All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe
@ 2023-12-21 17:21 Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] platform/x86: Cache pci_dev in struct hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Suma Hegde @ 2023-12-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: platform-driver-x86
  Cc: ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Suma Hegde, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

This is in advance to supporting ACPI based probe.

In case of non-ACPI driver, hsmp_test() can be
performed either in plat init() or in probe().

however, in case of ACPI probing, hsmp_test() cannot
be called in init(), as the mailbox reg offsets and
base addresses are read from ACPI table in the probe().

Hence, move hsmp_test() to probe as preparation for
ACPI support.

Also use hsmp_send_message() directly in hsmp_test()
as the semaphore is already initialized in probe.

Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v1:
1. Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
Changes since v2:
1. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"

 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
index b55d80e29139..3c17b488f4f8 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
@@ -244,12 +244,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hsmp_send_message);
 static int hsmp_test(u16 sock_ind, u32 value)
 {
 	struct hsmp_message msg = { 0 };
-	struct amd_northbridge *nb;
-	int ret = -ENODEV;
-
-	nb = node_to_amd_nb(sock_ind);
-	if (!nb || !nb->root)
-		return ret;
+	int ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * Test the hsmp port by performing TEST command. The test message
@@ -261,7 +256,7 @@ static int hsmp_test(u16 sock_ind, u32 value)
 	msg.args[0]	= value;
 	msg.sock_ind	= sock_ind;
 
-	ret = __hsmp_send_message(nb->root, &msg);
+	ret = hsmp_send_message(&msg);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -504,6 +499,15 @@ static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	for (i = 0; i < plat_dev.num_sockets; i++) {
 		sema_init(&plat_dev.sock[i].hsmp_sem, 1);
 		plat_dev.sock[i].sock_ind = i;
+
+		/* Test the hsmp interface on each socket */
+		ret = hsmp_test(i, 0xDEADBEEF);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("HSMP test message failed on Fam:%x model:%x\n",
+			       boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
+			pr_err("Is HSMP disabled in BIOS ?\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
 	}
 
 	plat_dev.hsmp_device.name	= HSMP_CDEV_NAME;
@@ -544,7 +548,6 @@ static struct platform_device *amd_hsmp_platdev;
 static int __init hsmp_plt_init(void)
 {
 	int ret = -ENODEV;
-	int i;
 
 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD || boot_cpu_data.x86 < 0x19) {
 		pr_err("HSMP is not supported on Family:%x model:%x\n",
@@ -560,17 +563,6 @@ static int __init hsmp_plt_init(void)
 	if (plat_dev.num_sockets == 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Test the hsmp interface on each socket */
-	for (i = 0; i < plat_dev.num_sockets; i++) {
-		ret = hsmp_test(i, 0xDEADBEEF);
-		if (ret) {
-			pr_err("HSMP test message failed on Fam:%x model:%x\n",
-			       boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
-			pr_err("Is HSMP disabled in BIOS ?\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
-	}
-
 	ret = platform_driver_register(&amd_hsmp_driver);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/7] platform/x86: Cache pci_dev in struct hsmp_socket
  2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-21 17:21 ` Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] platform/x86: Create static func to handle platdev Suma Hegde
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Suma Hegde @ 2023-12-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: platform-driver-x86
  Cc: ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Suma Hegde, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Cache pci_dev obj during probe as part of struct hsmp_socket
and use in amd_hsmp_rdwr(). This change will make it easier to
support both non-ACPI and ACPI devices.

Also add a check for sock_index agsint number of sockets
in the hsmp_send_message().

Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v1:
1. Remove !sock check in hsmp_send_message()
2. Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
Changes since v2:
1. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"

 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
index 3c17b488f4f8..1a2abe4460f9 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
 	void __iomem *metric_tbl_addr;
 	struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
 	char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
+	struct pci_dev *root;
 	u16 sock_ind;
 };
 
@@ -71,17 +72,20 @@ struct hsmp_plat_device {
 
 static struct hsmp_plat_device plat_dev;
 
-static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct pci_dev *root, u32 address,
+static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 address,
 			 u32 *value, bool write)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pci_write_config_dword(root, HSMP_INDEX_REG, address);
+	if (!sock->root)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = pci_write_config_dword(sock->root, HSMP_INDEX_REG, address);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = (write ? pci_write_config_dword(root, HSMP_DATA_REG, *value)
-		     : pci_read_config_dword(root, HSMP_DATA_REG, value));
+	ret = (write ? pci_write_config_dword(sock->root, HSMP_DATA_REG, *value)
+		     : pci_read_config_dword(sock->root, HSMP_DATA_REG, value));
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -95,7 +99,7 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct pci_dev *root, u32 address,
  * Returns 0 for success and populates the requested number of arguments.
  * Returns a negative error code for failure.
  */
-static int __hsmp_send_message(struct pci_dev *root, struct hsmp_message *msg)
+static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *msg)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout, short_sleep;
 	u32 mbox_status;
@@ -104,7 +108,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct pci_dev *root, struct hsmp_message *msg)
 
 	/* Clear the status register */
 	mbox_status = HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY;
-	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(root, SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP, &mbox_status, HSMP_WR);
+	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP, &mbox_status, HSMP_WR);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("Error %d clearing mailbox status register\n", ret);
 		return ret;
@@ -113,7 +117,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct pci_dev *root, struct hsmp_message *msg)
 	index = 0;
 	/* Write any message arguments */
 	while (index < msg->num_args) {
-		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(root, SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA + (index << 2),
+		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA + (index << 2),
 				    &msg->args[index], HSMP_WR);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("Error %d writing message argument %d\n", ret, index);
@@ -123,7 +127,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct pci_dev *root, struct hsmp_message *msg)
 	}
 
 	/* Write the message ID which starts the operation */
-	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(root, SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID, &msg->msg_id, HSMP_WR);
+	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID, &msg->msg_id, HSMP_WR);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("Error %d writing message ID %u\n", ret, msg->msg_id);
 		return ret;
@@ -140,7 +144,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct pci_dev *root, struct hsmp_message *msg)
 	timeout	= jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HSMP_MSG_TIMEOUT);
 
 	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
-		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(root, SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP, &mbox_status, HSMP_RD);
+		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP, &mbox_status, HSMP_RD);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("Error %d reading mailbox status\n", ret);
 			return ret;
@@ -175,7 +179,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct pci_dev *root, struct hsmp_message *msg)
 	 */
 	index = 0;
 	while (index < msg->response_sz) {
-		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(root, SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA + (index << 2),
+		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA + (index << 2),
 				    &msg->args[index], HSMP_RD);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("Error %d reading response %u for message ID:%u\n",
@@ -208,21 +212,19 @@ static int validate_message(struct hsmp_message *msg)
 
 int hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_message *msg)
 {
-	struct hsmp_socket *sock = &plat_dev.sock[msg->sock_ind];
-	struct amd_northbridge *nb;
+	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!msg)
 		return -EINVAL;
-
-	nb = node_to_amd_nb(msg->sock_ind);
-	if (!nb || !nb->root)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	ret = validate_message(msg);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (!plat_dev.sock || msg->sock_ind >= plat_dev.num_sockets)
+		return -ENODEV;
+	sock = &plat_dev.sock[msg->sock_ind];
+
 	/*
 	 * The time taken by smu operation to complete is between
 	 * 10us to 1ms. Sometime it may take more time.
@@ -233,7 +235,7 @@ int hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_message *msg)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = __hsmp_send_message(nb->root, msg);
+	ret = __hsmp_send_message(sock, msg);
 
 	up(&sock->hsmp_sem);
 
