* [PATCH RFC 0/2] spmi: Add multi master support
@ 2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, Abel Vesa
Newer SPMI controller (v7) found on Qualcomm platforms
provide support for multiple bus master. So add support
for multiple masters in both the generic framework and
the Qualcomm SPMI PMIC Arbiter driver.
Currently, the DT child nodes of the spmi controller node
are the slave devices connected to the bus. This patchset
proposes another layer of nodes in between. They would be
the master bus nodes. They will not be populated as separate
devices as they need to share register regions with the controller.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
Abel Vesa (2):
spmi: Add support for multi-master
spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for multi-master
drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 +-
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 711 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 +++--
include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +-
4 files changed, 506 insertions(+), 297 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ac139fc7db67968e5061715508b5fc4aa7c40c56
change-id: 20240207-spmi-multi-master-support-832a704b779b
Best regards,
--
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RFC 0/2] spmi: Add multi master support
@ 2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, Abel Vesa
Newer SPMI controller (v7) found on Qualcomm platforms
provide support for multiple bus master. So add support
for multiple masters in both the generic framework and
the Qualcomm SPMI PMIC Arbiter driver.
Currently, the DT child nodes of the spmi controller node
are the slave devices connected to the bus. This patchset
proposes another layer of nodes in between. They would be
the master bus nodes. They will not be populated as separate
devices as they need to share register regions with the controller.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
Abel Vesa (2):
spmi: Add support for multi-master
spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for multi-master
drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 +-
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 711 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 +++--
include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +-
4 files changed, 506 insertions(+), 297 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ac139fc7db67968e5061715508b5fc4aa7c40c56
change-id: 20240207-spmi-multi-master-support-832a704b779b
Best regards,
--
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
@ 2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, Abel Vesa
Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
index 5079442f8ea1..b19bb0351ff1 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb)
return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR;
}
-static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
+static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid)
{
struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
u32 rdata, cmd;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
return ret;
}
-static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
return 0;
}
-static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index 9ed1180fe31f..597207720146 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
}
/* Non-data command */
-static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
+static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
}
-static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static void qpnpint_spmi_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf,
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, 0, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void qpnpint_spmi_read(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf, size_t len)
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, 0, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
index 3a60fd2e09e1..7dc778db7242 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ int spmi_device_add(struct spmi_device *sdev)
struct spmi_controller *ctrl = sdev->ctrl;
int err;
- dev_set_name(&sdev->dev, "%d-%02x", ctrl->nr, sdev->usid);
+ dev_set_name(&sdev->dev, "%d-%02x-%02x", ctrl->nr, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
err = device_add(&sdev->dev);
if (err < 0) {
@@ -91,19 +91,19 @@ void spmi_device_remove(struct spmi_device *sdev)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_device_remove);
static inline int
-spmi_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 sid)
+spmi_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid, u8 sid)
{
int ret;
if (!ctrl || !ctrl->cmd || ctrl->dev.type != &spmi_ctrl_type)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = ctrl->cmd(ctrl, opcode, sid);
+ ret = ctrl->cmd(ctrl, opcode, mid, sid);
trace_spmi_cmd(opcode, sid, ret);
return ret;
}
-static inline int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+static inline int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
int ret;
@@ -112,12 +112,12 @@ static inline int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
return -EINVAL;
trace_spmi_read_begin(opcode, sid, addr);
- ret = ctrl->read_cmd(ctrl, opcode, sid, addr, buf, len);
+ ret = ctrl->read_cmd(ctrl, opcode, mid, sid, addr, buf, len);
trace_spmi_read_end(opcode, sid, addr, ret, len, buf);
return ret;
}
-static inline int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+static inline int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
int ret;
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static inline int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
return -EINVAL;
trace_spmi_write_begin(opcode, sid, addr, len, buf);
- ret = ctrl->write_cmd(ctrl, opcode, sid, addr, buf, len);
+ ret = ctrl->write_cmd(ctrl, opcode, mid, sid, addr, buf, len);
trace_spmi_write_end(opcode, sid, addr, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int spmi_register_read(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, u8 *buf)
if (addr > 0x1F)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_READ, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_READ, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_read);
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_read(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 16)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READ, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READ, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_read);
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_readl(struct spmi_device *sdev, u16 addr, u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 8)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_readl);
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ int spmi_register_write(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, u8 data)
if (addr > 0x1F)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WRITE, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WRITE, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
&data, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_write);
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_write);
*/
int spmi_register_zero_write(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 data)
{
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_ZERO_WRITE, sdev->usid, 0,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_ZERO_WRITE, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, 0,
&data, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_zero_write);
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_write(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, const u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 16)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITE, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITE, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_write);
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_writel(struct spmi_device *sdev, u16 addr, const u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 8)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sdev->usid,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sdev->mid, sdev->usid,
addr, buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_writel);
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_writel);
*/
int spmi_command_reset(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_RESET, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_RESET, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_reset);
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_reset);
*/
int spmi_command_sleep(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SLEEP, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SLEEP, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_sleep);
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_sleep);
*/
int spmi_command_wakeup(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_wakeup);
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_wakeup);
*/
int spmi_command_shutdown(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SHUTDOWN, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SHUTDOWN, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_shutdown);
@@ -477,15 +477,16 @@ struct spmi_controller *spmi_controller_alloc(struct device *parent,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_controller_alloc);
-static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
+static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
+ struct device_node *parent, u8 mid)
{
struct device_node *node;
int err;
- if (!ctrl->dev.of_node)
+ if (!parent)
return;
- for_each_available_child_of_node(ctrl->dev.of_node, node) {
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, node) {
struct spmi_device *sdev;
u32 reg[2];
@@ -519,6 +520,7 @@ static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
sdev->dev.of_node = node;
sdev->usid = (u8)reg[0];
+ sdev->mid = mid;
err = spmi_device_add(sdev);
if (err) {
@@ -529,6 +531,30 @@ static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
}
}
+static int of_spmi_register_bus_masters(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
+{
+ struct device_node *node = ctrl->dev.of_node, *child;
+ int mid = 0;
+
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) {
+ if (of_node_name_eq(child, "spmi-bus-master"))
+ of_spmi_register_devices(ctrl, child, mid++);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static bool of_spmi_has_bus_multi_master(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
+{
+ struct device_node *node = ctrl->dev.of_node, *child;
+
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child)
+ if (of_node_name_eq(child, "spmi-bus-master"))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* spmi_controller_add() - Add an SPMI controller
* @ctrl: controller to be registered.
@@ -548,8 +574,12 @@ int spmi_controller_add(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
- of_spmi_register_devices(ctrl);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
+ if (of_spmi_has_bus_multi_master(ctrl))
+ of_spmi_register_bus_masters(ctrl);
+ else
+ of_spmi_register_devices(ctrl, ctrl->dev.of_node, 0);
+ }
dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "spmi-%d registered: dev:%p\n",
ctrl->nr, &ctrl->dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/spmi.h b/include/linux/spmi.h
index 28e8c8bd3944..6e9031df47f0 100644
--- a/include/linux/spmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/spmi.h
@@ -34,12 +34,14 @@
* struct spmi_device - Basic representation of an SPMI device
* @dev: Driver model representation of the device.
* @ctrl: SPMI controller managing the bus hosting this device.
- * @usid: This devices' Unique Slave IDentifier.
+ * @usid: This device's Unique Slave IDentifier.
+ * @mid: This device's Bus Master IDentifier.
*/
struct spmi_device {
struct device dev;
struct spmi_controller *ctrl;
u8 usid;
+ u8 mid;
};
static inline struct spmi_device *to_spmi_device(struct device *d)
@@ -80,10 +82,10 @@ void spmi_device_remove(struct spmi_device *sdev);
struct spmi_controller {
struct device dev;
unsigned int nr;
- int (*cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 sid);
- int (*read_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+ int (*cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid, u8 sid);
+ int (*read_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len);
- int (*write_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+ int (*write_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len);
};
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, Abel Vesa
Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
index 5079442f8ea1..b19bb0351ff1 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb)
return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR;
}
-static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
+static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid)
{
struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
u32 rdata, cmd;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
return ret;
}
-static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
return 0;
}
-static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index 9ed1180fe31f..597207720146 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
}
/* Non-data command */
-static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
+static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
}
-static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static void qpnpint_spmi_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf,
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, 0, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void qpnpint_spmi_read(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf, size_t len)
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, 0, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
index 3a60fd2e09e1..7dc778db7242 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ int spmi_device_add(struct spmi_device *sdev)
struct spmi_controller *ctrl = sdev->ctrl;
int err;
- dev_set_name(&sdev->dev, "%d-%02x", ctrl->nr, sdev->usid);
+ dev_set_name(&sdev->dev, "%d-%02x-%02x", ctrl->nr, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
err = device_add(&sdev->dev);
if (err < 0) {
@@ -91,19 +91,19 @@ void spmi_device_remove(struct spmi_device *sdev)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_device_remove);
static inline int
-spmi_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 sid)
+spmi_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid, u8 sid)
{
int ret;
if (!ctrl || !ctrl->cmd || ctrl->dev.type != &spmi_ctrl_type)
return -EINVAL;
- ret = ctrl->cmd(ctrl, opcode, sid);
+ ret = ctrl->cmd(ctrl, opcode, mid, sid);
trace_spmi_cmd(opcode, sid, ret);
return ret;
}
-static inline int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+static inline int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
int ret;
@@ -112,12 +112,12 @@ static inline int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
return -EINVAL;
trace_spmi_read_begin(opcode, sid, addr);
- ret = ctrl->read_cmd(ctrl, opcode, sid, addr, buf, len);
+ ret = ctrl->read_cmd(ctrl, opcode, mid, sid, addr, buf, len);
trace_spmi_read_end(opcode, sid, addr, ret, len, buf);
return ret;
}
-static inline int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+static inline int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
int ret;
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static inline int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
return -EINVAL;
trace_spmi_write_begin(opcode, sid, addr, len, buf);
- ret = ctrl->write_cmd(ctrl, opcode, sid, addr, buf, len);
+ ret = ctrl->write_cmd(ctrl, opcode, mid, sid, addr, buf, len);
trace_spmi_write_end(opcode, sid, addr, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int spmi_register_read(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, u8 *buf)
if (addr > 0x1F)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_READ, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_READ, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_read);
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_read(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 16)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READ, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READ, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_read);
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_readl(struct spmi_device *sdev, u16 addr, u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 8)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_read_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_readl);
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ int spmi_register_write(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, u8 data)
if (addr > 0x1F)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WRITE, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WRITE, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
&data, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_write);
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_write);
*/
int spmi_register_zero_write(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 data)
{
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_ZERO_WRITE, sdev->usid, 0,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_ZERO_WRITE, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, 0,
&data, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_register_zero_write);
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_write(struct spmi_device *sdev, u8 addr, const u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 16)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITE, sdev->usid, addr,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITE, sdev->mid, sdev->usid, addr,
buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_write);
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ int spmi_ext_register_writel(struct spmi_device *sdev, u16 addr, const u8 *buf,
if (len == 0 || len > 8)
return -EINVAL;
- return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sdev->usid,
+ return spmi_write_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sdev->mid, sdev->usid,
addr, buf, len);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_writel);
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_ext_register_writel);
*/
int spmi_command_reset(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_RESET, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_RESET, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_reset);
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_reset);
*/
int spmi_command_sleep(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SLEEP, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SLEEP, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_sleep);
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_sleep);
*/
int spmi_command_wakeup(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_wakeup);
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_wakeup);
*/
int spmi_command_shutdown(struct spmi_device *sdev)
{
- return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SHUTDOWN, sdev->usid);
+ return spmi_cmd(sdev->ctrl, SPMI_CMD_SHUTDOWN, sdev->mid, sdev->usid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_command_shutdown);
@@ -477,15 +477,16 @@ struct spmi_controller *spmi_controller_alloc(struct device *parent,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spmi_controller_alloc);
-static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
+static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
+ struct device_node *parent, u8 mid)
{
struct device_node *node;
int err;
- if (!ctrl->dev.of_node)
+ if (!parent)
return;
- for_each_available_child_of_node(ctrl->dev.of_node, node) {
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, node) {
struct spmi_device *sdev;
u32 reg[2];
@@ -519,6 +520,7 @@ static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
sdev->dev.of_node = node;
sdev->usid = (u8)reg[0];
+ sdev->mid = mid;
err = spmi_device_add(sdev);
if (err) {
@@ -529,6 +531,30 @@ static void of_spmi_register_devices(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
}
}
+static int of_spmi_register_bus_masters(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
+{
+ struct device_node *node = ctrl->dev.of_node, *child;
+ int mid = 0;
+
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) {
+ if (of_node_name_eq(child, "spmi-bus-master"))
+ of_spmi_register_devices(ctrl, child, mid++);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static bool of_spmi_has_bus_multi_master(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
+{
+ struct device_node *node = ctrl->dev.of_node, *child;
+
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child)
+ if (of_node_name_eq(child, "spmi-bus-master"))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* spmi_controller_add() - Add an SPMI controller
* @ctrl: controller to be registered.
