All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:42:19 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgT1K2OH/ojXqcu2@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328043411.GA13860@lst.de>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:34:11AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:27:36PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >  	percpu_counter_set(&mp->m_fdblocks, fsc->fdblocks);
> > > -	percpu_counter_set(&mp->m_frextents, fsc->frextents);
> > > +	percpu_counter_set(&mp->m_frextents,
> > > +		fsc->frextents - fsc->frextents_delayed);
> > >  	mp->m_sb.sb_frextents = fsc->frextents;
> > 
> > Why do we set mp->m_frextents differently to mp->m_fdblocks?
> > Surely if we have to care about delalloc blocks here, we have to
> > process both data device and rt device delalloc block accounting the
> > same way, right?
> 
> Unfortunately there are different.  For data device blocks we use the
> lazy sb counters and thus never updated the sb version for any file
> system new enough to support scrub.  For RT extents lazy sb counters
> only appear half way down Darrick's giant stack and aren't even
> upstream yet.

Can you add a comment to either the code or commit message to that
effect? Otherwise I'm going to forget about that and not be able to
discover it from looking at the code and/or commit messages...

With such a comment, you can also add

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-28  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  3:08   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  3:15   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 14:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:13   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-29  4:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-30 21:55       ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 18:06       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 18:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:15   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:16   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:18   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:20   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:22   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:27   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  4:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:42       ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-03-28  8:25         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 21:25           ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:32   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  4:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:35   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:36   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:39   ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZgT1K2OH/ojXqcu2@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.