@@ -500,6 +502,10 @@ static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		sema_init(&plat_dev.sock[i].hsmp_sem, 1);
 		plat_dev.sock[i].sock_ind = i;
 
+		if (!node_to_amd_nb(i))
+			return -ENODEV;
+		plat_dev.sock[i].root = node_to_amd_nb(i)->root;
+
 		/* Test the hsmp interface on each socket */
 		ret = hsmp_test(i, 0xDEADBEEF);
 		if (ret) {
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 3/7] platform/x86: Create static func to handle platdev
  2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] platform/x86: Cache pci_dev in struct hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-21 17:21 ` Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] platform/x86: Define a struct to hold mailbox regs Suma Hegde
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Suma Hegde @ 2023-12-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: platform-driver-x86
  Cc: ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Suma Hegde, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Create a static function and call platform device alloc and add device,
which will simplify handling acpi and plat device probing.

Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v1:
1. Replace -1 with PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE in platform_device_alloc()
2. Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
Changes since v2:
1. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"

 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
index 1a2abe4460f9..e3354683b138 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
@@ -551,6 +551,21 @@ static struct platform_driver amd_hsmp_driver = {
 
 static struct platform_device *amd_hsmp_platdev;
 
+static int hsmp_plat_dev_register(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	amd_hsmp_platdev = platform_device_alloc(DRIVER_NAME, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE);
+	if (!amd_hsmp_platdev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = platform_device_add(amd_hsmp_platdev);
+	if (ret)
+		platform_device_put(amd_hsmp_platdev);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __init hsmp_plt_init(void)
 {
 	int ret = -ENODEV;
@@ -573,22 +588,10 @@ static int __init hsmp_plt_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	amd_hsmp_platdev = platform_device_alloc(DRIVER_NAME, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE);
-	if (!amd_hsmp_platdev) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto drv_unregister;
-	}
-
-	ret = platform_device_add(amd_hsmp_platdev);
-	if (ret) {
-		platform_device_put(amd_hsmp_platdev);
-		goto drv_unregister;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
+	ret = hsmp_plat_dev_register();
+	if (ret)
+		platform_driver_unregister(&amd_hsmp_driver);
 
-drv_unregister:
-	platform_driver_unregister(&amd_hsmp_driver);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 4/7] platform/x86: Define a struct to hold mailbox regs
  2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] platform/x86: Cache pci_dev in struct hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] platform/x86: Create static func to handle platdev Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-21 17:21 ` Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] platform/x86: Move dev from platdev to hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Suma Hegde @ 2023-12-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: platform-driver-x86
  Cc: ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Suma Hegde, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Define struct hsmp_mbaddr_info with register offsets and populate
them during probe, which avoids the usage of macros in core functions.

During ACPI probe, the same fields can be populated from ACPI table.

Also move plat dev init to a static function.

Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>

---
Changes since v1:
Move hsmp_test() to initialize_platdev()
Changes since v2:
1. Change initialize_platdev() name to init_socket_objects()
2. Use local variable sock to hold &plat_dev.sock[i] in
   init_socket_objects()
3. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"

 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
index e3354683b138..9b040c0b0d04 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
@@ -40,9 +40,10 @@
  * register into the SMN_INDEX register, and reads/writes the SMN_DATA reg.
  * Below are required SMN address for HSMP Mailbox register offsets in SMU address space
  */
-#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID		0x3B10534
-#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP	0x3B10980
-#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA	0x3B109E0
+#define SMN_HSMP_BASE		0x3B00000
+#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID		0x0010534
+#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP	0x0010980
+#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA	0x00109E0
 
 #define HSMP_INDEX_REG		0xc4
 #define HSMP_DATA_REG		0xc8
@@ -53,8 +54,17 @@
 
 #define HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE	10
 
+struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
+	u32 base_addr;
+	u32 msg_id_off;
+	u32 msg_resp_off;
+	u32 msg_arg_off;
+	u32 size;
+};
+
 struct hsmp_socket {
 	struct bin_attribute hsmp_attr;
+	struct hsmp_mbaddr_info mbinfo;
 	void __iomem *metric_tbl_addr;
 	struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
 	char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
@@ -72,7 +82,7 @@ struct hsmp_plat_device {
 
 static struct hsmp_plat_device plat_dev;
 
-static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 address,
+static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
 			 u32 *value, bool write)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -80,7 +90,8 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 address,
 	if (!sock->root)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	ret = pci_write_config_dword(sock->root, HSMP_INDEX_REG, address);
+	ret = pci_write_config_dword(sock->root, HSMP_INDEX_REG,
+				     sock->mbinfo.base_addr + offset);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -101,14 +112,17 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 address,
  */
 static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *msg)
 {
+	struct hsmp_mbaddr_info *mbinfo;
 	unsigned long timeout, short_sleep;
 	u32 mbox_status;
 	u32 index;
 	int ret;
 
+	mbinfo = &sock->mbinfo;
+
 	/* Clear the status register */
 	mbox_status = HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY;
-	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP, &mbox_status, HSMP_WR);
+	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, mbinfo->msg_resp_off, &mbox_status, HSMP_WR);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("Error %d clearing mailbox status register\n", ret);
 		return ret;
@@ -117,7 +131,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *ms
 	index = 0;
 	/* Write any message arguments */
 	while (index < msg->num_args) {
-		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA + (index << 2),
+		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, mbinfo->msg_arg_off + (index << 2),
 				    &msg->args[index], HSMP_WR);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("Error %d writing message argument %d\n", ret, index);
@@ -127,7 +141,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *ms
 	}
 
 	/* Write the message ID which starts the operation */
-	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID, &msg->msg_id, HSMP_WR);
+	ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, mbinfo->msg_id_off, &msg->msg_id, HSMP_WR);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("Error %d writing message ID %u\n", ret, msg->msg_id);
 		return ret;
@@ -144,7 +158,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *ms
 	timeout	= jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HSMP_MSG_TIMEOUT);
 
 	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
-		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP, &mbox_status, HSMP_RD);
+		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, mbinfo->msg_resp_off, &mbox_status, HSMP_RD);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("Error %d reading mailbox status\n", ret);
 			return ret;
@@ -179,7 +193,7 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *ms
 	 */
 	index = 0;
 	while (index < msg->response_sz) {
-		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA + (index << 2),
+		ret = amd_hsmp_rdwr(sock, mbinfo->msg_arg_off + (index << 2),
 				    &msg->args[index], HSMP_RD);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("Error %d reading response %u for message ID:%u\n",
@@ -487,24 +501,22 @@ static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int init_socket_objects(void)
 {
+	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
 	int ret, i;
 