@@ -548,8 +574,12 @@ int spmi_controller_add(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
- of_spmi_register_devices(ctrl);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
+ if (of_spmi_has_bus_multi_master(ctrl))
+ of_spmi_register_bus_masters(ctrl);
+ else
+ of_spmi_register_devices(ctrl, ctrl->dev.of_node, 0);
+ }
dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "spmi-%d registered: dev:%p\n",
ctrl->nr, &ctrl->dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/spmi.h b/include/linux/spmi.h
index 28e8c8bd3944..6e9031df47f0 100644
--- a/include/linux/spmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/spmi.h
@@ -34,12 +34,14 @@
* struct spmi_device - Basic representation of an SPMI device
* @dev: Driver model representation of the device.
* @ctrl: SPMI controller managing the bus hosting this device.
- * @usid: This devices' Unique Slave IDentifier.
+ * @usid: This device's Unique Slave IDentifier.
+ * @mid: This device's Bus Master IDentifier.
*/
struct spmi_device {
struct device dev;
struct spmi_controller *ctrl;
u8 usid;
+ u8 mid;
};
static inline struct spmi_device *to_spmi_device(struct device *d)
@@ -80,10 +82,10 @@ void spmi_device_remove(struct spmi_device *sdev);
struct spmi_controller {
struct device dev;
unsigned int nr;
- int (*cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 sid);
- int (*read_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+ int (*cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid, u8 sid);
+ int (*read_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len);
- int (*write_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode,
+ int (*write_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opcode, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len);
};
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RFC 2/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
@ 2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, Abel Vesa
The v7 HW supports currently 2 masters. So register
each master and adapt all ops to pass on the master id.
Legacy mode is still supported as long as there is no
child node that represents a bus master, but rather all
devicetree child nodes are actual slave decices.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 711 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 444 insertions(+), 267 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index 597207720146..4a281da3310c 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/spmi.h>
@@ -125,6 +127,25 @@ struct apid_data {
u8 irq_ee;
};
+struct spmi_pmic_arb;
+
+struct spmi_pmic_master {
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ void __iomem *intr;
+ void __iomem *cnfg;
+ u32 bus_instance;
+ u16 base_apid;
+ int apid_count;
+ u16 *ppid_to_apid;
+ u16 last_apid;
+ struct apid_data *apid_data;
+ u16 min_apid;
+ u16 max_apid;
+ int irq;
+ u8 id;
+};
+
/**
* struct spmi_pmic_arb - SPMI PMIC Arbiter object
*
@@ -155,34 +176,26 @@ struct apid_data {
struct spmi_pmic_arb {
void __iomem *rd_base;
void __iomem *wr_base;
- void __iomem *intr;
- void __iomem *cnfg;
void __iomem *core;
resource_size_t core_size;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
u8 channel;
- int irq;
u8 ee;
u32 bus_instance;
- u16 min_apid;
- u16 max_apid;
- u16 base_apid;
- int apid_count;
u32 *mapping_table;
DECLARE_BITMAP(mapping_table_valid, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS);
- struct irq_domain *domain;
struct spmi_controller *spmic;
const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops;
- u16 *ppid_to_apid;
- u16 last_apid;
- struct apid_data *apid_data;
int max_periphs;
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *masters;
+ int masters_count;
};
/**
* struct pmic_arb_ver_ops - version dependent functionality.
*
* @ver_str: version string.
+ * @init_apid: finds the apid base and count
* @ppid_to_apid: finds the apid for a given ppid.
* @non_data_cmd: on v1 issues an spmi non-data command.
* on v2 no HW support, returns -EOPNOTSUPP.
@@ -202,20 +215,21 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb {
*/
struct pmic_arb_ver_ops {
const char *ver_str;
- int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid);
+ int (*init_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master);
+ int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid);
/* spmi commands (read_cmd, write_cmd, cmd) functionality */
- int (*offset)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type);
+ int (*offset)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type);
u32 (*fmt_cmd)(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc);
int (*non_data_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid);
/* Interrupts controller functionality (offset of PIC registers) */
- void __iomem *(*owner_acc_status)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m,
+ void __iomem *(*owner_acc_status)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m,
u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*acc_enable)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*irq_status)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*irq_clear)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*acc_enable)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*irq_status)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*irq_clear)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
u32 (*apid_map_offset)(u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*apid_owner)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*apid_owner)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
};
static inline void pmic_arb_base_write(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb,
@@ -260,16 +274,17 @@ static void pmic_arb_write_data(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, const u8 *buf,
}
static int pmic_arb_wait_for_done(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
- void __iomem *base, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ void __iomem *base, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr,
enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[mid];
u32 status = 0;
u32 timeout = PMIC_ARB_TIMEOUT_US;
u32 offset;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, addr, ch_type);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, addr, ch_type);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -287,8 +302,8 @@ static int pmic_arb_wait_for_done(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
}
if (status & PMIC_ARB_STATUS_FAILURE) {
- dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "%s: %#x %#x: transaction failed (%#x)\n",
- __func__, sid, addr, status);
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "%s: %#x %#x %#x: transaction failed (%#x) reg: 0x%x\n",
+ __func__, sid, mid, addr, status, offset);
WARN_ON(1);
return -EIO;
}
@@ -313,12 +328,13 @@ static int
pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v1(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[0];
unsigned long flags;
u32 cmd;
int rc;
u32 offset;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, 0, PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, 0, PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -327,7 +343,7 @@ pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v1(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
pmic_arb_base_write(pmic_arb, offset + PMIC_ARB_CMD, cmd);
- rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, sid, 0,
+ rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, 0, sid, 0,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
@@ -341,7 +357,7 @@ pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
}
/* Non-data command */
-static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid)
+static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -354,13 +370,14 @@ static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 s
return pmic_arb->ver_ops->non_data_cmd(ctrl, opc, sid);
}
-static int pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid,
u16 addr, size_t len, u32 *cmd, u32 *offset)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[mid];
u8 bc = len - 1;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_OBS);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -388,7 +405,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 sid,
}
static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
- u32 offset, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf,
+ u32 offset, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf,
size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -396,7 +413,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
int rc;
pmic_arb_set_rd_cmd(pmic_arb, offset + PMIC_ARB_CMD, cmd);
- rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->rd_base, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->rd_base, mid, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_OBS);
if (rc)
return rc;
@@ -410,7 +427,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid,
u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -418,26 +435,27 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id,
u32 cmd, offset;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, mid, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
&offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
- rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, sid, addr, buf, len);
+ rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, mid, sid, addr, buf, len);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
return rc;
}
-static int pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc,
+static int pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, size_t len, u32 *cmd,
u32 *offset)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[mid];
u8 bc = len - 1;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -467,7 +485,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc,
}
static int pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
- u32 offset, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ u32 offset, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr,
const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -482,11 +500,11 @@ static int pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
/* Start the transaction */
pmic_arb_base_write(pmic_arb, offset + PMIC_ARB_CMD, cmd);
- return pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, sid, addr,
+ return pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, mid, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
}
-static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid,
u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -494,20 +512,20 @@ static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id
u32 cmd, offset;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, mid, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
&offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
- rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, sid, addr, buf,
+ rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, mid, sid, addr, buf,
len);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
return rc;
}
-static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr,
const u8 *buf, const u8 *mask, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -516,18 +534,18 @@ static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 sid, u16 addr,
unsigned long flags;
int rc, i;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sid, addr, len,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, mid, sid, addr, len,
&read_cmd, &read_offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, mid, sid, addr,
len, &write_cmd, &write_offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
- rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, read_cmd, read_offset, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, read_cmd, read_offset, mid, sid, addr,
temp, len);
if (rc)
goto done;
@@ -535,7 +553,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 sid, u16 addr,
for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
temp[i] = (temp[i] & ~mask[i]) | (buf[i] & mask[i]);
- rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, write_cmd, write_offset, sid,
+ rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, write_cmd, write_offset, mid, sid,
addr, temp, len);
done:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
@@ -564,11 +582,12 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb_qpnpint_type {
static void qpnpint_spmi_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf,
size_t len)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, 0, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, master->id, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
@@ -576,11 +595,12 @@ static void qpnpint_spmi_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf,
static void qpnpint_spmi_read(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf, size_t len)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, 0, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, master->id, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
@@ -590,12 +610,13 @@ static int qpnpint_spmi_masked_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg,
const void *buf, const void *mask,
size_t len)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_masked_write(pmic_arb->spmic, sid, (per << 8) + reg, buf,
+ rc = pmic_arb_masked_write(pmic_arb->spmic, master->id, sid, (per << 8) + reg, buf,
mask, len);
if (rc)
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x rc=%d\n",
@@ -603,34 +624,36 @@ static int qpnpint_spmi_masked_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg,
return rc;
}
-static void cleanup_irq(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 apid, int id)
+static void cleanup_irq(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 apid, int id)
{
- u16 ppid = pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid;
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ u16 ppid = master->apid_data[apid].ppid;
u8 sid = ppid >> 8;
u8 per = ppid & 0xFF;
u8 irq_mask = BIT(id);
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "%s apid=%d sid=0x%x per=0x%x irq=%d\n",
__func__, apid, sid, per, id);
- writel_relaxed(irq_mask, pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(pmic_arb, apid));
+ writel_relaxed(irq_mask, pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(master, apid));
}
-static int periph_interrupt(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 apid)
+static int periph_interrupt(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 apid)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
unsigned int irq;
u32 status, id;
int handled = 0;
- u8 sid = (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid >> 8) & 0xF;
- u8 per = pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid & 0xFF;
+ u8 sid = (master->apid_data[apid].ppid >> 8) & 0xF;
+ u8 per = master->apid_data[apid].ppid & 0xFF;
- status = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_status(pmic_arb, apid));
+ status = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_status(master, apid));
while (status) {
id = ffs(status) - 1;
status &= ~BIT(id);
- irq = irq_find_mapping(pmic_arb->domain,
- spec_to_hwirq(sid, per, id, apid));
+ irq = irq_find_mapping(master->domain,
+ spec_to_hwirq(sid, per, id, apid));
if (irq == 0) {
- cleanup_irq(pmic_arb, apid, id);
+ cleanup_irq(master, apid, id);
continue;
}
generic_handle_irq(irq);
@@ -642,16 +665,17 @@ static int periph_interrupt(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 apid)
static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops = pmic_arb->ver_ops;
struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
- int first = pmic_arb->min_apid;
- int last = pmic_arb->max_apid;
+ int first = master->min_apid;
+ int last = master->max_apid;
/*
* acc_offset will be non-zero for the secondary SPMI bus instance on
* v7 controllers.
