From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> To: glider@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, pcc@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yury.norov@gmail.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, eugenis@google.com, syednwaris@gmail.com, william.gray@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v10 2/2] lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{read,write}() Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:59:12 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231026135912.1214302-2-glider@google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231026135912.1214302-1-glider@google.com> Add basic tests ensuring that values can be added at arbitrary positions of the bitmap, including those spanning into the adjacent unsigned longs. Two new performance tests, test_bitmap_read_perf() and test_bitmap_write_perf(), can be used to assess future performance improvements of bitmap_read() and bitmap_write(): [ 0.431119][ T1] test_bitmap: Time spent in test_bitmap_read_perf: 615253 [ 0.433197][ T1] test_bitmap: Time spent in test_bitmap_write_perf: 916313 (numbers from a Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6154 CPU @ 3.00GHz machine running QEMU). Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- This patch was previously part of the "Implement MTE tag compression for swapped pages" series (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231011172836.2579017-4-glider@google.com/T/) This patch was previously called "lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{set,get}_value()" (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230720173956.3674987-3-glider@google.com/) and "lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{set,get}_value_unaligned" (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230713125706.2884502-3-glider@google.com/) v9: - use WRITE_ONCE() to prevent optimizations in test_bitmap_read_perf() - update patch description v8: - as requested by Andy Shevchenko, add tests for reading/writing sizes > BITS_PER_LONG v7: - as requested by Yury Norov, add performance tests for bitmap_read() and bitmap_write() v6: - use bitmap API to initialize test bitmaps - as requested by Yury Norov, do not check the return value of bitmap_read(..., 0) - fix a compiler warning on 32-bit systems v5: - update patch title - address Yury Norov's comments: - rename the test cases - factor out test_bitmap_write_helper() to test writing over different background patterns; - add a test case copying a nontrivial value bit-by-bit; - drop volatile v4: - Address comments by Andy Shevchenko: added Reviewed-by: and a link to the previous discussion - Address comments by Yury Norov: - expand the bitmap to catch more corner cases - add code testing that bitmap_set_value() does not touch adjacent bits - add code testing the nbits==0 case - rename bitmap_{get,set}_value() to bitmap_{read,write}() v3: - switch to using bitmap_{set,get}_value() - change the expected bit pattern in test_set_get_value(), as the test was incorrectly assuming 0 is the LSB. --- lib/test_bitmap.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c index f2ea9f30c7c5d..a4195c7376840 100644 --- a/lib/test_bitmap.c +++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c @@ -71,6 +71,17 @@ __check_eq_uint(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, return true; } +static bool __init +__check_eq_ulong(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, + const unsigned long exp_ulong, unsigned long x) +{ + if (exp_ulong != x) { + pr_err("[%s:%u] expected %lu, got %lu\n", + srcfile, line, exp_ulong, x); + return false; + } + return true; +} static bool __init __check_eq_bitmap(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, @@ -186,6 +197,7 @@ __check_eq_str(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, }) #define expect_eq_uint(...) __expect_eq(uint, ##__VA_ARGS__) +#define expect_eq_ulong(...) __expect_eq(ulong, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define expect_eq_bitmap(...) __expect_eq(bitmap, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define expect_eq_pbl(...) __expect_eq(pbl, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define expect_eq_u32_array(...) __expect_eq(u32_array, ##__VA_ARGS__) @@ -1222,6 +1234,168 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_const_eval(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(~var != ~BIT(25)); } +/* + * Test bitmap should be big enough to include the cases when start is not in + * the first word, and start+nbits lands in the following word. + */ +#define TEST_BIT_LEN (1000) + +/* + * Helper function to test bitmap_write() overwriting the chosen byte pattern. + */ +static void __init test_bitmap_write_helper(const char *pattern) +{ + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + DECLARE_BITMAP(exp_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + DECLARE_BITMAP(pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned long w, r, bit; + int i, n, nbits; + + /* + * Only parse the pattern once and store the result in the intermediate + * bitmap. + */ + bitmap_parselist(pattern, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + + /* + * Check that writing a single bit does not accidentally touch the + * adjacent bits. + */ + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + for (bit = 0; bit <= 1; bit++) { + bitmap_write(bitmap, bit, i, 1); + __assign_bit(i, exp_bitmap, bit); + expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, + TEST_BIT_LEN); + } + } + + /* Ensure writing 0 bits does not change anything. */ + bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + bitmap_write(bitmap, ~0UL, i, 0); + expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + } + + for (nbits = BITS_PER_LONG; nbits >= 1; nbits--) { + w = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ? 