-	plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
-				     (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
-				     GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!plat_dev.sock)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	plat_dev.dev = &pdev->dev;
-
 	for (i = 0; i < plat_dev.num_sockets; i++) {
-		sema_init(&plat_dev.sock[i].hsmp_sem, 1);
-		plat_dev.sock[i].sock_ind = i;
-
 		if (!node_to_amd_nb(i))
 			return -ENODEV;
-		plat_dev.sock[i].root = node_to_amd_nb(i)->root;
+		sock = &plat_dev.sock[i];
+		sock->root			= node_to_amd_nb(i)->root;
+		sock->sock_ind			= i;
+		sock->mbinfo.base_addr		= SMN_HSMP_BASE;
+		sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off		= SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID;
+		sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off	= SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP;
+		sock->mbinfo.msg_arg_off	= SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA;
+		sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
 
 		/* Test the hsmp interface on each socket */
 		ret = hsmp_test(i, 0xDEADBEEF);
@@ -516,6 +528,24 @@ static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		}
 	}
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+				     (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!plat_dev.sock)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	plat_dev.dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+	ret = init_socket_objects();
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	plat_dev.hsmp_device.name	= HSMP_CDEV_NAME;
 	plat_dev.hsmp_device.minor	= MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
 	plat_dev.hsmp_device.fops	= &hsmp_fops;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 5/7] platform/x86: Move dev from platdev to hsmp_socket
  2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] platform/x86: Define a struct to hold mailbox regs Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-21 17:21 ` Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing Suma Hegde
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Suma Hegde @ 2023-12-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: platform-driver-x86
  Cc: ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Suma Hegde, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

On an ACPI enabled platforms the probe is called for each socket
and the struct dev is different for each socket. This change
will help in handling both ACPI and non-ACPI platforms.

Also change pr_err() to dev_err() API.

Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>

---
Changes since v1:
Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
Changes since v2:
1. Edit commit message
2. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"

 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
index 9b040c0b0d04..e77d4cd83a07 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
@@ -69,13 +69,13 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
 	struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
 	char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
 	struct pci_dev *root;
+	struct device *dev;
 	u16 sock_ind;
 };
 
 struct hsmp_plat_device {
 	struct miscdevice hsmp_device;
 	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
-	struct device *dev;
 	u32 proto_ver;
 	u16 num_sockets;
 };
@@ -278,8 +278,9 @@ static int hsmp_test(u16 sock_ind, u32 value)
 
 	/* Check the response value */
 	if (msg.args[0] != (value + 1)) {
-		pr_err("Socket %d test message failed, Expected 0x%08X, received 0x%08X\n",
-		       sock_ind, (value + 1), msg.args[0]);
+		dev_err(plat_dev.sock[sock_ind].dev,
+			"Socket %d test message failed, Expected 0x%08X, received 0x%08X\n",
+			sock_ind, (value + 1), msg.args[0]);
 		return -EBADE;
 	}
 
@@ -358,12 +359,12 @@ static ssize_t hsmp_metric_tbl_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
 
 	/* Do not support lseek(), reads entire metric table */
 	if (count < bin_attr->size) {
-		dev_err(plat_dev.dev, "Wrong buffer size\n");
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Wrong buffer size\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (!sock) {
-		dev_err(plat_dev.dev, "Failed to read attribute private data\n");
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to read attribute private data\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -399,13 +400,13 @@ static int hsmp_get_tbl_dram_base(u16 sock_ind)
 	 */
 	dram_addr = msg.args[0] | ((u64)(msg.args[1]) << 32);
 	if (!dram_addr) {
-		dev_err(plat_dev.dev, "Invalid DRAM address for metric table\n");
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Invalid DRAM address for metric table\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	sock->metric_tbl_addr = devm_ioremap(plat_dev.dev, dram_addr,
+	sock->metric_tbl_addr = devm_ioremap(sock->dev, dram_addr,
 					     sizeof(struct hsmp_metric_table));
 	if (!sock->metric_tbl_addr) {
-		dev_err(plat_dev.dev, "Failed to ioremap metric table addr\n");
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to ioremap metric table addr\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -453,14 +454,15 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
 	if (WARN_ON(plat_dev.num_sockets > U8_MAX))
 		return -ERANGE;
 
-	hsmp_attr_grps = devm_kzalloc(plat_dev.dev, sizeof(struct attribute_group *) *
+	hsmp_attr_grps = devm_kzalloc(plat_dev.sock[0].dev, sizeof(struct attribute_group *) *
 				      (plat_dev.num_sockets + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!hsmp_attr_grps)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	/* Create a sysfs directory for each socket */
 	for (i = 0; i < plat_dev.num_sockets; i++) {
-		attr_grp = devm_kzalloc(plat_dev.dev, sizeof(struct attribute_group), GFP_KERNEL);
+		attr_grp = devm_kzalloc(plat_dev.sock[i].dev, sizeof(struct attribute_group),
+					GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!attr_grp)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -468,7 +470,7 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
 		attr_grp->name = plat_dev.sock[i].name;
 
 		/* Null terminated list of attributes */
-		hsmp_bin_attrs = devm_kzalloc(plat_dev.dev, sizeof(struct bin_attribute *) *
+		hsmp_bin_attrs = devm_kzalloc(plat_dev.sock[i].dev, sizeof(struct bin_attribute *) *
 					      (NUM_HSMP_ATTRS + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!hsmp_bin_attrs)
 			return -ENOMEM;
@@ -482,7 +484,7 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
-	return devm_device_add_groups(plat_dev.dev, hsmp_attr_grps);
+	return devm_device_add_groups(plat_dev.sock[0].dev, hsmp_attr_grps);
 }
 
 static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
@@ -501,7 +503,7 @@ static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int init_socket_objects(void)
+static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
 	int ret, i;
@@ -512,6 +514,7 @@ static int init_socket_objects(void)
 		sock = &plat_dev.sock[i];
 		sock->root			= node_to_amd_nb(i)->root;
 		sock->sock_ind			= i;
+		sock->dev			= dev;
 		sock->mbinfo.base_addr		= SMN_HSMP_BASE;
 		sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off		= SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID;
 		sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off	= SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP;
@@ -521,9 +524,9 @@ static int init_socket_objects(void)
 		/* Test the hsmp interface on each socket */
 		ret = hsmp_test(i, 0xDEADBEEF);
 		if (ret) {
-			pr_err("HSMP test message failed on Fam:%x model:%x\n",
-			       boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
-			pr_err("Is HSMP disabled in BIOS ?\n");
+			dev_err(dev, "HSMP test message failed on Fam:%x model:%x\n",
+				boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
+			dev_err(dev, "Is HSMP disabled in BIOS ?\n");
 			return ret;
 		}
 	}
@@ -540,9 +543,8 @@ static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				     GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!plat_dev.sock)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	plat_dev.dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	ret = init_socket_objects();
+	ret = init_socket_objects(&pdev->dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -555,13 +557,13 @@ static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ret = hsmp_cache_proto_ver();
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(plat_dev.dev, "Failed to read HSMP protocol version\n");
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to read HSMP protocol version\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = hsmp_create_sysfs_interface();
 	if (ret)
-		dev_err(plat_dev.dev, "Failed to create HSMP sysfs interface\n");
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to create HSMP sysfs interface\n");
 
 	return misc_register(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
 }
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing
  2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] platform/x86: Move dev from platdev to hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-21 17:21 ` Suma Hegde
  2023-12-22  8:51   ` Ilpo Järvinen
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh Suma Hegde
  2023-12-21 17:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Thomas Weißschuh 
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Suma Hegde @ 2023-12-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: platform-driver-x86
  Cc: ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Suma Hegde, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

ACPI table provides mailbox base address and register offset
information. The base address is provided as part of CRS method
and mailbox offsets are provided through DSD table.
Sockets are differentiated by UIDs.

Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
---
Changes since v1:
1. Define amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr() for doing mailbox memory mapped io
2. Add a check to see if mailbox register offsets are set in
   hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
3. Add a check to see if sock->mbinfo.base_addr sockck->mbinfo.size are
   set in hsmp_read_acpi_crs()
4. Change order of the statements in switch case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32
   in hsmp_resource()
5. Add hsmp_test() after hsmp_parse_acpi_table() call
6. Add r.end < r.start check in hsmp_resource()
7. Add !dsd error check in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd
Changes since v2:
1. Change EINVAL to ENODEV in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
2. Change EINVAL to ENOENT in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
3. Use resource_size() in hsmp_resource()

 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 296 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
index e77d4cd83a07..46924c572055 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
@@ -18,9 +18,11 @@
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/semaphore.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 
 #define DRIVER_NAME		"amd_hsmp"
-#define DRIVER_VERSION		"2.0"
+#define DRIVER_VERSION		"2.2"
+#define ACPI_HSMP_DEVICE_HID	"AMDI0097"
 
 /* HSMP Status / Error codes */
 #define HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY	0x00
@@ -54,6 +56,11 @@
 
 #define HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE	10
 
+/* These are the strings specified in ACPI table */
+#define MSG_IDOFF_STR		"MsgIdOffset"
+#define MSG_ARGOFF_STR		"MsgArgOffset"
+#define MSG_RESPOFF_STR		"MsgRspOffset"
+
 struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
 	u32 base_addr;
 	u32 msg_id_off;
@@ -66,6 +73,7 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
 	struct bin_attribute hsmp_attr;
 	struct hsmp_mbaddr_info mbinfo;
 	void __iomem *metric_tbl_addr;
+	void __iomem *virt_base_addr;
 	struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
 	char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
 	struct pci_dev *root;
@@ -78,12 +86,14 @@ struct hsmp_plat_device {
 	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
 	u32 proto_ver;
 	u16 num_sockets;
+	bool is_acpi_device;
+	bool is_probed;
 };
 
 static struct hsmp_plat_device plat_dev;
 
-static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
-			 u32 *value, bool write)
+static int amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
+			     u32 *value, bool write)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -101,8 +111,29 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
+			       u32 *value, bool write)
+{
+	if (write)
+		iowrite32(*value, sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
+	else
+		*value = ioread32(sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
+}
+
+static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
+			 u32 *value, bool write)
+{
+	if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
+		amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
+	else
+		return amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
- * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers.
+ * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers
+ * or by writing to MMIO space.
  *
  * The caller is expected to zero out any unused arguments.
  * If a response is expected, the number of response words should be greater than 0.
@@ -450,6 +481,9 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
 	int ret;
 	u16 i;
 
+	if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
+		return 0;
+
 	/* String formatting is currently limited to u8 sockets */
 	if (WARN_ON(plat_dev.num_sockets > U8_MAX))
 		return -ERANGE;
@@ -487,13 +521,188 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
 	return devm_device_add_groups(plat_dev.sock[0].dev, hsmp_attr_grps);
 }
 
-static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
+/* This is the UUID used for HSMP */
+static const guid_t acpi_hsmp_uuid = GUID_INIT(0xb74d619d, 0x5707, 0x48bd,
+						0xa6, 0x9f, 0x4e, 0xa2,
+						0x87, 0x1f, 0xc2, 0xf6);
+
+static inline bool is_acpi_hsmp_uuid(union acpi_object *obj)
+{
+	if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && obj->buffer.length == 16)
+		return guid_equal((guid_t *)obj->buffer.pointer, &acpi_hsmp_uuid);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static inline int hsmp_get_uid(struct device *dev, u16 *sock_ind)
+{
+	char *uid;
+
+	/*
+	 * UID (ID00, ID01..IDXX) is used for differentiating sockets,
+	 * read it and strip the "ID" part of it and convert the remaining
+	 * bytes to integer.
+	 */
+	uid = acpi_device_uid(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
+
+	return kstrtou16((uid + 2), 10, sock_ind);
+}
+
+static acpi_status hsmp_resource(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
+{
+	struct hsmp_socket *sock = data;
+	struct resource r;
+
+	switch (res->type) {
+	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32:
+		if (!acpi_dev_resource_memory(res, &r))
+			return AE_ERROR;
+		if (!r.start || r.end < r.start || !(r.flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_WRITEABLE))
+			return AE_ERROR;
+		sock->mbinfo.base_addr = r.start;
+		sock->mbinfo.size = resource_size(&r);
+		break;
+	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_END_TAG:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return AE_ERROR;
+	}
+
+	return AE_OK;
+}
+
+static int hsmp_read_acpi_dsd(struct hsmp_socket *sock)
+{
+	struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+	union acpi_object *guid, *mailbox_package;
+	union acpi_object *dsd;
+	acpi_status status;
+	int ret = 0;
+	int j;
+
+	status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(ACPI_HANDLE(sock->dev), "_DSD", NULL,
+					    &buf, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to read mailbox reg offsets from DSD table, err: %s\n",
+			acpi_format_exception(status));
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	dsd = buf.pointer;
+
+	/* HSMP _DSD property should contain 2 objects.
+	 * 1. guid which is an acpi object of type ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER
+	 * 2. mailbox which is an acpi object of type ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE
+	 *    This mailbox object contains 3 more acpi objects of type
+	 *    ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE for holding msgid, msgresp, msgarg offsets
+	 *    these packages inturn contain 2 acpi objects of type
+	 *    ACPI_TYPE_STRING and ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER
+	 */
+	if (!dsd || dsd->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || dsd->package.count != 2) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto free_buf;
+	}
+
+	guid = &dsd->package.elements[0];
+	mailbox_package = &dsd->package.elements[1];
+	if (!is_acpi_hsmp_uuid(guid) || mailbox_package->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Invalid hsmp _DSD table data\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto free_buf;
+	}
+
+	for (j = 0; j < mailbox_package->package.count; j++) {
+		union acpi_object *msgobj, *msgstr, *msgint;
+
+		msgobj	= &mailbox_package->package.elements[j];
+		msgstr	= &msgobj->package.elements[0];
+		msgint	= &msgobj->package.elements[1];
+
+		/* package should have 1 string and 1 integer object */
+		if (msgobj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ||
+		    msgstr->type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING ||
+		    msgint->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto free_buf;
+		}
+
+		if (!strncmp(msgstr->string.pointer, MSG_IDOFF_STR,
+			     msgstr->string.length)) {
+			sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off = msgint->integer.value;
+		} else if (!strncmp(msgstr->string.pointer, MSG_RESPOFF_STR,
+				    msgstr->string.length)) {
+			sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off =  msgint->integer.value;
+		} else if (!strncmp(msgstr->string.pointer, MSG_ARGOFF_STR,
+				    msgstr->string.length)) {
+			sock->mbinfo.msg_arg_off = msgint->integer.value;
+		} else {
+			ret = -ENOENT;
+			goto free_buf;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off || !sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off ||
+	    !sock->mbinfo.msg_arg_off)
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+
+free_buf:
+	ACPI_FREE(buf.pointer);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int hsmp_read_acpi_crs(struct hsmp_socket *sock)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	status = acpi_walk_resources(ACPI_HANDLE(sock->dev), METHOD_NAME__CRS,
+				     hsmp_resource, sock);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to look up MP1 base address from CRS method, err: %s\n",
+			acpi_format_exception(status));
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (!sock->mbinfo.base_addr || !sock->mbinfo.size)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* The mapped region should be un cached */
+	sock->virt_base_addr = devm_ioremap_uc(sock->dev, sock->mbinfo.base_addr,
+					       sock->mbinfo.size);
+	if (!sock->virt_base_addr) {
+		dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to ioremap MP1 base address\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Parse the ACPI table to read the data */
+static int hsmp_parse_acpi_table(struct device *dev, u16 sock_ind)
+{
+	struct hsmp_socket *sock = &plat_dev.sock[sock_ind];
+	int ret;
+
+	sock->sock_ind		= sock_ind;
+	sock->dev		= dev;
+	plat_dev.is_acpi_device	= true;
+
+	sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
+
+	/* Read MP1 base address from CRS method */
+	ret = hsmp_read_acpi_crs(sock);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Read mailbox offsets from DSD table */
+	return hsmp_read_acpi_dsd(sock);
+}
+
+static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(u16 sock_ind)
 {
 	struct hsmp_message msg = { 0 };
 	int ret;
 