*/
- int acc_offset = pmic_arb->base_apid >> 5;
+ int acc_offset = master->base_apid >> 5;
u8 ee = pmic_arb->ee;
u32 status, enable, handled = 0;
int i, id, apid;
@@ -662,7 +686,7 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
for (i = first >> 5; i <= last >> 5; ++i) {
- status = readl_relaxed(ver_ops->owner_acc_status(pmic_arb, ee, i - acc_offset));
+ status = readl_relaxed(ver_ops->owner_acc_status(master, ee, i - acc_offset));
if (status)
acc_valid = true;
@@ -676,9 +700,9 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
continue;
}
enable = readl_relaxed(
- ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, apid));
+ ver_ops->acc_enable(master, apid));
if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT)
- if (periph_interrupt(pmic_arb, apid) != 0)
+ if (periph_interrupt(master, apid) != 0)
handled++;
}
}
@@ -687,19 +711,19 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
if (!acc_valid) {
for (i = first; i <= last; i++) {
/* skip if APPS is not irq owner */
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[i].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee)
+ if (master->apid_data[i].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee)
continue;
irq_status = readl_relaxed(
- ver_ops->irq_status(pmic_arb, i));
+ ver_ops->irq_status(master, i));
if (irq_status) {
enable = readl_relaxed(
- ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, i));
+ ver_ops->acc_enable(master, i));
if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT) {
dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev,
"Dispatching IRQ for apid=%d status=%x\n",
i, irq_status);
- if (periph_interrupt(pmic_arb, i) != 0)
+ if (periph_interrupt(master, i) != 0)
handled++;
}
}
@@ -714,12 +738,13 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
static void qpnpint_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 irq = hwirq_to_irq(d->hwirq);
u16 apid = hwirq_to_apid(d->hwirq);
u8 data;
- writel_relaxed(BIT(irq), pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(pmic_arb, apid));
+ writel_relaxed(BIT(irq), pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(master, apid));
data = BIT(irq);
qpnpint_spmi_write(d, QPNPINT_REG_LATCHED_CLR, &data, 1);
@@ -735,14 +760,15 @@ static void qpnpint_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
static void qpnpint_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops = pmic_arb->ver_ops;
u8 irq = hwirq_to_irq(d->hwirq);
u16 apid = hwirq_to_apid(d->hwirq);
u8 buf[2];
writel_relaxed(SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT,
- ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, apid));
+ ver_ops->acc_enable(master, apid));
qpnpint_spmi_read(d, QPNPINT_REG_EN_SET, &buf[0], 1);
if (!(buf[0] & BIT(irq))) {
@@ -799,9 +825,9 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
static int qpnpint_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
- return irq_set_irq_wake(pmic_arb->irq, on);
+ return irq_set_irq_wake(master->irq, on);
}
static int qpnpint_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
@@ -823,17 +849,18 @@ static int qpnpint_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
static int qpnpint_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
struct irq_data *d, bool reserve)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 periph = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
u16 apid = hwirq_to_apid(d->hwirq);
u16 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u16 irq = hwirq_to_irq(d->hwirq);
u8 buf;
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
+ if (master->apid_data[apid].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed to xlate sid = %#x, periph = %#x, irq = %u: ee=%u but owner=%u\n",
sid, periph, irq, pmic_arb->ee,
- pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].irq_ee);
+ master->apid_data[apid].irq_ee);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -860,7 +887,8 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long *out_hwirq,
unsigned int *out_type)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = d->host_data;
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = d->host_data;
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u32 *intspec = fwspec->param;
u16 apid, ppid;
int rc;
@@ -876,7 +904,7 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
return -EINVAL;
ppid = intspec[0] << 8 | intspec[1];
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed to xlate sid = %#x, periph = %#x, irq = %u rc = %d\n",
intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2], rc);
@@ -885,10 +913,10 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
apid = rc;
/* Keep track of {max,min}_apid for bounding search during interrupt */
- if (apid > pmic_arb->max_apid)
- pmic_arb->max_apid = apid;
- if (apid < pmic_arb->min_apid)
- pmic_arb->min_apid = apid;
+ if (apid > master->max_apid)
+ master->max_apid = apid;
+ if (apid < master->min_apid)
+ master->min_apid = apid;
*out_hwirq = spec_to_hwirq(intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2], apid);
*out_type = intspec[3] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
@@ -942,15 +970,33 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+/*
+ * For non-v5 and non-v7, just set up the max and min apid.
+ */
+static int pmic_arb_init_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+
+ /*
+ * Initialize max_apid/min_apid to the opposite bounds, during
+ * the irq domain translation, we are sure to update these
+ */
+ master->max_apid = 0;
+ master->min_apid = pmic_arb->max_periphs - 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u32 *mapping_table = pmic_arb->mapping_table;
int index = 0, i;
u16 apid_valid;
u16 apid;
u32 data;
- apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
+ apid_valid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
if (apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID) {
apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
return apid;
@@ -958,7 +1004,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
for (i = 0; i < SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH; ++i) {
if (!test_and_set_bit(index, pmic_arb->mapping_table_valid))
- mapping_table[index] = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->cnfg +
+ mapping_table[index] = readl_relaxed(master->cnfg +
SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_REG(index));
data = mapping_table[index];
@@ -968,9 +1014,9 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
} else {
apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
+ master->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+ master->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
return apid;
}
} else {
@@ -978,9 +1024,9 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
} else {
apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
+ master->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+ master->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
return apid;
}
}
@@ -990,24 +1036,26 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
}
/* v1 offset per ee */
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return 0x800 + 0x80 * pmic_arb->channel;
}
-static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
{
- struct apid_data *apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[pmic_arb->last_apid];
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ struct apid_data *apidd = &master->apid_data[master->last_apid];
u32 regval, offset;
u16 id, apid;
- for (apid = pmic_arb->last_apid; ; apid++, apidd++) {
+ for (apid = master->last_apid; ; apid++, apidd++) {
offset = pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_map_offset(apid);
if (offset >= pmic_arb->core_size)
break;
- regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(pmic_arb,
+ regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(master,
apid));
apidd->irq_ee = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
apidd->write_ee = apidd->irq_ee;
@@ -1017,33 +1065,34 @@ static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
continue;
id = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[id] = apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ master->ppid_to_apid[id] = apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
apidd->ppid = id;
if (id == ppid) {
apid |= PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
break;
}
}
- pmic_arb->last_apid = apid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ master->last_apid = apid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
return apid;
}
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
{
u16 apid_valid;
- apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
+ apid_valid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
if (!(apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
- apid_valid = pmic_arb_find_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ apid_valid = pmic_arb_find_apid(master, ppid);
if (!(apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
return -ENODEV;
return apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
}
-static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
+static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
struct apid_data *apidd;
struct apid_data *prev_apidd;
u16 i, apid, ppid, apid_max;
@@ -1065,9 +1114,9 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
* where N = number of APIDs supported by the primary bus and
* M = number of APIDs supported by the secondary bus
*/
- apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[pmic_arb->base_apid];
- apid_max = pmic_arb->base_apid + pmic_arb->apid_count;
- for (i = pmic_arb->base_apid; i < apid_max; i++, apidd++) {
+ apidd = &master->apid_data[master->base_apid];
+ apid_max = master->base_apid + master->apid_count;
+ for (i = master->base_apid; i < apid_max; i++, apidd++) {
offset = pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_map_offset(i);
if (offset >= pmic_arb->core_size)
break;
@@ -1078,19 +1127,18 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
ppid = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
is_irq_ee = PMIC_ARB_CHAN_IS_IRQ_OWNER(regval);
- regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(pmic_arb,
- i));
+ regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(master, i));
apidd->write_ee = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
apidd->irq_ee = is_irq_ee ? apidd->write_ee : INVALID_EE;
- valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- apid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- prev_apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[apid];
+ valid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ apid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ prev_apidd = &master->apid_data[apid];
if (!valid || apidd->write_ee == pmic_arb->ee) {
/* First PPID mapping or one for this EE */
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] = i | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] = i | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
} else if (valid && is_irq_ee &&
prev_apidd->write_ee == pmic_arb->ee) {
/*
@@ -1101,16 +1149,16 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
}
apidd->ppid = ppid;
- pmic_arb->last_apid = i;
+ master->last_apid = i;
}
/* Dump the mapping table for debug purposes. */
dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "PPID APID Write-EE IRQ-EE\n");
for (ppid = 0; ppid < PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID; ppid++) {
- apid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
+ apid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
if (apid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID) {
apid &= ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[apid];
+ apidd = &master->apid_data[apid];
dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "%#03X %3u %2u %2u\n",
ppid, apid, apidd->write_ee, apidd->irq_ee);
}
@@ -1119,24 +1167,25 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
{
- if (!(pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
+ if (!(master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
return -ENODEV;
- return pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ return master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
}
/* v2 offset per ppid and per ee */
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 apid;
u16 ppid;
int rc;
ppid = sid << 8 | ((addr >> 8) & 0xFF);
- rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -1144,19 +1193,58 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
return 0x1000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x8000 * apid;
}
+/*
+ * v5 only supports one master. Compute apid accordingly.
