All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
@ 2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:

        timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
        if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
be found here (slightly WIP):

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left

Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
to have it proper.

Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
(except two). No functional changes intended.

Wolfram Sang (15):
  i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: hix5hd2: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: omap: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  i2c: pxa: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()

-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
@ 2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:

        timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
        if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
be found here (slightly WIP):

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left

Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
to have it proper.

Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
(except two). No functional changes intended.

Wolfram Sang (15):
  i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: hix5hd2: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: omap: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  i2c: pxa: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()

-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
@ 2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:

        timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
        if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
be found here (slightly WIP):

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left

Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
to have it proper.

Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
(except two). No functional changes intended.

Wolfram Sang (15):
  i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: hix5hd2: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: omap: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with
    wait_for_completion_timeout()
  i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  i2c: pxa: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()

-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 01/15] i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Elie Morisse, Shyam Sundar S K, Andi Shyti, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd-mp2-plat.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd-mp2-plat.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd-mp2-plat.c
index 112fe2bc5662..d3ac1c77a509 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd-mp2-plat.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd-mp2-plat.c
@@ -97,17 +97,17 @@ static void i2c_amd_cmd_completion(struct amd_i2c_common *i2c_common)
 static int i2c_amd_check_cmd_completion(struct amd_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
 {
 	struct amd_i2c_common *i2c_common = &i2c_dev->common;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->cmd_complete,
-					      i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->cmd_complete,
+						i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
 
 	if ((i2c_common->reqcmd == i2c_read ||
 	     i2c_common->reqcmd == i2c_write) &&
 	    i2c_common->msg->len > 32)
 		i2c_amd_dma_unmap(i2c_common);
 
-	if (timeout == 0) {
+	if (time_left == 0) {
 		amd_mp2_rw_timeout(i2c_common);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 02/15] i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Andi Shyti, Baruch Siach, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
index 3462f2bc0fa8..737604ae11fc 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dc_i2c_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
 			   int last)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
+	unsigned long time_left = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
@@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
 	dc_i2c_start_msg(i2c, first);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, time_left);
 	dc_i2c_set_irq(i2c, 0);
-	if (timeout == 0) {
+	if (time_left == 0) {
 		i2c->state = STATE_IDLE;
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 02/15] i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Andi Shyti, Baruch Siach, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
index 3462f2bc0fa8..737604ae11fc 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dc_i2c_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
 			   int last)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
+	unsigned long time_left = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
@@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
 	dc_i2c_start_msg(i2c, first);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, time_left);
 	dc_i2c_set_irq(i2c, 0);
-	if (timeout == 0) {
+	if (time_left == 0) {
 		i2c->state = STATE_IDLE;
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 03/15] i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Andi Shyti, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Alim Akhtar,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
index 385ef9d9e4d4..d8baca9b610c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static bool exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 static int exynos5_i2c_xfer_msg(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 			      struct i2c_msg *msgs, int stop)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	i2c->msg = msgs;
@@ -775,13 +775,13 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_xfer_msg(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 	exynos5_i2c_message_start(i2c, stop);
 
 	if (!i2c->atomic)
-		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete,
-						      EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
-	else
-		timeout = exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(i2c,
+		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete,
 							EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
+	else
+		time_left = exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(i2c,
+							  EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
 
-	if (timeout == 0)
+	if (time_left == 0)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 	else
 		ret = i2c->state;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 03/15] i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Andi Shyti, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Alim Akhtar,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
index 385ef9d9e4d4..d8baca9b610c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static bool exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 static int exynos5_i2c_xfer_msg(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 			      struct i2c_msg *msgs, int stop)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	i2c->msg = msgs;
@@ -775,13 +775,13 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_xfer_msg(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 	exynos5_i2c_message_start(i2c, stop);
 
 	if (!i2c->atomic)
-		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete,
-						      EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
-	else
-		timeout = exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(i2c,
+		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete,
 							EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
+	else
+		time_left = exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(i2c,
+							  EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
 