 	msg.msg_id	= HSMP_GET_PROTO_VER;
-	msg.sock_ind	= 0;
+	msg.sock_ind	= sock_ind;
 	msg.response_sz = hsmp_msg_desc_table[HSMP_GET_PROTO_VER].response_sz;
 
 	ret = hsmp_send_message(&msg);
@@ -534,28 +743,61 @@ static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct acpi_device_id amd_hsmp_acpi_ids[] = {
+	{ACPI_HSMP_DEVICE_HID, 0},
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, amd_hsmp_acpi_ids);
+
 static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	struct acpi_device *adev;
+	u16 sock_ind = 0;
 	int ret;
 
-	plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
-				     (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
-				     GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!plat_dev.sock)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	ret = init_socket_objects(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	plat_dev.hsmp_device.name	= HSMP_CDEV_NAME;
-	plat_dev.hsmp_device.minor	= MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
-	plat_dev.hsmp_device.fops	= &hsmp_fops;
-	plat_dev.hsmp_device.parent	= &pdev->dev;
-	plat_dev.hsmp_device.nodename	= HSMP_DEVNODE_NAME;
-	plat_dev.hsmp_device.mode	= 0644;
+	/*
+	 * On ACPI supported BIOS, there is an ACPI HSMP device added for
+	 * each socket, so the per socket probing, but the memory allocated for
+	 * sockets should be contiguous to access it as an array,
+	 * Hence allocate memory for all the sockets at once instead of allocating
+	 * on each probe.
+	 */
+	if (!plat_dev.is_probed) {
+		plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+					     (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
+					     GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!plat_dev.sock)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
+	if (adev && !acpi_match_device_ids(adev, amd_hsmp_acpi_ids)) {
+		ret = hsmp_get_uid(&pdev->dev, &sock_ind);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		if (sock_ind >= plat_dev.num_sockets)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		ret = hsmp_parse_acpi_table(&pdev->dev, sock_ind);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to parse ACPI table\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+		/* Test the hsmp interface */
+		ret = hsmp_test(sock_ind, 0xDEADBEEF);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "HSMP test message failed on Fam:%x model:%x\n",
+				boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Is HSMP disabled in BIOS ?\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	} else {
+		ret = init_socket_objects(&pdev->dev);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to init HSMP mailbox\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
 
-	ret = hsmp_cache_proto_ver();
+	ret = hsmp_cache_proto_ver(sock_ind);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to read HSMP protocol version\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -565,12 +807,35 @@ static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to create HSMP sysfs interface\n");
 
-	return misc_register(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
+	if (!plat_dev.is_probed) {
+		plat_dev.hsmp_device.name	= HSMP_CDEV_NAME;
+		plat_dev.hsmp_device.minor	= MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+		plat_dev.hsmp_device.fops	= &hsmp_fops;
+		plat_dev.hsmp_device.parent	= &pdev->dev;
+		plat_dev.hsmp_device.nodename	= HSMP_DEVNODE_NAME;
+		plat_dev.hsmp_device.mode	= 0644;
+
+		ret = misc_register(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		plat_dev.is_probed = true;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
 }
 
 static void hsmp_pltdrv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	misc_deregister(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
+	/*
+	 * We register only one misc_device even on multi socket system.
+	 * So, deregister should happen only once.
+	 */
+	if (plat_dev.is_probed) {
+		misc_deregister(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
+		plat_dev.is_probed = false;
+	}
 }
 
 static struct platform_driver amd_hsmp_driver = {
@@ -578,6 +843,7 @@ static struct platform_driver amd_hsmp_driver = {
 	.remove_new	= hsmp_pltdrv_remove,
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= DRIVER_NAME,
+		.acpi_match_table = amd_hsmp_acpi_ids,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -620,9 +886,11 @@ static int __init hsmp_plt_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = hsmp_plat_dev_register();
-	if (ret)
-		platform_driver_unregister(&amd_hsmp_driver);
+	if (!plat_dev.is_acpi_device) {
+		ret = hsmp_plat_dev_register();
+		if (ret)
+			platform_driver_unregister(&amd_hsmp_driver);
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh
  2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-21 17:21 ` Suma Hegde
  2023-12-22  8:24   ` Ilpo Järvinen
  2023-12-21 17:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Thomas Weißschuh 
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Suma Hegde @ 2023-12-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: platform-driver-x86
  Cc: ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Suma Hegde, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

AMD EPYC family 0x1A and Model 0x0-0xF are having different
mailbox message ID offset compared to previous
platforms. In case of ACPI based BIOS, this information will be read
from ACPI table, for non-ACPI BIOS, this needs to be #defined.

Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>

---
Changes since v1:
Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
Changes since v2:
1. Change "non ACPI" to "non-ACPI"
2. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"

 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
index 46924c572055..cc5e5e8124c9 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
  */
 #define SMN_HSMP_BASE		0x3B00000
 #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID		0x0010534
+#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_F1A_M0H	0x0010934
 #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP	0x0010980
 #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA	0x00109E0
 
@@ -712,6 +713,15 @@ static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(u16 sock_ind)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static inline bool is_f1a_m0h(void)
+{
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x1A &&
+	    (boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x00 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0x0F))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
@@ -725,10 +735,19 @@ static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
 		sock->sock_ind			= i;
 		sock->dev			= dev;
 		sock->mbinfo.base_addr		= SMN_HSMP_BASE;
-		sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off		= SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID;
+		sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
+
+		/*
+		 * This is a tranisitional change from non-ACPI to ACPI, only
+		 * family 0x1A, model 0x00 platform is supported for both ACPI and non-ACPI.
+		 */
+		if (is_f1a_m0h())
+			sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off	= SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_F1A_M0H;
+		else
+			sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off	= SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID;
+
 		sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off	= SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP;
 		sock->mbinfo.msg_arg_off	= SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA;
-		sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
 
 		/* Test the hsmp interface on each socket */
 		ret = hsmp_test(i, 0xDEADBEEF);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe
  2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-21 17:27 ` Thomas Weißschuh 
  2023-12-21 20:20   ` Hans de Goede
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh  @ 2023-12-21 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suma Hegde
  Cc: platform-driver-x86, ilpo.jarvinen, hdegoede, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Hi,

The subjects of all patches in the series are
very generic.
They should have some more specific prefix IMO.