+ */
+static int pmic_arb_init_apid_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (master->id != 0) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported masters count %d detected\n",
+ master->id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ master->base_apid = 0;
+ master->apid_count = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+
+ if (master->base_apid + master->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
+ master->base_apid + master->apid_count);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1(master);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(master);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "could not read APID->PPID mapping table, rc= %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* v5 offset per ee and per apid for observer channels and per apid for
* read/write channels.
*/
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 apid;
int rc;
u32 offset = 0;
u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
- rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -1166,7 +1254,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
offset = 0x10000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x80 * apid;
break;
case PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW:
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
+ if (master->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "disallowed SPMI write to sid=%u, addr=0x%04X\n",
sid, addr);
return -EPERM;
@@ -1178,19 +1266,64 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
return offset;
}
+/*
+ * Only v7 supports 2 bus masters. Each master will get a different apid count,
+ * read from different registers.
+ */
+static int pmic_arb_init_apid_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (master->id == 0) {
+ master->base_apid = 0;
+ master->apid_count = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+ } else if (master->id == 1) {
+ master->base_apid = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+ master->apid_count = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES1) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+ } else {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported masters count %d detected\n",
+ master->id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (master->base_apid + master->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
+ master->base_apid + master->apid_count);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1(master);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(master);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "could not read APID->PPID mapping table, rc= %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* v7 offset per ee and per apid for observer channels and per apid for
* read/write channels.
*/
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 apid;
int rc;
u32 offset = 0;
u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -1200,7 +1333,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
offset = 0x8000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x20 * apid;
break;
case PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW:
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
+ if (master->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "disallowed SPMI write to sid=%u, addr=0x%04X\n",
sid, addr);
return -EPERM;
@@ -1223,104 +1356,110 @@ static u32 pmic_arb_fmt_cmd_v2(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc)
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x20 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x20 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x100000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x100000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v3(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v3(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x200000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x200000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x10000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x10000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x200 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x200 + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x1000 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x100 + 0x10000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x100 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x600 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x600 + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x4 + 0x1000 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x4 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x104 + 0x10000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x104 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0xA00 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0xA00 + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x8 + 0x1000 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x8 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x108 + 0x10000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x108 + 0x1000 * n;
}
@@ -1340,9 +1479,9 @@ static u32 pmic_arb_apid_map_offset_v7(u16 n)
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_apid_owner_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_apid_owner_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->cnfg + 0x700 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->cnfg + 0x700 + 0x4 * n;
}
/*
@@ -1351,13 +1490,14 @@ pmic_arb_apid_owner_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
* 0.
*/
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_apid_owner_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_apid_owner_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->cnfg + 0x4 * (n - pmic_arb->base_apid);
+ return master->cnfg + 0x4 * (n - master->base_apid);
}
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v1 = {
.ver_str = "v1",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v1,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v1,
@@ -1372,6 +1512,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v1 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v2 = {
.ver_str = "v2",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v2,
@@ -1386,6 +1527,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v2 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v3 = {
.ver_str = "v3",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v2,
@@ -1400,6 +1542,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v3 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v5 = {
.ver_str = "v5",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v5,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v5,
@@ -1414,6 +1557,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v5 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v7 = {
.ver_str = "v7",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v7,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v7,
@@ -1433,6 +1577,128 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops = {
.translate = qpnpint_irq_domain_translate,
};
+static int spmi_pmic_master_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct device_node *node,
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 id)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[id];
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ void __iomem *intr;
+ void __iomem *cnfg;
+ int bus_instance = id;
+ int index, ret;
+ u32 irq;
+
+ master->ppid_to_apid = devm_kcalloc(dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID,
+ sizeof(*master->ppid_to_apid),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!master->ppid_to_apid)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ master->apid_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
+ sizeof(*master->apid_data),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!master->apid_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* Optional property for v7: */
+ of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,bus-id", &bus_instance);
+ if (bus_instance != id) {
+ dev_err(dev, "wrong bus-id value");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ index = of_property_match_string(node, "reg-names", "cnfg");
+ if (index < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "cnfg reg region missing");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ cnfg = devm_of_iomap(dev, node, index, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(cnfg))
+ return PTR_ERR(cnfg);
+
+ index = of_property_match_string(node, "reg-names", "intr");
+ if (index < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "intr reg region missing");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ intr = devm_of_iomap(dev, node, index, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(intr))
+ return PTR_ERR(intr);
+
+ irq = of_irq_get_byname(node, "periph_irq");
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return irq;
+
+ master->pmic_arb = pmic_arb;
+ master->intr = intr;
+ master->cnfg = cnfg;
+ master->irq = irq;
+ master->id = id;
+
+ ret = pmic_arb->ver_ops->init_apid(master);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain for master %d\n", id);
+
+ master->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, master);
+ if (!master->domain) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(master->irq,
+ pmic_arb_chained_irq, master);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int spmi_pmic_arb_register_masters(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb,
+ struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct spmi_controller *ctrl = pmic_arb->spmic;
+ struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct device_node *child;
+ int child_count = of_get_available_child_count(node);
+ int ret, i = 0;
+
+ /* Even without child nodes, there is at least one master */
+ pmic_arb->masters_count = child_count ? child_count : 1;
+
+ pmic_arb->masters = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, pmic_arb->masters_count,
+ sizeof(*pmic_arb->masters),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pmic_arb->masters)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (child_count) {
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) {
+ ret = spmi_pmic_master_init(pdev, child, pmic_arb, i++);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = spmi_pmic_master_init(pdev, node, pmic_arb, 0);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void spmi_pmic_arb_deregister_masters(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pmic_arb->masters_count; i++) {
+ irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->masters[i].irq,
+ NULL, NULL);
+ irq_domain_remove(pmic_arb->masters[i].domain);
+ }
+}
+
static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb;
@@ -1461,18 +1727,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* which does not result in a devm_request_mem_region() call.
*/
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "core");
- core = devm_ioremap(&ctrl->dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
+ core = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
if (IS_ERR(core))
return PTR_ERR(core);
pmic_arb->core_size = resource_size(res);
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID,
- sizeof(*pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
hw_ver = readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_VERSION);
if (hw_ver < PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V2_MIN) {
@@ -1493,86 +1753,27 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
"obsrvr");
- pmic_arb->rd_base = devm_ioremap(&ctrl->dev, res->start,
+ pmic_arb->rd_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
resource_size(res));
if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->rd_base))
return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->rd_base);
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
"chnls");
- pmic_arb->wr_base = devm_ioremap(&ctrl->dev, res->start,
+ pmic_arb->wr_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
resource_size(res));
if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->wr_base))
return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->wr_base);
}
- pmic_arb->max_periphs = PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS;
-
- if (hw_ver >= PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V7_MIN) {
+ if (hw_ver == PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V7_MIN)
pmic_arb->max_periphs = PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS_V7;
- /* Optional property for v7: */
- of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,bus-id",
- &pmic_arb->bus_instance);
- if (pmic_arb->bus_instance > 1) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid bus instance (%u) specified\n",
- pmic_arb->bus_instance);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (pmic_arb->bus_instance == 0) {
- pmic_arb->base_apid = 0;
- pmic_arb->apid_count =
- readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
- } else {
- pmic_arb->base_apid =
- readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
- pmic_arb->apid_count =
- readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES1) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
- }
-
- if (pmic_arb->base_apid + pmic_arb->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
- pmic_arb->base_apid + pmic_arb->apid_count);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- } else if (hw_ver >= PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V5_MIN) {
- pmic_arb->base_apid = 0;
- pmic_arb->apid_count = readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
-
- if (pmic_arb->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
- pmic_arb->apid_count);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- }
-
- pmic_arb->apid_data = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
- sizeof(*pmic_arb->apid_data),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pmic_arb->apid_data)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ else
+ pmic_arb->max_periphs = PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS;
- dev_info(&ctrl->dev, "PMIC arbiter version %s (0x%x)\n",
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PMIC arbiter version %s (0x%x)\n",
pmic_arb->ver_ops->ver_str, hw_ver);
- res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "intr");
- pmic_arb->intr = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, res);
- if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->intr))
- return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->intr);
-
- res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "cnfg");
- pmic_arb->cnfg = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, res);
- if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->cnfg))
- return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->cnfg);
-
- pmic_arb->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "periph_irq");
- if (pmic_arb->irq < 0)
- return pmic_arb->irq;
-
err = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,channel", &channel);
if (err) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "channel unspecified.\n");
@@ -1599,16 +1800,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
pmic_arb->ee = ee;
- mapping_table = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
- sizeof(*mapping_table), GFP_KERNEL);
+ mapping_table = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
+ sizeof(*mapping_table), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mapping_table)
return -ENOMEM;
pmic_arb->mapping_table = mapping_table;
- /* Initialize max_apid/min_apid to the opposite bounds, during
- * the irq domain translation, we are sure to update these */
- pmic_arb->max_apid = 0;
- pmic_arb->min_apid = pmic_arb->max_periphs - 1;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl);
raw_spin_lock_init(&pmic_arb->lock);
@@ -1617,34 +1814,14 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ctrl->read_cmd = pmic_arb_read_cmd;
ctrl->write_cmd = pmic_arb_write_cmd;
- if (hw_ver >= PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V5_MIN) {
- err = pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(pmic_arb);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not read APID->PPID mapping table, rc= %d\n",
- err);
- return err;
- }
- }
-
- dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain\n");
- pmic_arb->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
- &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, pmic_arb);
- if (!pmic_arb->domain) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
+ err = spmi_pmic_arb_register_masters(pmic_arb, pdev);
+ if (err)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->irq, pmic_arb_chained_irq,
- pmic_arb);
err = spmi_controller_add(ctrl);
if (err)
- goto err_domain_remove;
-
- return 0;
+ spmi_pmic_arb_deregister_masters(pmic_arb);
-err_domain_remove:
- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->irq, NULL, NULL);
- irq_domain_remove(pmic_arb->domain);
return err;
}
@@ -1652,9 +1829,9 @@ static void spmi_pmic_arb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct spmi_controller *ctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+
spmi_controller_remove(ctrl);
- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->irq, NULL, NULL);
- irq_domain_remove(pmic_arb->domain);
+ spmi_pmic_arb_deregister_masters(pmic_arb);
}
static const struct of_device_id spmi_pmic_arb_match_table[] = {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RFC 2/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, Abel Vesa
The v7 HW supports currently 2 masters. So register
each master and adapt all ops to pass on the master id.
