* + acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2023-07-24 17:58 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-07-24 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, weixugc, shy828301, rafael.j.wysocki, mhocko,
Jonathan.Cameron, hannes, dave, dave.hansen, dan.j.williams,
apopple, aneesh.kumar, ying.huang, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:29:30 +0800
Previously, in hmat_register_target_initiators(), the performance
attributes are calculated and the corresponding sysfs links and files are
created too. Which is called during memory onlining.
But now, to calculate the abstract distance of a memory target before
memory onlining, we need to calculate the performance attributes for a
memory target without creating sysfs links and files.
To do that, hmat_register_target_initiators() is refactored to make it
possible to calculate performance attributes separately.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230721012932.190742-3-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 81 +++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c~acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators
+++ a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
@@ -582,28 +582,25 @@ static int initiators_to_nodemask(unsign
return 0;
}
-static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+static void hmat_update_target_attrs(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes, int access)
{
- static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
struct memory_initiator *initiator;
- unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ unsigned int cpu_nid;
struct memory_locality *loc = NULL;
u32 best = 0;
- bool access0done = false;
int i;
- mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
/*
- * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, link
+ * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, set
* only that one. Otherwise, find the best performance attributes and
- * register all initiators that match.
+ * collect all initiators that match.
*/
if (target->processor_pxm != PXM_INVAL) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(target->processor_pxm);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- access0done = true;
- if (node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ if (access == 0 || node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
+ set_bit(target->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
return;
}
}
@@ -617,47 +614,10 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
* We'll also use the sorting to prime the candidate nodes with known
* initiators.
*/
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
list_sort(NULL, &initiators, initiator_cmp);
if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
return;
- if (!access0done) {
- for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
- loc = localities_types[i];
- if (!loc)
- continue;
-
- best = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
- u32 value;
-
- if (!test_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes))
- continue;
-
- value = hmat_initiator_perf(target, initiator,
- loc->hmat_loc);
- if (hmat_update_best(loc->hmat_loc->data_type, value, &best))
- bitmap_clear(p_nodes, 0, initiator->processor_pxm);
- if (value != best)
- clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
- }
- if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type,
- best, 0);
- }
-
- for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
- cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- }
- }
-
- /* Access 1 ignores Generic Initiators */
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
- if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
- return;
-
for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
loc = localities_types[i];
if (!loc)
@@ -667,7 +627,7 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
u32 value;
- if (!initiator->has_cpu) {
+ if (access == 1 && !initiator->has_cpu) {
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
continue;
}
@@ -681,14 +641,33 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
}
if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, 1);
+ hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, access);
}
+}
+
+static void __hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes,
+ int access)
+{
+ unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ int i;
+
+ mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ hmat_update_target_attrs(target, p_nodes, access);
for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, access);
}
}
+static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
+
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 0);
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 1);
+}
+
static void hmat_register_target_cache(struct memory_target *target)
{
unsigned mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ying.huang@intel.com are
memory-tiering-add-abstract-distance-calculation-algorithms-management.patch
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
acpi-hmat-calculate-abstract-distance-with-hmat.patch
dax-kmem-calculate-abstract-distance-with-general-interface.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* + acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2023-09-26 21:07 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-09-26 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, weixugc, shy828301, rafael.j.wysocki, mhocko,
Jonathan.Cameron, hannes, dave, dave.jiang, dave.hansen,
dan.j.williams, bharata, apopple, aneesh.kumar, ying.huang, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:06:26 +0800
Previously, in hmat_register_target_initiators(), the performance
attributes are calculated and the corresponding sysfs links and files are
created too. Which is called during memory onlining.
But now, to calculate the abstract distance of a memory target before
memory onlining, we need to calculate the performance attributes for a
memory target without creating sysfs links and files.
To do that, hmat_register_target_initiators() is refactored to make it
possible to calculate performance attributes separately.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230926060628.265989-3-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 81 +++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c~acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators
+++ a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
@@ -582,28 +582,25 @@ static int initiators_to_nodemask(unsign
return 0;
}
-static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+static void hmat_update_target_attrs(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes, int access)
{
- static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
struct memory_initiator *initiator;
- unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ unsigned int cpu_nid;
struct memory_locality *loc = NULL;
u32 best = 0;
- bool access0done = false;
int i;
- mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
/*
- * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, link
+ * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, set
* only that one. Otherwise, find the best performance attributes and
- * register all initiators that match.
+ * collect all initiators that match.
*/
if (target->processor_pxm != PXM_INVAL) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(target->processor_pxm);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- access0done = true;
- if (node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ if (access == 0 || node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
+ set_bit(target->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
return;
}
}
@@ -617,47 +614,10 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
* We'll also use the sorting to prime the candidate nodes with known
* initiators.