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefUL + : 0xdeadbeefUL; + w >>= (BITS_PER_LONG - nbits); + for (i = 0; i <= TEST_BIT_LEN - nbits; i++) { + bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + for (n = 0; n < nbits; n++) + __assign_bit(i + n, exp_bitmap, w & BIT(n)); + bitmap_write(bitmap, w, i, nbits); + expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + r = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, nbits); + expect_eq_ulong(r, w); + } + } +} + +static void __init test_bitmap_read_write(void) +{ + unsigned char *pattern[3] = {"", "all:1/2", "all"}; + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned long zero_bits = 0, bits_per_long = BITS_PER_LONG; + unsigned long val; + int i, pi; + + /* + * Reading/writing zero bits should not crash the kernel. + * READ_ONCE() prevents constant folding. + */ + bitmap_write(NULL, 0, 0, READ_ONCE(zero_bits)); + /* Return value of bitmap_read() is undefined here. */ + bitmap_read(NULL, 0, READ_ONCE(zero_bits)); + + /* + * Reading/writing more than BITS_PER_LONG bits should not crash the + * kernel. READ_ONCE() prevents constant folding. + */ + bitmap_write(NULL, 0, 0, READ_ONCE(bits_per_long) + 1); + /* Return value of bitmap_read() is undefined here. */ + bitmap_read(NULL, 0, READ_ONCE(bits_per_long) + 1); + + /* + * Ensure that bitmap_read() reads the same value that was previously + * written, and two consequent values are correctly merged. + * The resulting bit pattern is asymmetric to rule out possible issues + * with bit numeration order. + */ + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN - 7; i++) { + bitmap_zero(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + + bitmap_write(bitmap, 0b10101UL, i, 5); + val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, 5); + expect_eq_ulong(0b10101UL, val); + + bitmap_write(bitmap, 0b101UL, i + 5, 3); + val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i + 5, 3); + expect_eq_ulong(0b101UL, val); + + val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, 8); + expect_eq_ulong(0b10110101UL, val); + } + + for (pi = 0; pi < ARRAY_SIZE(pattern); pi++) + test_bitmap_write_helper(pattern[pi]); +} + +static void __init test_bitmap_read_perf(void) +{ + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned int cnt, nbits, i; + unsigned long val; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_fill(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = 0; cnt < 5; cnt++) { + for (nbits = 1; nbits <= BITS_PER_LONG; nbits++) { + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + if (i + nbits > TEST_BIT_LEN) + break; + /* + * Prevent the compiler from optimizing away the + * bitmap_read() by using its value. + */ + WRITE_ONCE(val, bitmap_read(bitmap, i, nbits)); + } + } + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("Time spent in %s:\t%llu\n", __func__, time); +} + +static void __init test_bitmap_write_perf(void) +{ + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned int cnt, nbits, i; + unsigned long val = 0xfeedface; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_zero(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = 0; cnt < 5; cnt++) { + for (nbits = 1; nbits <= BITS_PER_LONG; nbits++) { + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + if (i + nbits > TEST_BIT_LEN) + break; + bitmap_write(bitmap, val, i, nbits); + } + } + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("Time spent in %s:\t%llu\n", __func__, time); +} + +#undef TEST_BIT_LEN + static void __init selftest(void) { test_zero_clear(); @@ -1237,6 +1411,9 @@ static void __init selftest(void) test_bitmap_cut(); test_bitmap_print_buf(); test_bitmap_const_eval(); + test_bitmap_read_write(); + test_bitmap_read_perf(); + test_bitmap_write_perf(); test_find_nth_bit(); test_for_each_set_bit(); -- 2.42.0.758.gaed0368e0e-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> To: glider@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, pcc@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yury.norov@gmail.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, eugenis@google.com, syednwaris@gmail.com, william.gray@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v10 2/2] lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{read,write}() Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:59:12 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231026135912.1214302-2-glider@google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231026135912.1214302-1-glider@google.com> Add basic tests ensuring that values can be added at arbitrary positions of the bitmap, including those spanning into the adjacent unsigned longs. Two new performance tests, test_bitmap_read_perf() and test_bitmap_write_perf(), can be used to assess future performance improvements of bitmap_read() and bitmap_write(): [ 0.431119][ T1] test_bitmap: Time spent in test_bitmap_read_perf: 615253 [ 0.433197][ T1] test_bitmap: Time spent in test_bitmap_write_perf: 916313 (numbers from a Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6154 CPU @ 3.00GHz machine running QEMU). Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- This patch was previously part of the "Implement MTE tag compression for swapped pages" series (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231011172836.2579017-4-glider@google.com/T/) This patch was previously called "lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{set,get}_value()" (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230720173956.3674987-3-glider@google.com/) and "lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{set,get}_value_unaligned" (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230713125706.2884502-3-glider@google.com/) v9: - use WRITE_ONCE() to prevent optimizations in test_bitmap_read_perf() - update patch description v8: - as requested by Andy Shevchenko, add tests for reading/writing sizes > BITS_PER_LONG v7: - as requested by Yury Norov, add performance tests for bitmap_read() and bitmap_write() v6: - use bitmap API to initialize test bitmaps - as requested by Yury Norov, do not check the return value of bitmap_read(..., 0) - fix a compiler warning on 32-bit systems v5: - update patch title - address Yury Norov's comments: - rename the test cases - factor out test_bitmap_write_helper() to test writing over different background patterns; - add a test case copying a nontrivial value bit-by-bit; - drop volatile v4: - Address comments by Andy Shevchenko: added Reviewed-by: and a link to the previous discussion - Address comments by Yury Norov: - expand the bitmap to catch more corner cases - add code testing that bitmap_set_value() does not touch adjacent bits - add code testing the nbits==0 case - rename bitmap_{get,set}_value() to bitmap_{read,write}() v3: - switch to using bitmap_{set,get}_value() - change the expected bit pattern in test_set_get_value(), as the test was incorrectly assuming 0 is the LSB. --- lib/test_bitmap.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c index f2ea9f30c7c5d..a4195c7376840 100644 --- a/lib/test_bitmap.c +++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c @@ -71,6 +71,17 @@ __check_eq_uint(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, return true; } +static bool __init +__check_eq_ulong(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, + const unsigned long exp_ulong, unsigned long x) +{ + if (exp_ulong != x) { + pr_err("[%s:%u] expected %lu, got %lu\n", + srcfile, line, exp_ulong, x); + return false; + } + return true; +} static bool __init __check_eq_bitmap(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, @@ -186,6 +197,7 @@ __check_eq_str(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line, }) #define expect_eq_uint(...) __expect_eq(uint, ##__VA_ARGS__) +#define expect_eq_ulong(...) __expect_eq(ulong, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define expect_eq_bitmap(...) __expect_eq(bitmap, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define expect_eq_pbl(...) __expect_eq(pbl, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define expect_eq_u32_array(...) __expect_eq(u32_array, ##__VA_ARGS__) @@ -1222,6 +1234,168 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_const_eval(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(~var != ~BIT(25)); } +/* + * Test bitmap should be big enough to include the cases when start is not in + * the first word, and start+nbits lands in the following word. + */ +#define TEST_BIT_LEN (1000) + +/* + * Helper function to test bitmap_write() overwriting the chosen byte pattern. + */ +static void __init test_bitmap_write_helper(const char *pattern) +{ + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + DECLARE_BITMAP(exp_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + DECLARE_BITMAP(pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned long w, r, bit; + int i, n, nbits; + + /* + * Only parse the pattern once and store the result in the intermediate + * bitmap. + */ + bitmap_parselist(pattern, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + + /* + * Check that writing a single bit does not accidentally touch the + * adjacent bits. + */ + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + for (bit = 0; bit <= 1; bit++) { + bitmap_write(bitmap, bit, i, 1); + __assign_bit(i, exp_bitmap, bit); + expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, + TEST_BIT_LEN); + } + } + + /* Ensure writing 0 bits does not change anything. */ + bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + bitmap_write(bitmap, ~0UL, i, 0); + expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + } + + for (nbits = BITS_PER_LONG; nbits >= 1; nbits--) { + w = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ? 