Legacy mode is still supported as long as there is no
child node that represents a bus master, but rather all
devicetree child nodes are actual slave decices.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 711 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 444 insertions(+), 267 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index 597207720146..4a281da3310c 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/spmi.h>
@@ -125,6 +127,25 @@ struct apid_data {
u8 irq_ee;
};
+struct spmi_pmic_arb;
+
+struct spmi_pmic_master {
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ void __iomem *intr;
+ void __iomem *cnfg;
+ u32 bus_instance;
+ u16 base_apid;
+ int apid_count;
+ u16 *ppid_to_apid;
+ u16 last_apid;
+ struct apid_data *apid_data;
+ u16 min_apid;
+ u16 max_apid;
+ int irq;
+ u8 id;
+};
+
/**
* struct spmi_pmic_arb - SPMI PMIC Arbiter object
*
@@ -155,34 +176,26 @@ struct apid_data {
struct spmi_pmic_arb {
void __iomem *rd_base;
void __iomem *wr_base;
- void __iomem *intr;
- void __iomem *cnfg;
void __iomem *core;
resource_size_t core_size;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
u8 channel;
- int irq;
u8 ee;
u32 bus_instance;
- u16 min_apid;
- u16 max_apid;
- u16 base_apid;
- int apid_count;
u32 *mapping_table;
DECLARE_BITMAP(mapping_table_valid, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS);
- struct irq_domain *domain;
struct spmi_controller *spmic;
const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops;
- u16 *ppid_to_apid;
- u16 last_apid;
- struct apid_data *apid_data;
int max_periphs;
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *masters;
+ int masters_count;
};
/**
* struct pmic_arb_ver_ops - version dependent functionality.
*
* @ver_str: version string.
+ * @init_apid: finds the apid base and count
* @ppid_to_apid: finds the apid for a given ppid.
* @non_data_cmd: on v1 issues an spmi non-data command.
* on v2 no HW support, returns -EOPNOTSUPP.
@@ -202,20 +215,21 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb {
*/
struct pmic_arb_ver_ops {
const char *ver_str;
- int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid);
+ int (*init_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master);
+ int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid);
/* spmi commands (read_cmd, write_cmd, cmd) functionality */
- int (*offset)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type);
+ int (*offset)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type);
u32 (*fmt_cmd)(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc);
int (*non_data_cmd)(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid);
/* Interrupts controller functionality (offset of PIC registers) */
- void __iomem *(*owner_acc_status)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m,
+ void __iomem *(*owner_acc_status)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m,
u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*acc_enable)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*irq_status)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*irq_clear)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*acc_enable)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*irq_status)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*irq_clear)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
u32 (*apid_map_offset)(u16 n);
- void __iomem *(*apid_owner)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n);
+ void __iomem *(*apid_owner)(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n);
};
static inline void pmic_arb_base_write(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb,
@@ -260,16 +274,17 @@ static void pmic_arb_write_data(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, const u8 *buf,
}
static int pmic_arb_wait_for_done(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
- void __iomem *base, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ void __iomem *base, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr,
enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[mid];
u32 status = 0;
u32 timeout = PMIC_ARB_TIMEOUT_US;
u32 offset;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, addr, ch_type);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, addr, ch_type);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -287,8 +302,8 @@ static int pmic_arb_wait_for_done(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
}
if (status & PMIC_ARB_STATUS_FAILURE) {
- dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "%s: %#x %#x: transaction failed (%#x)\n",
- __func__, sid, addr, status);
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "%s: %#x %#x %#x: transaction failed (%#x) reg: 0x%x\n",
+ __func__, sid, mid, addr, status, offset);
WARN_ON(1);
return -EIO;
}
@@ -313,12 +328,13 @@ static int
pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v1(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[0];
unsigned long flags;
u32 cmd;
int rc;
u32 offset;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, 0, PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, 0, PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -327,7 +343,7 @@ pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v1(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
pmic_arb_base_write(pmic_arb, offset + PMIC_ARB_CMD, cmd);
- rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, sid, 0,
+ rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, 0, sid, 0,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
@@ -341,7 +357,7 @@ pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
}
/* Non-data command */
-static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid)
+static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -354,13 +370,14 @@ static int pmic_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 s
return pmic_arb->ver_ops->non_data_cmd(ctrl, opc, sid);
}
-static int pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid,
u16 addr, size_t len, u32 *cmd, u32 *offset)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[mid];
u8 bc = len - 1;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_OBS);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -388,7 +405,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 sid,
}
static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
- u32 offset, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf,
+ u32 offset, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 *buf,
size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -396,7 +413,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
int rc;
pmic_arb_set_rd_cmd(pmic_arb, offset + PMIC_ARB_CMD, cmd);
- rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->rd_base, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->rd_base, mid, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_OBS);
if (rc)
return rc;
@@ -410,7 +427,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid,
u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -418,26 +435,27 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id,
u32 cmd, offset;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, mid, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
&offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
- rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, sid, addr, buf, len);
+ rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, mid, sid, addr, buf, len);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
return rc;
}
-static int pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc,
+static int pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc, u8 mid,
u8 sid, u16 addr, size_t len, u32 *cmd,
u32 *offset)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[mid];
u8 bc = len - 1;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(pmic_arb, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->offset(master, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -467,7 +485,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 opc,
}
static int pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
- u32 offset, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ u32 offset, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr,
const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -482,11 +500,11 @@ static int pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u32 cmd,
/* Start the transaction */
pmic_arb_base_write(pmic_arb, offset + PMIC_ARB_CMD, cmd);
- return pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, sid, addr,
+ return pmic_arb_wait_for_done(ctrl, pmic_arb->wr_base, mid, sid, addr,
PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW);
}
-static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id, u8 sid,
+static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 mid, u8 sid,
u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -494,20 +512,20 @@ static int pmic_arb_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 master_id
u32 cmd, offset;
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, opc, mid, sid, addr, len, &cmd,
&offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
- rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, sid, addr, buf,
+ rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, cmd, offset, mid, sid, addr, buf,
len);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
return rc;
}
-static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 mid, u8 sid, u16 addr,
const u8 *buf, const u8 *mask, size_t len)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
@@ -516,18 +534,18 @@ static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 sid, u16 addr,
unsigned long flags;
int rc, i;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, sid, addr, len,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_read_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, mid, sid, addr, len,
&read_cmd, &read_offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb_fmt_write_cmd(pmic_arb, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, mid, sid, addr,
len, &write_cmd, &write_offset);
if (rc)
return rc;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
- rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, read_cmd, read_offset, sid, addr,
+ rc = pmic_arb_read_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, read_cmd, read_offset, mid, sid, addr,
temp, len);
if (rc)
goto done;
@@ -535,7 +553,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_masked_write(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 sid, u16 addr,
for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
temp[i] = (temp[i] & ~mask[i]) | (buf[i] & mask[i]);
- rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, write_cmd, write_offset, sid,
+ rc = pmic_arb_write_cmd_unlocked(ctrl, write_cmd, write_offset, mid, sid,
addr, temp, len);
done:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmic_arb->lock, flags);
@@ -564,11 +582,12 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb_qpnpint_type {
static void qpnpint_spmi_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf,
size_t len)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, 0, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_write_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL, master->id, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
@@ -576,11 +595,12 @@ static void qpnpint_spmi_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf,
static void qpnpint_spmi_read(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg, void *buf, size_t len)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
- if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, 0, sid,
+ if (pmic_arb_read_cmd(pmic_arb->spmic, SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL, master->id, sid,
(per << 8) + reg, buf, len))
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x\n",
d->irq);
@@ -590,12 +610,13 @@ static int qpnpint_spmi_masked_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg,
const void *buf, const void *mask,
size_t len)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u8 per = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
int rc;
- rc = pmic_arb_masked_write(pmic_arb->spmic, sid, (per << 8) + reg, buf,
+ rc = pmic_arb_masked_write(pmic_arb->spmic, master->id, sid, (per << 8) + reg, buf,
mask, len);
if (rc)
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed irqchip transaction on %x rc=%d\n",
@@ -603,34 +624,36 @@ static int qpnpint_spmi_masked_write(struct irq_data *d, u8 reg,
return rc;
}
-static void cleanup_irq(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 apid, int id)
+static void cleanup_irq(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 apid, int id)
{
- u16 ppid = pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid;
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ u16 ppid = master->apid_data[apid].ppid;
u8 sid = ppid >> 8;
u8 per = ppid & 0xFF;
u8 irq_mask = BIT(id);
dev_err_ratelimited(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "%s apid=%d sid=0x%x per=0x%x irq=%d\n",
__func__, apid, sid, per, id);
- writel_relaxed(irq_mask, pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(pmic_arb, apid));
+ writel_relaxed(irq_mask, pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(master, apid));
}
-static int periph_interrupt(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 apid)
+static int periph_interrupt(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 apid)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
unsigned int irq;
u32 status, id;
int handled = 0;
- u8 sid = (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid >> 8) & 0xF;
- u8 per = pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid & 0xFF;
+ u8 sid = (master->apid_data[apid].ppid >> 8) & 0xF;
+ u8 per = master->apid_data[apid].ppid & 0xFF;
- status = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_status(pmic_arb, apid));
+ status = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_status(master, apid));
while (status) {
id = ffs(status) - 1;
status &= ~BIT(id);
- irq = irq_find_mapping(pmic_arb->domain,
- spec_to_hwirq(sid, per, id, apid));
+ irq = irq_find_mapping(master->domain,
+ spec_to_hwirq(sid, per, id, apid));
if (irq == 0) {
- cleanup_irq(pmic_arb, apid, id);
+ cleanup_irq(master, apid, id);
continue;
}
generic_handle_irq(irq);
@@ -642,16 +665,17 @@ static int periph_interrupt(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 apid)
static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops = pmic_arb->ver_ops;
struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
- int first = pmic_arb->min_apid;
- int last = pmic_arb->max_apid;
+ int first = master->min_apid;
+ int last = master->max_apid;
/*
* acc_offset will be non-zero for the secondary SPMI bus instance on
* v7 controllers.