-	if (timeout == 0)
+	if (time_left == 0)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 	else
 		ret = i2c->state;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 04/15] i2c: hix5hd2: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Andi Shyti, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c
index 8e75515c3ca4..a47b9939fa2c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static void hix5hd2_i2c_message_start(struct hix5hd2_i2c_priv *priv, int stop)
 static int hix5hd2_i2c_xfer_msg(struct hix5hd2_i2c_priv *priv,
 				struct i2c_msg *msgs, int stop)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	priv->msg = msgs;
@@ -327,9 +327,9 @@ static int hix5hd2_i2c_xfer_msg(struct hix5hd2_i2c_priv *priv,
 	reinit_completion(&priv->msg_complete);
 	hix5hd2_i2c_message_start(priv, stop);
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->msg_complete,
-					      priv->adap.timeout);
-	if (timeout == 0) {
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->msg_complete,
+						priv->adap.timeout);
+	if (time_left == 0) {
 		priv->state = HIX5I2C_STAT_RW_ERR;
 		priv->err = -ETIMEDOUT;
 		dev_warn(priv->dev, "%s timeout=%d\n",
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Dong Aisheng, Andi Shyti, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, imx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
index 36e8f6196a87..0197786892a2 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
@@ -307,11 +307,11 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_master_disable(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
 
 static int lpi2c_imx_msg_complete(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
 
-	return timeout ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
+	return time_left ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
 }
 
 static int lpi2c_imx_txfifo_empty(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Dong Aisheng, Andi Shyti, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, imx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
index 36e8f6196a87..0197786892a2 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
@@ -307,11 +307,11 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_master_disable(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
 
 static int lpi2c_imx_msg_complete(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
 
-	return timeout ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
+	return time_left ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
 }
 
 static int lpi2c_imx_txfifo_empty(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 06/15] i2c: omap: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Aaro Koskinen, Janusz Krzysztofik, Tony Lindgren,
	Vignesh R, Andi Shyti, linux-omap, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index 36bebef36740..30a5ea282a8b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static int omap_i2c_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 			     struct i2c_msg *msg, int stop, bool polling)
 {
 	struct omap_i2c_dev *omap = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	u16 w;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -740,18 +740,18 @@ static int omap_i2c_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 	 * into arbitration and we're currently unable to recover from it.
 	 */
 	if (!polling) {
-		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&omap->cmd_complete,
-						      OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
+		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&omap->cmd_complete,
+							OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
 	} else {
 		do {
 			omap_i2c_wait(omap);
 			ret = omap_i2c_xfer_data(omap);
 		} while (ret == -EAGAIN);
 
-		timeout = !ret;
+		time_left = !ret;
 	}
 
-	if (timeout == 0) {
+	if (time_left == 0) {
 		omap_i2c_reset(omap);
 		__omap_i2c_init(omap);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 07/15] i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Patrice Chotard, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c
index dbb93394ff94..5e01fe3dbb63 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int st_i2c_xfer_msg(struct st_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, struct i2c_msg *msg,
 {
 	struct st_i2c_client *c = &i2c_dev->client;
 	u32 ctl, i2c, it;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	c->addr		= i2c_8bit_addr_from_msg(msg);
@@ -685,11 +685,11 @@ static int st_i2c_xfer_msg(struct st_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, struct i2c_msg *msg,
 		st_i2c_set_bits(i2c_dev->base + SSC_I2C, SSC_I2C_STRTG);
 	}
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
-			i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
+						i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
 	ret = c->result;
 
-	if (!timeout)
+	if (!time_left)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 
 	i2c = SSC_I2C_STOPG | SSC_I2C_REPSTRTG;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 07/15] i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Patrice Chotard, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c
index dbb93394ff94..5e01fe3dbb63 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-st.c
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int st_i2c_xfer_msg(struct st_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, struct i2c_msg *msg,
 {
 	struct st_i2c_client *c = &i2c_dev->client;
 	u32 ctl, i2c, it;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	c->addr		= i2c_8bit_addr_from_msg(msg);
@@ -685,11 +685,11 @@ static int st_i2c_xfer_msg(struct st_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, struct i2c_msg *msg,
 		st_i2c_set_bits(i2c_dev->base + SSC_I2C, SSC_I2C_STRTG);
 	}
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
-			i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
+						i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
 	ret = c->result;
 
-	if (!timeout)
+	if (!time_left)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 
 	i2c = SSC_I2C_STOPG | SSC_I2C_REPSTRTG;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 08/15] i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Pierre-Yves MORDRET, Alain Volmat, Andi Shyti,
	Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
index 859ac0cf7f6c..f8b12be6ef55 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static int stm32f4_i2c_xfer_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
 {
 	struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *f4_msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
 	void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	u32 mask;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -706,11 +706,11 @@ static int stm32f4_i2c_xfer_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
 		stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
 	}
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
-					      i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
+						i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
 	ret = f4_msg->result;
 
