Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] genirq/devres: Add devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg()

From: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amitk@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	mmayer@broadcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	florian.fainelli@broadcom.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
	bchihi@baylibre.com, wenst@chromium.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] genirq/devres: Add devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg()
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:06:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20805fef-d6aa-91d8-999e-04b1d6b7a37a@vivo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11052797-b006-11bb-e4eb-987ddd568b24@kernel.org>

On 2023/7/4 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> [你通常不会收到来自 krzk@kernel.org 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification，以了解这一点为什么很重要]
>
> On 03/07/2023 19:43, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 02:31:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2023 11:04, Yangtao Li wrote:
>>>> There are more than 700 calls to the devm_request_threaded_irq method.
>>>> Most drivers only request one interrupt resource, and these error
>>>> messages are basically the same. If error messages are printed
>>>> everywhere, more than 1000 lines of code can be saved by removing the
>>>> msg in the driver.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> +int devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
>>>> +                              irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn,
>>>> +                              unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname,
>>>> +                              void *dev_id, const char *emsg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +   int rc;
>>>> +
>>>> +   rc = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags,
>>>> +                                  devname, dev_id);
>>>> +   if (rc && rc != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>>>> +           dev_err(dev, "Failed to request %sinterrupt %u %s %s: %pe\n",
>>>> +                   thread_fn ? "threaded " : "", irq, devname ? : dev_name(dev),
>>>> +                   emsg ? : "", ERR_PTR(rc));
>>> It is open-coding dev_err_probe(). Just use dev_err_probe instead.
>> dev_err_probe is supposed to be only called in probe functions, while
>> devm_request_threaded_irq might be called in other contexts (e.g. when a
>> device is opened). That's why I asked to not use dev_err_probe() in v2
> True, but then all the callers of this function will forget to set
> deferred probe reason.

So let's use dev_err_probe?

BTW, any suggestions for names here, keep using 
devm_request_threaded_irq_emsg or change to a new name?

I am afraid that after more drivers are changed in the follow-up series, 
the name will need to be changed again.

Thx,

Yangtao

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>