All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
@ 2013-10-02 18:25 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2013-10-02 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux; +Cc: linux-arch, linux-kernel


The include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h stubs that just vector huge_pte_*()
calls to the pte_*() implementations won't work in certain situations.

x86 and sparc, for example, return "unsigned long" from the bit
checks, and just go "return pte_val(pte) & PTE_BIT_FOO;"

But since huge_pte_*() returns 'int', if any high bits on 64-bit are
relevant, they get chopped off.

The net effect is that we can loop forever trying to COW a huge page,
because the huge_pte_write() check signals false all the time.

Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

Anyone mind if I push this through the sparc tree?

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
index d06079c..99b490b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ static inline pte_t mk_huge_pte(struct page *page, pgprot_t pgprot)
 	return mk_pte(page, pgprot);
 }
 
-static inline int huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
 {
 	return pte_write(pte);
 }
 
-static inline int huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
 {
 	return pte_dirty(pte);
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
@ 2013-10-02 18:25 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2013-10-02 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux; +Cc: linux-arch, linux-kernel


The include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h stubs that just vector huge_pte_*()
calls to the pte_*() implementations won't work in certain situations.

x86 and sparc, for example, return "unsigned long" from the bit
checks, and just go "return pte_val(pte) & PTE_BIT_FOO;"

But since huge_pte_*() returns 'int', if any high bits on 64-bit are
relevant, they get chopped off.

The net effect is that we can loop forever trying to COW a huge page,
because the huge_pte_write() check signals false all the time.

Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

Anyone mind if I push this through the sparc tree?

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
index d06079c..99b490b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ static inline pte_t mk_huge_pte(struct page *page, pgprot_t pgprot)
 	return mk_pte(page, pgprot);
 }
 
-static inline int huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
 {
 	return pte_write(pte);
 }
 
-static inline int huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
 {
 	return pte_dirty(pte);
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
  2013-10-02 18:25 ` David Miller
@ 2013-10-02 22:34   ` David Rientjes
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2013-10-02 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: sparclinux, linux-arch, linux-kernel

On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, David Miller wrote:

> The include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h stubs that just vector huge_pte_*()
> calls to the pte_*() implementations won't work in certain situations.
> 
> x86 and sparc, for example, return "unsigned long" from the bit
> checks, and just go "return pte_val(pte) & PTE_BIT_FOO;"
> 

x86 should be safe since it's known that both _PAGE_BIT_RW and 
_PAGE_BIT_DIRTY are <= 32.

> But since huge_pte_*() returns 'int', if any high bits on 64-bit are
> relevant, they get chopped off.
> 
> The net effect is that we can loop forever trying to COW a huge page,
> because the huge_pte_write() check signals false all the time.
> 
> Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

> ---
> 
> Anyone mind if I push this through the sparc tree?
> 

Makes sense since it's the only arch that appears affected.

> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
> index d06079c..99b490b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
> @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ static inline pte_t mk_huge_pte(struct page *page, pgprot_t pgprot)
>  	return mk_pte(page, pgprot);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
> +static inline unsigned long huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	return pte_write(pte);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
> +static inline unsigned long huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	return pte_dirty(pte);
>  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
@ 2013-10-02 22:34   ` David Rientjes
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2013-10-02 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: sparclinux, linux-arch, linux-kernel

On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, David Miller wrote:

> The include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h stubs that just vector huge_pte_*()
> calls to the pte_*() implementations won't work in certain situations.
> 
> x86 and sparc, for example, return "unsigned long" from the bit
> checks, and just go "return pte_val(pte) & PTE_BIT_FOO;"
> 

x86 should be safe since it's known that both _PAGE_BIT_RW and 
_PAGE_BIT_DIRTY are <= 32.

> But since huge_pte_*() returns 'int', if any high bits on 64-bit are
> relevant, they get chopped off.
> 
> The net effect is that we can loop forever trying to COW a huge page,
> because the huge_pte_write() check signals false all the time.
> 
> Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

> ---
> 
> Anyone mind if I push this through the sparc tree?
> 

Makes sense since it's the only arch that appears affected.

> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
> index d06079c..99b490b 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
> @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ static inline pte_t mk_huge_pte(struct page *page, pgprot_t pgprot)
>  	return mk_pte(page, pgprot);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
> +static inline unsigned long huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	return pte_write(pte);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
> +static inline unsigned long huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	return pte_dirty(pte);
>  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
  2013-10-02 22:34   ` David Rientjes
@ 2013-10-02 23:59     ` David Miller
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2013-10-02 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rientjes; +Cc: sparclinux, linux-arch, linux-kernel

From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:34:48 -0700 (PDT)

> On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Anyone mind if I push this through the sparc tree?
>> 
> 
> Makes sense since it's the only arch that appears affected.

Ok, thanks for reviewing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
@ 2013-10-02 23:59     ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2013-10-02 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rientjes; +Cc: sparclinux, linux-arch, linux-kernel

From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:34:48 -0700 (PDT)

> On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Anyone mind if I push this through the sparc tree?
>> 
> 
> Makes sense since it's the only arch that appears affected.

Ok, thanks for reviewing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
  2013-10-02 18:25 ` David Miller
@ 2013-10-03  8:54   ` David Howells
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2013-10-03  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: dhowells, sparclinux, linux-arch, linux-kernel

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> The include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h stubs that just vector huge_pte_*()
> calls to the pte_*() implementations won't work in certain situations.
> 
> x86 and sparc, for example, return "unsigned long" from the bit
> checks, and just go "return pte_val(pte) & PTE_BIT_FOO;"
> 
> But since huge_pte_*() returns 'int', if any high bits on 64-bit are
> relevant, they get chopped off.
> 
> The net effect is that we can loop forever trying to COW a huge page,
> because the huge_pte_write() check signals false all the time.
> 
> Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
@ 2013-10-03  8:54   ` David Howells
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2013-10-03  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: dhowells, sparclinux, linux-arch, linux-kernel

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> The include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h stubs that just vector huge_pte_*()
> calls to the pte_*() implementations won't work in certain situations.
> 
> x86 and sparc, for example, return "unsigned long" from the bit
> checks, and just go "return pte_val(pte) & PTE_BIT_FOO;"
> 
> But since huge_pte_*() returns 'int', if any high bits on 64-bit are
> relevant, they get chopped off.
> 
> The net effect is that we can loop forever trying to COW a huge page,
> because the huge_pte_write() check signals false all the time.
> 
> Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-03  8:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-02 18:25 [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type David Miller
2013-10-02 18:25 ` David Miller
2013-10-02 22:34 ` David Rientjes
2013-10-02 22:34   ` David Rientjes
2013-10-02 23:59   ` David Miller
2013-10-02 23:59     ` David Miller
2013-10-03  8:54 ` David Howells
2013-10-03  8:54   ` David Howells

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.