-	if (!timeout)
+	if (!time_left)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 08/15] i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Pierre-Yves MORDRET, Alain Volmat, Andi Shyti,
	Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
index 859ac0cf7f6c..f8b12be6ef55 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static int stm32f4_i2c_xfer_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
 {
 	struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *f4_msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
 	void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	u32 mask;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -706,11 +706,11 @@ static int stm32f4_i2c_xfer_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
 		stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
 	}
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
-					      i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
+						i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
 	ret = f4_msg->result;
 
-	if (!timeout)
+	if (!time_left)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 09/15] i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Pierre-Yves MORDRET, Alain Volmat, Andi Shyti,
	Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
index 01210452216b..cfee2d9c09de 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
@@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 	struct stm32f7_i2c_msg *f7_msg = &i2c_dev->f7_msg;
 	struct stm32_i2c_dma *dma = i2c_dev->dma;
 	struct device *dev = i2c_dev->dev;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int i, ret;
 
 	f7_msg->addr = addr;
@@ -1809,8 +1809,8 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 	if (ret)
 		goto pm_free;
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
-					      i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
+						i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
 	ret = f7_msg->result;
 	if (ret) {
 		if (i2c_dev->use_dma)
@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 		goto pm_free;
 	}
 
-	if (!timeout) {
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "Access to slave 0x%x timed out\n", f7_msg->addr);
 		if (i2c_dev->use_dma)
 			dmaengine_terminate_sync(dma->chan_using);
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 09/15] i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Pierre-Yves MORDRET, Alain Volmat, Andi Shyti,
	Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
index 01210452216b..cfee2d9c09de 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
@@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 	struct stm32f7_i2c_msg *f7_msg = &i2c_dev->f7_msg;
 	struct stm32_i2c_dma *dma = i2c_dev->dma;
 	struct device *dev = i2c_dev->dev;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int i, ret;
 
 	f7_msg->addr = addr;
@@ -1809,8 +1809,8 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 	if (ret)
 		goto pm_free;
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
-					      i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
+						i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
 	ret = f7_msg->result;
 	if (ret) {
 		if (i2c_dev->use_dma)
@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
 		goto pm_free;
 	}
 
-	if (!timeout) {
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "Access to slave 0x%x timed out\n", f7_msg->addr);
 		if (i2c_dev->use_dma)
 			dmaengine_terminate_sync(dma->chan_using);
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 10/15] i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:36 ` Wolfram Sang
  2024-04-29  6:56   ` Ard Biesheuvel
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Ard Biesheuvel, Andi Shyti, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c
index bbea521b05dd..bf9bcfefa30e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int synquacer_i2c_doxfer(struct synquacer_i2c *i2c,
 				struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
 {
 	unsigned char bsr;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	synquacer_i2c_hw_init(i2c);
@@ -335,9 +335,9 @@ static int synquacer_i2c_doxfer(struct synquacer_i2c *i2c,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->completion,
-					msecs_to_jiffies(i2c->timeout_ms));
-	if (timeout == 0) {
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->completion,
+						msecs_to_jiffies(i2c->timeout_ms));
+	if (time_left == 0) {
 		dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "timeout\n");
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 11/15] i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:36 ` Wolfram Sang
  2024-04-30 12:43   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2024-04-30 12:49   ` Paul Cercueil
  -1 siblings, 2 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Paul Cercueil, Andi Shyti, linux-mips, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c
index 55035cca0ae5..7951891d6b97 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_read(struct jz4780_i2c *i2c,
 				       int idx)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int wait_time = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * (len + 5);
 	unsigned short tmp;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -600,10 +600,10 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_read(struct jz4780_i2c *i2c,
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
-					      msecs_to_jiffies(wait_time));
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
+						msecs_to_jiffies(wait_time));
 
-	if (!timeout) {
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_err(&i2c->adap.dev, "irq read timeout\n");
 		dev_dbg(&i2c->adap.dev, "send cmd count:%d  %d\n",
 			i2c->cmd, i2c->cmd_buf[i2c->cmd]);
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_write(struct jz4780_i2c *i2c,
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	int wait_time = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * (len + 5);
-	long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	unsigned short tmp;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -655,14 +655,14 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_write(struct jz4780_i2c *i2c,
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
-					      msecs_to_jiffies(wait_time));
-	if (timeout && !i2c->stop_hold) {
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
+						msecs_to_jiffies(wait_time));
+	if (time_left && !i2c->stop_hold) {
 		unsigned short i2c_sta;
 		int write_in_process;
 