*/
- int acc_offset = pmic_arb->base_apid >> 5;
+ int acc_offset = master->base_apid >> 5;
u8 ee = pmic_arb->ee;
u32 status, enable, handled = 0;
int i, id, apid;
@@ -662,7 +686,7 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
for (i = first >> 5; i <= last >> 5; ++i) {
- status = readl_relaxed(ver_ops->owner_acc_status(pmic_arb, ee, i - acc_offset));
+ status = readl_relaxed(ver_ops->owner_acc_status(master, ee, i - acc_offset));
if (status)
acc_valid = true;
@@ -676,9 +700,9 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
continue;
}
enable = readl_relaxed(
- ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, apid));
+ ver_ops->acc_enable(master, apid));
if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT)
- if (periph_interrupt(pmic_arb, apid) != 0)
+ if (periph_interrupt(master, apid) != 0)
handled++;
}
}
@@ -687,19 +711,19 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
if (!acc_valid) {
for (i = first; i <= last; i++) {
/* skip if APPS is not irq owner */
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[i].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee)
+ if (master->apid_data[i].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee)
continue;
irq_status = readl_relaxed(
- ver_ops->irq_status(pmic_arb, i));
+ ver_ops->irq_status(master, i));
if (irq_status) {
enable = readl_relaxed(
- ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, i));
+ ver_ops->acc_enable(master, i));
if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT) {
dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev,
"Dispatching IRQ for apid=%d status=%x\n",
i, irq_status);
- if (periph_interrupt(pmic_arb, i) != 0)
+ if (periph_interrupt(master, i) != 0)
handled++;
}
}
@@ -714,12 +738,13 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
static void qpnpint_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u8 irq = hwirq_to_irq(d->hwirq);
u16 apid = hwirq_to_apid(d->hwirq);
u8 data;
- writel_relaxed(BIT(irq), pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(pmic_arb, apid));
+ writel_relaxed(BIT(irq), pmic_arb->ver_ops->irq_clear(master, apid));
data = BIT(irq);
qpnpint_spmi_write(d, QPNPINT_REG_LATCHED_CLR, &data, 1);
@@ -735,14 +760,15 @@ static void qpnpint_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
static void qpnpint_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops = pmic_arb->ver_ops;
u8 irq = hwirq_to_irq(d->hwirq);
u16 apid = hwirq_to_apid(d->hwirq);
u8 buf[2];
writel_relaxed(SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT,
- ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, apid));
+ ver_ops->acc_enable(master, apid));
qpnpint_spmi_read(d, QPNPINT_REG_EN_SET, &buf[0], 1);
if (!(buf[0] & BIT(irq))) {
@@ -799,9 +825,9 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
static int qpnpint_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
- return irq_set_irq_wake(pmic_arb->irq, on);
+ return irq_set_irq_wake(master->irq, on);
}
static int qpnpint_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
@@ -823,17 +849,18 @@ static int qpnpint_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
static int qpnpint_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
struct irq_data *d, bool reserve)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 periph = hwirq_to_per(d->hwirq);
u16 apid = hwirq_to_apid(d->hwirq);
u16 sid = hwirq_to_sid(d->hwirq);
u16 irq = hwirq_to_irq(d->hwirq);
u8 buf;
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
+ if (master->apid_data[apid].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed to xlate sid = %#x, periph = %#x, irq = %u: ee=%u but owner=%u\n",
sid, periph, irq, pmic_arb->ee,
- pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].irq_ee);
+ master->apid_data[apid].irq_ee);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -860,7 +887,8 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long *out_hwirq,
unsigned int *out_type)
{
- struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = d->host_data;
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = d->host_data;
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u32 *intspec = fwspec->param;
u16 apid, ppid;
int rc;
@@ -876,7 +904,7 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
return -EINVAL;
ppid = intspec[0] << 8 | intspec[1];
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed to xlate sid = %#x, periph = %#x, irq = %u rc = %d\n",
intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2], rc);
@@ -885,10 +913,10 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
apid = rc;
/* Keep track of {max,min}_apid for bounding search during interrupt */
- if (apid > pmic_arb->max_apid)
- pmic_arb->max_apid = apid;
- if (apid < pmic_arb->min_apid)
- pmic_arb->min_apid = apid;
+ if (apid > master->max_apid)
+ master->max_apid = apid;
+ if (apid < master->min_apid)
+ master->min_apid = apid;
*out_hwirq = spec_to_hwirq(intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2], apid);
*out_type = intspec[3] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
@@ -942,15 +970,33 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+/*
+ * For non-v5 and non-v7, just set up the max and min apid.
+ */
+static int pmic_arb_init_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+
+ /*
+ * Initialize max_apid/min_apid to the opposite bounds, during
+ * the irq domain translation, we are sure to update these
+ */
+ master->max_apid = 0;
+ master->min_apid = pmic_arb->max_periphs - 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u32 *mapping_table = pmic_arb->mapping_table;
int index = 0, i;
u16 apid_valid;
u16 apid;
u32 data;
- apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
+ apid_valid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
if (apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID) {
apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
return apid;
@@ -958,7 +1004,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
for (i = 0; i < SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH; ++i) {
if (!test_and_set_bit(index, pmic_arb->mapping_table_valid))
- mapping_table[index] = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->cnfg +
+ mapping_table[index] = readl_relaxed(master->cnfg +
SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_REG(index));
data = mapping_table[index];
@@ -968,9 +1014,9 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
} else {
apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
+ master->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+ master->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
return apid;
}
} else {
@@ -978,9 +1024,9 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
} else {
apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
+ master->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+ master->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
return apid;
}
}
@@ -990,24 +1036,26 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
}
/* v1 offset per ee */
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return 0x800 + 0x80 * pmic_arb->channel;
}
-static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
{
- struct apid_data *apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[pmic_arb->last_apid];
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ struct apid_data *apidd = &master->apid_data[master->last_apid];
u32 regval, offset;
u16 id, apid;
- for (apid = pmic_arb->last_apid; ; apid++, apidd++) {
+ for (apid = master->last_apid; ; apid++, apidd++) {
offset = pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_map_offset(apid);
if (offset >= pmic_arb->core_size)
break;
- regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(pmic_arb,
+ regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(master,
apid));
apidd->irq_ee = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
apidd->write_ee = apidd->irq_ee;
@@ -1017,33 +1065,34 @@ static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
continue;
id = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[id] = apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ master->ppid_to_apid[id] = apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
apidd->ppid = id;
if (id == ppid) {
apid |= PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
break;
}
}
- pmic_arb->last_apid = apid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ master->last_apid = apid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
return apid;
}
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
{
u16 apid_valid;
- apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
+ apid_valid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
if (!(apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
- apid_valid = pmic_arb_find_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ apid_valid = pmic_arb_find_apid(master, ppid);
if (!(apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
return -ENODEV;
return apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
}
-static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
+static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
struct apid_data *apidd;
struct apid_data *prev_apidd;
u16 i, apid, ppid, apid_max;
@@ -1065,9 +1114,9 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
* where N = number of APIDs supported by the primary bus and
* M = number of APIDs supported by the secondary bus
*/
- apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[pmic_arb->base_apid];
- apid_max = pmic_arb->base_apid + pmic_arb->apid_count;
- for (i = pmic_arb->base_apid; i < apid_max; i++, apidd++) {
+ apidd = &master->apid_data[master->base_apid];
+ apid_max = master->base_apid + master->apid_count;
+ for (i = master->base_apid; i < apid_max; i++, apidd++) {
offset = pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_map_offset(i);
if (offset >= pmic_arb->core_size)
break;
@@ -1078,19 +1127,18 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
ppid = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
is_irq_ee = PMIC_ARB_CHAN_IS_IRQ_OWNER(regval);
- regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(pmic_arb,
- i));
+ regval = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->ver_ops->apid_owner(master, i));
apidd->write_ee = SPMI_OWNERSHIP_PERIPH2OWNER(regval);
apidd->irq_ee = is_irq_ee ? apidd->write_ee : INVALID_EE;
- valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- apid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- prev_apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[apid];
+ valid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ apid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ prev_apidd = &master->apid_data[apid];
if (!valid || apidd->write_ee == pmic_arb->ee) {
/* First PPID mapping or one for this EE */
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] = i | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] = i | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
} else if (valid && is_irq_ee &&
prev_apidd->write_ee == pmic_arb->ee) {
/*
@@ -1101,16 +1149,16 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
}
apidd->ppid = ppid;
- pmic_arb->last_apid = i;
+ master->last_apid = i;
}
/* Dump the mapping table for debug purposes. */
dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "PPID APID Write-EE IRQ-EE\n");
for (ppid = 0; ppid < PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID; ppid++) {
- apid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
+ apid = master->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
if (apid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID) {
apid &= ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
- apidd = &pmic_arb->apid_data[apid];
+ apidd = &master->apid_data[apid];
dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "%#03X %3u %2u %2u\n",
ppid, apid, apidd->write_ee, apidd->irq_ee);
}
@@ -1119,24 +1167,25 @@ static int pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
return 0;
}
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 ppid)
{
- if (!(pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
+ if (!(master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
return -ENODEV;
- return pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+ return master->ppid_to_apid[ppid] & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
}
/* v2 offset per ppid and per ee */
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 apid;
u16 ppid;
int rc;
ppid = sid << 8 | ((addr >> 8) & 0xFF);
- rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -1144,19 +1193,58 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
return 0x1000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x8000 * apid;
}
+/*
+ * v5 only supports one master. Compute apid accordingly.
+ */
+static int pmic_arb_init_apid_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (master->id != 0) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported masters count %d detected\n",
+ master->id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ master->base_apid = 0;
+ master->apid_count = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+
+ if (master->base_apid + master->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
+ master->base_apid + master->apid_count);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1(master);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(master);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "could not read APID->PPID mapping table, rc= %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* v5 offset per ee and per apid for observer channels and per apid for
* read/write channels.
*/
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 apid;
int rc;
u32 offset = 0;
u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
- rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -1166,7 +1254,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
offset = 0x10000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x80 * apid;
break;
case PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW:
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
+ if (master->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "disallowed SPMI write to sid=%u, addr=0x%04X\n",
sid, addr);
return -EPERM;
@@ -1178,19 +1266,64 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
return offset;
}
+/*
+ * Only v7 supports 2 bus masters. Each master will get a different apid count,
+ * read from different registers.
+ */
+static int pmic_arb_init_apid_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (master->id == 0) {
+ master->base_apid = 0;
+ master->apid_count = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+ } else if (master->id == 1) {
+ master->base_apid = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+ master->apid_count = readl_relaxed(pmic_arb->core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES1) &
+ PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
+ } else {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported masters count %d detected\n",
+ master->id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (master->base_apid + master->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
+ master->base_apid + master->apid_count);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1(master);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(master);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "could not read APID->PPID mapping table, rc= %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* v7 offset per ee and per apid for observer channels and per apid for
* read/write channels.
*/
-static int pmic_arb_offset_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
- enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
+static int pmic_arb_offset_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 sid, u16 addr,
+ enum pmic_arb_channel ch_type)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
u16 apid;
int rc;
u32 offset = 0;
u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
- rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
+ rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(master, ppid);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -1200,7 +1333,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
offset = 0x8000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x20 * apid;
break;
case PMIC_ARB_CHANNEL_RW:
- if (pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
+ if (master->apid_data[apid].write_ee != pmic_arb->ee) {
dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "disallowed SPMI write to sid=%u, addr=0x%04X\n",
sid, addr);
return -EPERM;
@@ -1223,104 +1356,110 @@ static u32 pmic_arb_fmt_cmd_v2(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc)
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x20 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x20 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x100000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x100000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v3(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v3(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x200000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x200000 + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x10000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x10000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 m, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_owner_acc_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u8 m, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x1000 * m + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x200 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x200 + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x1000 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x100 + 0x10000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_acc_enable_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_acc_enable_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x100 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x600 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x600 + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x4 + 0x1000 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x4 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x104 + 0x10000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_status_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x104 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v1(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0xA00 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0xA00 + 0x4 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->intr + 0x8 + 0x1000 * n;
+ return master->intr + 0x8 + 0x1000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v5(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v5(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x108 + 0x10000 * n;
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_irq_clear_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_irq_clear_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = master->pmic_arb;
return pmic_arb->wr_base + 0x108 + 0x1000 * n;
}
@@ -1340,9 +1479,9 @@ static u32 pmic_arb_apid_map_offset_v7(u16 n)
}
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_apid_owner_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_apid_owner_v2(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->cnfg + 0x700 + 0x4 * n;
+ return master->cnfg + 0x700 + 0x4 * n;
}
/*
@@ -1351,13 +1490,14 @@ pmic_arb_apid_owner_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
* 0.
