[meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[Paul Eggleton]

Add a recipe for mosh, and for dependencies migrate libio-pty-perl from
OE-Classic and bring in protobuf from meta-virtualization.

I considered putting this in meta-networking, however meta-virtualization
will still need protobuf and it already depends on meta-oe, and officially
meta-networking does not depend on meta-oe so splitting these would not
really work with the current layer dependencies.


The following changes since commit c383d6230942bb1558cee02764bced09031cb70f:

  llvm3.3: Add zlib dependency and explicitly enable it (2013-07-12 12:12:09 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded-contrib paule/mosh
  http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/meta-openembedded-contrib/log/?h=paule/mosh

Paul Eggleton (3):
  protobuf: add recipe from meta-virtualization and tweak
  libio-pty-perl: add from OE-Classic and update
  mosh: add new recipe for version 1.2.4

 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb    | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb   | 14 +++++++++++
 .../recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb    | 20 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb

-- 
1.8.1.2

[meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] protobuf: add recipe from meta-virtualization and tweak

[Paul Eggleton]

* Add proper SUMMARY
* Break long DESCRIPTION onto multiple lines
* Reorder some lines

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
---
 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c4ed5e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+SUMMARY = "Protocol Buffers - structured data serialisation mechanism"
+DESCRIPTION = "Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data in an \
+efficient yet extensible format. Google uses Protocol Buffers for almost \
+all of its internal RPC protocols and file formats."
+HOMEPAGE = "http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/"
+SECTION = "console/tools"
+LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause"
+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.txt;md5=af6809583bfde9a31595a58bb4a24514"
+
+SRC_URI = "http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-${PV}.tar.gz"
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "dc84e9912ea768baa1976cb7bbcea7b5"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eac6969b617f397247e805267da2b0db3ff9e5a9163b123503a192fbb5776567"
+
+EXTRA_OECONF += " --with-protoc=echo"
+
+inherit autotools
+
+BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
-- 
1.8.1.2

[meta-oe][PATCH 2/3] libio-pty-perl: add from OE-Classic and update

[Paul Eggleton]

* Update to version 1.10
* Set SUMMARY instead of DESCRIPTION
* Put SRC_URI checksums under SRC_URI
* Add LIC_FILES_CHKSUM
* Make LICENSE slightly more specific and add spacing

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
---
 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..88db683
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+SUMMARY = "Perl module for pseudo tty IO"
+SECTION = "libs"
+LICENSE = "Artistic-1.0 | GPL-1.0+"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://META.yml;beginline=7;endline=8;md5=f86a66cc3d9522a227298d6898b181a2"
+
+SRC_URI = "http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/IO/IO-Tty-${PV}.tar.gz"
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "46baec86a145e57f0ec661fa412b097c"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "31a6e21ad187ec5ea93c2b898d6b3519647c5fce9f394b6d3c05a1f7c3f6f8b1"
+
+S = "${WORKDIR}/IO-Tty-${PV}"
+
+inherit cpan
+
-- 
1.8.1.2

[meta-oe][PATCH 3/3] mosh: add new recipe for version 1.2.4

[Paul Eggleton]

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
---
 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e9881bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+SUMMARY = "Remote shell supporting roaming and high-latency connections"
+DESCRIPTION = "Remote terminal application that allows roaming, supports \
+intermittent connectivity, and provides intelligent local echo and line \
+editing of user keystrokes. Mosh is a replacement for SSH. It's more \
+robust and responsive, especially over Wi-Fi, cellular, and \
+long-distance links."
+HOMEPAGE = "http://mosh.mit.edu"
+LICENSE = "GPLv3+"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504"
+
+DEPENDS = "protobuf-native protobuf ncurses zlib libio-pty-perl openssl"
+
+SRC_URI = "http://mosh.mit.edu/mosh-${PV}.tar.gz"
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c2d918f4d91fdc32546e2e089f9281b2"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "e74d0d323226046e402dd469a176075fc2013b69b0e67cea49762c957175df46"
+
+inherit autotools
+
+PACKAGE_BEFORE_PN += "${PN}-server"
+FILES_${PN}-server = "${bindir}/mosh-server"
+
+# mosh uses SSH to authenticate and the client uses OpenSSH-specific features
+RDEPENDS_${PN} += "openssh-ssh"
+# The server seemed not to work with dropbear either
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-server += "openssh-sshd"
+# Note: the server also requires a UTF-8 locale, but there's no way
+# to add a dependency for this
+
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 3/3] mosh: add new recipe for version 1.2.4