-		timeout = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * 100;
-		for (; timeout > 0; timeout--) {
+		time_left = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * 100;
+		for (; time_left > 0; time_left--) {
 			i2c_sta = jz4780_i2c_readw(i2c, JZ4780_I2C_STA);
 
 			write_in_process = (i2c_sta & JZ4780_I2C_STA_MSTACT) ||
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_write(struct jz4780_i2c *i2c,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!timeout) {
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_err(&i2c->adap.dev, "write wait timeout\n");
 		ret = -EIO;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 12/15] i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:36 ` Wolfram Sang
  2024-04-29 10:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
  2024-04-30  2:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
  -1 siblings, 2 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Andi Shyti,
	linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
index 090b4846ed62..0a8b95ce35f7 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
@@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i
 {
 	struct dma_slave_config config = {};
 	struct gpi_i2c_config peripheral = {};
-	int i, ret = 0, timeout;
+	int i, ret = 0;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	dma_addr_t tx_addr, rx_addr;
 	void *tx_buf = NULL, *rx_buf = NULL;
 	const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld *itr = gi2c->clk_fld;
@@ -629,8 +630,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i
 
 		dma_async_issue_pending(gi2c->tx_c);
 
-		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT);
-		if (!timeout)
+		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT);
+		if (!time_left)
 			gi2c->err = -ETIMEDOUT;
 
 		if (gi2c->err) {
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 13/15] i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Heiko Stuebner, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-rockchip, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
index 8c7367f289d3..beca61700c89 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
@@ -1060,7 +1060,8 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 				struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num, bool polling)
 {
 	struct rk3x_i2c *i2c = (struct rk3x_i2c *)adap->algo_data;
-	unsigned long timeout, flags;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	long time_left;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int i;
@@ -1092,20 +1093,20 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 		if (!polling) {
 			rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
 
-			timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, !i2c->busy,
-						     msecs_to_jiffies(WAIT_TIMEOUT));
+			time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, !i2c->busy,
+						       msecs_to_jiffies(WAIT_TIMEOUT));
 		} else {
 			disable_irq(i2c->irq);
 			rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
 
-			timeout = rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll(i2c);
+			time_left = rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll(i2c);
 
 			enable_irq(i2c->irq);
 		}
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
 
-		if (timeout == 0) {
+		if (time_left == 0) {
 			/* Force a STOP condition without interrupt */
 			i2c_writel(i2c, 0, REG_IEN);
 			val = i2c_readl(i2c, REG_CON) & REG_CON_TUNING_MASK;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 13/15] i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Heiko Stuebner, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-rockchip, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
index 8c7367f289d3..beca61700c89 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
@@ -1060,7 +1060,8 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 				struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num, bool polling)
 {
 	struct rk3x_i2c *i2c = (struct rk3x_i2c *)adap->algo_data;
-	unsigned long timeout, flags;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	long time_left;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int i;
@@ -1092,20 +1093,20 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 		if (!polling) {
 			rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
 
-			timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, !i2c->busy,
-						     msecs_to_jiffies(WAIT_TIMEOUT));
+			time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, !i2c->busy,
+						       msecs_to_jiffies(WAIT_TIMEOUT));
 		} else {
 			disable_irq(i2c->irq);
 			rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
 
-			timeout = rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll(i2c);
+			time_left = rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll(i2c);
 
 			enable_irq(i2c->irq);
 		}
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
 
-		if (timeout == 0) {
+		if (time_left == 0) {
 			/* Force a STOP condition without interrupt */
 			i2c_writel(i2c, 0, REG_IEN);
 			val = i2c_readl(i2c, REG_CON) & REG_CON_TUNING_MASK;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 13/15] i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Heiko Stuebner, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-rockchip, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
index 8c7367f289d3..beca61700c89 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
@@ -1060,7 +1060,8 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 				struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num, bool polling)
 {
 	struct rk3x_i2c *i2c = (struct rk3x_i2c *)adap->algo_data;
-	unsigned long timeout, flags;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	long time_left;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int i;
@@ -1092,20 +1093,20 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 		if (!polling) {
 			rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
 
-			timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, !i2c->busy,
-						     msecs_to_jiffies(WAIT_TIMEOUT));
+			time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, !i2c->busy,
+						       msecs_to_jiffies(WAIT_TIMEOUT));
 		} else {
 			disable_irq(i2c->irq);
 			rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
 
-			timeout = rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll(i2c);
+			time_left = rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll(i2c);
 
 			enable_irq(i2c->irq);
 		}
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
 
-		if (timeout == 0) {
+		if (time_left == 0) {
 			/* Force a STOP condition without interrupt */
 			i2c_writel(i2c, 0, REG_IEN);
 			val = i2c_readl(i2c, REG_CON) & REG_CON_TUNING_MASK;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 14/15] i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Alim Akhtar, Andi Shyti,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
index 275f7c42165c..01419c738cfc 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ static void s3c24xx_i2c_wait_idle(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c)
 static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
 			      struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout = 0;
+	long time_left = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = s3c24xx_i2c_set_master(i2c);
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
 				dev_err(i2c->dev, "deal with arbitration loss\n");
 		}
 	} else {
-		timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, i2c->msg_num == 0, HZ * 5);
+		time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, i2c->msg_num == 0, HZ * 5);
 	}
 
 	ret = i2c->msg_idx;
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
 	 * Having these next two as dev_err() makes life very
 	 * noisy when doing an i2cdetect
 	 */
-	if (timeout == 0)
+	if (time_left == 0)
 		dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "timeout\n");
 	else if (ret != num)
 		dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "incomplete xfer (%d)\n", ret);
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 14/15] i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
@ 2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c
  Cc: Wolfram Sang, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Alim Akhtar, Andi Shyti,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
index 275f7c42165c..01419c738cfc 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ static void s3c24xx_i2c_wait_idle(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c)
 static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
 			      struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout = 0;
+	long time_left = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = s3c24xx_i2c_set_master(i2c);
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
 				dev_err(i2c->dev, "deal with arbitration loss\n");
 		}
 	} else {
-		timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, i2c->msg_num == 0, HZ * 5);
+		time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, i2c->msg_num == 0, HZ * 5);
 	}
 
 	ret = i2c->msg_idx;
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_doxfer(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c,
 	 * Having these next two as dev_err() makes life very
 	 * noisy when doing an i2cdetect
 	 */
-	if (timeout == 0)
+	if (time_left == 0)
 		dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "timeout\n");
 	else if (ret != num)
 		dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "incomplete xfer (%d)\n", ret);
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 15/15] i2c: pxa: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2024-04-27 20:36 ` Wolfram Sang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-04-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-i2c; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Andi Shyti, linux-kernel

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
index 888ca636f3f3..f495560bd99c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static inline void i2c_pxa_stop_message(struct pxa_i2c *i2c)
 static int i2c_pxa_send_mastercode(struct pxa_i2c *i2c)
 {
 	u32 icr;
-	long timeout;
+	long time_left;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&i2c->lock);
 	i2c->highmode_enter = true;
@@ -837,12 +837,12 @@ static int i2c_pxa_send_mastercode(struct pxa_i2c *i2c)
 	writel(icr, _ICR(i2c));
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&i2c->lock);
-	timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait,
-			i2c->highmode_enter == false, HZ * 1);
+	time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait,
+				       i2c->highmode_enter == false, HZ * 1);
 
 	i2c->highmode_enter = false;
 
-	return (timeout == 0) ? I2C_RETRY : 0;
+	return (time_left == 0) ? I2C_RETRY : 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_pxa_handler(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
  */
 static int i2c_pxa_do_xfer(struct pxa_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int num)
 {
-	long timeout;
+	long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ static int i2c_pxa_do_xfer(struct pxa_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int num)
 	/*
 	 * The rest of the processing occurs in the interrupt handler.
 	 */
-	timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, i2c->msg_num == 0, HZ * 5);
+	time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, i2c->msg_num == 0, HZ * 5);
 	i2c_pxa_stop_message(i2c);
 
 	/*
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static int i2c_pxa_do_xfer(struct pxa_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int num)
 	 */
 	ret = i2c->msg_idx;
 
-	if (!timeout && i2c->msg_num) {
+	if (!time_left && i2c->msg_num) {
 		i2c_pxa_scream_blue_murder(i2c, "timeout with active message");
 		i2c_recover_bus(&i2c->adap);
 		ret = I2C_RETRY;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-28  1:45     ` Peng Fan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2024-04-28  1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c
  Cc: Aisheng Dong, Andi Shyti, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, imx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