*/
static void __iomem *
-pmic_arb_apid_owner_v7(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 n)
+pmic_arb_apid_owner_v7(struct spmi_pmic_master *master, u16 n)
{
- return pmic_arb->cnfg + 0x4 * (n - pmic_arb->base_apid);
+ return master->cnfg + 0x4 * (n - master->base_apid);
}
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v1 = {
.ver_str = "v1",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v1,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v1,
@@ -1372,6 +1512,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v1 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v2 = {
.ver_str = "v2",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v2,
@@ -1386,6 +1527,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v2 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v3 = {
.ver_str = "v3",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v1,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v2,
@@ -1400,6 +1542,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v3 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v5 = {
.ver_str = "v5",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v5,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v5,
@@ -1414,6 +1557,7 @@ static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v5 = {
static const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops pmic_arb_v7 = {
.ver_str = "v7",
+ .init_apid = pmic_arb_init_apid_v7,
.ppid_to_apid = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v5,
.non_data_cmd = pmic_arb_non_data_cmd_v2,
.offset = pmic_arb_offset_v7,
@@ -1433,6 +1577,128 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops = {
.translate = qpnpint_irq_domain_translate,
};
+static int spmi_pmic_master_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct device_node *node,
+ struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 id)
+{
+ struct spmi_pmic_master *master = &pmic_arb->masters[id];
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ void __iomem *intr;
+ void __iomem *cnfg;
+ int bus_instance = id;
+ int index, ret;
+ u32 irq;
+
+ master->ppid_to_apid = devm_kcalloc(dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID,
+ sizeof(*master->ppid_to_apid),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!master->ppid_to_apid)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ master->apid_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
+ sizeof(*master->apid_data),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!master->apid_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* Optional property for v7: */
+ of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,bus-id", &bus_instance);
+ if (bus_instance != id) {
+ dev_err(dev, "wrong bus-id value");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ index = of_property_match_string(node, "reg-names", "cnfg");
+ if (index < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "cnfg reg region missing");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ cnfg = devm_of_iomap(dev, node, index, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(cnfg))
+ return PTR_ERR(cnfg);
+
+ index = of_property_match_string(node, "reg-names", "intr");
+ if (index < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "intr reg region missing");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ intr = devm_of_iomap(dev, node, index, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(intr))
+ return PTR_ERR(intr);
+
+ irq = of_irq_get_byname(node, "periph_irq");
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return irq;
+
+ master->pmic_arb = pmic_arb;
+ master->intr = intr;
+ master->cnfg = cnfg;
+ master->irq = irq;
+ master->id = id;
+
+ ret = pmic_arb->ver_ops->init_apid(master);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain for master %d\n", id);
+
+ master->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, master);
+ if (!master->domain) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(master->irq,
+ pmic_arb_chained_irq, master);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int spmi_pmic_arb_register_masters(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb,
+ struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct spmi_controller *ctrl = pmic_arb->spmic;
+ struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct device_node *child;
+ int child_count = of_get_available_child_count(node);
+ int ret, i = 0;
+
+ /* Even without child nodes, there is at least one master */
+ pmic_arb->masters_count = child_count ? child_count : 1;
+
+ pmic_arb->masters = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, pmic_arb->masters_count,
+ sizeof(*pmic_arb->masters),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pmic_arb->masters)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (child_count) {
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) {
+ ret = spmi_pmic_master_init(pdev, child, pmic_arb, i++);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = spmi_pmic_master_init(pdev, node, pmic_arb, 0);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void spmi_pmic_arb_deregister_masters(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pmic_arb->masters_count; i++) {
+ irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->masters[i].irq,
+ NULL, NULL);
+ irq_domain_remove(pmic_arb->masters[i].domain);
+ }
+}
+
static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb;
@@ -1461,18 +1727,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* which does not result in a devm_request_mem_region() call.
*/
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "core");
- core = devm_ioremap(&ctrl->dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
+ core = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
if (IS_ERR(core))
return PTR_ERR(core);
pmic_arb->core_size = resource_size(res);
- pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID,
- sizeof(*pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
hw_ver = readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_VERSION);
if (hw_ver < PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V2_MIN) {
@@ -1493,86 +1753,27 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
"obsrvr");
- pmic_arb->rd_base = devm_ioremap(&ctrl->dev, res->start,
+ pmic_arb->rd_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
resource_size(res));
if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->rd_base))
return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->rd_base);
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
"chnls");
- pmic_arb->wr_base = devm_ioremap(&ctrl->dev, res->start,
+ pmic_arb->wr_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
resource_size(res));
if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->wr_base))
return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->wr_base);
}
- pmic_arb->max_periphs = PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS;
-
- if (hw_ver >= PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V7_MIN) {
+ if (hw_ver == PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V7_MIN)
pmic_arb->max_periphs = PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS_V7;
- /* Optional property for v7: */
- of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,bus-id",
- &pmic_arb->bus_instance);
- if (pmic_arb->bus_instance > 1) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid bus instance (%u) specified\n",
- pmic_arb->bus_instance);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (pmic_arb->bus_instance == 0) {
- pmic_arb->base_apid = 0;
- pmic_arb->apid_count =
- readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
- } else {
- pmic_arb->base_apid =
- readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
- pmic_arb->apid_count =
- readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES1) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
- }
-
- if (pmic_arb->base_apid + pmic_arb->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
- pmic_arb->base_apid + pmic_arb->apid_count);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- } else if (hw_ver >= PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V5_MIN) {
- pmic_arb->base_apid = 0;
- pmic_arb->apid_count = readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_FEATURES) &
- PMIC_ARB_FEATURES_PERIPH_MASK;
-
- if (pmic_arb->apid_count > pmic_arb->max_periphs) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported APID count %d detected\n",
- pmic_arb->apid_count);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- }
-
- pmic_arb->apid_data = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
- sizeof(*pmic_arb->apid_data),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pmic_arb->apid_data)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ else
+ pmic_arb->max_periphs = PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS;
- dev_info(&ctrl->dev, "PMIC arbiter version %s (0x%x)\n",
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PMIC arbiter version %s (0x%x)\n",
pmic_arb->ver_ops->ver_str, hw_ver);
- res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "intr");
- pmic_arb->intr = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, res);
- if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->intr))
- return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->intr);
-
- res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "cnfg");
- pmic_arb->cnfg = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, res);
- if (IS_ERR(pmic_arb->cnfg))
- return PTR_ERR(pmic_arb->cnfg);
-
- pmic_arb->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "periph_irq");
- if (pmic_arb->irq < 0)
- return pmic_arb->irq;
-
err = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,channel", &channel);
if (err) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "channel unspecified.\n");
@@ -1599,16 +1800,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
pmic_arb->ee = ee;
- mapping_table = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
- sizeof(*mapping_table), GFP_KERNEL);
+ mapping_table = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, pmic_arb->max_periphs,
+ sizeof(*mapping_table), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mapping_table)
return -ENOMEM;
pmic_arb->mapping_table = mapping_table;
- /* Initialize max_apid/min_apid to the opposite bounds, during
- * the irq domain translation, we are sure to update these */
- pmic_arb->max_apid = 0;
- pmic_arb->min_apid = pmic_arb->max_periphs - 1;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl);
raw_spin_lock_init(&pmic_arb->lock);
@@ -1617,34 +1814,14 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ctrl->read_cmd = pmic_arb_read_cmd;
ctrl->write_cmd = pmic_arb_write_cmd;
- if (hw_ver >= PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V5_MIN) {
- err = pmic_arb_read_apid_map_v5(pmic_arb);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not read APID->PPID mapping table, rc= %d\n",
- err);
- return err;
- }
- }
-
- dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain\n");
- pmic_arb->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
- &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, pmic_arb);
- if (!pmic_arb->domain) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
+ err = spmi_pmic_arb_register_masters(pmic_arb, pdev);
+ if (err)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->irq, pmic_arb_chained_irq,
- pmic_arb);
err = spmi_controller_add(ctrl);
if (err)
- goto err_domain_remove;
-
- return 0;
+ spmi_pmic_arb_deregister_masters(pmic_arb);
-err_domain_remove:
- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->irq, NULL, NULL);
- irq_domain_remove(pmic_arb->domain);
return err;
}
@@ -1652,9 +1829,9 @@ static void spmi_pmic_arb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct spmi_controller *ctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+
spmi_controller_remove(ctrl);
- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pmic_arb->irq, NULL, NULL);
- irq_domain_remove(pmic_arb->domain);
+ spmi_pmic_arb_deregister_masters(pmic_arb);
}
static const struct of_device_id spmi_pmic_arb_match_table[] = {
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
@ 2024-02-06 23:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-06 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-06 23:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-06 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-06 23:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2024-02-07 7:19 ` Abel Vesa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-07 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
>
> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
HW-wise.
If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
multiple masters.
I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 7:19 ` Abel Vesa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-07 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
>
> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
HW-wise.
If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
multiple masters.
I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-07 7:19 ` Abel Vesa
@ 2024-02-07 7:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> >
> > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>
> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> HW-wise.
>
> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> multiple masters.
struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>
> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
>
> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
Buses, not just masters.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 7:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> >
> > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>
> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> HW-wise.
>
> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> multiple masters.
struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>
> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
>
> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
Buses, not just masters.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-07 7:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2024-02-07 9:08 ` Abel Vesa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-07 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> > >
> > > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> >
> > It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> > HW-wise.
> >
> > If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> > be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> > multiple masters.
>
> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
>
> >
> > I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> >
> > Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>
> Buses, not just masters.
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best wishes
> > > Dmitry
>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 9:08 ` Abel Vesa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2024-02-07 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> > >
> > > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> >
> > It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> > HW-wise.
> >
> > If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> > be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> > multiple masters.
>
> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
>
> >
> > I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> >
> > Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>
> Buses, not just masters.
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best wishes
> > > Dmitry
>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-07 9:08 ` Abel Vesa
@ 2024-02-07 9:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > > > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > > > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > > > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > > > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> > >
> > > It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> > > HW-wise.
> > >
> > > If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> > > be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> > > multiple masters.
> >
> > struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> > device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> > struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> > SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>
> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
SPMI controller doesn't support multiple buses. You have a device
which has two SPMI controllers inside. Just like all multi-bus
controllers.
>
> >
> > >
> > > I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> > >
> > > Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
> >
> > Buses, not just masters.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > With best wishes
> > > > Dmitry
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 9:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > > > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > > > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > > > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > > > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> > >
> > > It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> > > HW-wise.
> > >
> > > If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> > > be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> > > multiple masters.
> >
> > struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> > device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> > struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> > SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>
> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
SPMI controller doesn't support multiple buses. You have a device
which has two SPMI controllers inside. Just like all multi-bus
controllers.
>
> >
> > >
> > > I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> > >
> > > Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
> >
> > Buses, not just masters.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > With best wishes
> > > > Dmitry
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-07 9:08 ` Abel Vesa
@ 2024-02-07 11:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > > > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > > > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > > > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > > > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> > >
> > > It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> > > HW-wise.
