17:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230530111753.403722-1-falcon@tinylab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c68a6f60-0906-408a-9454-419085df695e@t-8ch.de>

> On 2023-05-30 14:42:56+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > These test cases are required to make sure the new added data types are
> > really 64bit based.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > index 20d184da9a2b..43ce4d34b596 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > @@ -721,6 +721,14 @@ int run_stdlib(int min, int max)
> >  #else
> >  # warning "__SIZEOF_LONG__ is undefined"
> >  #endif /* __SIZEOF_LONG__ */
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_time_t);           EXPECT_EQ(1, 8,                sizeof(time_t)); break;
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_timespec);         EXPECT_EQ(1, 16,               sizeof(struct timespec)); break;
> > +#ifdef NOLIBC
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_itimerspec);       EXPECT_EQ(1, 32,               sizeof(struct itimerspec)); break;
> > +#endif
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_timeval);          EXPECT_EQ(1, 16,               sizeof(struct timeval)); break;
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_itimerval);        EXPECT_EQ(1, 32,               sizeof(struct itimerval)); break;
> > +		CASE_TEST(sizeof_off_t);            EXPECT_EQ(1, 8,                sizeof(off_t)); break;
> 
> These will break on 32bit glibc configurations.
> (At least on x86)

Yes, I added a big #ifdef at first, but narrowed it down after a default
x86_64 gcc+glibc test, 32bit has been ignored from my mind ;-(

Will add the big #ifdef back.

Thanks,
Zhangjin

> 
> >  		case __LINE__:
> >  			return ret; /* must be last */
> >  		/* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
> > -- 

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-30 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-29 19:45 [PATCH v2 00/13] nolibc: add part2 of support for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:45 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] selftests/nolibc: remove gettimeofday_bad1/2 completely Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:46   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] selftests/nolibc: support two errnos with EXPECT_SYSER2() Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:47   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] selftests/nolibc: waitpid_min: add waitid syscall support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:49   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] tools/nolibc: add missing nanoseconds support for __NR_statx Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:50   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 21:39   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-29 21:39     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30  5:21     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  5:21       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] tools/nolibc: add more wait status related types Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:51   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] tools/nolibc: add pure 64bit off_t, time_t and blkcnt_t Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:53   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] tools/nolibc: sys_lseek: add pure 64bit lseek Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:54   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  8:10   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-30  8:10     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-30 13:54     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30 13:54       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 16:28       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-02 16:28         ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-29 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] tools/nolibc: add pure 64bit time structs Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:56   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] tools/nolibc: sys_select: add pure 64bit select Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:57   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] tools/nolibc: sys_poll: add pure 64bit poll Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:58   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] tools/nolibc: sys_gettimeofday: add pure 64bit gettimeofday Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 19:59   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 20:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] tools/nolibc: sys_wait4: add waitid syscall support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 20:01   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] selftests/nolibc: riscv: customize makefile for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29 20:03   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-02  4:06   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-02  4:06     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-02 10:33     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-02 10:33       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-02 11:56       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-02 11:56         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  6:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] nolibc: add part3 of support " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  6:33   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  6:37   ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/nolibc: add new gettimeofday test cases Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  6:37     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30 10:59     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30 10:59       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30 11:28       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30 11:28         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30 11:54         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30 11:54           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30 12:05       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-30 12:05         ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-30 12:31         ` Andreas Schwab
2023-05-30 12:31           ` Andreas Schwab
2023-05-30 12:35         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30 12:35           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30  6:42   ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/nolibc: add sizeof test for the new 64bit data types Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  6:42     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30  9:18     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30  9:18       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-30 11:17       ` Zhangjin Wu [this message]
2023-05-30 11:17         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-02 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] nolibc: add part2 of support for rv32 Willy Tarreau
2023-06-02 19:44   ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230530111753.403722-1-falcon@tinylab.org \
    --to=falcon@tinylab.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.