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefUL + : 0xdeadbeefUL; + w >>= (BITS_PER_LONG - nbits); + for (i = 0; i <= TEST_BIT_LEN - nbits; i++) { + bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + for (n = 0; n < nbits; n++) + __assign_bit(i + n, exp_bitmap, w & BIT(n)); + bitmap_write(bitmap, w, i, nbits); + expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + r = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, nbits); + expect_eq_ulong(r, w); + } + } +} + +static void __init test_bitmap_read_write(void) +{ + unsigned char *pattern[3] = {"", "all:1/2", "all"}; + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned long zero_bits = 0, bits_per_long = BITS_PER_LONG; + unsigned long val; + int i, pi; + + /* + * Reading/writing zero bits should not crash the kernel. + * READ_ONCE() prevents constant folding. + */ + bitmap_write(NULL, 0, 0, READ_ONCE(zero_bits)); + /* Return value of bitmap_read() is undefined here. */ + bitmap_read(NULL, 0, READ_ONCE(zero_bits)); + + /* + * Reading/writing more than BITS_PER_LONG bits should not crash the + * kernel. READ_ONCE() prevents constant folding. + */ + bitmap_write(NULL, 0, 0, READ_ONCE(bits_per_long) + 1); + /* Return value of bitmap_read() is undefined here. */ + bitmap_read(NULL, 0, READ_ONCE(bits_per_long) + 1); + + /* + * Ensure that bitmap_read() reads the same value that was previously + * written, and two consequent values are correctly merged. + * The resulting bit pattern is asymmetric to rule out possible issues + * with bit numeration order. + */ + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN - 7; i++) { + bitmap_zero(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + + bitmap_write(bitmap, 0b10101UL, i, 5); + val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, 5); + expect_eq_ulong(0b10101UL, val); + + bitmap_write(bitmap, 0b101UL, i + 5, 3); + val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i + 5, 3); + expect_eq_ulong(0b101UL, val); + + val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, 8); + expect_eq_ulong(0b10110101UL, val); + } + + for (pi = 0; pi < ARRAY_SIZE(pattern); pi++) + test_bitmap_write_helper(pattern[pi]); +} + +static void __init test_bitmap_read_perf(void) +{ + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned int cnt, nbits, i; + unsigned long val; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_fill(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = 0; cnt < 5; cnt++) { + for (nbits = 1; nbits <= BITS_PER_LONG; nbits++) { + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + if (i + nbits > TEST_BIT_LEN) + break; + /* + * Prevent the compiler from optimizing away the + * bitmap_read() by using its value. + */ + WRITE_ONCE(val, bitmap_read(bitmap, i, nbits)); + } + } + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("Time spent in %s:\t%llu\n", __func__, time); +} + +static void __init test_bitmap_write_perf(void) +{ + DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + unsigned int cnt, nbits, i; + unsigned long val = 0xfeedface; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_zero(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN); + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = 0; cnt < 5; cnt++) { + for (nbits = 1; nbits <= BITS_PER_LONG; nbits++) { + for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) { + if (i + nbits > TEST_BIT_LEN) + break; + bitmap_write(bitmap, val, i, nbits); + } + } + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("Time spent in %s:\t%llu\n", __func__, time); +} + +#undef TEST_BIT_LEN + static void __init selftest(void) { test_zero_clear(); @@ -1237,6 +1411,9 @@ static void __init selftest(void) test_bitmap_cut(); test_bitmap_print_buf(); test_bitmap_const_eval(); + test_bitmap_read_write(); + test_bitmap_read_perf(); + test_bitmap_write_perf(); test_find_nth_bit(); test_for_each_set_bit(); -- 2.42.0.758.gaed0368e0e-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 13:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-10-26 13:59 [PATCH v10 1/2] lib/bitmap: add bitmap_{read,write}() Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-26 13:59 ` Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-26 13:59 ` Alexander Potapenko [this message] 2023-10-26 13:59 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{read,write}() Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-26 14:24 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] lib/bitmap: add bitmap_{read,write}() Andy Shevchenko 2023-10-26 14:24 ` Andy Shevchenko 2023-10-26 14:48 ` Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-26 14:48 ` Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-26 20:14 ` Andy Shevchenko 2023-10-26 20:14 ` Andy Shevchenko 2023-10-27 8:03 ` Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-27 8:03 ` Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-27 8:11 ` Alexander Potapenko 2023-10-27 8:11 ` Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20231026135912.1214302-2-glider@google.com \ --to=glider@google.com \ --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \ --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \ --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \ --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=eugenis@google.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \ --cc=pcc@google.com \ --cc=syednwaris@gmail.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=william.gray@linaro.org \ --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.