> > >
> > > If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> > > be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> > > multiple masters.
> >
> > struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> > device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> > struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> > SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>
> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
So, after the off-line discussion:
- add new compatible string for sm8450+
- register two spmi controller instances
- drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
- optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
>
> >
> > >
> > > I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> > >
> > > Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
> >
> > Buses, not just masters.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > With best wishes
> > > > Dmitry
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 11:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> > > > > Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> > > > > framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> > > > > controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> > > > > check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> > > > > and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> > > > > approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> > > > bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> > > > the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> > > > multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> > > > a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> > >
> > > It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> > > HW-wise.
> > >
> > > If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> > > be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> > > multiple masters.
> >
> > struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> > device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> > struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> > SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>
> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
So, after the off-line discussion:
- add new compatible string for sm8450+
- register two spmi controller instances
- drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
- optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
>
> >
> > >
> > > I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> > >
> > > Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
> >
> > Buses, not just masters.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> > > > > drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > > include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> > > > > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > With best wishes
> > > > Dmitry
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-07 11:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2024-02-07 12:46 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2024-02-07 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov, Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
Il 07/02/24 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
>>>>>> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
>>>>>> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
>>>>>> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
>>>>>> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
>>>>>> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
>>>>>> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
>>>>> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
>>>>> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
>>>>> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
>>>>> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>>>>
>>>> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
>>>> HW-wise.
>>>>
>>>> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
>>>> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
>>>> multiple masters.
>>>
>>> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
>>> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
>>> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
>>> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>>
>> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
>> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
>> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
>
> So, after the off-line discussion:
> - add new compatible string for sm8450+
> - register two spmi controller instances
Well, I don't know about the actual hardware that you're trying to implement
but, in my opinion, the "idea" of this series does actually make sense.
The SPMI specification says that SPMI supports up to 4 masters, and up to
16 slaves.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Angelo
> - drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
> - optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>>>
>>> Buses, not just masters.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>>>> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
>>>>>> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>> Dmitry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best wishes
>>> Dmitry
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 12:46 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2024-02-07 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov, Abel Vesa
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek
Il 07/02/24 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
>>>>>> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
>>>>>> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
>>>>>> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
>>>>>> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
>>>>>> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
>>>>>> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
>>>>> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
>>>>> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
>>>>> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
>>>>> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>>>>
>>>> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
>>>> HW-wise.
>>>>
>>>> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
>>>> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
>>>> multiple masters.
>>>
>>> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
>>> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
>>> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
>>> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>>
>> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
>> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
>> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
>
> So, after the off-line discussion:
> - add new compatible string for sm8450+
> - register two spmi controller instances
Well, I don't know about the actual hardware that you're trying to implement
but, in my opinion, the "idea" of this series does actually make sense.
The SPMI specification says that SPMI supports up to 4 masters, and up to
16 slaves.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Angelo
> - drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
> - optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>>>
>>> Buses, not just masters.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>>>> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
>>>>>> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>> Dmitry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best wishes
>>> Dmitry
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-07 12:46 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
@ 2024-02-07 14:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: Abel Vesa, Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson,
Konrad Dybcio, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 07/02/24 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> >>>>>> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> >>>>>> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> >>>>>> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> >>>>>> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> >>>>>> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> >>>>>> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> >>>>> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> >>>>> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> >>>>> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> >>>>> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> >>>> HW-wise.
> >>>>
> >>>> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> >>>> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> >>>> multiple masters.
> >>>
> >>> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> >>> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> >>> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> >>> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
> >>
> >> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
> >> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
> >> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
> >
> > So, after the off-line discussion:
> > - add new compatible string for sm8450+
> > - register two spmi controller instances
>
> Well, I don't know about the actual hardware that you're trying to implement
> but, in my opinion, the "idea" of this series does actually make sense.
>
> The SPMI specification says that SPMI supports up to 4 masters, and up to
> 16 slaves.
So, that is my main question: whether this supports multiple masters
on a same bus or multiple buses. From the SoC pins description I
assume the latter is the case.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Cheers,
> Angelo
>
> > - drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
> > - optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> >>>>
> >>>> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
> >>>
> >>> Buses, not just masters.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> >>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> >>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >>>>>> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> >>>>>> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> With best wishes
> >>>>> Dmitry
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> With best wishes
> >>> Dmitry
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 14:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2024-02-07 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: Abel Vesa, Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson,
Konrad Dybcio, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
linux-mediatek
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 07/02/24 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
> >>>>>> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
> >>>>>> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
> >>>>>> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
> >>>>>> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
> >>>>>> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
> >>>>>> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
> >>>>> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
> >>>>> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
> >>>>> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
> >>>>> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
> >>>> HW-wise.
> >>>>
> >>>> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
> >>>> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
> >>>> multiple masters.
> >>>
> >>> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
> >>> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
> >>> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
> >>> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
> >>
> >> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
> >> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
> >> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
> >
> > So, after the off-line discussion:
> > - add new compatible string for sm8450+
> > - register two spmi controller instances
>
> Well, I don't know about the actual hardware that you're trying to implement
> but, in my opinion, the "idea" of this series does actually make sense.
>
> The SPMI specification says that SPMI supports up to 4 masters, and up to
> 16 slaves.
So, that is my main question: whether this supports multiple masters
on a same bus or multiple buses. From the SoC pins description I
assume the latter is the case.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Cheers,
> Angelo
>
> > - drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
> > - optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
> >>>>
> >>>> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
> >>>
> >>> Buses, not just masters.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
> >>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
> >>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >>>>>> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
> >>>>>> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> With best wishes
> >>>>> Dmitry
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> With best wishes
> >>> Dmitry
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
2024-02-07 14:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2024-02-07 14:57 ` neil.armstrong
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: neil.armstrong @ 2024-02-07 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: Abel Vesa, Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson,
Konrad Dybcio, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
linux-mediatek
On 07/02/2024 15:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Il 07/02/24 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
>>>>>>>> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
>>>>>>>> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
>>>>>>>> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
>>>>>>>> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
>>>>>>>> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
>>>>>>>> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
>>>>>>> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
>>>>>>> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
>>>>>>> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
>>>>>>> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
>>>>>> HW-wise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
>>>>>> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
>>>>>> multiple masters.
>>>>>
>>>>> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
>>>>> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
>>>>> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
>>>>> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>>>>
>>>> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
>>>> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
>>>> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
>>>
>>> So, after the off-line discussion:
>>> - add new compatible string for sm8450+
>>> - register two spmi controller instances
>>
>> Well, I don't know about the actual hardware that you're trying to implement
>> but, in my opinion, the "idea" of this series does actually make sense.
>>
>> The SPMI specification says that SPMI supports up to 4 masters, and up to
>> 16 slaves.
>
> So, that is my main question: whether this supports multiple masters
> on a same bus or multiple buses. From the SoC pins description I
> assume the latter is the case.
This is clearly 2 separate physically separate busses, not 2 masters on the same bus.
We registers separate controllers for i2c, spi, 1w, ... in this case, why not here ?
Neil
>
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Angelo
>>
>>> - drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
>>> - optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Buses, not just masters.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
>>>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
>>>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>>>>>> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>> Dmitry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master
@ 2024-02-07 14:57 ` neil.armstrong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: neil.armstrong @ 2024-02-07 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Cc: Abel Vesa, Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger, Bjorn Andersson,
Konrad Dybcio, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm,
linux-mediatek
On 07/02/2024 15:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Il 07/02/24 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov ha scritto:
>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 11:08, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 24-02-07 09:23:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24-02-07 01:55:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 01:34, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some newer SPMI controllers support multiple bus masters.
>>>>>>>> Such a master can control multiple slave devices. The generic
>>>>>>>> framework needs to be able to pass on the master id to the
>>>>>>>> controller-specific driver. So do that. The framework will
>>>>>>>> check if the devicetree child nodes are actually bus masters
>>>>>>>> and will register the devices for each master. The legacy
>>>>>>>> approach will still be supported for backwards compatibility.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please remind me, are those two actual bus musters driving a single
>>>>>>> bus in parallel or two SPMI buses being handled by a single device? In
>>>>>>> the latter case this implementation is incorrect. There should be
>>>>>>> multiple spmi_controller instances, one for each bus. Allocate them in
>>>>>>> a loop and set ctrl->dev.of_node after allocating.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's two SPMI buses (two sets of wires) handled by the same controller,
>>>>>> HW-wise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we register two spmi controllers with the kernel framework, it will
>>>>>> be HW inaccurate, because there is just one controller which has
>>>>>> multiple masters.
>>>>>
>>>>> struct spmi_controller is a controller for a single bus. Inside your
>>>>> device you have two SPMI buses, each can be controlled by its own
>>>>> struct spmi_controller. Just like devices that control multiple I2C,
>>>>> SPI or USB busses register a separate instance of the bus controller.
>>>>
>>>> Well, this is what this patchset is trying to do in the generic part.
>>>> The SPMI controller supports multiple buses (HW-wise) and therefore SW
>>>> implementation shouldn't be tied to single bus requirement.
>>>
>>> So, after the off-line discussion:
>>> - add new compatible string for sm8450+
>>> - register two spmi controller instances
>>
>> Well, I don't know about the actual hardware that you're trying to implement
>> but, in my opinion, the "idea" of this series does actually make sense.
>>
>> The SPMI specification says that SPMI supports up to 4 masters, and up to
>> 16 slaves.
>
> So, that is my main question: whether this supports multiple masters
> on a same bus or multiple buses. From the SoC pins description I
> assume the latter is the case.
This is clearly 2 separate physically separate busses, not 2 masters on the same bus.
We registers separate controllers for i2c, spi, 1w, ... in this case, why not here ?
Neil
>
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Angelo
>>
>>> - drop the master-id from the SPMI interface
>>> - optionally: think about having a new separate driver for v7 SPMI.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not saying it might not work. But, to me, it looks more like a hack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically, we would be mapping HW bus masters to kernel controllers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Buses, not just masters.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 6 ++--
>>>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 10 +++---
>>>>>>>> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>>>>>> include/linux/spmi.h | 10 +++---
>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>> Dmitry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-07 14:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-06 23:33 [PATCH RFC 0/2] spmi: Add multi master support Abel Vesa
2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
2024-02-06 23:33 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] spmi: Add support for multi-master Abel Vesa
2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
2024-02-06 23:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-06 23:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 7:19 ` Abel Vesa
2024-02-07 7:19 ` Abel Vesa
2024-02-07 7:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 7:23 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 9:08 ` Abel Vesa
2024-02-07 9:08 ` Abel Vesa
2024-02-07 9:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 9:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 11:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 11:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 12:46 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-07 12:46 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-07 14:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 14:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-07 14:57 ` neil.armstrong
2024-02-07 14:57 ` neil.armstrong
2024-02-06 23:33 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] spmi: pmic-arb: " Abel Vesa
2024-02-06 23:33 ` Abel Vesa
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.