* #cpus property
@ 2007-02-26 22:54 Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-26 23:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yoder Stuart-B08248 @ 2007-02-26 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Anyone know the origin of the #cpus property that seems to be in most of
the DTS files. It seems to be documented nowhere.
It's obviously describing how many cpus exist. However, greping the
kernel source turns up no references to it.
Is it supposed to be required for all cpus nodes? Are there plans to
actually use it?
Stuart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: #cpus property
2007-02-26 22:54 #cpus property Yoder Stuart-B08248
@ 2007-02-26 23:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 2:11 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2007-02-26 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yoder Stuart-B08248; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
> Anyone know the origin of the #cpus property that seems to be in most
> of
> the DTS files. It seems to be documented nowhere.
It was there in the first DTS file to hit the kernel
source tree. Probably all others just copied that.
> It's obviously describing how many cpus exist. However, greping the
> kernel source turns up no references to it.
>
> Is it supposed to be required for all cpus nodes? Are there plans to
> actually use it?
It is utterly redundant as simply looking at the number
of child nodes of /cpus/ will tell you the same thing.
Well *hopefully* the same thing, heh.
Segher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: #cpus property
2007-02-26 23:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
@ 2007-02-27 2:11 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 6:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2007-02-27 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Segher Boessenkool; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Yoder Stuart-B08248
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:33:05AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Anyone know the origin of the #cpus property that seems to be in most
> > of
> > the DTS files. It seems to be documented nowhere.
>
> It was there in the first DTS file to hit the kernel
> source tree. Probably all others just copied that.
That sounds likely. We should probably get rid of it, the kernel
doesn't use it. BenH, Paulus, you can't see any use for this one?
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: #cpus property
2007-02-27 2:11 ` David Gibson
@ 2007-02-27 6:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2007-02-27 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Gibson; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Yoder Stuart-B08248
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:11 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:33:05AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > Anyone know the origin of the #cpus property that seems to be in most
> > > of
> > > the DTS files. It seems to be documented nowhere.
> >
> > It was there in the first DTS file to hit the kernel
> > source tree. Probably all others just copied that.
>
> That sounds likely. We should probably get rid of it, the kernel
> doesn't use it. BenH, Paulus, you can't see any use for this one?
Nope.
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-27 6:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-26 22:54 #cpus property Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-26 23:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 2:11 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 6:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.