[Otavio Salvador]

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e9881bc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +SUMMARY = "Remote shell supporting roaming and high-latency connections"
> +DESCRIPTION = "Remote terminal application that allows roaming, supports \
> +intermittent connectivity, and provides intelligent local echo and line \
> +editing of user keystrokes. Mosh is a replacement for SSH. It's more \
> +robust and responsive, especially over Wi-Fi, cellular, and \
> +long-distance links."
> +HOMEPAGE = "http://mosh.mit.edu"
> +LICENSE = "GPLv3+"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504"
> +
> +DEPENDS = "protobuf-native protobuf ncurses zlib libio-pty-perl openssl"
> +
> +SRC_URI = "http://mosh.mit.edu/mosh-${PV}.tar.gz"
> +
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c2d918f4d91fdc32546e2e089f9281b2"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "e74d0d323226046e402dd469a176075fc2013b69b0e67cea49762c957175df46"
> +
> +inherit autotools
> +
> +PACKAGE_BEFORE_PN += "${PN}-server"
> +FILES_${PN}-server = "${bindir}/mosh-server"
> +
> +# mosh uses SSH to authenticate and the client uses OpenSSH-specific features
> +RDEPENDS_${PN} += "openssh-ssh"
> +# The server seemed not to work with dropbear either
> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-server += "openssh-sshd"
> +# Note: the server also requires a UTF-8 locale, but there's no way
> +# to add a dependency for this

I'd put this as a WARNING and on the top of the recipe or something so
it is easily visible.

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 3/3] mosh: add new recipe for version 1.2.4

[Paul Eggleton]

On Monday 15 July 2013 00:54:32 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Paul Eggleton
> > +# Note: the server also requires a UTF-8 locale, but there's no way
> > +# to add a dependency for this
> 
> I'd put this as a WARNING and on the top of the recipe or something so
> it is easily visible.

OK, I've moved the comment to the top and reformatted it slightly on the 
branch. Note that it's not a disaster if the user forgets to do this - they'll 
soon find out at runtime when it doesn't work, and the error mosh produces is 
thankfully clear on what is missing.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[Joe MacDonald]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2187 bytes --]

[[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies] On 13.07.13 (Sat 15:47) Paul Eggleton wrote:

> Add a recipe for mosh, and for dependencies migrate libio-pty-perl from
> OE-Classic and bring in protobuf from meta-virtualization.
> 
> I considered putting this in meta-networking, however meta-virtualization
> will still need protobuf and it already depends on meta-oe, and officially
> meta-networking does not depend on meta-oe so splitting these would not
> really work with the current layer dependencies.

That's not strictly true anymore, actually.  It was my intent and I
think there's value in it, but CRDA (already in meta-networking) depends
on python-m2crypto (in meta-oe).  I discovered it in my world build a
few weeks ago and hadn't yet managed to get round to seeing if there was
a clean way to separate the two.

I absolutely don't want the stated intent that meta-networking be
standalone be a barrier to adding packages to it that clearly belong to
it.

That's my way of saying I've no objection right now to including this in
meta-net.

-J.

> 
> 
> The following changes since commit c383d6230942bb1558cee02764bced09031cb70f:
> 
>   llvm3.3: Add zlib dependency and explicitly enable it (2013-07-12 12:12:09 +0200)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded-contrib paule/mosh
>   http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/meta-openembedded-contrib/log/?h=paule/mosh
> 
> Paul Eggleton (3):
>   protobuf: add recipe from meta-virtualization and tweak
>   libio-pty-perl: add from OE-Classic and update
>   mosh: add new recipe for version 1.2.4
> 
>  meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb    | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb   | 14 +++++++++++
>  .../recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb    | 20 +++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/mosh/mosh_1.2.4.bb
>  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/perl/libio-pty-perl_1.10.bb
>  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
> 
-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[Otavio Salvador]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Joe MacDonald
<Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com> wrote:
> [[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies] On 13.07.13 (Sat 15:47) Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
>> Add a recipe for mosh, and for dependencies migrate libio-pty-perl from
>> OE-Classic and bring in protobuf from meta-virtualization.
>>
>> I considered putting this in meta-networking, however meta-virtualization
>> will still need protobuf and it already depends on meta-oe, and officially
>> meta-networking does not depend on meta-oe so splitting these would not
>> really work with the current layer dependencies.
>
> That's not strictly true anymore, actually.  It was my intent and I
> think there's value in it, but CRDA (already in meta-networking) depends
> on python-m2crypto (in meta-oe).  I discovered it in my world build a
> few weeks ago and hadn't yet managed to get round to seeing if there was
> a clean way to separate the two.
>
> I absolutely don't want the stated intent that meta-networking be
> standalone be a barrier to adding packages to it that clearly belong to
> it.
>
> That's my way of saying I've no objection right now to including this in
> meta-net.