Dec 21, 2023 18:21:48 Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>:

> This is in advance to supporting ACPI based probe.
>
> In case of non-ACPI driver, hsmp_test() can be
> performed either in plat init() or in probe().
>
> however, in case of ACPI probing, hsmp_test() cannot
> be called in init(), as the mailbox reg offsets and
> base addresses are read from ACPI table in the probe().
>
> Hence, move hsmp_test() to probe as preparation for
> ACPI support.
>
> Also use hsmp_send_message() directly in hsmp_test()
> as the semaphore is already initialized in probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
> Changes since v2:
> 1. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"
>
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe
  2023-12-21 17:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Thomas Weißschuh 
@ 2023-12-21 20:20   ` Hans de Goede
  2023-12-22  6:43     ` Hegde, Suma
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2023-12-21 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Weißschuh, Suma Hegde
  Cc: platform-driver-x86, ilpo.jarvinen, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Hi Thomas,

On 12/21/23 18:27, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The subjects of all patches in the series are
> very generic.
> They should have some more specific prefix IMO.

That is a good point, but that is something which
I can fix while merging these. So assuming this
is the only outstanding comment there is no need
to send a v4 for this.

Regards,

Hans



> 
> Dec 21, 2023 18:21:48 Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>:
> 
>> This is in advance to supporting ACPI based probe.
>>
>> In case of non-ACPI driver, hsmp_test() can be
>> performed either in plat init() or in probe().
>>
>> however, in case of ACPI probing, hsmp_test() cannot
>> be called in init(), as the mailbox reg offsets and
>> base addresses are read from ACPI table in the probe().
>>
>> Hence, move hsmp_test() to probe as preparation for
>> ACPI support.
>>
>> Also use hsmp_send_message() directly in hsmp_test()
>> as the semaphore is already initialized in probe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
>> Changes since v2:
>> 1. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"
>>
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe
  2023-12-21 20:20   ` Hans de Goede
@ 2023-12-22  6:43     ` Hegde, Suma
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hegde, Suma @ 2023-12-22  6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hans de Goede, Thomas Weißschuh
  Cc: platform-driver-x86, ilpo.jarvinen, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Hi Hans,

On 12/22/2023 1:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 12/21/23 18:27, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The subjects of all patches in the series are
>> very generic.
>> They should have some more specific prefix IMO.
> That is a good point, but that is something which
> I can fix while merging these. So assuming this
> is the only outstanding comment there is no need
> to send a v4 for this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
Thank you!  I will not send v4 unless I receive other new comments.
>
>> Dec 21, 2023 18:21:48 Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>:
>>
>>> This is in advance to supporting ACPI based probe.
>>>
>>> In case of non-ACPI driver, hsmp_test() can be
>>> performed either in plat init() or in probe().
>>>
>>> however, in case of ACPI probing, hsmp_test() cannot
>>> be called in init(), as the mailbox reg offsets and
>>> base addresses are read from ACPI table in the probe().
>>>
>>> Hence, move hsmp_test() to probe as preparation for
>>> ACPI support.
>>>
>>> Also use hsmp_send_message() directly in hsmp_test()
>>> as the semaphore is already initialized in probe.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> 1. Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> 1. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"
>>>
>>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-22  8:24   ` Ilpo Järvinen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2023-12-22  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suma Hegde; +Cc: platform-driver-x86, Hans de Goede, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2030 bytes --]

On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Suma Hegde wrote:

> AMD EPYC family 0x1A and Model 0x0-0xF are having different
> mailbox message ID offset compared to previous
> platforms. In case of ACPI based BIOS, this information will be read
> from ACPI table, for non-ACPI BIOS, this needs to be #defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> Add "Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
> Changes since v2:
> 1. Change "non ACPI" to "non-ACPI"
> 2. Add "Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>"
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> index 46924c572055..cc5e5e8124c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>   */
>  #define SMN_HSMP_BASE		0x3B00000
>  #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID		0x0010534
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_F1A_M0H	0x0010934
>  #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP	0x0010980
>  #define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA	0x00109E0
>  
> @@ -712,6 +713,15 @@ static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(u16 sock_ind)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool is_f1a_m0h(void)
> +{
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x1A &&
> +	    (boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x00 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0x0F))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
> @@ -725,10 +735,19 @@ static int init_socket_objects(struct device *dev)
>  		sock->sock_ind			= i;
>  		sock->dev			= dev;
>  		sock->mbinfo.base_addr		= SMN_HSMP_BASE;
> -		sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off		= SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID;
> +		sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * This is a tranisitional change from non-ACPI to ACPI, only

transitional ?


-- 
 i.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing
  2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing Suma Hegde
@ 2023-12-22  8:51   ` Ilpo Järvinen
  2024-01-02 12:41     ` Hans de Goede
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2023-12-22  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suma Hegde; +Cc: platform-driver-x86, Hans de Goede, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Suma Hegde wrote:

> ACPI table provides mailbox base address and register offset
> information. The base address is provided as part of CRS method
> and mailbox offsets are provided through DSD table.
> Sockets are differentiated by UIDs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Define amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr() for doing mailbox memory mapped io
> 2. Add a check to see if mailbox register offsets are set in
>    hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
> 3. Add a check to see if sock->mbinfo.base_addr sockck->mbinfo.size are
>    set in hsmp_read_acpi_crs()
> 4. Change order of the statements in switch case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32
>    in hsmp_resource()
> 5. Add hsmp_test() after hsmp_parse_acpi_table() call
> 6. Add r.end < r.start check in hsmp_resource()
> 7. Add !dsd error check in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd
> Changes since v2:
> 1. Change EINVAL to ENODEV in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
> 2. Change EINVAL to ENOENT in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
> 3. Use resource_size() in hsmp_resource()
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 296 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> index e77d4cd83a07..46924c572055 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
> @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/semaphore.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  
>  #define DRIVER_NAME		"amd_hsmp"
> -#define DRIVER_VERSION		"2.0"
> +#define DRIVER_VERSION		"2.2"
> +#define ACPI_HSMP_DEVICE_HID	"AMDI0097"
>  
>  /* HSMP Status / Error codes */
>  #define HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY	0x00
> @@ -54,6 +56,11 @@
>  
>  #define HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE	10
>  
> +/* These are the strings specified in ACPI table */
> +#define MSG_IDOFF_STR		"MsgIdOffset"
> +#define MSG_ARGOFF_STR		"MsgArgOffset"
> +#define MSG_RESPOFF_STR		"MsgRspOffset"
> +
>  struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
>  	u32 base_addr;
>  	u32 msg_id_off;
> @@ -66,6 +73,7 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
>  	struct bin_attribute hsmp_attr;
>  	struct hsmp_mbaddr_info mbinfo;
>  	void __iomem *metric_tbl_addr;
> +	void __iomem *virt_base_addr;
>  	struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
>  	char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
>  	struct pci_dev *root;
> @@ -78,12 +86,14 @@ struct hsmp_plat_device {
>  	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
>  	u32 proto_ver;
>  	u16 num_sockets;
> +	bool is_acpi_device;
> +	bool is_probed;
>  };
>  
>  static struct hsmp_plat_device plat_dev;
>  
> -static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
> -			 u32 *value, bool write)
> +static int amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
> +			     u32 *value, bool write)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -101,8 +111,29 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
> +			       u32 *value, bool write)
> +{
> +	if (write)
> +		iowrite32(*value, sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
> +	else
> +		*value = ioread32(sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
> +			 u32 *value, bool write)
> +{
> +	if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
> +		amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
> +	else
> +		return amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
> - * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers.
> + * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers
> + * or by writing to MMIO space.
>   *
>   * The caller is expected to zero out any unused arguments.
>   * If a response is expected, the number of response words should be greater than 0.
> @@ -450,6 +481,9 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>  	int ret;
>  	u16 i;
>  
> +	if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
> +		return 0;

This comes out of nowhere... Why proto_ver isn't enough to handle this?
If it's needed, would the check perhaps belong to 
hsmp_is_sock_attr_visible() instead?

>  	/* String formatting is currently limited to u8 sockets */
>  	if (WARN_ON(plat_dev.num_sockets > U8_MAX))
>  		return -ERANGE;
> @@ -487,13 +521,188 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>  	return devm_device_add_groups(plat_dev.sock[0].dev, hsmp_attr_grps);
>  }
>  
> -static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
> +/* This is the UUID used for HSMP */
> +static const guid_t acpi_hsmp_uuid = GUID_INIT(0xb74d619d, 0x5707, 0x48bd,
> +						0xa6, 0x9f, 0x4e, 0xa2,
> +						0x87, 0x1f, 0xc2, 0xf6);
> +
> +static inline bool is_acpi_hsmp_uuid(union acpi_object *obj)
> +{
> +	if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && obj->buffer.length == 16)

16 -> UUID_SIZE.

> +		return guid_equal((guid_t *)obj->buffer.pointer, &acpi_hsmp_uuid);
> +
> +	return false;
> +}


>  static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +	struct acpi_device *adev;
> +	u16 sock_ind = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> -				     (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
> -				     GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!plat_dev.sock)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	ret = init_socket_objects(&pdev->dev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	plat_dev.hsmp_device.name	= HSMP_CDEV_NAME;
> -	plat_dev.hsmp_device.minor	= MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
> -	plat_dev.hsmp_device.fops	= &hsmp_fops;
> -	plat_dev.hsmp_device.parent	= &pdev->dev;
> -	plat_dev.hsmp_device.nodename	= HSMP_DEVNODE_NAME;
> -	plat_dev.hsmp_device.mode	= 0644;
> +	/*
> +	 * On ACPI supported BIOS, there is an ACPI HSMP device added for
> +	 * each socket, so the per socket probing, but the memory allocated for
> +	 * sockets should be contiguous to access it as an array,
> +	 * Hence allocate memory for all the sockets at once instead of allocating
> +	 * on each probe.
> +	 */
> +	if (!plat_dev.is_probed) {
> +		plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +					     (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
> +					     GFP_KERNEL);

I know you're just moving code around here so no need to do it in this 
patchset but this should use devm_kcalloc() and there are also extra 
parenthesis.


-- 
 i.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing
  2023-12-22  8:51   ` Ilpo Järvinen
@ 2024-01-02 12:41     ` Hans de Goede
  2024-01-02 13:24       ` Hegde, Suma
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2024-01-02 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilpo Järvinen, Suma Hegde
  Cc: platform-driver-x86, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Hi Suma,

On 12/22/23 09:51, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Suma Hegde wrote:
> 
>> ACPI table provides mailbox base address and register offset
>> information. The base address is provided as part of CRS method
>> and mailbox offsets are provided through DSD table.
>> Sockets are differentiated by UIDs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Define amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr() for doing mailbox memory mapped io
>> 2. Add a check to see if mailbox register offsets are set in
>>    hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
>> 3. Add a check to see if sock->mbinfo.base_addr sockck->mbinfo.size are
>>    set in hsmp_read_acpi_crs()
>> 4. Change order of the statements in switch case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32
>>    in hsmp_resource()
>> 5. Add hsmp_test() after hsmp_parse_acpi_table() call
>> 6. Add r.end < r.start check in hsmp_resource()
>> 7. Add !dsd error check in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd
>> Changes since v2:
>> 1. Change EINVAL to ENODEV in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
>> 2. Change EINVAL to ENOENT in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
>> 3. Use resource_size() in hsmp_resource()
>>
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 296 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>> index e77d4cd83a07..46924c572055 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>> @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@
>>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>  
>>  #define DRIVER_NAME		"amd_hsmp"
>> -#define DRIVER_VERSION		"2.0"
>> +#define DRIVER_VERSION		"2.2"
>> +#define ACPI_HSMP_DEVICE_HID	"AMDI0097"
>>  
>>  /* HSMP Status / Error codes */
>>  #define HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY	0x00
>> @@ -54,6 +56,11 @@
>>  
>>  #define HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE	10
>>  
>> +/* These are the strings specified in ACPI table */
>> +#define MSG_IDOFF_STR		"MsgIdOffset"
>> +#define MSG_ARGOFF_STR		"MsgArgOffset"
>> +#define MSG_RESPOFF_STR		"MsgRspOffset"
>> +
>>  struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
>>  	u32 base_addr;
>>  	u32 msg_id_off;
>> @@ -66,6 +73,7 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
>>  	struct bin_attribute hsmp_attr;
>>  	struct hsmp_mbaddr_info mbinfo;
>>  	void __iomem *metric_tbl_addr;
>> +	void __iomem *virt_base_addr;
>>  	struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
>>  	char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
>>  	struct pci_dev *root;
>> @@ -78,12 +86,14 @@ struct hsmp_plat_device {
>>  	struct hsmp_socket *sock;
>>  	u32 proto_ver;
>>  	u16 num_sockets;
>> +	bool is_acpi_device;
>> +	bool is_probed;
>>  };
>>  
>>  static struct hsmp_plat_device plat_dev;
>>  
>> -static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> -			 u32 *value, bool write)
>> +static int amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> +			     u32 *value, bool write)
>>  {
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>> @@ -101,8 +111,29 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> +			       u32 *value, bool write)
>> +{
>> +	if (write)
>> +		iowrite32(*value, sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
>> +	else
>> +		*value = ioread32(sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> +			 u32 *value, bool write)
>> +{
>> +	if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
>> +		amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
>> +	else
>> +		return amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>> - * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers.
>> + * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers
>> + * or by writing to MMIO space.
>>   *
>>   * The caller is expected to zero out any unused arguments.
>>   * If a response is expected, the number of response words should be greater than 0.
>> @@ -450,6 +481,9 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>>  	int ret;
>>  	u16 i;
>>  
>> +	if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
>> +		return 0;
> 
> This comes out of nowhere... Why proto_ver isn't enough to handle this?
> If it's needed, would the check perhaps belong to 
> hsmp_is_sock_attr_visible() instead?
> 
>>  	/* String formatting is currently limited to u8 sockets */
>>  	if (WARN_ON(plat_dev.num_sockets > U8_MAX))
>>  		return -ERANGE;
>> @@ -487,13 +521,188 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>>  	return devm_device_add_groups(plat_dev.sock[0].dev, hsmp_attr_grps);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
>> +/* This is the UUID used for HSMP */
>> +static const guid_t acpi_hsmp_uuid = GUID_INIT(0xb74d619d, 0x5707, 0x48bd,
>> +						0xa6, 0x9f, 0x4e, 0xa2,
>> +						0x87, 0x1f, 0xc2, 0xf6);
>> +
>> +static inline bool is_acpi_hsmp_uuid(union acpi_object *obj)
>> +{
>> +	if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && obj->buffer.length == 16)
> 
> 16 -> UUID_SIZE.

