All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:03:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327110318.2776850-9-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327110318.2776850-1-hch@lst.de>

The code to account fdblocks and frextents in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay
is a bit weird in that it accounts frextents before the iext tree
manipulations and fdblocks after it.  Given that the iext tree
manipulations cannot fail currently that's not really a problem, but
still odd.  Move the frextent manipulation to the end, and use a
fdblocks variable to account of the unconditional indirect blocks and
the data blocks only freed for !RT.  This prepares for following
updates in the area and already makes the code more readable.

Also remove the !isrt assert given that this code clearly handles
rt extents correctly, and we'll soon reinstate delalloc support for
RT inodes.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 572c91c986b6af..a9a23a5d2e487f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -4917,6 +4917,7 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
 	xfs_fileoff_t		del_endoff, got_endoff;
 	xfs_filblks_t		got_indlen, new_indlen, stolen;
 	uint32_t		state = xfs_bmap_fork_to_state(whichfork);
+	uint64_t		fdblocks;
 	int			error = 0;
 	bool			isrt;
 
@@ -4932,15 +4933,11 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
 	ASSERT(got->br_startoff <= del->br_startoff);
 	ASSERT(got_endoff >= del_endoff);
 
-	if (isrt)
-		xfs_add_frextents(mp, xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, del->br_blockcount));
-
 	/*
 	 * Update the inode delalloc counter now and wait to update the
 	 * sb counters as we might have to borrow some blocks for the
 	 * indirect block accounting.
 	 */
-	ASSERT(!isrt);
 	error = xfs_quota_unreserve_blkres(ip, del->br_blockcount);
 	if (error)
 		return error;
@@ -5017,12 +5014,15 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
 
 	ASSERT(da_old >= da_new);
 	da_diff = da_old - da_new;
-	if (!isrt)
-		da_diff += del->br_blockcount;
-	if (da_diff) {
-		xfs_add_fdblocks(mp, da_diff);
-		xfs_mod_delalloc(mp, -da_diff);
-	}
+	fdblocks = da_diff;
+
+	if (isrt)
+		xfs_add_frextents(mp, xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, del->br_blockcount));
+	else
+		fdblocks += del->br_blockcount;
+
+	xfs_add_fdblocks(mp, fdblocks);
+	xfs_mod_delalloc(mp, -(int64_t)fdblocks);
 	return error;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  3:08   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  3:15   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 14:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:13   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-29  4:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-30 21:55       ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 18:06       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 18:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:15   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:16   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:18   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:20   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-03-28  4:22   ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:27   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  4:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:42       ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  8:25         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 21:25           ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:32   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  4:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:35   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:36   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:39   ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240327110318.2776850-9-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.