* [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-10 14:21 ` Johan Jonker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Johan Jonker @ 2020-01-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heiko
Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
linux-arm-kernel
An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 3 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 3 +++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
@@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3; /* IO line */
vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio; /* card's power */
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
brcmf: wifi@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
@@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
sd-uhs-sdr104;
vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
brcmf: wifi@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
@@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
sd-uhs-sdr104;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
brcmf: wifi@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-10 14:21 ` Johan Jonker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Johan Jonker @ 2020-01-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ
Cc: robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 3 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 3 +++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
@@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3; /* IO line */
vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio; /* card's power */
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
brcmf: wifi@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
@@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
sd-uhs-sdr104;
vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
brcmf: wifi@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
@@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
sd-uhs-sdr104;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
status = "okay";
brcmf: wifi@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Johan Jonker @ 2020-01-10 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heiko
Cc: robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip,
devicetree, linux-kernel
Hi,
Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
Thanks
2020-01-10 15:21 GMT+01:00, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
>
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> @@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
> vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3; /* IO line */
> vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio; /* card's power */
>
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> @@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
> sd-uhs-sdr104;
> vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
> vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> @@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
> sd-uhs-sdr104;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Johan Jonker @ 2020-01-10 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heiko
Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
Thanks
2020-01-10 15:21 GMT+01:00, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
>
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> @@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
> vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3; /* IO line */
> vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio; /* card's power */
>
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> @@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
> sd-uhs-sdr104;
> vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
> vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> @@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
> sd-uhs-sdr104;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Johan Jonker @ 2020-01-10 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ
Cc: robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hi,
Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
Thanks
2020-01-10 15:21 GMT+01:00, Johan Jonker <jbx6244-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
>
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> @@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
> vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3; /* IO line */
> vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio; /* card's power */
>
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> @@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
> sd-uhs-sdr104;
> vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
> vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> @@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
> sd-uhs-sdr104;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> brcmf: wifi@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
@ 2020-01-13 9:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2020-01-13 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Jonker
Cc: robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip,
devicetree, linux-kernel
Hi Johan,
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Hi,
>
> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
are completely probeable without needing further information and
only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.
So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
connected card - hence should stay in the board file.
Heiko
>
> Thanks
>
> 2020-01-10 15:21 GMT+01:00, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>:
> > An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> > rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> > Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
> >
> > make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 3 +++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > @@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
> > vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3; /* IO line */
> > vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio; /* card's power */
> >
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> > interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > @@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
> > sd-uhs-sdr104;
> > vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
> > vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> > interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > @@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
> > sd-uhs-sdr104;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> > interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-13 9:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2020-01-13 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Jonker
Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
linux-arm-kernel
Hi Johan,
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Hi,
>
> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
are completely probeable without needing further information and
only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.
So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
connected card - hence should stay in the board file.
Heiko
>
> Thanks
>
> 2020-01-10 15:21 GMT+01:00, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>:
> > An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> > rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> > Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
> >
> > make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 3 +++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > @@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
> > vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3; /* IO line */
> > vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio; /* card's power */
> >
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> > interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > @@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
> > sd-uhs-sdr104;
> > vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
> > vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> > interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > @@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
> > sd-uhs-sdr104;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> > interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
2020-01-13 9:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
(?)
@ 2020-01-13 10:27 ` Robin Murphy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2020-01-13 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stuebner, Johan Jonker
Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
linux-arm-kernel
On 13/01/2020 9:26 am, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
>> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
>> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
>> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
>
> I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
> in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
> are completely probeable without needing further information and
> only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.
>
> So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
> connected card - hence should stay in the board file.
Indeed, and in general dtc already warns about those properties being
present unnecessarily, e.g.:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi:1812.27-1847.4: Warning
(avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /mipi@ff968000: unnecessary
#address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
Robin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-13 10:27 ` Robin Murphy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2020-01-13 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stuebner, Johan Jonker
Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
linux-arm-kernel
On 13/01/2020 9:26 am, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
>> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
>> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
>> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
>
> I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
> in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
> are completely probeable without needing further information and
> only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.
>
> So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
> connected card - hence should stay in the board file.
Indeed, and in general dtc already warns about those properties being
present unnecessarily, e.g.:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi:1812.27-1847.4: Warning
(avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /mipi@ff968000: unnecessary
#address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
Robin.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-13 10:27 ` Robin Murphy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2020-01-13 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stuebner, Johan Jonker
Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
On 13/01/2020 9:26 am, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
>> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
>> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
>> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
>
> I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
> in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
> are completely probeable without needing further information and
> only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.
>
> So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
> connected card - hence should stay in the board file.
Indeed, and in general dtc already warns about those properties being
present unnecessarily, e.g.:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi:1812.27-1847.4: Warning
(avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /mipi@ff968000: unnecessary
#address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
Robin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-13 9:24 ` Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2020-01-13 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Jonker
Cc: robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip,
devicetree, linux-kernel
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 15:21:28 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
>
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
applied for 5.6
Thanks
Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-13 9:24 ` Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2020-01-13 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Jonker
Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
linux-arm-kernel
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 15:21:28 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
>
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
applied for 5.6
Thanks
Heiko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-13 9:24 ` Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2020-01-13 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Jonker
Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 15:21:28 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
>
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
applied for 5.6
Thanks
Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread