All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary input parameter 'how' in ifdown function
@ 2023-08-21  8:41 Zhengchao Shao
  2023-08-22  7:18 ` Simon Horman
  2023-08-22 13:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhengchao Shao @ 2023-08-21  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, steffen.klassert, herbert,
	dsahern
  Cc: eyal.birger, paulmck, joel, tglx, mbizon, jmaxwell37,
	weiyongjun1, yuehaibing, shaozhengchao

When the ifdown function in the dst_ops structure is referenced, the input
parameter 'how' is always true. In the current implementation of the
ifdown interface, ip6_dst_ifdown does not use the input parameter 'how',
xfrm6_dst_ifdown and xfrm4_dst_ifdown functions use the input parameter
'unregister'. But false judgment on 'unregister' in xfrm6_dst_ifdown and
xfrm4_dst_ifdown is false, so remove the input parameter 'how' in ifdown
function.

Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
---
 include/net/dst_ops.h   |  2 +-
 net/core/dst.c          |  2 +-
 net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c | 11 +----------
 net/ipv6/route.c        |  5 ++---
 net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c |  6 +-----
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/dst_ops.h b/include/net/dst_ops.h
index 632086b2f644..6d1c8541183d 100644
--- a/include/net/dst_ops.h
+++ b/include/net/dst_ops.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct dst_ops {
 	u32 *			(*cow_metrics)(struct dst_entry *, unsigned long);
 	void			(*destroy)(struct dst_entry *);
 	void			(*ifdown)(struct dst_entry *,
-					  struct net_device *dev, int how);
+					  struct net_device *dev);
 	struct dst_entry *	(*negative_advice)(struct dst_entry *);
 	void			(*link_failure)(struct sk_buff *);
 	void			(*update_pmtu)(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk,
diff --git a/net/core/dst.c b/net/core/dst.c
index 79d9306ad1ee..980e2fd2f013 100644
--- a/net/core/dst.c
+++ b/net/core/dst.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ void dst_dev_put(struct dst_entry *dst)
 
 	dst->obsolete = DST_OBSOLETE_DEAD;
 	if (dst->ops->ifdown)
-		dst->ops->ifdown(dst, dev, true);
+		dst->ops->ifdown(dst, dev);
 	dst->input = dst_discard;
 	dst->output = dst_discard_out;
 	dst->dev = blackhole_netdev;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index 57ea394ffa8c..c33bca2c3841 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
@@ -124,22 +124,13 @@ static void xfrm4_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
 	xfrm_dst_destroy(xdst);
 }
 
-static void xfrm4_dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct net_device *dev,
-			     int unregister)
-{
-	if (!unregister)
-		return;
-
-	xfrm_dst_ifdown(dst, dev);
-}
-
 static struct dst_ops xfrm4_dst_ops_template = {
 	.family =		AF_INET,
 	.update_pmtu =		xfrm4_update_pmtu,
 	.redirect =		xfrm4_redirect,
 	.cow_metrics =		dst_cow_metrics_generic,
 	.destroy =		xfrm4_dst_destroy,
-	.ifdown =		xfrm4_dst_ifdown,
+	.ifdown =		xfrm_dst_ifdown,
 	.local_out =		__ip_local_out,
 	.gc_thresh =		32768,
 };
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 6b46abe0b7da..e82bcfde5bf9 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ unsigned int		ip6_mtu(const struct dst_entry *dst);
 static struct dst_entry *ip6_negative_advice(struct dst_entry *);
 static void		ip6_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *);
 static void		ip6_dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *,
-				       struct net_device *dev, int how);
+				       struct net_device *dev);
 static void		 ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops);
 
 static int		ip6_pkt_discard(struct sk_buff *skb);
@@ -371,8 +371,7 @@ static void ip6_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
 	fib6_info_release(from);
 }
 
-static void ip6_dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct net_device *dev,
-			   int how)
+static void ip6_dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
 	struct inet6_dev *idev = rt->rt6i_idev;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
index 8f931e46b460..41a680c76d2e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
@@ -124,14 +124,10 @@ static void xfrm6_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
 	xfrm_dst_destroy(xdst);
 }
 
-static void xfrm6_dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct net_device *dev,
-			     int unregister)
+static void xfrm6_dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct xfrm_dst *xdst;
 
-	if (!unregister)
-		return;
-
 	xdst = (struct xfrm_dst *)dst;
 	if (xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev->dev == dev) {
 		struct inet6_dev *loopback_idev =
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary input parameter 'how' in ifdown function
  2023-08-21  8:41 [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary input parameter 'how' in ifdown function Zhengchao Shao
@ 2023-08-22  7:18 ` Simon Horman
  2023-08-22 13:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2023-08-22  7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhengchao Shao
  Cc: netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, steffen.klassert, herbert,
	dsahern, eyal.birger, paulmck, joel, tglx, mbizon, jmaxwell37,
	weiyongjun1, yuehaibing

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 04:41:04PM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> When the ifdown function in the dst_ops structure is referenced, the input
> parameter 'how' is always true. In the current implementation of the
> ifdown interface, ip6_dst_ifdown does not use the input parameter 'how',
> xfrm6_dst_ifdown and xfrm4_dst_ifdown functions use the input parameter
> 'unregister'. But false judgment on 'unregister' in xfrm6_dst_ifdown and
> xfrm4_dst_ifdown is false, so remove the input parameter 'how' in ifdown
> function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary input parameter 'how' in ifdown function
  2023-08-21  8:41 [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary input parameter 'how' in ifdown function Zhengchao Shao
  2023-08-22  7:18 ` Simon Horman
@ 2023-08-22 13:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2023-08-22 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhengchao Shao
  Cc: netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, steffen.klassert, herbert,
	dsahern, eyal.birger, paulmck, joel, tglx, mbizon, jmaxwell37,
	weiyongjun1, yuehaibing

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:41:04 +0800 you wrote:
> When the ifdown function in the dst_ops structure is referenced, the input
> parameter 'how' is always true. In the current implementation of the
> ifdown interface, ip6_dst_ifdown does not use the input parameter 'how',
> xfrm6_dst_ifdown and xfrm4_dst_ifdown functions use the input parameter
> 'unregister'. But false judgment on 'unregister' in xfrm6_dst_ifdown and
> xfrm4_dst_ifdown is false, so remove the input parameter 'how' in ifdown
> function.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: remove unnecessary input parameter 'how' in ifdown function
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/43c2817225fc

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-22 13:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-21  8:41 [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary input parameter 'how' in ifdown function Zhengchao Shao
2023-08-22  7:18 ` Simon Horman
2023-08-22 13:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.