*/
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
list_sort(NULL, &initiators, initiator_cmp);
if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
return;
- if (!access0done) {
- for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
- loc = localities_types[i];
- if (!loc)
- continue;
-
- best = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
- u32 value;
-
- if (!test_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes))
- continue;
-
- value = hmat_initiator_perf(target, initiator,
- loc->hmat_loc);
- if (hmat_update_best(loc->hmat_loc->data_type, value, &best))
- bitmap_clear(p_nodes, 0, initiator->processor_pxm);
- if (value != best)
- clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
- }
- if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type,
- best, 0);
- }
-
- for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
- cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- }
- }
-
- /* Access 1 ignores Generic Initiators */
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
- if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
- return;
-
for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
loc = localities_types[i];
if (!loc)
@@ -667,7 +627,7 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
u32 value;
- if (!initiator->has_cpu) {
+ if (access == 1 && !initiator->has_cpu) {
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
continue;
}
@@ -681,14 +641,33 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
}
if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, 1);
+ hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, access);
}
+}
+
+static void __hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes,
+ int access)
+{
+ unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ int i;
+
+ mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ hmat_update_target_attrs(target, p_nodes, access);
for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, access);
}
}
+static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
+
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 0);
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 1);
+}
+
static void hmat_register_target_cache(struct memory_target *target)
{
unsigned mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ying.huang@intel.com are
mm-fix-draining-remote-pageset.patch
mm-pcp-avoid-to-drain-pcp-when-process-exit.patch
cacheinfo-calculate-per-cpu-data-cache-size.patch
mm-pcp-reduce-lock-contention-for-draining-high-order-pages.patch
mm-restrict-the-pcp-batch-scale-factor-to-avoid-too-long-latency.patch
mm-page_alloc-scale-the-number-of-pages-that-are-batch-allocated.patch
mm-add-framework-for-pcp-high-auto-tuning.patch
mm-tune-pcp-high-automatically.patch
mm-pcp-decrease-pcp-high-if-free-pages-high-watermark.patch
mm-pcp-avoid-to-reduce-pcp-high-unnecessarily.patch
mm-pcp-reduce-detecting-time-of-consecutive-high-order-page-freeing.patch
memory-tiering-add-abstract-distance-calculation-algorithms-management.patch
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
acpi-hmat-calculate-abstract-distance-with-hmat.patch
dax-kmem-calculate-abstract-distance-with-general-interface.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* + acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2023-09-12 17:25 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-09-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, weixugc, shy828301, rafael.j.wysocki, mhocko,
Jonathan.Cameron, hannes, dave, dave.jiang, dave.hansen,
dan.j.williams, bharata, apopple, aneesh.kumar, ying.huang, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:20:59 +0800
Previously, in hmat_register_target_initiators(), the performance
attributes are calculated and the corresponding sysfs links and files are
created too. Which is called during memory onlining.
But now, to calculate the abstract distance of a memory target before
memory onlining, we need to calculate the performance attributes for a
memory target without creating sysfs links and files.
To do that, hmat_register_target_initiators() is refactored to make it
possible to calculate performance attributes separately.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230912082101.342002-3-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 81 +++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c~acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators
+++ a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
@@ -582,28 +582,25 @@ static int initiators_to_nodemask(unsign
return 0;
}
-static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+static void hmat_update_target_attrs(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes, int access)
{
- static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
struct memory_initiator *initiator;
- unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ unsigned int cpu_nid;
struct memory_locality *loc = NULL;
u32 best = 0;
- bool access0done = false;
int i;
- mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
/*
- * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, link
+ * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, set
* only that one. Otherwise, find the best performance attributes and
- * register all initiators that match.
+ * collect all initiators that match.
*/
if (target->processor_pxm != PXM_INVAL) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(target->processor_pxm);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- access0done = true;
- if (node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ if (access == 0 || node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
+ set_bit(target->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
return;
}
}
@@ -617,47 +614,10 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
* We'll also use the sorting to prime the candidate nodes with known
* initiators.
