All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org,
	ndesaulniers@google.com, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	frederic@kernel.org, quic_neeraju@quicinc.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:47:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202306080917.C0B16C8@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wj-BGgTF0YgY+L7_G8Jb0UO38Cd8dwrfMqFMEh93B3D7g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:45:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So for convenient automatic pointer freeing, you want an interface
> much more akin to
> 
>         struct whatever *ptr __automatic_kfree = kmalloc(...);
> 
> which is much more legible, doesn't have any type mis-use issues, and
> is also just trivially dealt with by a
> 
>   static inline void automatic_kfree_wrapper(void *pp)
>   { void *p = *(void **)pp; if (p) kfree(p); }
>   #define __automatic_kfree \
>         __attribute__((__cleanup__(automatic_kfree_wrapper)))
>   #define no_free_ptr(p) \
>         ({ __auto_type __ptr = (p); (p) = NULL; __ptr; })
> 
> which I just tested generates the sane code even for the "set the ptr
> to NULL and return success" case.
> 
> The above allows you to trivially do things like
> 
>         struct whatever *p __automatic_kfree = kmalloc(..);
> 
>         if (!do_something(p))
>                 return -ENOENT;
> 
>         return no_free_ptr(p);

I am a little worried about how (any version so far of) this API could go
wrong, e.g. if someone uses this and does "return p" instead of "return
no_free_ptr(p)", it'll return a freed pointer. I was hoping we could do
something like this to the end of automatic_kfree_wrapper():

	*(void **)pp = NULL;

i.e. if no_free_ptr() goes missing, "return p" will return NULL, which
is much easier to track down that dealing with later use-after-free bugs,
etc. Unfortunately, the __cleanup ordering is _after_ the compiler stores
the return value...

static inline void cleanup_info(struct info **p)
{
	free(*p);
	*p = NULL; /* this is effectively ignored */
}

struct info *do_something(int f)
{
	struct info *var __attribute__((__cleanup__(cleanup_info))) =
		malloc(1024);

	process(var);

	return var; /* oops, forgot to disable cleanup */
}

compile down to:

do_something:
        pushq   %rbx
        movl    $1024, %edi
        call    malloc
        movq    %rax, %rbx
        movq    %rax, %rdi
        call    process
        movq    %rbx, %rdi
        call    free
        movq    %rbx, %rax	; uses saved copy of malloc return
        popq    %rbx
        ret

The point being, if we can proactively make this hard to shoot ourselves in
the foot, that would be nice. :)

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-26 20:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Introduce __cleanup__ based guards Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 21:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 21:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-27  8:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched: Use fancy new guards Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-27 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-05-27 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-29 12:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-05-29 19:04     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-29 21:27       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-05-30  0:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-30  9:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30  9:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30 13:58     ` Valentin Schneider
2023-06-06  9:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-06 13:17       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 13:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-06 14:50           ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 16:06             ` Kees Cook
2023-06-06 18:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-06 23:22               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-07  9:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-08  8:52                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-08  9:04                     ` Greg KH
2023-06-08 15:45                     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-08 16:47                       ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-06-08 16:59                         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-08 17:20                         ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-06-08 18:51                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-08 20:14                             ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-06-09 10:20                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-08 20:06                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-09  2:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-09  8:14                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-09 21:18                           ` Kees Cook
2023-06-09  8:27                       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2023-06-06 15:31       ` Kees Cook
2023-06-06 15:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 16:08           ` Kees Cook
2023-06-08 16:25           ` David Laight
2023-05-30  9:26   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202306080917.C0B16C8@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.