Please submit a v4 addressing Ilpo's review remarks on this patch.

And while at it please also fix the subject-prefix to be:

platform/x86/amd/hsmp: 

As suggested by Thomas.

There have been a bunch of drivers/platform/x86/amd changes merged
recently, please base your v4 on top of:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

to avoid conflicts.

Regards,

Hans



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing
  2024-01-02 12:41     ` Hans de Goede
@ 2024-01-02 13:24       ` Hegde, Suma
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hegde, Suma @ 2024-01-02 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hans de Goede, Ilpo Järvinen
  Cc: platform-driver-x86, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi

Hi Hans,

On 1/2/2024 6:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Hi Suma,
>
> On 12/22/23 09:51, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Suma Hegde wrote:
>>
>>> ACPI table provides mailbox base address and register offset
>>> information. The base address is provided as part of CRS method
>>> and mailbox offsets are provided through DSD table.
>>> Sockets are differentiated by UIDs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> 1. Define amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr() for doing mailbox memory mapped io
>>> 2. Add a check to see if mailbox register offsets are set in
>>>     hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
>>> 3. Add a check to see if sock->mbinfo.base_addr sockck->mbinfo.size are
>>>     set in hsmp_read_acpi_crs()
>>> 4. Change order of the statements in switch case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32
>>>     in hsmp_resource()
>>> 5. Add hsmp_test() after hsmp_parse_acpi_table() call
>>> 6. Add r.end < r.start check in hsmp_resource()
>>> 7. Add !dsd error check in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> 1. Change EINVAL to ENODEV in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
>>> 2. Change EINVAL to ENOENT in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
>>> 3. Use resource_size() in hsmp_resource()
>>>
>>>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>   1 file changed, 296 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>>> index e77d4cd83a07..46924c572055 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>>> @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@
>>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>   #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>>
>>>   #define DRIVER_NAME         "amd_hsmp"
>>> -#define DRIVER_VERSION              "2.0"
>>> +#define DRIVER_VERSION              "2.2"
>>> +#define ACPI_HSMP_DEVICE_HID        "AMDI0097"
>>>
>>>   /* HSMP Status / Error codes */
>>>   #define HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY       0x00
>>> @@ -54,6 +56,11 @@
>>>
>>>   #define HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE     10
>>>
>>> +/* These are the strings specified in ACPI table */
>>> +#define MSG_IDOFF_STR               "MsgIdOffset"
>>> +#define MSG_ARGOFF_STR              "MsgArgOffset"
>>> +#define MSG_RESPOFF_STR             "MsgRspOffset"
>>> +
>>>   struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
>>>       u32 base_addr;
>>>       u32 msg_id_off;
>>> @@ -66,6 +73,7 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
>>>       struct bin_attribute hsmp_attr;
>>>       struct hsmp_mbaddr_info mbinfo;
>>>       void __iomem *metric_tbl_addr;
>>> +    void __iomem *virt_base_addr;
>>>       struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
>>>       char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
>>>       struct pci_dev *root;
>>> @@ -78,12 +86,14 @@ struct hsmp_plat_device {
>>>       struct hsmp_socket *sock;
>>>       u32 proto_ver;
>>>       u16 num_sockets;
>>> +    bool is_acpi_device;
>>> +    bool is_probed;
>>>   };
>>>
>>>   static struct hsmp_plat_device plat_dev;
>>>
>>> -static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>>> -                     u32 *value, bool write)
>>> +static int amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>>> +                         u32 *value, bool write)
>>>   {
>>>       int ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -101,8 +111,29 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>>>       return ret;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static void amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>>> +                           u32 *value, bool write)
>>> +{
>>> +    if (write)
>>> +            iowrite32(*value, sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
>>> +    else
>>> +            *value = ioread32(sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>>> +                     u32 *value, bool write)
>>> +{
>>> +    if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
>>> +            amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
>>> +    else
>>> +            return amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
>>> +
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   /*
>>> - * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers.
>>> + * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers
>>> + * or by writing to MMIO space.
>>>    *
>>>    * The caller is expected to zero out any unused arguments.
>>>    * If a response is expected, the number of response words should be greater than 0.
>>> @@ -450,6 +481,9 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>>>       int ret;
>>>       u16 i;
>>>
>>> +    if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
>>> +            return 0;
>> This comes out of nowhere... Why proto_ver isn't enough to handle this?
>> If it's needed, would the check perhaps belong to
>> hsmp_is_sock_attr_visible() instead?
>>
>>>       /* String formatting is currently limited to u8 sockets */
>>>       if (WARN_ON(plat_dev.num_sockets > U8_MAX))
>>>               return -ERANGE;
>>> @@ -487,13 +521,188 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>>>       return devm_device_add_groups(plat_dev.sock[0].dev, hsmp_attr_grps);
>>>   }
>>>
>>> -static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
>>> +/* This is the UUID used for HSMP */
>>> +static const guid_t acpi_hsmp_uuid = GUID_INIT(0xb74d619d, 0x5707, 0x48bd,
>>> +                                            0xa6, 0x9f, 0x4e, 0xa2,
>>> +                                            0x87, 0x1f, 0xc2, 0xf6);
>>> +
>>> +static inline bool is_acpi_hsmp_uuid(union acpi_object *obj)
>>> +{
>>> +    if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && obj->buffer.length == 16)
>> 16 -> UUID_SIZE.
> Please submit a v4 addressing Ilpo's review remarks on this patch.
>
> And while at it please also fix the subject-prefix to be:
>
> platform/x86/amd/hsmp:
>
> As suggested by Thomas.
>
> There have been a bunch of drivers/platform/x86/amd changes merged
> recently, please base your v4 on top of:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>
> to avoid conflicts.
Sure, I will send v4 with addressing review comments and re basing on top of

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

Thanks and Regards,

Suma

> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-02 13:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-21 17:21 [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] platform/x86: Cache pci_dev in struct hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] platform/x86: Create static func to handle platdev Suma Hegde
2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] platform/x86: Define a struct to hold mailbox regs Suma Hegde
2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] platform/x86: Move dev from platdev to hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing Suma Hegde
2023-12-22  8:51   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-02 12:41     ` Hans de Goede
2024-01-02 13:24       ` Hegde, Suma
2023-12-21 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh Suma Hegde
2023-12-22  8:24   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-21 17:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Thomas Weißschuh 
2023-12-21 20:20   ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-22  6:43     ` Hegde, Suma

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.