*/
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
list_sort(NULL, &initiators, initiator_cmp);
if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
return;
- if (!access0done) {
- for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
- loc = localities_types[i];
- if (!loc)
- continue;
-
- best = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
- u32 value;
-
- if (!test_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes))
- continue;
-
- value = hmat_initiator_perf(target, initiator,
- loc->hmat_loc);
- if (hmat_update_best(loc->hmat_loc->data_type, value, &best))
- bitmap_clear(p_nodes, 0, initiator->processor_pxm);
- if (value != best)
- clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
- }
- if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type,
- best, 0);
- }
-
- for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
- cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- }
- }
-
- /* Access 1 ignores Generic Initiators */
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
- if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
- return;
-
for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
loc = localities_types[i];
if (!loc)
@@ -667,7 +627,7 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
u32 value;
- if (!initiator->has_cpu) {
+ if (access == 1 && !initiator->has_cpu) {
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
continue;
}
@@ -681,14 +641,33 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
}
if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, 1);
+ hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, access);
}
+}
+
+static void __hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes,
+ int access)
+{
+ unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ int i;
+
+ mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ hmat_update_target_attrs(target, p_nodes, access);
for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, access);
}
}
+static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
+
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 0);
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 1);
+}
+
static void hmat_register_target_cache(struct memory_target *target)
{
unsigned mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ying.huang@intel.com are
mm-fix-draining-remote-pageset.patch
memory-tiering-add-abstract-distance-calculation-algorithms-management.patch
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
acpi-hmat-calculate-abstract-distance-with-hmat.patch
dax-kmem-calculate-abstract-distance-with-general-interface.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* + acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2023-08-16 22:49 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-08-16 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, weixugc, shy828301, rafael.j.wysocki, mhocko,
Jonathan.Cameron, hannes, dave, dave.hansen, dan.j.williams,
bharata, apopple, aneesh.kumar, ying.huang, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: acpi, hmat: refactor hmat_register_target_initiators()
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:00:22 +0800
Previously, in hmat_register_target_initiators(), the performance
attributes are calculated and the corresponding sysfs links and files
are created too. Which is called during memory onlining.
But now, to calculate the abstract distance of a memory target before
memory onlining, we need to calculate the performance attributes for
a memory target without creating sysfs links and files.
To do that, hmat_register_target_initiators() is refactored to make it
possible to calculate performance attributes separately.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230816080024.105554-3-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 81 +++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c~acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators
+++ a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
@@ -582,28 +582,25 @@ static int initiators_to_nodemask(unsign
return 0;
}
-static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+static void hmat_update_target_attrs(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes, int access)
{
- static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
struct memory_initiator *initiator;
- unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ unsigned int cpu_nid;
struct memory_locality *loc = NULL;
u32 best = 0;
- bool access0done = false;
int i;
- mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
/*
- * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, link
+ * If the Address Range Structure provides a local processor pxm, set
* only that one. Otherwise, find the best performance attributes and
- * register all initiators that match.
+ * collect all initiators that match.
*/
if (target->processor_pxm != PXM_INVAL) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(target->processor_pxm);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- access0done = true;
- if (node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ if (access == 0 || node_state(cpu_nid, N_CPU)) {
+ set_bit(target->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
return;
}
}
@@ -617,47 +614,10 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
* We'll also use the sorting to prime the candidate nodes with known
* initiators.
*/
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
list_sort(NULL, &initiators, initiator_cmp);
if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
return;
- if (!access0done) {
- for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
- loc = localities_types[i];
- if (!loc)
- continue;
-
- best = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
- u32 value;
-
- if (!test_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes))
- continue;
-
- value = hmat_initiator_perf(target, initiator,
- loc->hmat_loc);
- if (hmat_update_best(loc->hmat_loc->data_type, value, &best))
- bitmap_clear(p_nodes, 0, initiator->processor_pxm);
- if (value != best)
- clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
- }
- if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type,
- best, 0);
- }
-
- for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
- cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 0);
- }
- }
-
- /* Access 1 ignores Generic Initiators */
- bitmap_zero(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
- if (initiators_to_nodemask(p_nodes) < 0)
- return;
-
for (i = WRITE_LATENCY; i <= READ_BANDWIDTH; i++) {
loc = localities_types[i];
if (!loc)
@@ -667,7 +627,7 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
list_for_each_entry(initiator, &initiators, node) {
u32 value;
- if (!initiator->has_cpu) {
+ if (access == 1 && !initiator->has_cpu) {
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
continue;
}
@@ -681,14 +641,33 @@ static void hmat_register_target_initiat
clear_bit(initiator->processor_pxm, p_nodes);
}
if (best)
- hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, 1);
+ hmat_update_target_access(target, loc->hmat_loc->data_type, best, access);
}
+}
+
+static void __hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target,
+ unsigned long *p_nodes,
+ int access)
+{
+ unsigned int mem_nid, cpu_nid;
+ int i;
+
+ mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+ hmat_update_target_attrs(target, p_nodes, access);
for_each_set_bit(i, p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES) {
cpu_nid = pxm_to_node(i);
- register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, 1);
+ register_memory_node_under_compute_node(mem_nid, cpu_nid, access);
}
}
+static void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(p_nodes, MAX_NUMNODES);
+
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 0);
+ __hmat_register_target_initiators(target, p_nodes, 1);
+}
+
static void hmat_register_target_cache(struct memory_target *target)
{
unsigned mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ying.huang@intel.com are
memory-tiering-add-abstract-distance-calculation-algorithms-management.patch
acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch
acpi-hmat-calculate-abstract-distance-with-hmat.patch
dax-kmem-calculate-abstract-distance-with-general-interface.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-26 23:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-24 17:58 + acpi-hmat-refactor-hmat_register_target_initiators.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
2023-08-16 22:49 Andrew Morton
2023-09-12 17:25 Andrew Morton
2023-09-26 21:07 Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.