All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Use get_page() instead of kvm_get_pfn()
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:46:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21cf5bb7-e70c-345b-be9e-ea009823c255@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726153552.1535838-6-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 7/26/21 4:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When mapping a THP, we are guaranteed that the page isn't reserved,
> and we can safely avoid the kvm_is_reserved_pfn() call.
>
> Replace kvm_get_pfn() with get_page(pfn_to_page()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index ebb28dd4f2c9..b303aa143592 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>  		*ipap &= PMD_MASK;
>  		kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>  		pfn &= ~(PTRS_PER_PMD - 1);
> -		kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
> +		get_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>  		*pfnp = pfn;
>  
>  		return PMD_SIZE;

I am not very familiar with the mm subsystem, but I did my best to review this change.

kvm_get_pfn() uses get_page(pfn) if !PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)). I looked at
the documentation for the PG_reserved page flag, and for normal memory, what
looked to me like the most probable situation where that can be set for a
transparent hugepage was for the zero page. Looked at mm/huge_memory.c, and
huge_zero_pfn is allocated via alloc_pages(__GFP_ZERO) (and other flags), which
doesn't call SetPageReserved().

I looked at how a huge page can be mapped from handle_mm_fault and from
khugepaged, and it also looks to like both are using using alloc_pages() to
allocate a new hugepage.

I also did a grep for SetPageReserved(), and there are very few places where that
is called, and none looked like they have anything to do with hugepages.

As far as I can tell, this change is correct, but I think someone who is familiar
with mm would be better suited for reviewing this patch.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Use get_page() instead of kvm_get_pfn()
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:46:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21cf5bb7-e70c-345b-be9e-ea009823c255@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726153552.1535838-6-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 7/26/21 4:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When mapping a THP, we are guaranteed that the page isn't reserved,
> and we can safely avoid the kvm_is_reserved_pfn() call.
>
> Replace kvm_get_pfn() with get_page(pfn_to_page()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index ebb28dd4f2c9..b303aa143592 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>  		*ipap &= PMD_MASK;
>  		kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>  		pfn &= ~(PTRS_PER_PMD - 1);
> -		kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
> +		get_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>  		*pfnp = pfn;
>  
>  		return PMD_SIZE;

I am not very familiar with the mm subsystem, but I did my best to review this change.

kvm_get_pfn() uses get_page(pfn) if !PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)). I looked at
the documentation for the PG_reserved page flag, and for normal memory, what
looked to me like the most probable situation where that can be set for a
transparent hugepage was for the zero page. Looked at mm/huge_memory.c, and
huge_zero_pfn is allocated via alloc_pages(__GFP_ZERO) (and other flags), which
doesn't call SetPageReserved().

I looked at how a huge page can be mapped from handle_mm_fault and from
khugepaged, and it also looks to like both are using using alloc_pages() to
allocate a new hugepage.

I also did a grep for SetPageReserved(), and there are very few places where that
is called, and none looked like they have anything to do with hugepages.

As far as I can tell, this change is correct, but I think someone who is familiar
with mm would be better suited for reviewing this patch.

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Use get_page() instead of kvm_get_pfn()
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:46:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21cf5bb7-e70c-345b-be9e-ea009823c255@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210726153552.1535838-6-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 7/26/21 4:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When mapping a THP, we are guaranteed that the page isn't reserved,
> and we can safely avoid the kvm_is_reserved_pfn() call.
>
> Replace kvm_get_pfn() with get_page(pfn_to_page()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index ebb28dd4f2c9..b303aa143592 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>  		*ipap &= PMD_MASK;
>  		kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>  		pfn &= ~(PTRS_PER_PMD - 1);
> -		kvm_get_pfn(pfn);
> +		get_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>  		*pfnp = pfn;
>  
>  		return PMD_SIZE;

I am not very familiar with the mm subsystem, but I did my best to review this change.

kvm_get_pfn() uses get_page(pfn) if !PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)). I looked at
the documentation for the PG_reserved page flag, and for normal memory, what
looked to me like the most probable situation where that can be set for a
transparent hugepage was for the zero page. Looked at mm/huge_memory.c, and
huge_zero_pfn is allocated via alloc_pages(__GFP_ZERO) (and other flags), which
doesn't call SetPageReserved().

I looked at how a huge page can be mapped from handle_mm_fault and from
khugepaged, and it also looks to like both are using using alloc_pages() to
allocate a new hugepage.

I also did a grep for SetPageReserved(), and there are very few places where that
is called, and none looked like they have anything to do with hugepages.

As far as I can tell, this change is correct, but I think someone who is familiar
with mm would be better suited for reviewing this patch.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 15:35 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: Remove kvm_is_transparent_hugepage() and friends Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: Introduce helper to retrieve a PTE and its level Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 10:29   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 10:29     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 10:29     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 15:25   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-27 15:25     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-27 15:25     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-28 12:17     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 12:17       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 12:17       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: arm64: Walk userspace page tables to compute the THP mapping size Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 15:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-27 15:55     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-27 15:55     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Avoid mapping size adjustment on permission fault Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 16:00   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-27 16:00     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-27 16:00     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: Remove kvm_is_transparent_hugepage() and PageTransCompoundMap() Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Use get_page() instead of kvm_get_pfn() Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 17:46   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-07-27 17:46     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-27 17:46     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: Get rid " Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-26 15:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-02 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: Remove kvm_is_transparent_hugepage() and friends Marc Zyngier
2021-08-02 13:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-02 13:39   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21cf5bb7-e70c-345b-be9e-ea009823c255@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.