I agree; maybe we could add those inside meta-oe subdir? so people can
opt in enable them or not.

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[Paul Eggleton]

On Monday 15 July 2013 12:02:59 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Joe MacDonald
> 
> <Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com> wrote:
> > [[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies] On 13.07.13 (Sat 
15:47) Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> Add a recipe for mosh, and for dependencies migrate libio-pty-perl from
> >> OE-Classic and bring in protobuf from meta-virtualization.
> >> 
> >> I considered putting this in meta-networking, however meta-virtualization
> >> will still need protobuf and it already depends on meta-oe, and
> >> officially meta-networking does not depend on meta-oe so splitting these
> >> would not really work with the current layer dependencies.
> > 
> > That's not strictly true anymore, actually.  It was my intent and I
> > think there's value in it, but CRDA (already in meta-networking) depends
> > on python-m2crypto (in meta-oe).  I discovered it in my world build a
> > few weeks ago and hadn't yet managed to get round to seeing if there was
> > a clean way to separate the two.
> > 
> > I absolutely don't want the stated intent that meta-networking be
> > standalone be a barrier to adding packages to it that clearly belong to
> > it.
> > 
> > That's my way of saying I've no objection right now to including this in
> > meta-net.
> 
> I agree; maybe we could add those inside meta-oe subdir? so people can
> opt in enable them or not.

Sorry Otavio, what are you suggesting exactly?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[Otavio Salvador]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Monday 15 July 2013 12:02:59 Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Joe MacDonald
>>
>> <Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com> wrote:
>> > [[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies] On 13.07.13 (Sat
> 15:47) Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> >> Add a recipe for mosh, and for dependencies migrate libio-pty-perl from
>> >> OE-Classic and bring in protobuf from meta-virtualization.
>> >>
>> >> I considered putting this in meta-networking, however meta-virtualization
>> >> will still need protobuf and it already depends on meta-oe, and
>> >> officially meta-networking does not depend on meta-oe so splitting these
>> >> would not really work with the current layer dependencies.
>> >
>> > That's not strictly true anymore, actually.  It was my intent and I
>> > think there's value in it, but CRDA (already in meta-networking) depends
>> > on python-m2crypto (in meta-oe).  I discovered it in my world build a
>> > few weeks ago and hadn't yet managed to get round to seeing if there was
>> > a clean way to separate the two.
>> >
>> > I absolutely don't want the stated intent that meta-networking be
>> > standalone be a barrier to adding packages to it that clearly belong to
>> > it.
>> >
>> > That's my way of saying I've no objection right now to including this in
>> > meta-net.
>>
>> I agree; maybe we could add those inside meta-oe subdir? so people can
>> opt in enable them or not.
>
> Sorry Otavio, what are you suggesting exactly?

To have a meta-networking/meta-oe with recipes which requires it.

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[Joe MacDonald]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2690 bytes --]

[Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies] On 13.07.15 (Mon 13:40) Otavio Salvador wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Paul Eggleton
> <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 15 July 2013 12:02:59 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Joe MacDonald
> >>
> >> <Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com> wrote:
> >> > [[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies] On 13.07.13 (Sat
> > 15:47) Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> >> Add a recipe for mosh, and for dependencies migrate libio-pty-perl from
> >> >> OE-Classic and bring in protobuf from meta-virtualization.
> >> >>
> >> >> I considered putting this in meta-networking, however meta-virtualization
> >> >> will still need protobuf and it already depends on meta-oe, and
> >> >> officially meta-networking does not depend on meta-oe so splitting these
> >> >> would not really work with the current layer dependencies.
> >> >
> >> > That's not strictly true anymore, actually.  It was my intent and I
> >> > think there's value in it, but CRDA (already in meta-networking) depends
> >> > on python-m2crypto (in meta-oe).  I discovered it in my world build a
> >> > few weeks ago and hadn't yet managed to get round to seeing if there was
> >> > a clean way to separate the two.
> >> >
> >> > I absolutely don't want the stated intent that meta-networking be
> >> > standalone be a barrier to adding packages to it that clearly belong to
> >> > it.
> >> >
> >> > That's my way of saying I've no objection right now to including this in
> >> > meta-net.
> >>
> >> I agree; maybe we could add those inside meta-oe subdir? so people can
> >> opt in enable them or not.
> >
> > Sorry Otavio, what are you suggesting exactly?
> 
> To have a meta-networking/meta-oe with recipes which requires it.