> Subject: [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
> wait_for_completion_timeout()
> 
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-
> lpi2c.c
> index 36e8f6196a87..0197786892a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> @@ -307,11 +307,11 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_master_disable(struct
> lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> 
>  static int lpi2c_imx_msg_complete(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)  {
> -	unsigned long timeout;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
> 
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
> 
> -	return timeout ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	return time_left ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
>  }
> 
>  static int lpi2c_imx_txfifo_empty(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> --
> 2.43.0
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-28  1:45     ` Peng Fan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2024-04-28  1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c
  Cc: Aisheng Dong, Andi Shyti, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, imx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

> Subject: [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
> wait_for_completion_timeout()
> 
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-
> lpi2c.c
> index 36e8f6196a87..0197786892a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> @@ -307,11 +307,11 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_master_disable(struct
> lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> 
>  static int lpi2c_imx_msg_complete(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)  {
> -	unsigned long timeout;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
> 
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ);
> 
> -	return timeout ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	return time_left ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
>  }
> 
>  static int lpi2c_imx_txfifo_empty(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> --
> 2.43.0
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 02/15] i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-28  4:38     ` Baruch Siach
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2024-04-28  4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: linux-i2c, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27 2024, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
>
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Acked-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>

Thanks,
baruch

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
> index 3462f2bc0fa8..737604ae11fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dc_i2c_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
>  			   int last)
>  {
> -	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
> +	unsigned long time_left = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
> @@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
>  	dc_i2c_start_msg(i2c, first);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
>  
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, timeout);
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, time_left);
>  	dc_i2c_set_irq(i2c, 0);
> -	if (timeout == 0) {
> +	if (time_left == 0) {
>  		i2c->state = STATE_IDLE;
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	}


-- 
                                                     ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 02/15] i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-28  4:38     ` Baruch Siach
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2024-04-28  4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: linux-i2c, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27 2024, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
>
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Acked-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>

Thanks,
baruch

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
> index 3462f2bc0fa8..737604ae11fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-digicolor.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dc_i2c_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
>  			   int last)
>  {
> -	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
> +	unsigned long time_left = msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
> @@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static int dc_i2c_xfer_msg(struct dc_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, int first,
>  	dc_i2c_start_msg(i2c, first);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
>  
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, timeout);
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->done, time_left);
>  	dc_i2c_set_irq(i2c, 0);
> -	if (timeout == 0) {
> +	if (time_left == 0) {
>  		i2c->state = STATE_IDLE;
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	}


-- 
                                                     ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/15] i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-28 12:15     ` Uwe Kleine-König
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2024-04-28 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, Patrice Chotard, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 849 bytes --]

Hello Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:59PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

I like the improvement in general and looking at this driver in more
detail this looks right.

Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe
 
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/15] i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
@ 2024-04-28 12:15     ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2024-04-28 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, Patrice Chotard, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 849 bytes --]

Hello Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:59PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

I like the improvement in general and looking at this driver in more
detail this looks right.

Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Best regards
Uwe
 
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 10/15] i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 10/15] i2c: synquacer: " Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-29  6:56   ` Ard Biesheuvel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2024-04-29  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: linux-i2c, Andi Shyti, linux-kernel

On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 22:36, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
>
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
>
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c
> index bbea521b05dd..bf9bcfefa30e 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int synquacer_i2c_doxfer(struct synquacer_i2c *i2c,
>                                 struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
>  {
>         unsigned char bsr;
> -       unsigned long timeout;
> +       unsigned long time_left;
>         int ret;
>
>         synquacer_i2c_hw_init(i2c);
> @@ -335,9 +335,9 @@ static int synquacer_i2c_doxfer(struct synquacer_i2c *i2c,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> -       timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->completion,
> -                                       msecs_to_jiffies(i2c->timeout_ms));
> -       if (timeout == 0) {
> +       time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->completion,
> +                                               msecs_to_jiffies(i2c->timeout_ms));
> +       if (time_left == 0) {
>                 dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "timeout\n");
>                 return -EAGAIN;
>         }
> --
> 2.43.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 12/15] i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 12/15] i2c: qcom-geni: " Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-29 10:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
  2024-04-30  2:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Bryan O'Donoghue @ 2024-04-29 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c
  Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Andi Shyti, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel

On 27/04/2024 21:36, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> index 090b4846ed62..0a8b95ce35f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> @@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i
>   {
>   	struct dma_slave_config config = {};
>   	struct gpi_i2c_config peripheral = {};
> -	int i, ret = 0, timeout;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>   	dma_addr_t tx_addr, rx_addr;
>   	void *tx_buf = NULL, *rx_buf = NULL;
>   	const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld *itr = gi2c->clk_fld;
> @@ -629,8 +630,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i
>   
>   		dma_async_issue_pending(gi2c->tx_c);
>   
> -		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (!timeout)
> +		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT);
> +		if (!time_left)
>   			gi2c->err = -ETIMEDOUT;
>   
>   		if (gi2c->err) {
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  (?)
@ 2024-04-30  0:07   ` Andi Shyti
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2024-04-30  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:52PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:
> 
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
> be found here (slightly WIP):
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
> 
> Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
> send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
> this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
> to have it proper.
> 
> Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
> (except two). No functional changes intended.

