* [PATCH] fs/userfaultd: Fix a recently introduced lockdep complaint
@ 2019-02-09 1:03 Bart Van Assche
2019-02-09 5:51 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2019-02-09 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-mm, Bart Van Assche, Christoph Hellwig, Andrea Arcangeli,
stable, syzbot
Avoid that lockdep reports the following:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.0.0-rc4+ #56 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz-executor5/9727 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}, at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}, at: userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
and this task is already holding:
000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1036 [inline]
000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_read+0x27a/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&ctx->fd_wqh){....} -> (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
...
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock --> &ctx->fd_wqh --> &ctx->fault_pending_wqh
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock);
lock(&ctx->fd_wqh);
<Interrupt>
lock(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor5/9727:
#0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
#0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1036 [inline]
#0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_read+0x27a/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:
-> (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} {
IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a5760a0>] __key.51972+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
aio_poll fs/aio.c:1772 [inline]
__io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
io_submit_one+0xedf/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1953 [inline]
__se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1923 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_submit+0x1bd/0x580 fs/aio.c:1923
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> (&ctx->fd_wqh){....} {
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
__wake_up_common_lock+0xc7/0x190 kernel/sched/wait.c:120
__wake_up+0xe/0x10 kernel/sched/wait.c:145
userfaultfd_release+0x4f5/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:924
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a575e20>] __key.44854+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline]
__se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline]
__x64_sys_read+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
the dependencies between the lock to be acquired
and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
-> (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.} {
HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
SOFTIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a575ee0>] __key.44851+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline]
__se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline]
__x64_sys_read+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9727 Comm: syz-executor5 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4+ #56
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_bad_irq_dependency kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1573 [inline]
check_usage.cold+0x60f/0x940 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1605
check_irq_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1661 [inline]
check_prev_add_irq kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h:8 [inline]
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1871 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1979 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2350 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1f47/0x4700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3338
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline]
__se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline]
__x64_sys_read+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: ae62c16e105a ("userfaultfd: disable irqs when taking the waitqueue lock")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 89800fc7dc9d..4bcaaee1ee84 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
blocking_state = return_to_userland ? TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE :
TASK_KILLABLE;
- spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/*
* After the __add_wait_queue the uwq is visible to userland
* through poll/read().
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
* __add_wait_queue.
*/
set_current_state(blocking_state);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vmf->vma))
must_wait = userfaultfd_must_wait(ctx, vmf->address, vmf->flags,
@@ -552,13 +552,13 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
* kernel stack can be released after the list_del_init.
*/
if (!list_empty_careful(&uwq.wq.entry)) {
- spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/*
* No need of list_del_init(), the uwq on the stack
* will be freed shortly anyway.
*/
list_del(&uwq.wq.entry);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
}
/*
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
init_waitqueue_entry(&ewq->wq, current);
release_new_ctx = NULL;
- spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
/*
* After the __add_wait_queue the uwq is visible to userland
* through poll/read().
@@ -613,15 +613,15 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
break;
}
- spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
wake_up_poll(&ctx->fd_wqh, EPOLLIN);
schedule();
- spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
}
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
if (release_new_ctx) {
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
@@ -913,10 +913,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
* the last page faults that may have been already waiting on
* the fault_*wqh.
*/
- spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
__wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, &range);
__wake_up(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, 1, &range);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/* Flush pending events that may still wait on event_wqh */
wake_up_all(&ctx->event_wqh);
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
if (!ret && msg->event == UFFD_EVENT_FORK) {
ret = resolve_userfault_fork(ctx, fork_nctx, msg);
- spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
if (!list_empty(&fork_event)) {
/*
* The fork thread didn't abort, so we can
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
if (ret)
userfaultfd_ctx_put(fork_nctx);
}
- spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
}
return ret;
@@ -1214,14 +1214,14 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
static void __wake_userfault(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
struct userfaultfd_wake_range *range)
{
- spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/* wake all in the range and autoremove */
if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh))
__wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh, TASK_NORMAL,
range);
if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_wqh))
__wake_up(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, 1, range);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
}
static __always_inline void wake_userfault(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
@@ -1872,7 +1872,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
wait_queue_entry_t *wq;
unsigned long pending = 0, total = 0;
- spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_pending_wqh.head, entry) {
pending++;
total++;
@@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_wqh.head, entry) {
total++;
}
- spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/*
* If more protocols will be added, there will be all shown
--
2.20.1.791.gb4d0f1c61a-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fs/userfaultd: Fix a recently introduced lockdep complaint
2019-02-09 1:03 [PATCH] fs/userfaultd: Fix a recently introduced lockdep complaint Bart Van Assche
@ 2019-02-09 5:51 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2019-02-09 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm, Christoph Hellwig, Andrea Arcangeli
On 2/8/19 5:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Avoid that lockdep reports the following: [ ... ]
Hi Christoph,
If patch "aio: Fix locking in aio_poll()"
(https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=154967401921791) would be
accepted, would that allow to revert commit ae62c16e105a ("userfaultfd:
disable irqs when taking the waitqueue lock") instead of applying this
patch?
Thanks,
Bart.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-09 5:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-09 1:03 [PATCH] fs/userfaultd: Fix a recently introduced lockdep complaint Bart Van Assche
2019-02-09 5:51 ` Bart Van Assche
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.