Oh.  That's an interesting idea.  I guess the argument against that is
the support infrastructure has a reasonable home in meta-oe and nobody
wants meta-oe to depend on meta-networking.  I do think that having some
mechanism for keeping meta-net reasonably standalone but still not full
of stuff that's on there to satisfy dependencies is good, though.
Haven't really thought much about this yet, though.

-J.

> 
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] protobuf: add recipe from meta-virtualization and tweak

[Samuel Stirtzel]

2013/7/13 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
> * Add proper SUMMARY
> * Break long DESCRIPTION onto multiple lines
> * Reorder some lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c4ed5e6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +SUMMARY = "Protocol Buffers - structured data serialisation mechanism"
> +DESCRIPTION = "Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data in an \
> +efficient yet extensible format. Google uses Protocol Buffers for almost \
> +all of its internal RPC protocols and file formats."
> +HOMEPAGE = "http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/"
> +SECTION = "console/tools"
> +LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause"
> +
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.txt;md5=af6809583bfde9a31595a58bb4a24514"
> +
> +SRC_URI = "http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-${PV}.tar.gz"
> +
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "dc84e9912ea768baa1976cb7bbcea7b5"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eac6969b617f397247e805267da2b0db3ff9e5a9163b123503a192fbb5776567"
> +
> +EXTRA_OECONF += " --with-protoc=echo"


Hi,

do you know why it doesn't use:

EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-protoc=${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/protoc"

in combination with DEPENDS += "protobuf-native" in protobuf?
Instead the recipe that uses protobuf/protoc depends on protobuf and
protobuf-native.

My assumption is, that the result would the same, and it is currently
skipping tests for the cross compiled protobuf.
Or does it archive anything else?



--
Regards
Samuel

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] protobuf: add recipe from meta-virtualization and tweak

[Paul Eggleton]

On Tuesday 16 July 2013 17:36:08 Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
> 2013/7/13 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
> > * Add proper SUMMARY
> > * Break long DESCRIPTION onto multiple lines
> > * Reorder some lines
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb | 20
> >  ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
> > b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb new file mode
> > 100644
> > index 0000000..c4ed5e6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +SUMMARY = "Protocol Buffers - structured data serialisation mechanism"
> > +DESCRIPTION = "Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data in
> > an \ +efficient yet extensible format. Google uses Protocol Buffers for
> > almost \ +all of its internal RPC protocols and file formats."
> > +HOMEPAGE = "http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/"
> > +SECTION = "console/tools"
> > +LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause"
> > +
> > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> > "file://COPYING.txt;md5=af6809583bfde9a31595a58bb4a24514" +
> > +SRC_URI = "http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-${PV}.tar.gz"
> > +
> > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "dc84e9912ea768baa1976cb7bbcea7b5"
> > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> > "eac6969b617f397247e805267da2b0db3ff9e5a9163b123503a192fbb5776567" +
> > +EXTRA_OECONF += " --with-protoc=echo"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> do you know why it doesn't use:
> 
> EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-protoc=${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/protoc"
> 
> in combination with DEPENDS += "protobuf-native" in protobuf?
> Instead the recipe that uses protobuf/protoc depends on protobuf and
> protobuf-native.
> 
> My assumption is, that the result would the same, and it is currently
> skipping tests for the cross compiled protobuf.
> Or does it archive anything else?

I'm not sure, this bit came from the original protobuf recipe in meta-
virtualization. David, you seem to have written this recipe originally, do you 
have any insight into the above?

Thanks,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] protobuf: add recipe from meta-virtualization and tweak

[Samuel Stirtzel]

2013/7/17 David Nyström <David.Nystrom@enea.com>:
> On Tuesday 16 July 2013 17:36:08 Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
>> My assumption is, that the result would the same, and it is currently
>> skipping tests for the cross compiled protobuf.
>> Or does it archive anything else?
[...]
>
> Sorry for the indentation issues, I'm on vacation, and did not bring my
> equipment.
>
> Yes, I believe this was an ugly hack to skip/pass tests. A bit of a warning
> though, these recipes have been tested on x86-64 only afaik.
>

Hi,

my tests case for this patch also works on ARM.
So no objections from my side.


--
Regards
Samuel