It all looks good, I will give people a few days more for reviews
and comments and then I'll take it in.

Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
@ 2024-04-30  0:07   ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2024-04-30  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:52PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:
> 
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
> be found here (slightly WIP):
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
> 
> Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
> send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
> this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
> to have it proper.
> 
> Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
> (except two). No functional changes intended.

It all looks good, I will give people a few days more for reviews
and comments and then I'll take it in.

Andi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
@ 2024-04-30  0:07   ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2024-04-30  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:52PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:
> 
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
> be found here (slightly WIP):
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
> 
> Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
> send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
> this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
> to have it proper.
> 
> Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
> (except two). No functional changes intended.

It all looks good, I will give people a few days more for reviews
and comments and then I'll take it in.

Andi

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 12/15] i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 12/15] i2c: qcom-geni: " Wolfram Sang
  2024-04-29 10:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
@ 2024-04-30  2:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2024-04-30  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Andi Shyti,
	linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:36:04PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> index 090b4846ed62..0a8b95ce35f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
> @@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i
>  {
>  	struct dma_slave_config config = {};
>  	struct gpi_i2c_config peripheral = {};
> -	int i, ret = 0, timeout;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>  	dma_addr_t tx_addr, rx_addr;
>  	void *tx_buf = NULL, *rx_buf = NULL;
>  	const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld *itr = gi2c->clk_fld;
> @@ -629,8 +630,8 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i
>  
>  		dma_async_issue_pending(gi2c->tx_c);
>  
> -		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (!timeout)
> +		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT);
> +		if (!time_left)
>  			gi2c->err = -ETIMEDOUT;
>  
>  		if (gi2c->err) {
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 11/15] i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 11/15] i2c: jz4780: " Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-04-30 12:43   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2024-04-30 12:49   ` Paul Cercueil
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2024-04-30 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c
  Cc: Paul Cercueil, Andi Shyti, linux-mips, linux-kernel

On 27/4/24 22:36, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 11/15] i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
  2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 11/15] i2c: jz4780: " Wolfram Sang
  2024-04-30 12:43   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2024-04-30 12:49   ` Paul Cercueil
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Paul Cercueil @ 2024-04-30 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c; +Cc: Andi Shyti, linux-mips, linux-kernel

Le samedi 27 avril 2024 à 22:36 +0200, Wolfram Sang a écrit :
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named
> 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns
> like:
> 
> 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> 	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make
> the code
> self explaining.
> 
> Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Acked-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>

Cheers,
-Paul

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c
> index 55035cca0ae5..7951891d6b97 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-jz4780.c
> @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_read(struct
> jz4780_i2c *i2c,
>  				       int idx)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	long timeout;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>  	int wait_time = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * (len + 5);
>  	unsigned short tmp;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> @@ -600,10 +600,10 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_read(struct
> jz4780_i2c *i2c,
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
>  
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
> -					     
> msecs_to_jiffies(wait_time));
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
> +						msecs_to_jiffies(wai
> t_time));
>  
> -	if (!timeout) {
> +	if (!time_left) {
>  		dev_err(&i2c->adap.dev, "irq read timeout\n");
>  		dev_dbg(&i2c->adap.dev, "send cmd count:%d  %d\n",
>  			i2c->cmd, i2c->cmd_buf[i2c->cmd]);
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_write(struct
> jz4780_i2c *i2c,
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int wait_time = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * (len + 5);
> -	long timeout;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
>  	unsigned short tmp;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> @@ -655,14 +655,14 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_write(struct
> jz4780_i2c *i2c,
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
>  
> -	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
> -					     
> msecs_to_jiffies(wait_time));
> -	if (timeout && !i2c->stop_hold) {
> +	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->trans_waitq,
> +						msecs_to_jiffies(wai
> t_time));
> +	if (time_left && !i2c->stop_hold) {
>  		unsigned short i2c_sta;
>  		int write_in_process;
>  
> -		timeout = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * 100;
> -		for (; timeout > 0; timeout--) {
> +		time_left = JZ4780_I2C_TIMEOUT * 100;
> +		for (; time_left > 0; time_left--) {
>  			i2c_sta = jz4780_i2c_readw(i2c,
> JZ4780_I2C_STA);
>  
>  			write_in_process = (i2c_sta &
> JZ4780_I2C_STA_MSTACT) ||
> @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static inline int jz4780_i2c_xfer_write(struct
> jz4780_i2c *i2c,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!timeout) {
> +	if (!time_left) {
>  		dev_err(&i2c->adap.dev, "write wait timeout\n");
>  		ret = -EIO;
>  	}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
  2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
  (?)
@ 2024-05-02 11:29   ` Andi Shyti
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2024-05-02 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:52PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to

there was a little checkpatch warning here for the line being
over 75 characters, but I went ahead anyway and pushed the whole
series to i2c/i2c-host.

Thanks,
Andi

> store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:
> 
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
> be found here (slightly WIP):
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
> 
> Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
> send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
> this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
> to have it proper.
> 
> Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
> (except two). No functional changes intended.
> 
> Wolfram Sang (15):
>   i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: hix5hd2: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: omap: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
>   i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
>   i2c: pxa: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
@ 2024-05-02 11:29   ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2024-05-02 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:52PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to

there was a little checkpatch warning here for the line being
over 75 characters, but I went ahead anyway and pushed the whole
series to i2c/i2c-host.

Thanks,
Andi

> store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:
> 
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
> be found here (slightly WIP):
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
> 
> Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
> send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
> this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
> to have it proper.
> 
> Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
> (except two). No functional changes intended.
> 
> Wolfram Sang (15):
>   i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: hix5hd2: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: omap: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
>   i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
>   i2c: pxa: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_*
@ 2024-05-02 11:29   ` Andi Shyti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2024-05-02 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, imx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel,
	linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-stm32

Hi Wolfram,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:52PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to

there was a little checkpatch warning here for the line being
over 75 characters, but I went ahead anyway and pushed the whole
series to i2c/i2c-host.

Thanks,
Andi

> store the result of wait_for_*() causing patterns like:
> 
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
>         if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
> 
> This is the I2C part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can
> be found here (slightly WIP):
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
> 
> Because these patches are generated, they need manual audit. So, I will
> send them step by step. This is part 1 and also a call for opinions if
> this is a desirable change. But at least in the I2C realm, I really want
> to have it proper.
> 
> Build bot is happy with these patches and I also compile tested them
> (except two). No functional changes intended.
> 
> Wolfram Sang (15):
>   i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: digicolor: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: hix5hd2: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: omap: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: stm32f4: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: stm32f7: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: synquacer: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: jz4780: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: qcom-geni: use 'time_left' variable with
>     wait_for_completion_timeout()
>   i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
>   i2c: s3c2410: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
>   i2c: pxa: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-02 11:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-27 20:35 [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_* Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35 ` [PATCH 01/15] i2c: amd-mp2-plat: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout() Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35 ` [PATCH 02/15] i2c: digicolor: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-28  4:38   ` Baruch Siach
2024-04-28  4:38     ` Baruch Siach
2024-04-27 20:35 ` [PATCH 03/15] i2c: exynos5: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35 ` [PATCH 04/15] i2c: hix5hd2: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35 ` [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-28  1:45   ` Peng Fan
2024-04-28  1:45     ` Peng Fan
2024-04-27 20:35 ` [PATCH 06/15] i2c: omap: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35 ` [PATCH 07/15] i2c: st: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:35   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-28 12:15   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-04-28 12:15     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 08/15] i2c: stm32f4: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 09/15] i2c: stm32f7: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 10/15] i2c: synquacer: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29  6:56   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 11/15] i2c: jz4780: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-30 12:43   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-04-30 12:49   ` Paul Cercueil
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 12/15] i2c: qcom-geni: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 10:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-04-30  2:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 13/15] i2c: rk3x: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout() Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 14/15] i2c: s3c2410: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH 15/15] i2c: pxa: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-30  0:07 ` [PATCH 00/15] i2c: use 'time_left' with wait_for_* Andi Shyti
2024-04-30  0:07   ` Andi Shyti
2024-04-30  0:07   ` Andi Shyti
2024-05-02 11:29 ` Andi Shyti
2024-05-02 11:29   ` Andi Shyti
2024-05-02 11:29   ` Andi Shyti

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.